Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Journalism must be diff in the UK...Follow

#1 Nov 10 2008 at 7:11 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Quote:
But what really stands out is her red dress, a garment that betrays her excitement in more ways than one. The colour is racy, the cut (empire-line with a pencil skirt) emphatically sexy. And it has been a long while since a neckline as fashion-forward as this has been spotted within a mile of the Oval Office.

It is a dress that requires total self-belief and plenty of chutzpah, not to mention a decent set of curves. It is a results dress: if you wore it on a date, you’d definitely expect a lift home. It’s the equivalent of the Versace safety-pin number that Elizabeth Hurley wore in 1994 to the premiere of Four Weddings and a Funeral. It doesn’t just say, “Look at me”; it says, “Don’t you dare look at anyone else.”

WTF? Does this guy want to bang Michelle like a dusky chocolate gong or what? God, you Brits are repressed.











And your teeth are bad.

Edited, Nov 10th 2008 9:13pm by Atomicflea
#2 Nov 10 2008 at 7:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
It's a nice dress, but... yeah.

WTF, mate?

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#3 Nov 10 2008 at 7:58 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
To paraphrase Freud, sometimes a dress is just a dress.
#4 Nov 10 2008 at 8:13 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Maybe she's colorblind and thinks it's a muted shade of plaid?
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#5 Nov 11 2008 at 12:36 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
4,731 posts
That Murdock owned rag? You call that journalism? :p
#6 Nov 11 2008 at 1:20 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
Does this guy want to bang Michelle like a dusky chocolate gong or what? God, you Brits are repressed.
'This guy' is Sarah Vine, and is to journalism what gbaji is to brevity.

I would though.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#7 Nov 11 2008 at 1:23 AM Rating: Good
Also, to re-emphasise youshutup's point, the Times under Murdoch has become the upmarket version of The Sun.

____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#8 Nov 11 2008 at 8:14 AM Rating: Decent
I only read the Times when I want to convince people I'm a pretentious, right-wing *****

P.S. I didn't like the dress, but I'd hit it.
#9 Nov 11 2008 at 8:30 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Who knew an outfit could be so revealing.

This dress, at least, is a whole lot easier on the eyes than that number she donned on election night.



Edited, Nov 11th 2008 5:30pm by Elinda
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#10 Nov 11 2008 at 8:42 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
That article seems to be the type of result you get when you require a certain word-count, but you won't give resources or time for journalistic research.

Plus, that neck-line is actually hideous.

Edited, Nov 11th 2008 11:43am by Aripyanfar
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 221 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (221)