I'm not sure what to say about this, Governor Palin :: Free Realms

Quote Reply

#1 Oct 23 2008 at 11:06 AM Rating: Excellent

Samira

View User Forum

Will swallow your soul

29,360 posts

Except that I hope you will be gracious enough to say the same thing on November 5.

teh article wrote:

DENVER â€“ Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin.... expresses confidence that in spite of disheartening polls, "putting this in God's hands, that the right thing for America will be done at the end of the day on Nov. 4."

____________________________

In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#2 Oct 23 2008 at 11:10 AM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1677457099301

View User Forum

Scholar

2,064 posts

Didn't you know, God hates liberals?

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#3 Oct 23 2008 at 11:14 AM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1649636418093

View User Forum

Sage

30,646 posts

Wow.

The article wrote:

She continued: "When we hear along the rope lines that people are interceding for us and praying for us, it's our reminder to do the same, to put this all in God's hands, to seek his perfect will for this nation, and to of course seek his wisdom and guidance in putting this nation back on the right track."

Describing herself as a "hard-core pro-lifer," Palin said the birth of a son with Down syndrome was "this opportunity for me to really be walking the walk and not just talking the talk. There's purpose in this also and for a greater good to be met there."

Palin said the campaign had to have faith that its message will be heard "minus the filter of the mainstream media."

"That filter has to be erased," she said. "So we have to have faith in the wisdom of the people that they'll understand what our message is. But even bigger that then, I have to have that faith that God is going to help us get that message out there."

It's scary to me that this could be president.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#4 Oct 23 2008 at 11:14 AM Rating: Excellent

Uglysasquatch

Soulless Internet Tiger

35,474 posts

Palin wrote:

Describing herself as a "hard-core pro-lifer," Palin said the birth of a son with Down syndrome was "this opportunity for me to really be walking the walk and not just talking the talk. There's purpose in this also and for a greater good to be met there."

I'm confused. God decided to test Palin by giving her a Down syndrome child. What makes he so important that God felt testing her was more important than giving the child a normal life?

____________________________

Donate. One day it could be your family.

An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#5 Oct 23 2008 at 11:18 AM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1649636418093

View User Forum

Sage

30,646 posts

Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:

Palin wrote:

Describing herself as a "hard-core pro-lifer," Palin said the birth of a son with Down syndrome was "this opportunity for me to really be walking the walk and not just talking the talk. There's purpose in this also and for a greater good to be met there."

I'm confused. God decided to test Palin by giving her a Down syndrome child. What makes he so important that God felt testing her was more important than giving the child a normal life?

Do not question god's will you heathen!!!!

Don't worry, Ugly, I'll pray for you.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#6 Oct 23 2008 at 11:20 AM Rating: Excellent

Jophiel

View User Forum

Liberal Conspiracy

TILT

Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:

God decided to test Palin by giving her a Down syndrome child. What makes he so important that God felt testing her was more important than giving the child a normal life?

Knowing the risks of starting a long and tedious religion thread, do you really want an answer for that?

____________________________

Belkira wrote:

Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#7 Oct 23 2008 at 11:23 AM Rating: Good

Guenny

Sage

4,042 posts

shadomen wrote:

Didn't you know, God hates liberals and black people?

We're screwed.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#8 Oct 23 2008 at 11:27 AM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1649636418093

View User Forum

Sage

30,646 posts

Jophiel wrote:

Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:

God decided to test Palin by giving her a Down syndrome child. What makes he so important that God felt testing her was more important than giving the child a normal life?

Knowing the risks of starting a long and tedious religion thread, do you really want an answer for that?

No worries, Joph, I took care of it. I called him a heathen for questioning god like the good prayer warrior I am.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#9 Oct 23 2008 at 11:27 AM Rating: Good

Uglysasquatch

Soulless Internet Tiger

35,474 posts

Jophiel wrote:

Knowing the risks of starting a long and tedious religion thread, do you really want an answer for that?

No. It was rhetorical to be honest.

____________________________

Donate. One day it could be your family.

An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#10 Oct 23 2008 at 12:07 PM Rating: Excellent

Debalic

Prodigal Son

20,643 posts

Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:

Palin wrote:

Describing herself as a "hard-core pro-lifer," Palin said the birth of a son with Down syndrome was "this opportunity for me to really be walking the walk and not just talking the talk. There's purpose in this also and for a greater good to be met there."

I'm confused. God decided to test Palin by giving her a Down syndrome child. What makes her so important that God felt testing her was more important than giving the child a normal life?

Darwin must be rolling in his grave. Palin should have eaten that poor damaged thing as soon as it came out.

____________________________

publiusvarus wrote:

we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#11 Oct 23 2008 at 12:11 PM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1593375017434

Sage

1,596 posts

So is it safe to say that someone could just sharpie out that whole "Separation of Church and State" thing without anyone in the government caring?

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#12 Oct 23 2008 at 2:17 PM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1680481127345

View User Forum

Sage

21,262 posts

That is, in a nutshell, why she rallied the base.

Because the evangelical base, the 23% that still approve of Bush, is made of religious whackjobs.

Any time a preacher at the local uni says "This book teaches you everything you need to know!" I always shout out, "What's the square root of 188 and at what point does ATP enter into the Krebb's Cycle? I got two quizzes today!"

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#13 Oct 23 2008 at 3:28 PM Rating: Excellent

trickybeck

Tracer Bullet

12,636 posts

catwho, pet mage of Jabober wrote:

Any time a preacher at the local uni says "This book teaches you everything you need to know!" I always shout out, "What's the square root of 188 and at what point does ATP enter into the Krebb's Cycle? I got two quizzes today!"

You shouldn't be so irrational if you're trying to argue with a preacher.

Edited, Oct 23rd 2008 6:29pm by trickybeck

▲ Page top

#14 REDACTED, Posted: Oct 23 2008 at 11:01 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Darwin must be rolling in his grave. Palin should have eaten that poor damaged thing as soon as it came out.

Quote Reply

#15 Oct 23 2008 at 11:16 PM Rating: Excellent

Timelordwho

View User Forum

Unplanned

13,240 posts

I hope they are too busy praying that they forget to vote.

Quote:

Darwin is dead: 600 scientist from around the world signed a petition asking that dwarin theories be removed from our school. His theory of evolution is not supported by fossil records or any known laws of physics. There is zero evidence to back up his theory.In fact, Darwin himself stated that unless there were trillions of other galaxies out there, his theory was flawed.

Ahahaha No.

Quote:

[What exactly is a religious whackjob?
In a country who claims an 85% christian population, 12% believing in God but not Christ, 3% of atheist, one can make a case that it is the 3% that are whacko

Protip: It is not what religion or lack of one that makes them a nutjob. The religion is just a focus for their idiocy.

Edited, Oct 24th 2008 3:17am by Timelordwho

____________________________

Just as Planned.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#16 Oct 23 2008 at 11:41 PM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1592265474954

Scholar

2,293 posts

vanelr wrote:

600 scientist from around the world signed a petition asking that dwarin theories be removed from our school. His theory of evolution is not supported by fossil records or any known laws of physics

This made me lol at work, made my morning, thank you.

vanelr wrote:

What exactly is a religious whackjob?

You, unless youre trolling, i hope not, much less funny.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#17 Oct 23 2008 at 11:45 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1716164190383

View User Forum

Sage

19,999 posts

vanelr wrote:

What exactly is a religious whackjob?
In a country who claims an 85% christian population, 12% believing in God but not Christ, 3% of atheist, one can make a case that it is the 3% that are whacko?

More likely the ~1.2% that believes the Bible is literal truth (the world is 6000 years old, humanity is the result of incest [remember, if we're taking the Bible as literal truth, Eve is genetically the same as Adam due to being made from his rib, therefore it's clone-incest], etc.).

Note: the 1.2% figure is entirely made up, but it feels roughly correct, give or take about half - so between, roughly, 2 and 5 million people.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#18 Oct 23 2008 at 11:51 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1624234683084

Sage

2,824 posts

Quote:

\ His theory of evolution is not supported by fossil records or any known laws of physics. There is zero evidence to back up his theory.In fact, Darwin himself stated that unless there were trillions of other galaxies out there, his theory was flawed.

Wow. I knew physicists were working on a grand unified theory but I had no idea they were also trying to incorporate evolution into relativity and quantum physics.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#19 Oct 24 2008 at 12:00 AM Rating: Excellent

Danalog

Code Monkey

7,476 posts

Remember, EARTH HAS 4 CORNER SIMULTANEOUS 4-DAY TIME CUBE IN ONLY 24 HOUR ROTATION. 4 Corner TIME, CUBES EARTH.
We, (Mom, Dad & Me), Gene Ray Possess Harmonic Cubic Wisdom that transcends and contradicts the Bibical 1st Day - Genesis 1.5 - when the greatest math & scientific scam of all human existence was deified. Claim of single 1st Day composed of Day, Night, Morning & Evening was a Lie, as they were Static points as 4 corners and did not rotate as Time motion. Instead each of the 4 quadrant Times represented a single and separate 24 hour Day rotation within a common 24 hour rotation of Earth. You would be wiser if unschooled then be taught ONEness stupidity to worship Evil of ONEism, contradicted by Opposite Creation. Religion is Organize Crime to collect $Tithes.

____________________________

Do what now?

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#20 Oct 24 2008 at 12:02 AM Rating: Excellent

Timelordwho

View User Forum

Unplanned

13,240 posts

Time cube isn't just an idea, It's a way of life.

____________________________

Just as Planned.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#21 Oct 24 2008 at 12:20 AM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1716164190383

View User Forum

Sage

19,999 posts

Timelordwho wrote:

Time cube isn't just an idea, It's a way of life.

"Timecube vs. the Flat Earth Society" would make for an interesting Internet argument.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#22 Oct 24 2008 at 1:30 AM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1670199487804

Scholar

8,619 posts

Quote:

Darwin himself stated that unless there were trillions of other galaxies out there, his theory was flawed.

Well last time I looked ...

Quote:

The Rebirth of Cosmology. New York: Knopf, 1976: "The latest estimates have ranged anywhere from ten billion to one hundred billion galaxies."

I'm almost certain that 100 billion is a trillion, guess he was right.

Quote:

What is the total number of galaxies in the universe? Sagan assumed 100 billion. Is that still valid? Recently the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) surveyed, to the faintest levels yet detected, a small area of sky. Extrapolating from the number of galaxies detected by HST to that expected over the whole sky, I calculate 130 billion galaxies, slightly larger than Sagans estimate. Then the number of stars in the universe is 400 billion x 130 billion, or about 50,000 billion billion. A billion billion. That's 1,000,000,000,000,000,000.

God sure must be busy...

Edited, Oct 24th 2008 5:33am by tarv

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#23 Oct 24 2008 at 1:43 AM Rating: Excellent

Timelordwho

View User Forum

Unplanned

13,240 posts

Quote:

I'm almost certain that 100 billion is a trillion, guess he was right.

1000 billion is a trillion, in the same way 1000 thousand is a million, not 100 thousand.

____________________________