Jophiel wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
It goes a long way to appeasing all the HRC supporters
Who cares? They were arguably irrelevent before the election and they certainly are now. Obama's win/loss in 2012 will be based on how he does the next four years, not if some angry woman still feels slighted that her candidate didn't win something she felt entitled to.
If I was a US citizen, I would much prefer HRC's "Primaries" healthcare plan over Barrack Obama's. Not being a US citizen, I'm not really up on what all the differences between their policy plans were, but if the health plan is anything to go by, there were some substantial ones.
I presume that there's quite a few people who preferred HRC's policies to Obama's, and they might feel that there's a better chance of Obama's Presidency being "Hilary flavoured" if she's got this substantial post in his administration.
This perception of mine might be an artifact of Australian politics in comparison to American politics, where in Australia there's some processes that allow for minority voices and views to have an additive effect in the political mix of what gets done. For example the ruling Liberal Party's completely new-at-the-time Goods and Services Tax got modified substantially in some details by the very minority (3rd party)Democrat Party. The Democrat Party got fresh and unprepared food excluded from the tax, along with educational materials, when the GST was supposed to be a blanket tax on all consumer goods and services.
Edited, Dec 2nd 2008 10:15am by Aripyanfar