Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Obama's CabinetFollow

#1 Nov 21 2008 at 10:59 AM Rating: Decent
**
559 posts
On news that Hillary Clinton will accept the Sec. of State post after Thanksgiving, we have to wonder, is this the change we have been hoping for? As someone who campaigned (however briefly) and voted for Obama, I'm not sure I can agree with any decision Obama has made since he has become President elect.

Banking bailout - terrible idea, throwing gasoline onto a fire to reduce the flames? how about we restructure our economy to remove ourselves from perpetual debt to the Federal Reserve?

Auto bailout - almost as bad as the banks

Chief of Staff (Emanuel) - another elite zionist in a position of power, great..

Health and Human Services (Daschle) - not a bad choice but I would have preferred Howard Dean

Homeland Security (Napolito) - not a bad choice if we lived in a vaccuum, but if Napolito leaves office then the extremely corrupt right-wing Sec. of State Jan Brewer would become Governor of Arizona which would be a complete disaster

Attorney General (Holder) - a political insider with close ties to corrupt politicians, is this the person that will stand up to and prosecute special interests?

Speculative:
Sec. of State (Clinton) - atrocious
Sec. of Defense (Gates) - Bush leftovers
NS Advisor (Jones) - military insider who is friends with John McCain...why not Susan Rice??

So, is this just a temporary transition team before Obama really buckles down and starts changing things, or is this just more of the same status quo, the rich ruling elite that has been in power since the beginning of history? What do you think?
#2 Nov 21 2008 at 11:20 AM Rating: Excellent
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Quote:

Banking bailout - terrible idea, throwing gasoline onto a fire to reduce the flames? how about we restructure our economy to remove ourselves from perpetual debt to the Federal Reserve?

Auto bailout - almost as bad as the banks


I think people need to hold their nose and deal with the bailouts. If major banks and the automotive industry goes under, we can count on at least 3-4% more unemployment (which will have a ripple effect through the rest of the economy) and enough economic collapse to trigger a major depression. This whole restructuring of the economy should have taken place in 1999. We're not here right now. Our economy is in a survival mode. Restructure when the economy is not ******* And I'm about self-interest. If the banks and the auto industry go down, we all go down. We're all ******* We can be self-righteous as we want and it doesn't mean jack ****.

This is the result of 30 years of supply side economics. It'll take a lot to repair this mistake.

____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#3 Nov 21 2008 at 11:22 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,086 posts
Quote:
I'm not sure I can agree with any decision Obama has made since he has become President elect.


Why not wait and see what he can do with the team he assembles? You trusted him enough to vote for him, he may have his reasons for his choices. The proof will be in his results in the coming year or two. You also have to remember, he will be unable to move many of his agendas forward without some backing from the opposition and old guard. This may be a case of unite and rule, rather than divide and be impotent.

I'm waiting with expectation and its not often I am excited by politics or politicans. I'm jealous, at least your new president is a young, intelligent and attractive man. All I have is a grim scotsman Smiley: frown
#4 Nov 21 2008 at 11:23 AM Rating: Good
Commander Annabella wrote:
I think people need to hold their nose and deal with the bailouts. If major banks and the automotive industry goes under, we can count on at least 3-4% more unemployment (which will have a ripple effect through the rest of the economy) and enough economic collapse to trigger a major depression. This whole restructuring of the economy should have taken place in 1999. We're not here right now. Our economy is in a survival mode. Restructure when the economy is not @#%^ed. And I'm about self-interest. If the banks and the auto industry go down, we all go down. We're all @#%^ed. We can be self-righteous as we want and it doesn't mean jack sh*t.
This.

Edited, Nov 21st 2008 2:23pm by Mindel
#5 Nov 21 2008 at 11:24 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Emmanuel: Sure, I like it. He's a smart, tough guy. He'll do fine.

Holder: No real opinion. He seems to be well regarded although every story about him has to mention the Rich pardon. In my dream world, it'd have been Patrick Fitzgerald.

Daschle: Sure, why not.

Clinton: I'm torn. I think she's a solid policy wonk and is well regarded throughout most of the world. Her husband brings considerable bagge and I'm tired of hearing "OMG the Clintons are gonna...". Not even so much that I think they are going to do X; I'm just tired of hearing the conspiracies.

Napolito: Apart from being governor of a border state (quick, appoint Palin!), I have no idea why she'd being considered for the job. I could give a rat's *** who winds up governor of Arizona. Stop electing corrupt Sec.'s of State.

Gates: Sure, why not. Iraq wasn't a clusterfuck because of Gates, Gates got called in to try and fix it.

Auto Bailout: I like the idea of attaching a lot of strings and making the Big Three come up with a plan first. I hope that follows through. I'm against just letting them wither on the vine. Without the auto industry, US industrial manufacturing is practically dead and I don't think that's a good thing.

I'll also note that I spent a good deal of time from January onwards second-guessing choices Obama & Co. made. They've proven themselves to be smarter than me in all this. I'm not saying I should blindly smile and nod from this point forward but I'm willing to give some benefit of the doubt.

Edited, Nov 21st 2008 1:28pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#6 Nov 21 2008 at 11:26 AM Rating: Good
**
291 posts
Quote:
What do you think?


He promised to "reach across the aisle." Arguably, he's reaching across some aisles here. That would be a nice change.

Jones has been critical of Pres Bush's policies. Friends with John McCain? So what. Wasn't it the Dems who decried guilt by association with respect to some of Mr Obama's friends?

Story on Jones:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article5208597.ece

Quote:
James Jones, a decorated Vietnam veteran and former Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, is admired by both Republicans and Democrats and would bring particular expertise on Iraq and Afghanistan, two of Mr Obama's top overseas priorities when he takes office on January 20.

No final decision has been made on the post of National Security Adviser, but the serious consideration being given to General Jones reflects Mr Obama's continued determination to put together a bipartisan team of strong characters, and even former rivals. General Jones is also close to Hillary Clinton, and yet enjoys such cross-party appeal that in 2006 he was twice asked by Condoleezza Rice, President Bush's Secretary of State, to be her deputy. He declined.


Edited, Nov 21st 2008 2:27pm by Ahkuraj
#7 Nov 21 2008 at 11:34 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
I don't think America is about to give up a good percentage of it's manufacturing base.
#8 Nov 21 2008 at 11:42 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
Chief of Staff (Emanuel) - another elite zionist in a position of power, great..


This just makes me laugh. What the fUck does this even mean? That he's Jewish and smarter than you? That hardly disqualifies him, frankly.

Look, here's the thing. Obama is the visionary. He sets the tone and he sets the goals and then everyone digs in to see how feasible they are and whether they might actually work and what it's going to take and whether it's worth spending the political capital. He has to delegate **** or nothing gets done.

You don't delegate to people you pulled in off the street. Not at the top levels. Andrew Jackson tried that, and every President since then has had ample opportunity to learn from his mistakes. You delegate tasks out to people who can actually get **** done. That means, yes, experienced pols - "insiders" or whatever you want to call them. That's not elitist; that's just smart.



____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#9 Nov 21 2008 at 12:09 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Samira wrote:
Quote:
Chief of Staff (Emanuel) - another elite zionist in a position of power, great..


This just makes me laugh. What the fUck does this even mean? That he's Jewish and smarter than you? That hardly disqualifies him, frankly.

Look, here's the thing. Obama is the visionary. He sets the tone and he sets the goals and then everyone digs in to see how feasible they are and whether they might actually work and what it's going to take and whether it's worth spending the political capital. He has to delegate sh*t or nothing gets done.

You don't delegate to people you pulled in off the street. Not at the top levels. Andrew Jackson tried that, and every President since then has had ample opportunity to learn from his mistakes. You delegate tasks out to people who can actually get sh*t done. That means, yes, experienced pols - "insiders" or whatever you want to call them. That's not elitist; that's just smart.

Honestly, I couldn't respond to this guys post with any seriousness.

There are lots of good arguments for and against the bail outs. I still struggle daily trying to forge my own opinion about it (not that it matters - but still). But the personal slams on the cabinet member selections by the op make this post nothing but a joke.

A black guy, a Jew and a woman walked into the white house......
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#10 Nov 21 2008 at 12:11 PM Rating: Good
**
559 posts
Quote:
Why not wait and see what he can do with the team he assembles? You trusted him enough to vote for him, he may have his reasons for his choices. The proof will be in his results in the coming year or two. You also have to remember, he will be unable to move many of his agendas forward without some backing from the opposition and old guard. This may be a case of unite and rule, rather than divide and be impotent.


Agreed, good point. I'm just a bit nervous based on his decisions so far, but its fair to point out that no one has had a chance to enact policy at this point.

Quote:
You don't delegate to people you pulled in off the street. Not at the top levels. Andrew Jackson tried that, and every President since then has had ample opportunity to learn from his mistakes. You delegate tasks out to people who can actually get sh*t done. That means, yes, experienced pols - "insiders" or whatever you want to call them. That's not elitist; that's just smart.


You mean the same Andrew Jackson who was the last President to pay off the national debt and who called the banking cartels who formed the Federal Reserve a "hydra-headed monster eating the flesh of the common man." Yeah, he was one of the greatest Presidents in history and someone from whom we could all learn a lot.

Quote:
I think people need to hold their nose and deal with the bailouts. If major banks and the automotive industry goes under, we can count on at least 3-4% more unemployment (which will have a ripple effect through the rest of the economy) and enough economic collapse to trigger a major depression. This whole restructuring of the economy should have taken place in 1999. We're not here right now. Our economy is in a survival mode. Restructure when the economy is not @#%^ed. And I'm about self-interest. If the banks and the auto industry go down, we all go down. We're all @#%^ed. We can be self-righteous as we want and it doesn't mean jack sh*t.

This is the result of 30 years of supply side economics. It'll take a lot to repair this mistake.


I'm not talking about de-regulation. This is a result of modern money mechanics and a credit based economy. We create fake money digitally that never actually exists and then are surprised when it turns out the money doesn't exist. Do you know what the modern US dollar is based on? Do you know how money is created?

If we keep dumping money into a broken system it will still be broken. I'm not about to give my money to the same criminals that have been controlling the economies of the world for centuries.


#11 Nov 21 2008 at 12:16 PM Rating: Default
**
559 posts
Quote:
Chief of Staff (Emanuel) - another elite zionist in a position of power, great..


This just makes me laugh. What the **** does this even mean? That he's Jewish and smarter than you? That hardly disqualifies him, frankly.


The point is that Americans are brainlessly supportive of Israel for no other reason than ignorance or religious bias, and neither one is a good reason. The fact that most of our politicians support the country that has violated the most UN resolutions in history and constantly commits acts of terrorism against citizens in Palestine is reprehensible, and the fact that they all support each other by hiring and appointing people to cabinets is disgusting.

Its called nepotism.


#12 Nov 21 2008 at 12:19 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
soulshaver wrote:
Quote:
Chief of Staff (Emanuel) - another elite zionist in a position of power, great..


This just makes me laugh. What the @#%^ does this even mean? That he's Jewish and smarter than you? That hardly disqualifies him, frankly.




Its called nepotism.
Huh?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#13 Nov 21 2008 at 12:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
You mean the same Andrew Jackson who was the last President to pay off the national debt and who called the banking cartels who formed the Federal Reserve a "hydra-headed monster eating the flesh of the common man." Yeah, he was one of the greatest Presidents in history and someone from whom we could all learn a lot.


He was one of the worst. You know nothing.

His fiscal policies led to the first major depression in U.S. history.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#14 Nov 21 2008 at 12:21 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
soulshaver wrote:
Its called nepotism.


No, I'm nepotism.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#15 Nov 21 2008 at 12:22 PM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Elinda wrote:
soulshaver wrote:
Quote:
Chief of Staff (Emanuel) - another elite zionist in a position of power, great..


This just makes me laugh. What the @#%^ does this even mean? That he's Jewish and smarter than you? That hardly disqualifies him, frankly.




Its called nepotism.
Huh?


Emanuel is smarter than soulshaver, kind of like my Swingline stapler.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#16 Nov 21 2008 at 12:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
soulshaver wrote:
Its called nepotism.


No, I'm nepotism.


You know who was a really prime example of nepotism in action?

Andrew Jackson.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#17 Nov 21 2008 at 12:24 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Andrew Jackson, as both man and president, is one of my least favorite people in American history.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#18 Nov 21 2008 at 12:26 PM Rating: Good
***
2,824 posts
Quote:
You mean the same Andrew Jackson who was the last President to pay off the national debt and who called the banking cartels who formed the Federal Reserve a "hydra-headed monster eating the flesh of the common man." Yeah, he was one of the greatest Presidents in history and someone from whom we could all learn a lot.


What fringe party is championing Andrew Jackson? Is there some party that is demanding we go back to the gold standard and exchange gold coins instead of paper money?
#19 Nov 21 2008 at 12:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Elinda wrote:
soulshaver wrote:
Quote:
Chief of Staff (Emanuel) - another elite zionist in a position of power, great..

This just makes me laugh. What the @#%^ does this even mean? That he's Jewish and smarter than you? That hardly disqualifies him, frankly.
Its called nepotism.
Huh?
Back in October, I had a robocall warning me that Obama had an illegitimate white Jewish son. I wish I had listened to them Smiley: frown
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#20 Nov 21 2008 at 12:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Not just Jewish, Joph.

Zionist.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#21 Nov 21 2008 at 12:34 PM Rating: Decent
**
559 posts
Quote:
He was one of the worst. You know nothing.

His fiscal policies led to the first major depression in U.S. history.


No, his fiscal policies were never realized as he came up against to much political opposition from the status quo. Then he was almost assassinated twice so he quit trying to implement his vision for a new economy, which left us halfway dependent on central banks who created the depression themselves.

Whats ironic is that you all jump on me for using the term zionist as a personal attack, yet most of your responses have been ignorant and derogatory personal insults directed towards me that have nothing to do with the issues.

Quote:
What fringe party is championing Andrew Jackson? Is there some party that is demanding we go back to the gold standard and exchange gold coins instead of paper money?


Does it have to be a party or supported by more than one person for you to jump in line, or can you think for yourself and make your own decisions?

Yes, I am advocating that we nationalize the federal reserve and base our money on good and services at the very least, not credit (which is a complete fantasy.)

Do you not realize that our government puts us into debt everytime it prints a dollar from the federal reserve?
#22 Nov 21 2008 at 12:38 PM Rating: Good
***
2,824 posts
I was making a joke about the Coinage Act which was a half-baked plan to begin with. I wasn't arguing for or against fiat currency.



Edited, Nov 21st 2008 1:54pm by baelnic
#23 Nov 21 2008 at 12:47 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
No, his fiscal policies were never realized as he came up against to much political opposition from the status quo. Then he was almost assassinated twice so he quit trying to implement his vision for a new economy, which left us halfway dependent on central banks who created the depression themselves.


You mean the policy wherein he attempted to dismantle all banks? That one? The one that resulted in widespread credit scams?

The person who attempted to assassinate him over the banking crisis was judged insane, by the way. Hardly a credible reason to stop his all-important crusade against a strong Federal bank.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#24 Nov 21 2008 at 3:29 PM Rating: Excellent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

You know who was a really prime example of nepotism in action?

Andrew Jackson.


We have to stop reading the same books. For instance, I insist you not read Anathem until at least March when I've had time to get through it.


Banking bailout - terrible idea, throwing gasoline onto a fire to reduce the flames? how about we restructure our economy to remove ourselves from perpetual debt to the Federal Reserve?


You don't understand Macroeconomics. Or, to be massively generous, you don't understand post Breton Woods credit markets.


Auto bailout - almost as bad as the banks


You don't understand manufacturing.


Chief of Staff (Emanuel) - another elite zionist in a position of power, great..


His middle name is Isreal. Really, it is.


Health and Human Services (Daschle) - not a bad choice but I would have preferred Howard Dean


Dean would have been an abysmal choice if you want progress on healthcare. Tommy D, on the other hand is ideal. He's also a headsplitter. It's clear Obama is determined to keep my wing of the party in line with his plans to govern as a relative centrist. Keep in mind Daschele's entire Senate staff essentially became Obama's Senate staff and served him very well there. They have an excellent working relationship.


Homeland Security (Napolito) - not a bad choice if we lived in a vaccuum, but if Napolito leaves office then the extremely corrupt right-wing Sec. of State Jan Brewer would become Governor of Arizona which would be a complete disaster


This is largely a meaningless position. It seems as if it should be one of great power and importance, but unlike State where the Secratery personally impacts things frequently, at HS the bottom up bureaucracy essentially runs EVERYTHING.


Attorney General (Holder) - a political insider with close ties to corrupt politicians, is this the person that will stand up to and prosecute special interests?


Not thrilled with Holder, either. He's a decent lawyer, clearly, but he seems to just be a vessel for Obama to manage DoJ through. Which is fine, although a little disconcerting.


Speculative:
Sec. of State (Clinton) - atrocious


I'm not sure where this sentiment comes from. From a Machevelian standpoint it's brilliant. From a foreign relations standpoint, the Clintons are widely respected. I'd have preferred Kerry, but there are obvious reasons that would haven't worked out well. I'm sure there was some sentiment for Beardy, but he's much better at Commerce.


Sec. of Defense (Gates) - Bush leftovers


Gates is excellent. I know I present myself as an expert on everything, but on this I really am. Gates is the best I've ever seen at running DoD. Which is the job, right? Not to be a good soundbite, or a military genius.



NS Advisor (Jones) - military insider who is friends with John McCain...why not Susan Rice??


Why not Sam Nunn?


So, is this just a temporary transition team before Obama really buckles down and starts changing things, or is this just more of the same status quo, the rich ruling elite that has been in power since the beginning of history? What do you think?


What the fuck did you think was going to happen, sucker? The Great Leap Forward still isn't coming.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#25 Nov 21 2008 at 3:33 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Smasharoo wrote:



So, is this just a temporary transition team before Obama really buckles down and starts changing things, or is this just more of the same status quo, the rich ruling elite that has been in power since the beginning of history? What do you think?


What the fuck did you think was going to happen, sucker? The Great Leap Forward still isn't coming.



The revolution will not be televised.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#26 Nov 21 2008 at 3:35 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
We have to stop reading the same books. For instance, I insist you not read Anathem until at least March when I've had time to get through it.


Typically I'd wait 'til it's out in paperback, but Stephenson is a particular weakness of mine. I'm not sure I can promise this.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 255 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (255)