Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Al-Qaeda endorses McCainFollow

#1 Oct 22 2008 at 8:13 AM Rating: Default
**
559 posts
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081022/ap_on_el_pr/al_qaida_us_election_2

This is a surprise I figured they would endorse their fellow MUSLIM TERRORIST Obama.

There is a special place in hell for jihadists who don't support other jihadists.
#2 Oct 22 2008 at 8:19 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
soulshaver wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081022/ap_on_el_pr/al_qaida_us_election_2

This is a surprise I figured they would endorse their fellow MUSLIM TERRORIST Obama.

There is a special place in hell for jihadists who don't support other jihadists.
You really are a simple creature. Smiley: oyvey
#3 Oct 22 2008 at 8:19 AM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
To be fair, you missed an important step: they said they want to plot an attack prior to the election, in order to swing the public feeling toward fear and thus a McCain victory, which would in turn result in a prolonged war in the Middle East, increased anger from Muslims and Arabs, and eventually result in the downfall of the US.

Strangely enough, I think they're exactly right in how that would pan out. Odd, though, considering another attack pre-election would be the second attack a Republican president had allowed on foreign soil in the last 8 years.

Well, fingers crossed it doesn't happen!
#4 Oct 22 2008 at 8:24 AM Rating: Good
So much for "Al-Qaeda would love nothing more than an Obama victory."

Apparently not.
#5 Oct 22 2008 at 8:30 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
It's amazing what you can learn by reading other threads.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#6 Oct 22 2008 at 8:31 AM Rating: Default
**
559 posts
Quote:
You really are a simple creature.


What's really sad is that people take some of my posts on these boards seriously because there are actually people out there who believe that Obama is a MUSLIM TERRORIST. LOLSAD
#7 Oct 22 2008 at 8:31 AM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
catwho, pet mage of Jabober wrote:
So much for "Al-Qaeda would love nothing more than an Obama victory."

Apparently not.


Didn't you see that episode of South Park? Where the rich black people moved in, and the KKK wanted to stop them. But everyone hated the KKK, so in order to get what they wanted, they had to say the opposite of what they wanted so everyone would vote against them.

It's reverse psychology, or something.

Al-Qaeda really wants Obama, but they can't endorse him since it would be bad for the campaign. So they will endorse the opposite so that everyone will vote against them and who they really want to win will be elected.

It's so simple. Smiley: tinfoilhat
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#8 Oct 22 2008 at 8:32 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
soulshaver wrote:
Quote:
You really are a simple creature.


What's really sad is that people take some of my posts on these boards seriously because there are actually people out there who believe that Obama is a MUSLIM TERRORIST. LOLSAD
Sorry, its easy to confuse sarcasm for some of the actual stupidity on the intarwebs.
#9 Oct 22 2008 at 8:34 AM Rating: Good
**
559 posts
Quote:
Sorry, its easy to confuse sarcasm for some of the actual stupidity on the intarwebs.


Knowing the intarwebs, I bring this on myself.
#10 Oct 22 2008 at 8:35 AM Rating: Decent
**
559 posts
Quote:
Didn't you see that episode of South Park? Where the rich black people moved in, and the KKK wanted to stop them. But everyone hated the KKK, so in order to get what they wanted, they had to say the opposite of what they wanted so everyone would vote against them.

It's reverse psychology, or something.

Al-Qaeda really wants Obama, but they can't endorse him since it would be bad for the campaign. So they will endorse the opposite so that everyone will vote against them and who they really want to win will be elected.


You just totally legitimated my worldview.
#11 Oct 22 2008 at 8:46 AM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
soulshaver wrote:
Quote:
Didn't you see that episode of South Park? Where the rich black people moved in, and the KKK wanted to stop them. But everyone hated the KKK, so in order to get what they wanted, they had to say the opposite of what they wanted so everyone would vote against them.

It's reverse psychology, or something.

Al-Qaeda really wants Obama, but they can't endorse him since it would be bad for the campaign. So they will endorse the opposite so that everyone will vote against them and who they really want to win will be elected.


You just totally legitimated my worldview.


I thought it would be a good laugh :(
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#12 Oct 22 2008 at 9:04 AM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
soulshaver wrote:
Quote:
Didn't you see that episode of South Park? Where the rich black people moved in, and the KKK wanted to stop them. But everyone hated the KKK, so in order to get what they wanted, they had to say the opposite of what they wanted so everyone would vote against them.

It's reverse psychology, or something.

Al-Qaeda really wants Obama, but they can't endorse him since it would be bad for the campaign. So they will endorse the opposite so that everyone will vote against them and who they really want to win will be elected.

You just totally legitimated my worldview.

I've always said that South Park is the most legitimate and relevant show on TV.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#13 Oct 22 2008 at 11:05 AM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Debalic wrote:
soulshaver wrote:
Quote:
Didn't you see that episode of South Park? Where the rich black people moved in, and the KKK wanted to stop them. But everyone hated the KKK, so in order to get what they wanted, they had to say the opposite of what they wanted so everyone would vote against them.

It's reverse psychology, or something.

Al-Qaeda really wants Obama, but they can't endorse him since it would be bad for the campaign. So they will endorse the opposite so that everyone will vote against them and who they really want to win will be elected.

You just totally legitimated my worldview.

I've always said that South Park is the most legitimate and relevant show on TV.

Smiley: thumbsup
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#14 Oct 22 2008 at 12:02 PM Rating: Decent
you can argue reverse logic here.

but it would fly in the face of the fact that our republican addministraition has not only increasd the size of al queda, but its resources and its respect through out the middle east. war is good for radicals.

i believe they were sincere.
#16 Oct 22 2008 at 12:27 PM Rating: Good
knoxsouthy wrote:
Liberal idiots,

Which political party do you think radical muslims would prefer in power?

LOL...we both know you know the answer.
The Libertarians, actually.

Because then they could pretty much get away with whatever they wanted without government interference.

The problem with having Democrats in power, in their eyes, would be the ridiculous continued insistence that the Buddhists, the Bahai, and such also have influence.
#17 Oct 22 2008 at 12:53 PM Rating: Excellent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
knoxsouthy wrote:
Liberal idiots,

Which political party do you think radical muslims would prefer in power?

LOL...we both know you know the answer.

The GOP. Because you warmongering idiots are the ones providing the cause for the continued existence of terrorism. It's the perfect recruitment policy.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#19 Oct 22 2008 at 1:01 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,395 posts
Quote:
It's sad you think being nice to people who want to destroy your entire civilization is somehow going to accomplish anything.



For the record, at least half the people who want to destroy it now didn't want to 10 years ago. Yes, there were those who wanted to destroy our entire civilisation before that, but that number has gone up exponentially for every year that the war continues.
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#21 Oct 22 2008 at 1:14 PM Rating: Excellent
****
9,395 posts
No they didn't. (insert random Iraqi civilian's name here) didn't want to destroy America in 1998. But then in 03' his house gets bombed while he was at work and his family was killed. Now wouldn't you be angry at those responsible if you were in his shoes.

Also, I'm not advocating violence against America, I'm just saying that people, even in countries like what Iraq was before the war, don't just hate something because their government tells them to.
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#22 Oct 22 2008 at 1:16 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
knoxsouthy wrote:
Debo,

Quote:
Because you warmongering idiots are the ones providing the cause for the continued existence of terrorism.

LMAO...you have completely lost it. I'm already signing you up for a therapist to console you when obama looses.

It's sad you think being nice to people who want to destroy your entire civilization is somehow going to accomplish anything.

Lost what? It's widely known that the root cause of middle eastern terrorism is the support of Israel's defense of their arbitrarily-assigned nation, as well as western societal and moral values encroaching upon tribal civilizations.

If we stopped forcing 20th century western philosophy upon these simple folk, they wouldn't resent us so much.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#24 Oct 22 2008 at 1:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Better that, than a craven who wishes his own country be attacked.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#25 Oct 22 2008 at 3:08 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
shadowrelm wrote:
you can argue reverse logic here.

but it would fly in the face of the fact that our republican addministraition has not only increasd the size of al queda, but its resources and its respect through out the middle east. war is good for radicals.

i believe they were sincere.


But all I said was merely a joke. I don't think you can use South Park as a legitimate reference. (Though, a few of their episodes were pretty good satire).
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 200 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (200)