Front news page on NYtimes.com
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/03/palin-cleared-by-independent-counsel/
Keep on harping how she is soooo unethical though.
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Palin found innocent in Ethics Investigation
Palin found innocent in Ethics InvestigationFollow
I can't believe I read all those comments.
The frothing paranoia was quite amusing, but mostly I saw head-busting ignorance feeding upon ignorance.
There was one bright spot:
So very, very true.
The frothing paranoia was quite amusing, but mostly I saw head-busting ignorance feeding upon ignorance.
There was one bright spot:
A liberal or independent who posted there said wrote:
She is why you lost.
So very, very true.
Quick clarification question: was this second panel the one Palin appointed after she claimed the original investigation was full of partisan politics? The one she had power over?
I think it was, but I'm not positive.
I think it was, but I'm not positive.
I'm pretty sure it was too. We'll here more about it after the election is over, no doubt.
Her gubernatorial seat was never in danger, but Troopergate hanging over her head would dampen her chances of a 2012 nomination, and we can't have that now, can we?
Her gubernatorial seat was never in danger, but Troopergate hanging over her head would dampen her chances of a 2012 nomination, and we can't have that now, can we?
#5REDACTED,
Posted: Nov 03 2008 at 8:00 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) The only paranoia I see is the left ranting about bush 24/7 for the next 2000 years.
Bush who?
. . .
Oh, that guy.
We're already suppressing the memories.
Edit: For the record, I don't have cable and don't watch TV so I don't see any TV coverage unless someone posts a YouTube. You could argue that the Internet also has a liberal bias, but it might be difficult to support.
Edited, Nov 3rd 2008 11:14pm by catwho
. . .
Oh, that guy.
We're already suppressing the memories.
Edit: For the record, I don't have cable and don't watch TV so I don't see any TV coverage unless someone posts a YouTube. You could argue that the Internet also has a liberal bias, but it might be difficult to support.
Edited, Nov 3rd 2008 11:14pm by catwho
#7REDACTED,
Posted: Nov 03 2008 at 8:16 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Right, until Barry makes his first mistake.
LockeColeMA wrote:
Quick clarification question: was this second panel the one Palin appointed after she claimed the original investigation was full of partisan politics? The one she had power over?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Nobody cares if she's unethical or not. We care that she's a dumb bimbo that has more "experience" than Obama yet has less of a clue about politics in all of her public appearances. I'll agree to her innocence if you agree that she's an idiot and should have never even been considered for the VP seat. McCain flushed his ticket down the toilet the day he decided to pull such a stupid publicity stunt.
Thanks Amor. Just to clear things up though, I'm voting for President, not Vice President.
#11REDACTED,
Posted: Nov 03 2008 at 8:37 PM, Rating: Unrated, (Expand Post) Now, if only the people of your party would do that. Oh, and tell that to the media who lambasted Palin from the beginning. She took it like no other and moved forward. Do remember though, that Barry is the least vetted President in the history of the US. But, that doesn't matter, he's black, he's change (What change exactly? It's change! It must be good), a pass in the media, media openly rooting for him, I could go on and on. The vast percentage of journalists in this country are a joke. Journalism as we know it, is dead, the MSM (Main street media) is nothing but another ideological tool.
If change is so bad, why was McCain calling for it as well even today?
I'm like Smash, I've been laughing at Palin ever since she was announced. I haven't really stopped laughing since.
I'm like Smash, I've been laughing at Palin ever since she was announced. I haven't really stopped laughing since.
Quote:
media openly rooting for him
Editorials do not equal real news.
Quote:
Now, if only the people of your party would do that.
Seeing as how McCain could very well die, I will take Sarah Palin into account when I complete my line at the poll.
Quote:
Do remember though, that Barry is the least vetted President in the history of the US.
Sure, because in the 1800's, it was as easy to discover facts about people as it is now with the internet.
Quote:
The vast percentage of journalists in this country are a joke. Journalism as we know it, is dead, the MSM (Main street media) is nothing but another ideological tool.
This could be blamed on both parties. Press conferences don't really exist so much anymore. Now they just hand out sheets with the newss on them.
Quote:
Rachel Maddow
Rachel Maddow is not news. Air America is not news. Bill O'Reilly is not news. Keith Olbermann is not news. Seriously, if you listen to these sources for 'news' you need your head examined.
A show on a cable news channel does not a journalist make.
Edited, Nov 4th 2008 12:03am by Paskil
#14REDACTED,
Posted: Nov 03 2008 at 8:54 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Do you not understand anything? Change for the sake of change is not inherently "good". You have to ask what kind of change, is it beneficial, how will it effect us, etc.
AmorTonight wrote:
Do remember though, that Barry is the least vetted President in the history of the US.
AmorTonight wrote:
Do remember though, that Barry is the least vetted President in the history of the US.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
I fail to understand the argument that Lincoln was somehow less qualified then obama is now, As I understand both served in congress, before all that obama worked at a couple of "community organizer" jobs, then did **** at Harvard then ran for state and eventually national congress. Lincoln was a captain of a militia during some war with a Indian tribe. Later he learned law and also entered the state then national congresses. Not to mention joining a fledgling new political party, something obama who followed many of the extremes of the democrat party can claim.
At the most one could say they share the same qualification levels...
This is just what I gathered from brief research, if anyone can show me otherwise then maybe I'd reconsider.
At the most one could say they share the same qualification levels...
This is just what I gathered from brief research, if anyone can show me otherwise then maybe I'd reconsider.
Experienced =/= Qualified
Qualified =/= Experienced
And the topic in question was "Vetting," which is neither.
Edited, Nov 3rd 2008 11:22pm by trickybeck
SefanaPPO wrote:
I fail to understand the argument that Lincoln was somehow less qualified then obama is now, As I understand both served in congress, before all that obama worked at a couple of "community organizer" jobs,
Read farther down please...
Experienced =/= Qualified
Qualified =/= Experienced
And the topic in question was "Vetting," which is neither.
And it's implying the same thing.
Edited, Nov 4th 2008 12:31am by SefanaPPO
Quote:
Experienced =/= Qualified
Qualified =/= Experienced
And the topic in question was "Vetting," which is neither.
And it's implying the same thing.
Edited, Nov 4th 2008 12:31am by SefanaPPO
SefanaPPO wrote:
And it's implying the same thing.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
AmorTonight wrote:
No doubt if Barry wins any mistake he makes you'll just blame it on bush. No matter the democratic congress of the last two years, or the possible supermajority. Nope, Bush's fault.
Kinda like you guys blame Clinton for everything? Gotcha.
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
Lady Tare wrote:
AmorTonight wrote:
No doubt if Barry wins any mistake he makes you'll just blame it on bush. No matter the democratic congress of the last two years, or the possible supermajority. Nope, Bush's fault.
Kinda like you guys blame Clinton for everything? Gotcha.
Yeah I've never once heard a Conservative blame Bush for the current economy or give Clinton credit when we actually had an economy during his term.
As far as Palin goes; she's an idiot. It's so obvious to anyone who isn't sucking on the Republican tit. I don't hate John McCain, and I don't think he'd made an awful President, but there's at least a somewhat moderate chance that Palin will be president before 2012 and that's scary.
But, I'm still holding out on my prediction that ~Summer 2009, Sarah Palin is going to resign to "care for her special needs child" or for "health reasons".
Recent Visitors: 218
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (218)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Palin found innocent in Ethics Investigation
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC