Totem wrote:
Let's turn this around then. If you are not using science as the basis for equal marital rights for gays, then on what are you basing a need for special treatment?
And once again, you make the error of calling "equal rights" special treatment.
Quote:
After all, if this is just about wants or desires, someone then could make the argument that a precocious 13 or 14 year old is able to make the decision to enter into a relationship with another much older person.
So, now that your absurd strawman about fetuses is pretty well exhausted, you are actually trying to equate homosexuality with pedophilia?
A 13 or 14 year old is not capable of giving informed consent under the law, and the biggest reason for that is that adolescents are scientifically proven to have less developed brains with less capability of making rational informed choices. A grown homosexual adult is fully capable of informed consent.
Quote:
Just because you think they are not qualified to make that decision, in their particular case they may indeed be able to rationally decide for themselves what is best for them.
My opinion of their abilities has nothing to do with it. Science has shown that neurological development is not fully completed in adolescents, which is why they have a higher tendency toward rash, risky, and unwise decisions. The age of consent protects them from themselves and their immature brains.
Quote:
Or polygamy. Polygamists say that their's is just as much a right as anyone else's to marry who they choose or how many.
And I agree. If fully consenting informed ADULTS wish to enter into a plural marriage, more power to them. I'm all in favor of polyamory, so long as it's not the result of religious and cultural coercion inflicted upon unwilling partners.
Quote:
On what are you basing this particular segment of society's needs, yet excluding others?
The basis that there is no logical rationale for denying
consenting adults the right to form a legally recognized marital union.
Quote:
Let's not use feelings or wishes here either. Give me a solid, reasonable basis for homosexual unions that excludes these others, because I don't hear you clamoring for their inclusion.
Easy peasy. Immature brain and decision-making capabilities in adolescents is a neurological, scientifically proven fact, therefore excluding them from the group of people allowed to make informed-consent decisions is perfect sound and reasonable restriction. No such restriction has any business existing for adults.