Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Gun controlFollow

#152REDACTED, Posted: Oct 28 2008 at 8:42 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Yea, because obviously people kill other people because it's easy. Come on. Do you honestly believe that? Tell me you don't.
#153 Oct 28 2008 at 8:46 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
AmorTonight wrote:
Yea, because obviously people kill other people because it's easy. Come on. Do you honestly believe that? Tell me you don't.
Now you're messing up your causality. Its not "Crimes are higher because people like to kill people when its easier to do so," its "Crimes are higher because people who are likely to commit crimes have an easier way to do so."
#154 Oct 28 2008 at 8:48 AM Rating: Good
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
GUNS DO NOT KILL PEOPLE, PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE.
1500 people die in the US every year because you people can't grow up and learn to keep guns in gun clubs and out of your homes.

Not to mention the 26,000 other people who died that quite concievably wouldn't have done so had a gun not been readily been availible.

PEOPLE ARE HARDER TO KILL IF YOU DON'T HAVE A GUN, FUcking ******.

Will it stop them all? no of course it will not, will your death rates drop considerably? Yes they will probably fall to slightly above UK levels per capita.

UK total homicides 1.40

USA total homicides 8.95

Or are you so missguided to think that people in the UK don't have access to other methods of killing people?
#155 Oct 28 2008 at 8:49 AM Rating: Good
Baron von tarv wrote:

Or are you so missguided to think that people in the UK don't have access to other methods of killing people?


Poisoned fish and chips and a bit of rat poison in the tea?
#156 Oct 28 2008 at 8:53 AM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
Poisoned fish and chips and a bit of rat poison in the tea?
Nah we just cook normally thats usually enough.
#157 Oct 28 2008 at 8:59 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
Yea, because obviously people kill other people because it's easy. Come on. Do you honestly believe that? Tell me you don't.


There is no adequate response.

I loathe you. You can't read; you don't comprehend simple inferences; you don't seem to understand the first thing about.. well here it's the difference between necessity and sufficiency but, the problem is really larger than this. A 12 year old is more capable of creating a coherent body of thought; an essay on what a kindergarten boy did on his summer vacation is more complex, less superficial, than those previous incomprehensible tirades of anecdotes and irrelevant.. (I can't even call them thoughts...) slogans of thinly veiled...

Indescribable.

May god have mercy on your immortal soul.
#158 Oct 28 2008 at 9:01 AM Rating: Decent
Baron von tarv wrote:
1500 people die in the US every year because you people can't grow up and learn to keep guns in gun clubs and out of your homes.


To be fair, I'm sure jsut as many people die a year from choking on a fry or something. 1500 is really a platry number.
#159 Oct 28 2008 at 9:01 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
I like when Pensive gets mad and all the big words come spilling out at once. It amuses me.
#160REDACTED, Posted: Oct 28 2008 at 9:09 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Tarv, I love how you somehow can foretell the future and what it would be like if they banned guns. Is it easier for someone to kill someone with a gun than a knife or other weapon? Sure. Will people resort to whatever weapon in order to kill? Yes.
#161 Oct 28 2008 at 9:14 AM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
To be fair, I'm sure jsut as many people die a year from choking on a fry or something. 1500 is really a platry number.
When you consider that every single person eats three times a day the shear numbers will mean the figures will be higher. (figure is actually twice that number @3000) approx 900,000,000 meals per day and 3000 deaths in a year. as opposed to 230,000,000 touched maybe once a week? FUck knows how many times you gun obsessed types fondle your weapon (Can you see what i did there?) leading to 1500 deaths.

Are you satified to let 1500 people die a year so that you can have a gun at home rather than keep it at a gun club?
#162 Oct 28 2008 at 9:15 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
AmorTonight wrote:
Tarv, I love how you somehow can foretell the future and what it would be like if they banned guns.
You don't need to "tell the future," asshat, you just have to look at countries that have done it.

Tell me, why do you need a gun?
#163 Oct 28 2008 at 9:15 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
There was about a 300 year political struggle in Britain about whether to create a police force at all, or not. Police officers were seen as a fundamental violation of individual rights, a totalitarian tool of government oppression.

It took a long time, but they got there in the end.
#164 Oct 28 2008 at 9:17 AM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
So, you take guns away. Awesome, they will either obtain them illegally
Strawman, figures show that 75% of illegal firearms where once legally owned. Smiley: schooled
Quote:
Also, don't play the I'm qualified to fire an assault rifle with me either, because I am too.
Ex/current military are you?
#165 Oct 28 2008 at 9:18 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Baron von tarv wrote:
Quote:
So, you take guns away. Awesome, they will either obtain them illegally
Strawman, figures show that 75% of illegal firearms where once legally owned. Smiley: schooled
Quote:
Also, don't play the I'm qualified to fire an assault rifle with me either, because I am too.
Ex/current military are you?
Baron von tarv wrote:
75% of illegal firearms where once legally owned. Smiley: schooled
Baron von tarv wrote:
owned. Smiley: schooled


Edited, Oct 28th 2008 12:19pm by AshOnMyTomatoes

Edited, Oct 28th 2008 12:19pm by AshOnMyTomatoes
#166REDACTED, Posted: Oct 28 2008 at 9:18 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I'm sure comparing a small European country that has vastly different demographics than the US is an accurate measure? Hmmm, right. You fail to take into account other variables that play a role in determining how effective it would be. But, sure, think everything in the world is so simple that simply banning is a good deterrent. /rollseyes
#167 Oct 28 2008 at 9:19 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Amor wrote:
Tarv, I love how you somehow can foretell the future and what it would be like if they banned guns.


Amor wrote:
A lot of supposition about the future and what it would be like if they banned guns.
#168 Oct 28 2008 at 9:22 AM Rating: Decent
Baron von tarv wrote:
Quote:
GUNS DO NOT KILL PEOPLE, PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE.
1500 people die in the US every year because you people can't grow up and learn to keep guns in gun clubs and out of your homes.

Not to mention the 26,000 other people who died that quite concievably wouldn't have done so had a gun not been readily been availible.

PEOPLE ARE HARDER TO KILL IF YOU DON'T HAVE A GUN, FUcking ******.

Will it stop them all? no of course it will not, will your death rates drop considerably? Yes they will probably fall to slightly above UK levels per capita.

UK total homicides 1.40

USA total homicides 8.95

Or are you so missguided to think that people in the UK don't have access to other methods of killing people?


As I demonstrated earlier using someone old but still relevant data, the ratio of gun related fatalities to privately owned firearms is 0.0001599375 or 0.016%. Hardly a significant number, especially when you are (or anyone else is) suggesting that a 200 year old right (not privilege) be revoked simply because you don't like people owning guns.

Sure, you can speak only to the actual number of fatalities, but then, that's ignoring the truth in favor of your opinion on the matter.

In the same year that 30,708 people were killed by guns in the numbers I quoted, 42,013 died in automobile related deaths. Given a US population of roughly 268 million that year, the % of population deaths caused by guns was 0.011%, while the % of population deaths caused by automobiles was 0.015%. For the sake of argument, estimates put the number of motor vehicles on U.S. roads in 1997 at about 208 million, which gives us a ratio of vehicle related deaths to motor vehicles of 0.000201985 - a higher ratio than that of privately owned guns.

You can look at 42,013 and say that's a big number, and you can look at 30,708 and say that's a big number, but they're pretty damn close, and yet people like you contend that guns are some ridiculously dangerous force that puts our population on the brink of self-destruction. The numbers clearly debunk that claim and show that guns are actually less dangerous than automobiles, even when accounting for criminal misuse of said guns.

And just for giggles, let's look at some recent data on U.S. deaths and their leading causes from the CDC, shall we? For the year 2005:

Number of deaths: 2,448,017

Death rate: 825.9 deaths per 100,000 population
Life expectancy: 77.8 years
Infant Mortality rate: 6.87 deaths per 1,000 live births

Number of deaths for leading causes of death:
Heart disease: 652,091
Cancer: 559,312
Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 143,579
Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 130,933
Accidents (unintentional injuries): 117,809
Diabetes: 75,119
Alzheimer's disease: 71,599
Influenza/Pneumonia: 63,001
Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 43,901
Septicemia: 34,136

2.5 million people died in 2005 - 30,694 of which were firearm related. Firearms accounted for only 1.22% of all deaths in that year and didn't even make the top 15 leading causes of death.

The fact of the matter is that your opinion is exaggerated and not based on facts. The truth is that guns can be misused, but generally arent, and are not a significant cause of death in the U.S., comparatively speaking. Even POISON related deaths surpassed firearm related deaths in that same year - 32,691 to 30,694.

For reference:
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/FASTATS/deaths.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/injury99-05/injury99-05.htm
http://www.bradycenter.org/stop2/facts/fs2.php

Edited, Oct 28th 2008 12:24pm by BrownDuck
#169REDACTED, Posted: Oct 28 2008 at 9:23 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Current. I like to shoot as a hobby and to keep my skills. Albeit I necessarily don't need them right now (Shooting skill), but, when I go to a cutter and on a boarding team then I would like to be able to train any time I want to keep my shooting skills as sharp as they can be.
#170 Oct 28 2008 at 9:28 AM Rating: Good
Baron von tarv wrote:
Are you satified to let 1500 people die a year so that you can have a gun at home rather than keep it at a gun club?


Yea.

1500 is a drop in the bucket. How many people die from choking while ************* My point is the absurdity of throwing a number like 1500 people around. Woopie, a small town dies every year from mismanaging a firearm. It's nothing compared to other stupid ****.

BUT, I am for gun control. Strict gun control. I just don't see the big deal about the 1500.
#171 Oct 28 2008 at 9:31 AM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:

In the same year that 30,708 people were killed by guns in the numbers I quoted, 42,013 died in automobile related deaths.
BD i like you and all but you CANNOT compair deaths in road accidents to gun deaths.

1. Cars are used every single day for hours at a time by almost every single adult in America.

2. Car have a purpose that is Necessary to the wealth and day to day activity of the country, without them the whole country would come to a grinding halt.

3. Cars are not designed to be a WEAPON

4. Changes to car design to make them safer has been a major priority of the automotive industry for years.

5. What I proposed on page 1 (or it might have been two) is a formula that would make gun use safer without restricting the entertainment value of guns as a hobby.
#172 Oct 28 2008 at 9:41 AM Rating: Default
Baron von tarv wrote:
Quote:

In the same year that 30,708 people were killed by guns in the numbers I quoted, 42,013 died in automobile related deaths.
BD i like you and all but you CANNOT compair deaths in road accidents to gun deaths.

1. Cars are used every single day for hours at a time by almost every single adult in America.

2. Car have a purpose that is Necessary to the wealth and day to day activity of the country, without them the whole country would come to a grinding halt.

3. Cars are not designed to be a WEAPON

4. Changes to car design to make them safer has been a major priority of the automotive industry for years.

5. What I proposed on page 1 (or it might have been two) is a formula that would make gun use safer without restricting the entertainment value of guns as a hobby.


What about poison deaths? They outrank guns too. And poisons were designed to kill (something).

The point is not specifically about automobiles, Tarv. The point is that the number of people killed by guns is rather insignificant when looking at the big picture, and there are far greater causes to fight for. I mean, go back and read 2 or 3 posts ago where I quoted percentages

Quote:
In 1998, 30,708 people in the United States died from firearm-related deaths - 12,102 (39%) of those were murdered; 17,424 (57%) were suicides; 866 (3%) were accidents; and in 316 (1%) the intent was unknown. [4]


57% of all firearm related deaths that year (and subsequent years, actually) were suicides. You know what? I don't give a rat's *** if some john decided his life wasn't worth living. That's not any justification to restrict or abolish my right to recreational shooting. If you really only care about the number of accidental deaths or homicides, the number is actually far lower than 30,708 - it's about 13,000.
#173 Oct 28 2008 at 9:44 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
The Great BrownDuck wrote:
2.5 million people died in 2005 - 30,694 of which were firearm related. Firearms accounted for only 1.22% of all deaths in that year and didn't even make the top 15 leading causes of death.
OMG outlaw cancer!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#174 Oct 28 2008 at 9:47 AM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
OMG outlaw cancer!


I don't think we can do that with this Administration or the Republican ticket up next. OMG outlaw Repulicans!

Or you know, vote and ****.
#175 Oct 28 2008 at 9:53 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Quote:
OMG outlaw cancer!


I'm running on a platform of phasing in clinical immortality in 2024.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#176 Oct 28 2008 at 9:59 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
Quote:
OMG outlaw cancer!


I'm running on a platform of phasing in clinical immortality in 2024.
Now there's a platform I can live with.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 206 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (206)