Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

So what's Obamalamadingdong's stance on the Patriot Act?Follow

#1 Oct 24 2008 at 7:33 AM Rating: Default
*****
16,160 posts
Obama, to the best of my knowledge, in addition to you Black Neo lovers haven't made a peep about repealing, er, "fixing" that most hated of facist pieces of legislation, the Patriot Act *bum-bum-BUM!* (Ominous music)

Is he so civic minded that even though it's in effect he'll not use it? Or is it that he's so gentle and lovingly hopeful about mending hurt feelings that he'll rename it the Pillow Act for how soft and fluffy we treat our enemies?

What gives, Bush-haters?

Totem
#2 Oct 24 2008 at 7:35 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
He's prolly afraid the CIA/Homeland Security will take him out if he proposes reducing or eliminating it. Smiley: tinfoilhat
#3 Oct 24 2008 at 7:37 AM Rating: Decent
Totem wrote:
Obama, to the best of my knowledge, in addition to you Black Neo lovers haven't made a peep about repealing, er, "fixing" that most hated of facist pieces of legislation, the Patriot Act *bum-bum-BUM!* (Ominous music)

Is he so civic minded that even though it's in effect he'll not use it? Or is it that he's so gentle and lovingly hopeful about mending hurt feelings that he'll rename it the Pillow Act for how soft and fluffy we treat our enemies?

What gives, Bush-haters?

Totem
I don't think it's come up in a while, but didn't he say earlier in the year that he supported a modified version of the act that contained strict civil liberties protections?
#4 Oct 24 2008 at 7:38 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Not that hard to find, Totes.

Keep the core of the act, modify it to protect civil liberties.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#5 Oct 24 2008 at 7:43 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,760 posts
I seem to recall reading somewhere that he supported re-authorizing it, but stated it needed some re-working. He ended up supporting a slightly modified version that supposedly compromised somewhat between the original travesty, and a version he hoped for.

But don't quote me on that.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#6 Oct 24 2008 at 12:02 PM Rating: Decent
*****
16,160 posts
You guys won't pester him to repeal it?

Totem
#7 Oct 24 2008 at 12:04 PM Rating: Good
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
You guys won't pester him to repeal it?
If civil liberty's are protected there is no need to repeal it since that the only thing people where objecting to in the first place Smiley: schooled
#8 Oct 24 2008 at 12:09 PM Rating: Default
most americans on both sides agree with much of the patriot act.

what the dems dont like is warrentless wire taps. thats the part we will try modifying. need to spy to stop a bad guy? go ahead, but make sure you have a reason to spy on joe. want to randomly spy on anyone you choose? not in this country, try passing your resume out in russia or china.

govenmnets authority should never be beyond reproach. and the current wording of the patriot act lets them do what ever they feel they want to do without oversight.

i am really supprised you "smaller govermnent" types would authorize this very communistic wording. but then your full of hypocracies like that.
#9 Oct 24 2008 at 12:10 PM Rating: Decent
*****
16,160 posts
The general consensus here, as I recall, was that the Patriot Act, in and of itself, is a repudiation of our civic freedoms as defined in the Bill of Rights. I disagreed, but the vast majority here were quite incensed about its' implementation.

Totem
#10 Oct 24 2008 at 12:12 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Totem wrote:
The general consensus here, as I recall, was that the Patriot Act, in and of itself, is a repudiation of our civic freedoms as defined in the Bill of Rights. I disagreed, but the vast majority here were quite incensed about its' implementation.

Totem

Well if they change it, it won't be "itself" anymore, now will it?

#11 Oct 24 2008 at 12:15 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Precisely. Which is why I ask if you guys will lobby to repeal it.

Totem
#12 Oct 24 2008 at 12:38 PM Rating: Good
**
559 posts
Quote:
Which is why I ask if you guys will lobby to repeal it.


Yes and I have emailed Obama about his position on it already, among other policies, all you get is an automated response from the Obama campaign saying they will look into your request.

Having said that, I think Obama and Congress can find a way to compromise so that our civil liberties are protected while still preserving some of the security changes that were made after Sept. 11'th. They are not doing that right now. In 2007 the Justice Dep't concluded after an internal investigation that the FBI had been illegally abusing the Patirot Act.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11100916/

The new FISA amendment was even more generous giving away civil liberties, and the FBI is now lobbying Congress to basically extend the NSA FISA powers for domestic cases inside the US.

I don't want to give up my freedoms to people who have already been convicted of abusing them.


I think right now Obama is trying to be the best general candidate he can without revealing too much of his hand, so I am hopeful he will be more vigilante once he is in office. We really need to clean up the voting procedures as well, and he was a voting & civil rights attorney and professor of constitutional law, so I think he does value the Constitution and wants to protect its integrity and meaning.






Edited, Oct 24th 2008 3:42pm by soulshaver
#13 Oct 24 2008 at 12:40 PM Rating: Decent
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Totem is trying too hard at this point.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#14 Oct 24 2008 at 12:58 PM Rating: Decent
*****
16,160 posts
I think it's a reasonable question. When the Patriot Act was renewed there was quite a bit of outrage here on the board about how badly it infringed upon our rights as American citizens. As time passed we heard less and less about the topic.

Now there is a good chance with this election the discontented Left will be able to enact or repeal legislation as they please, and I would think the Patriot Act would be front and center on the list of items to be acted upon. So I asked the question looking for what I thought would be genuine interest on the part of Obamunists to do just that.

I find it remarkable that there isn't much passion to change the rule.

Totem
#15 Oct 24 2008 at 1:00 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Commander Annabella wrote:
Totem is trying too hard at this point.

Quote:
Totem: What's Obama going to do about the Patriot Act?

A: Change it.

Totem: You don't want him to repeal it?

A: He's changing the bad parts.

Totem: I thought you didn't like it in and of itself?

A: It's not itself anymore if it's been changed.

Totem: Precisely, so why don't you want it repealed?

A: /boggle


#16 Oct 24 2008 at 1:26 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,001 posts
Quote:
Obamunists


Quote:
Obamalamadingdong


These are cute and reinforce your statements.
#17 Oct 24 2008 at 1:51 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
What else am I supposed to call them? Obamites? Obaminions? Obaminations? What? Obamunists seem to be as close to what that would signifiy as I can do. Help me out here then.

Totem
#18 Oct 24 2008 at 1:56 PM Rating: Good
****
4,901 posts
Totem wrote:
What else am I supposed to call them? Obamites? Obaminions? Obaminations? What? Obamunists seem to be as close to what that would signifiy as I can do. Help me out here then.

Totem


Patriots Smiley: smile
____________________________
Love,
PunkFloyd
#19 Oct 24 2008 at 1:58 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
So the "bad" parts are going to be taken out, eh, trick? Does that include everything between the words "Patriot" and "Act?" I wasn't aware that there was anything a Lefty in good standing found acceptable in such a rights trampeling travesty of a law. Perhaps then the careful spying of Muzzie terrorists is a good thing now that your man is about to get into office?

I get it.
/nods

As long as Bush has anything to do with anything it is bad. But give it to the Black Neo and all of a sudden it becomes a force for good, Mom, apple pie, and the American Way.

I see you workin' it.

Totem
#20 Oct 24 2008 at 2:05 PM Rating: Good
***
2,824 posts
Quote:
What else am I supposed to call them? Obamites? Obaminions? Obaminations? What? Obamunists seem to be as close to what that would signifiy as I can do. Help me out here then.


Democrats?
#21 Oct 24 2008 at 2:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
As long as I get to call McCain supporters McCainmongers
____________________________
Do what now?
#22 Oct 24 2008 at 2:56 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
I think the point Tote's is making here is that when the issue of the Patriot Act has come up in the past, most of us Conservatives have had the opinion that while it had some problematic aspects to it, the Act itself shouldn't be scrapped, but just amended to close the problematic loopholes with regards to protections of people's rights.

I know for a fact that I consistently stated that position regarding the Act. Yet, I also know that I was continually argued against with seemingly blind hatred for the Act itself no matter what form it took. Anyone who didn't join in by attacking the Patriot Act in its entirety was painted as a stooge of Bush. The Act itself was hung as a boat anchor around Bush's neck as well as though he wrote it personally or something.


Now. When Obama's holding essentially the same position, none of you seem to mind it. Strange, don't you think?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#23 Oct 24 2008 at 2:58 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Totem wrote:
So the "bad" parts are going to be taken out, eh, trick? Does that include everything between the words "Patriot" and "Act?" I wasn't aware that there was anything a Lefty in good standing found acceptable in such a rights trampeling travesty of a law.

That's because you act obnoxiously obtuse to try to argue these points.

I can see how it would cause you confusion.




Edited, Oct 24th 2008 6:04pm by trickybeck
#24 Oct 24 2008 at 3:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Now. When Obama's holding essentially the same position, none of you seem to mind it. Strange, don't you think?
Via the glory of Allakhazam's search engine, I can confidently state that I never expressed a blanket hatred for the Patriot Act.

Am I still allowed to vote for Obama?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#25 Oct 24 2008 at 5:30 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Now. When Obama's holding essentially the same position, none of you seem to mind it. Strange, don't you think?
Via the glory of Allakhazam's search engine, I can confidently state that I never expressed a blanket hatred for the Patriot Act.

Am I still allowed to vote for Obama?



If I say "no", will it actually affect your vote?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#26 Oct 24 2008 at 5:56 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
If I say "no", will it actually affect your vote?
Yeah, but not the state's results Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 176 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (176)