Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Bullet ReviewFollow

#77 Dec 29 2008 at 5:17 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Watch Manhunt,


It'd be the best Lecter movie if were just a *little* less obviously a Micheal Mann movie.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#78 Dec 29 2008 at 5:18 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Watch Manhunt,


It'd be the best Lecter movie if were just a *little* less obviously a Micheal Mann movie.

The fUck?

Catherine Deneuve would be the hottest woman if she looked a *little* less gorgeous?
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#79 Dec 29 2008 at 9:44 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
I'm now convinced that you two have incredibly bizarre tastes in film. Is this one of those pretentious artsy kind of things where you declare a pile of shit to be art because you think it makes you part of some special "in" crowd or something?


Red Dragon is far and away superior to Manhunter. I liked Manhunter when it came out. I liked the story and the characters. However, it never held any repeat interest for me. I saw it once, knew the story and never had much interest to see it again. If I caught it on cable, I'd watch a couple minutes of it, think "Yeah. I've seen this, don't need to see it again" and change the channel.

I own Red Dragon on DVD (but don't own Silence of the Lambs or any of the others in that set) and watch it from time to time exactly because I think that Norton captured the essence of the main character so perfectly. And the fact that the cinematography doesn't look like it was filmed by a student with a super8 camera kinda helps matters too...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#80 Dec 30 2008 at 2:46 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Red Dragon is far and away superior to Manhunter.

Meh. Apples and oranges. What is certain is that the protagonist in Manhunter is vastly more interesting.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#81 Dec 30 2008 at 6:41 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
Red Dragon is far and away superior to Manhunter.

Meh. Apples and oranges. What is certain is that the protagonist in Manhunter is vastly more interesting.



/shrug

It's a different take on the character. Peterson's take was more emotional. He played Graham as a broken person wanting nothing more than to excise his own inner demons. Norton's take was more cerebral, focusing on the how and why and desperately attempting to avoid dealing with ability to see into the criminal mind. Both had to deal with the same issues, and both actors played the parts well with a lot of overlap.

Having seen both films and read the book, I simply believe that Norton's performance is closer to the character as written. Peterson overplays the broken aspect of his character IMO, and that overshadows the rest of his performance. Norton's approach is more balanced. I suppose if you really like the focus on him being a broken hero, using what makes him insane to hunt those who are insane, then I can see you preferring Manhunter to Red Dragon. But while that aspect was present in the book, it wasn't nearly as strongly so as Peterson's performance suggested.


To be fair though. It has been a long time since I've seen Manhunter in its entirety. It's just that when I saw Red Dragon it just blew me away with how much it "fit" the book, whereas I never got that sense when reading the book towards Manhunter (which I saw before reading it). Could be because of the ordering of things. Who knows?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#82 Dec 30 2008 at 7:00 PM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
I liked Manhunter. It was deliciously 80s.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#83 Jan 05 2009 at 10:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Thumbelyna Quick Hands wrote:
[The Big] Bounce, starring Owen Wilson and Morgan Freeman.
I'm telling myself that I'm going to finish this movie but it's a struggle. The weird thing is that it's not terrible -- I've seen worse movies -- but man, it's just draining my soul or something. Owen Wilson even got a few chuckles out of me but I think he's a psychic vampire who attacks via DVD. I'll either report back or be left an empty husk.

Not listed but I saw Burn After Reading last night. Not the bestest Cohen movie ever but fun. It doesn't require you to pay attention to minutiae to follow the plot but you'll have to at least stay awake. All the principle actors put forth a good to great job with Pitt probably engaging me the most just be being a complete dumbass. Tilda Swinton felt a little flat but I suppose she was supposed to. Malkovich was good but Malkovich is always good. On the other hand, he's also always like watching John Malkovich.

JK Simmons only has a few scenes as a CIA director but he absolutely steals them.

Flea thought it was worth the watch although she described it later as "a long joke with a good payoff but you're still not sure the payoff was worth the length". I'm a little less critical and felt it was certainly worth seeing once. I'm not sure how much it'd hold to repeat viewings; it doesn't have a Lewbowski-esque catalog of repeatable clever phrases or a bunch of hidden things to catch but see it the once and decide for yourself.

Edited, Jan 5th 2009 12:42pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#84 Jan 05 2009 at 2:44 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Having seen both films and read the book, I simply believe that Norton's performance is closer to the character as written.


Possibly. They're horribly sh*tty books, though, so I'm not sure that's an accolade.

Edited, Jan 5th 2009 6:05pm by Smasharoo
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#85 Jan 05 2009 at 3:03 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Flea thought it was worth the watch although she described it later as "a long joke with a good payoff but you're still not sure the payoff was worth the length". I'm a little less critical and felt it was certainly worth seeing once. I'm not sure how much it'd hold to repeat viewings; it doesn't have a Lewbowski-esque catalog of repeatable clever phrases or a bunch of hidden things to catch but see it the once and decide for yourself.


I came to practically the same conclusion after watching Burn After Reading. Brad Pitt's character was definitely the funniest and most sympathetic. The ending scene felt like the punchline to the entire movie.
#86 Jan 11 2009 at 9:22 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Watched The Visitor tonight.

It was.... a decent movie. It's a personal growth tale wrapped up in an "good guy immigrant getting the shaft by the US system" tale and does a pretty good job of the first and a somewhat predictible job of the second. Not bad but the second part doesn't tread any new ground. But I thought the first aspect of it kept it watchable and that really is the primary focus of the film with the immigration slant being more of a plot mover than the message. Richard Jenkins does a good job as the main character, a Connecticut economics professor (Vale) who's kind of a dick, largely as a result of settling into a comfortable groove. The immigrant couple whose lives he becomes involved in are well acted; I especially liked Haaz Sleiman's job as Tarek, the male half of the immigrant couple Vale finds living in his Manhattan apartment.

It might be unfair to sum up the pacing, direction, etc by saying "It's an indie flick" but it also fits. The plot moves along without dragging but there's no frantic moments. There's a few genuinely funny moments, a few probably poignant moments depending in the viewer and it kept me engaged without checking the clock. Since Anna was the one who asked about it, I'll say that she'd probably enjoy it from what I know of Anna.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#87 Jan 12 2009 at 3:12 AM Rating: Good
Saw a few films on the plane to Argentina, and on the buses that took us from side of the country to another, so here's a few quick reviews of movies I caught:

- Vicky Christina Barcelona: Woody Allen's latest movie. Now, being French, I'm a huge fan of Woody Allen. I love his humour, his movies, I love the guy. And, being a guy, I'm a huge fan of Scralett Johanson. I love her lips, her boobs, I love the girl. I also really like Penelope Cruz and Javier Bardem, though for slightly different reasons. Keeping all this in mind, this was one of the worst movies I have ever seen in my life. The acting was shockingly awful, the dialogues were laughable, the voice-over will probably be considered a crime against humanity in years to come, and the story seemed like it was written by an angsty 16 year old emo girl. On the bright side, if you buy this DVD to someone for Christmas, you're sure to ruin an hour and a half of their life, so there's always that.



- How to Lose Friends and Alienate People: Based on a true story by some **** called Toby Young, this is a pretty funny movie. Nothing amazing, but I love Simon Pegg, and I think he is quickly taking over Ricky Gervais's mantle as the annoying-but-funny-loser. It's the usual "person-in-a-strange-environment" comedy theme, this time with a twaty English guy stuck in the American world of PR and entertainment. It works well in this film, and it's really quite enjoyable. Nothing amazing, but a funny English comedy.


- Ghost Town: Quite sh*t, I was expecting much better. Don't bother really, the film above is 100 times funnier.


- 8 Below: An inspiring movie about 8 Husky dogs that get abandonned in Antartica for 150 days by the local scientific team. It's a Disney movie aimed at 8 year olds, but I was almost in tears. I do have an unhealthly love for dogs, especially Huskies, so maybe it's just me, but man, that scene where Max gives Maya the Albatros he hunted, and then she doesn't want to it cos she's got a broken leg, but he still places it front of her because she's the leader of the pack, that was really touching. And the scene where they fight off the Sea Leopard was quite scary too. It's all based on a true story as well, though I have my doubts as to the veracity of some of the scenes where the dogs are alone in Antartica. Mostly because of the lack of human-speaking eye-witnesses. Still, top notch movie for 8 year-olds, or for people that really like dogs and are stuck on a 21 hour bus journey to Patagonia.


Edited, Jan 12th 2009 11:12am by RedPhoenixxx
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#88 Jan 12 2009 at 4:53 PM Rating: Good
***
2,086 posts
More by accident than design I just watched the Lake House. I missed it on its first release and only happened on it by chance as it was shown on TV while I was doing some webby things.
Lazy cut and pasted synopsis:

Quote:
The Lake House (2006)
Premiere. A lonely doctor begins exchanging letters with a former occupant of her lakeside house. Before long they fall in love, but it dawns that he is living two years in the past, prompting the doctor to solve the riddle of their mysterious ability to communicate across time - and find a way for them to meet in person. Romantic fantasy, starring Sandra Bullock, Keanu Reeves and Christopher Plummer
Category General Movie/Drama
Director Alejandro Agresti
Cast
Kate Forster Sandra Bullock (IMDB)
Alex Wyler Keanu Reeves (IMDB)
Simon Wyler Christopher Plummer (IMDB)
Anna Shohreh Aghdashloo (IMDB)
Henry Wyler Ebon Moss-Bachrach (IMDB)
Kate's mother Willeke van Ammelrooy (IMDB)
Morgan Dylan Walsh (IMDB)
Mona Lynn Collins (IMDB)


Great story, good script and more than passable acting. I was crying so much near the end. I would love a lake house and Sandra Bullocks red coat Smiley: nod

Edited, Jan 12th 2009 7:53pm by GwynapNud
#89 Jan 19 2009 at 5:08 AM Rating: Good
I saw Slumdog Millionaire during the weekend, and it was pretty kick-***.

I'm a big fan of Danny Boyle anyway, Trainspotting being one of my all-time favourite films, and he's done really well on that one. It's half-Bollywood half-Hollywood, wih a sprinkling of English directing, and it works really well. The actors are great, the dialogues funny, the sceneries brilliant: you really feel like you're in India, as opposed to India-inside-a-Hollywood-studio. The film is funny, sad, happy, discomforting, conflictual, messy, a bit like India itself. I'd heartily reccomend it. It won't change your life, but its 2 hours of pretty great entertainment.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#90 Jan 19 2009 at 5:20 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I saw Happiness this weekend and it made me want to bleach my brain Smiley: dubious
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#91 Jan 19 2009 at 5:40 AM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
I saw Happiness this weekend and it made me want to bleach my brain Smiley: dubious


The pedophile movie with the guy from Capote? I saw it ages ago, and I still get slight nausea just thinking about it.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#92 Jan 19 2009 at 6:05 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
I rented Appaloosa over the weekend, and unless you're a die hard western fan (even then, don't expect much), you should probably skip it. Jeremy Irons was good in it, and Viggo Mortensen was ok. Both Ed Harris and Renee Zellweger were horrible and nothing ever happened.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#93 Jan 19 2009 at 6:07 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
The @#%^phile movie with the guy from Capote? I saw it ages ago, and I still get slight nausea just thinking about it.
That's the one. I mean, it had some good dark humor and it kept me interested but, man, it was like 2 hours of feeling uncomfortable. It ranks among the better movies that I'll never, ever, ever watch again.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#94 Jan 19 2009 at 6:09 AM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
It ranks among the better movies that I'll never, ever, ever watch again.


I'd add Dancer in the Dark to this particular list.

Smiley: cry
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#95 Jan 19 2009 at 6:12 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
Jophiel wrote:
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
The @#%^phile movie with the guy from Capote? I saw it ages ago, and I still get slight nausea just thinking about it.
That's the one. I mean, it had some good dark humor and it kept me interested but, man, it was like 2 hours of feeling uncomfortable. It ranks among the better movies that I'll never, ever, ever watch again.

Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, is that movie for me.

It's so, so, so, so, sad. Probably made 10 times worse because I was breaking up from a 7 year relationship at the time I saw it in the cinema. The cinematography, martial arts action and Asian poignancy of it was extraordinary. But it traumatised me to the pit of my soul. I've never cried so much in a cinema before or since.

Edited, Jan 19th 2009 9:14am by Aripyanfar
#96 Jan 19 2009 at 6:22 AM Rating: Good
Aripyanfar wrote:
But it traumatised me to the pit of my soul.


Damn, I never thought HTCD was traumatic... I really liked it, but I can't for the life of me remember what was sad about it.

For pure trauma, the 9 mins rape scene in Irreversible is top of my list. The whole film is pretty sick, but that scene is really, really, really hard to watch.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#97 Jan 19 2009 at 6:25 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
But it traumatised me to the pit of my soul.


Damn, I never thought HTCD was traumatic... I really liked it, but I can't for the life of me remember what was sad about it.

Very bad complete spoilers:

Oh no!!! I've forgotten how to hide text!
#98 Jan 19 2009 at 6:27 AM Rating: Good
Bah, anyone who hasn't seen HTCD by now deserves to have it spoilt for them.

Translation: I don't know how to hide text either, and I can't be ***** to experiment.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#99 Jan 19 2009 at 6:43 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Spoiler text goes here.

Edited, Jan 19th 2009 8:43am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#100 Jan 19 2009 at 6:44 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Helps if I don't parse the code

Spoiler text goes here.

Huh. I guess color parses whether you click the parse box or not.

Edited, Jan 19th 2009 8:44am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#101 Jan 19 2009 at 6:47 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
Jophiel, you aren't helping! How do I create the box that the mouse rolls back?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 335 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (335)