Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 21
Reply To Thread

The most incredibly stupid ignorant hateful thing I've read Follow

#1 Nov 05 2008 at 5:12 AM Rating: Good
Well, for today that is. I post on a military wife board and while usually their stupidity only mildly annoys me, today I feel like I want to put electric shock collars on them. Every time they think or try to voice their ignorant or homophobic thoughts I want it to shock them. Srsly, we were debating prop8 and one dumbass posts,
Quote:
Originally posted by (nameremovedtoprotectheignorant):


Quote:
Originally posted by (infinitely smarter chick):
Quote:
Originally posted by (nameremovedtoprotectheignorant):
Well if we should let anybody married whomever they loved maybe I'll leave DH and marry my vacumn cleaner. He cleans more messes than he makes.
Whether it is sarcasm or not, that completely trivializes the issue. These are two human beings who love eachother and wish to have the same rights as you or I.
Sure, right NOW it's two humans. But who's to say it won't eventually be man and machine or man and animal? Marriage was originally intended to be between a man and a woman - now we're trying to legalize marriage between two men or two women. So you really can't say that it might not evolve further.
And if/when it does - the same argument will stand for the supporters of that issue: 'Who are we to stand in their way?'.



Why why why? Why would you argue that two gay people wanting to be married was like someone wanting to marry an animal? Am I wrong in assuming she's comparing homosexuality to being a beast?
#2 Nov 05 2008 at 5:16 AM Rating: Excellent
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Quote:
The most incredibly stupid ignorant hateful thing I've read


Hang about. Varus will be here before long. Smiley: wink2
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#3 Nov 05 2008 at 5:24 AM Rating: Decent
Even better, the dumb ***** is now trying to convince me she's gay. Married to a man, homosexuality bashing biggot.
#4 Nov 05 2008 at 5:26 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Katie, the gay rights issue *is* the civil rights issue of our time, it's what I've dedicated myself to since I was able and while what you've posted is infuriating, it's nothing compared to the hate I've encountered from what I would have previously thought were reasonable and intelligent people. In my research, I encountered even professors with Ph.D.s that spouted such hateful comments as AIDS being a just response from God to counter the infectious gay population and others expressing their "tolerance" by stating that homosexuality is a birth defect like down syndrome and that we should offer our pity. There will be set backs, there will be disappointments like the constitutional amendments, but I have to believe that we make two steps forward for every one step back and that by the time that Hannah is grown, she can look back on these times as my parents could look back on the days of various states banning interracial marriage before Loving v. Virginia. Hang in there.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#5 Nov 05 2008 at 5:40 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,952 posts
Baby steps, baby steps. We got there in the end with peasant emancipation, with anti-slavery, with votes for all men not just land-owners, with votes for women. We are a long way down the road with equality for non-whites, and almost totally there with equality for women.

It takes time. You are helping the cause along, Katie, by arguing the issue. talk enough to enough people, and eventually "we" will have enough people convinced to put equal rights into laws.
#6 Nov 05 2008 at 5:45 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
That's the worst you've ever heard?

You're positively virginal.
#7 Nov 05 2008 at 6:04 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Katielynn wrote:
Why why why? Why would you argue that two gay people wanting to be married was like someone wanting to marry an animal? Am I wrong in assuming she's comparing homosexuality to being a beast?

Hell, you're the republican, you tell us.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#8 Nov 05 2008 at 6:04 AM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Yeah, Rick Santorum said the same thing 4 years ago. Actually he went off an a nice long rant that gave us lots of quotes.

#9 Nov 05 2008 at 6:09 AM Rating: Decent
Debalic wrote:
Katielynn wrote:
Why why why? Why would you argue that two gay people wanting to be married was like someone wanting to marry an animal? Am I wrong in assuming she's comparing homosexuality to being a beast?

Hell, you're the republican, you tell us.



Ahem! I am not, nor have I ever registered with one part or the other. I am walk the line between the two, but I lean to the blue.
#10 Nov 05 2008 at 6:12 AM Rating: Good
If AIDS was a gay disease from God then only gay people would get AIDS.

Since it infects a tragic number of people regardless of sexual orientation, it is instead the gaia response to human overpopulation. The plague didn't work in the middle ages, so something more insidious and slowly deadly had to come along. I only hope and pray a cure or vaccine or SOMETHING is found soon.

We need a red ribbon smiley Smiley: frown
#11 Nov 05 2008 at 6:16 AM Rating: Decent
**
291 posts
So what is wrong with someone wanting to marry their vacuum cleaner?
#12 Nov 05 2008 at 6:33 AM Rating: Good
**
907 posts
Ahkuraj wrote:
So what is wrong with someone wanting to marry their vacuum cleaner?


that's lust not love.


@Katie: I'm sick of those stupid slippery slope arguments myself. The anti-gays don't have any decent arguments though, so they resort to the slippery slope. Apparently it works though, as we can see from all the anti-gay ballot measures passing around the nation :(
#13 Nov 05 2008 at 7:07 AM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
It was very interesting looking at the demographic breakdown for California's Prop 8 last night. As of the time I went to bed, it was 50/50 among women, but the only demographic where the majority voted NO was in the 18-29 age group, with 63% opposing.

I'm beginning to think that (since we seem to insist on putting gay rights up for a vote whereas that's never been done with civil rights issues before--desegregation didn't happen because the people voted for it, nor did women get the vote that way) what's necessary for gay rights to finally just HAPPEN is going to be the passing of the older generation. Which is monumentally unfair--you shouldn't have to tell people who are being treated like second-class citizens that they have to wait 20 years to be treated fairly, but it looks like that's what's going to have to happen.

Edited, Nov 5th 2008 7:09am by Ambrya
#14 Nov 05 2008 at 7:20 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
It's the single issue Obama disappoints me on. Both he and Biden agree on civil unions, but I think the concept ignores the heart of the matter.

Still, it's an issue no one to-date has really stuck his neck out for. As a nation we're making progress, but we just aren't there yet.

Edited, Nov 5th 2008 9:21am by Atomicflea
#15 Nov 05 2008 at 7:26 AM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Listen, I've been out since 1990. I've been aware of my identity since the mid-80s. Back then, the amount of representation in the media was virtually nil. What, there was that guy on Soap and that was about it. No major celebrities, movie stars, not that many mainstream singers-- let's be honest, I didn't know anyone who was out for the first 18 years of my life and I distinctly remember thinking that I was @#%^ed if I was going to live my life this way--totally isolated and depressed. I also had kids constantly said that if they saw a homosexual on sight, they think they should have the right to say something. I'll be honest, I knew alot of dudes that reminded me of Brokeback Mountain.

The fact that this is a real issue--that we have a president that even mentions gay Americans, that it is even being debated, is a major shift in American consciousness. The status of ***** people has shifted enormously in the last 18 years--it's a seismic shift, not only in visibility but in acceptance. I see this in my community, in my family and in the country at large.

I remember when Reagan could not even mention AIDS at the height of the epidemic.

This might be a set back but we're never going back to the way it used to be. I have confidence that one day ***** people will be granted all the rights that are granted to straight people in the US.



Edited, Nov 5th 2008 10:37am by Annabella
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#16 Nov 05 2008 at 8:17 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Katielynn wrote:
Why would you argue that two gay people wanting to be married was like someone wanting to marry an animal?
Because they don't have any good argument for not wanting two homosexuals to marry. they DO assume that you don't want people to marry animals. So, in lieu of an argument against gay marriage, they say it's the same thing as human/animal marriage and argue against that instead.

This is the way they always do it. Every discussion of gay marriage turns into some slippery slope argument about "what about if someone wants 4000 wives?? And wants to marry their cat?? Or wants to marry their babies???"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#17 Nov 05 2008 at 9:04 AM Rating: Excellent
It's been a tough morning for me with this topic. When I woke up, I checked the results for Prop. 8, 2, and 102 and felt depressed when I saw the results, and it cast a shadow over what was a very good election cycle for me.

Not ten minutes ago, I just got off the phone with a girl I know in CA, who had called me up crying because now she can't have the possibility of getting married anymore. It's not that she had someone she was thinking about marrying, it's not the fact that she had someone that she was planning on getting married to, it was the fact that the fact that she had the chance was ripped away from her...

Listening to her broke my heart, and makes me wonder how people can do this to other people.

It's a failure of conscience, that's all I can think to say.

I just hope that I can have faith rebuilt in it.

Edit: Fixed a grammar error that made my post make less sense. Smiley: mad

Edited, Nov 5th 2008 12:10pm by Nightsintdreams
____________________________
Proud citizen of Miranda.

-Currently on Pochacco Server of Hello Kitty Online.
#18 Nov 05 2008 at 9:07 AM Rating: Good
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
It's the first time in California history that we have voted explicitly to remove an existing civil right.

Primary funding for the initiative? The Mormon and Catholic churches.

And oh, lawdy, the lies they told, those good religious people.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#19 Nov 05 2008 at 9:12 AM Rating: Good
***
1,594 posts
It's a slow process, but you could see it last night. People are losing some of their paranoid xenophobia.

Eventually the very idea of a "prop 8" will be seen as a vile and barbaric policy.

But you can't ask for change too quickly..
#20 Nov 05 2008 at 9:19 AM Rating: Excellent
An Obama presidency will be good for gay marriage in the long term, even if he only openly supports civil unions.

If he gets 4 years, he can ensure a balanced SCOTUS.

If he gets 8 years, he can definitely stack the SCOTUS with more progressives.

The SCOTUS is often the most lasting legacy a president can leave, because years after he's gone his guys are going to be making decisions.

It won't happen tomorrow, it won't happen even next year, but those marriages in California that may just be invalidated now are going to result in lawsuits, and those lawsuits are going to eventually end up at the SCOTUS. Much like it took a Supreme Court decision to strike down laws against interracial marriage, it will probably take a Supreme Court decision to strike down similar bans against gay marriage.

#21 Nov 05 2008 at 9:22 AM Rating: Excellent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Ahkuraj wrote:
So what is wrong with someone wanting to marry their vacuum cleaner?
You'd certainly not have the disease transmission issues that you'd have marrying a bio-organism. Arguably, sex could be interesting if not sterile. I'd just don't think I could commit to a life of bag changing.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#22 Nov 05 2008 at 9:30 AM Rating: Excellent
**
907 posts
I think I'm more annoyed and pissed off at Arkansas for banning gay adoption than the gay marriage thing. I do expect to one day adopt a child, preferably with a partner, but marriage isn't so much a big deal to me personally. I just feel everyone deserves the right to marry.
#23 Nov 05 2008 at 9:36 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Deadbeet wrote:
I think I'm more annoyed and pissed off at Arkansas for banning gay adoption than the gay marriage thing. I do expect to one day adopt a child, preferably with a partner, but marriage isn't so much a big deal to me personally. I just feel everyone deserves the right to marry.
They banned 'gay' adoption specifically, or adoption to non married partners?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#24 Nov 05 2008 at 10:02 AM Rating: Good
***
1,594 posts
Arkansas banned adoption by non-married partners because their own courts banned a law against gay adoption two years ago.
#25 Nov 05 2008 at 10:06 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
What does this mean for marriages already celebrated in those states? Does it invalidate them, or does it mean that they have the right to challenge it in court?
#26 Nov 05 2008 at 10:07 AM Rating: Good
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
That is up in the air, at least in California. Legal opinions differ. It'll end up in court for sure.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 21
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 231 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (231)