Belkira the Tulip wrote:
There is nothing that says that heterosexuality is instinctual. It very well may be, but I can't see a way that one (heterosexuality) would be instinctual while the other (homosexuality) would not be. It makes no sense whatsoever.
It stands to reason that if one is an instinct, the other must be as well. If one is a choice, the other must be as well.
It stands to reason that if one is an instinct, the other must be as well. If one is a choice, the other must be as well.
Being flim-flammy on the subject may be obscuring things. Lets look at it logically from both standpoints:
1. Suppose I believe homosexuality must be a choice. It follows that if I believe this, I also believe that homosexuals that believe otherwise are either lying to themselves, or lying to everyone else, about it being an instinct for them. I know that as a heterosexual, there was never a conscious choice involved for me. Therefore, homosexuality=choice (based on what I deem as common sense and natural history) and heterosexuality=instinct (based on personal experience).
2. Suppose I believe homosexuality must be instinct. I then also believe that heterosexuality is an instinct. Simple one.
In either case (and I must say, I'm leaning towards #2, although part of me still wants to believe #1), heterosexuality is an instinct. There is no need for the duality that you're basing on nothing.