Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Way to be biased Media!Follow

#27 Oct 20 2008 at 12:59 PM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Samira wrote:
journalistic types are all about brevity of style.
You listening gbaji??

Smiley: lolSmiley: laughSmiley: lol
Smiley: laughSmiley: lolSmiley: laugh
Smiley: lolSmiley: laughSmiley: lol
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#28 Oct 20 2008 at 1:46 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
gbaji wrote:
[quote=trickybeck]
Obama is not leading 3-1 in the polls though, meaning that those in the field of journalism are significantly "out of touch" politically with the people they write for. What that means is debatable of course...


They're just ahead of the curve.
#29 Oct 20 2008 at 1:50 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Obama leads in endorsements and spending....hmm...smells like....

LIBERAL CONSPIRACY!
#30 Oct 20 2008 at 2:40 PM Rating: Good
Samira wrote:
calindc wrote:
Samira wrote:
So, you just have no idea how newspaper endorsements work. We get it.



Apparently not.

Enlighten please.


Scroll up. The editorial staff will put their little heads together and come up with an endorsement (or occasionally if there's no consensus they'll do a Point/Counterpoint type split endorsement), which the managing editor typically writes.

It's on the Op/Ed page, because that's where it belongs. Nevertheless the paper itself is said to have endorsed the candidate because journalistic types are all about brevity of style.



I get it, but I still do not agree with it. I do understand and respect your opinion, though.

Thank you

--Cal
#31 Oct 20 2008 at 3:15 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,755 posts
calindc wrote:
Samira wrote:
calindc wrote:
Samira wrote:
So, you just have no idea how newspaper endorsements work. We get it.



Apparently not.

Enlighten please.


Scroll up. The editorial staff will put their little heads together and come up with an endorsement (or occasionally if there's no consensus they'll do a Point/Counterpoint type split endorsement), which the managing editor typically writes.

It's on the Op/Ed page, because that's where it belongs. Nevertheless the paper itself is said to have endorsed the candidate because journalistic types are all about brevity of style.



I get it, but I still do not agree with it. I do understand and respect your opinion, though.

Thank you

--Cal


GTFO you ******.
#32 Oct 20 2008 at 4:16 PM Rating: Default
NephthysWanderer wrote:
calindc wrote:
Samira wrote:
calindc wrote:
Samira wrote:
So, you just have no idea how newspaper endorsements work. We get it.



Apparently not.

Enlighten please.


Scroll up. The editorial staff will put their little heads together and come up with an endorsement (or occasionally if there's no consensus they'll do a Point/Counterpoint type split endorsement), which the managing editor typically writes.

It's on the Op/Ed page, because that's where it belongs. Nevertheless the paper itself is said to have endorsed the candidate because journalistic types are all about brevity of style.



I get it, but I still do not agree with it. I do understand and respect your opinion, though.

Thank you

--Cal


GTFO you ******.


NephthysWanderer
Is Nice


irony is ironic
#33 Oct 20 2008 at 4:28 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
calindc wrote:
NephthysWanderer
Is Nice


irony is ironic


Na, if he wasn't nice he woulda just called you a *****.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#34 Oct 20 2008 at 4:32 PM Rating: Good
**
559 posts
This is an unbiased breakdown of the Presidential candidates if you are looking:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_1xQeOPE9ePU/SPyrFSxsAhI/AAAAAAAACuw/atWjbianB50/s1600-h/obama+sign+in+iowa.jpg

#35 Oct 20 2008 at 5:15 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
calindc wrote:
NephthysWanderer wrote:
GTFO you ******.


NephthysWanderer
Is Nice


irony is ironic
Nepthys and the admins will be gratified you noticed their little joke.
#36 Oct 20 2008 at 7:24 PM Rating: Decent
TirithRR wrote:
calindc wrote:
NephthysWanderer
Is Nice


irony is ironic


Na, if he wasn't nice he woulda just called you a @#%^.


He can call me whatever he likes to. I do not tend to be rattled by an internet forumn, no matter how well versed their contibuters might be.

I rated him up anyways, just as I have you.

Enjoy your evening

--Cal
#37 Oct 21 2008 at 6:24 AM Rating: Good
In other OMG Biased Mainstream Media news, Michele Bachmann keeps digging herself deeper, and blames Chris Matthews for "distorting" what she said "as he's paid so well to do." Now she says, "I never said all liberals were anti-American."

(Totem and gbhaji would disagree likely.)

Poor Bachmann does not realize this is the YouTube era of politics, where everyone on the Internets can watch the entire interview over and over again and come to their own conclusions. Who needs media to spin and distort when the entire truth is available to see?
#38 Oct 21 2008 at 6:33 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
catwho, pet mage of Jabober wrote:
Now she says, "I never said all liberals were anti-American."
That's true. Unfortunately, it's also not what made people say "WTF??"

It was her charging that we need media investigations into anti-American behavior from members of Congress which made people say "WTF?"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#39 Oct 21 2008 at 6:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Jophiel wrote:
catwho, pet mage of Jabober wrote:
Now she says, "I never said all liberals were anti-American."
That's true. Unfortunately, it's also not what made people say "WTF??"

It was her charging that we need media investigations into anti-American behavior from members of Congress which made people say "WTF?"


Sweet, I missed the first rounds of McCarthyism, I call dibbs on being the first to get blacklisted!
#41 Oct 21 2008 at 8:03 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Note that Varrus tries to change the subject away from the insanity which is Michele Bachmann Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#42 Oct 21 2008 at 8:08 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
The media did focus on that, and (obviously) so did the McCain campaign.

But here's the thing: I agree with the statement as it stands in context:

the exchange as linked on some blog wrote:
"Well," said Obama, "here's a way of thinking about it. How long have been a plumber?"

Wurzelbacher said 15 years.

Obama says, “Over the last 15 years, when you weren’t making 250, you would have been given a tax cut from me, so you’d actually have more money, which means you would have saved more, which means you would have gotten to the point where you could build your small business quicker than under the current tax code. So there are two ways of looking at it – I mean one way of looking at it is, now that you’ve become more successful through hard work – you don’t want to be taxed as much.”

“Exactly," Wurzelbacher said.

Obama continued, “But another way of looking at it is 95% of folks who are making less than 250, they may be working hard too, but they’re being taxed at a higher rate than they would be under mine. So what I’m doing is, put yourself back 10 years ago when you were only making whatever, 60 or 70. Under my tax plan you would be keeping more of your paycheck, you’d be paying lower taxes, which means you would have saved…Now look, nobody likes high taxes."

"No," said Wurzelbacher.

"Of course not," said Obama. "But what’s happened is that we end up – we’ve cut taxes a lot for folks like me who make a lot more than 250. We haven’t given a break to folks who make less, and as a consequence, the average wage and income for ordinary folks, the vast majority of Americans, has actually gone down over the last eight years. So all I want to do is – I’ve got a tax cut. The only thing that changes, is I’m gonna cut taxes a little bit more for the folks who are most in need and for the 5% of the folks who are doing very well - even though they’ve been working hard and I appreciate that – I just want to make sure they’re paying a little bit more in order to pay for those other tax cuts. Now, I respect the disagreement. I just want you to be clear – it’s not that I want to punish your success – I just want to make sure that everybody who is behind you – that they’ve got a chance at success too.”

Wurzelbacher said it seemed as though Obama might support a flat tax.

Obama says, “you know, I would be open to it except here’s the problem with a flat tax is that if you actually put a flat tax together, in order for it to work and replace all the revenue that we’ve got, you’d probably end up having to make it like about a 40% sales tax. I mean that’s the value added, making it up. Now some people say 23 or 25, but in truth when you add up all the revenue that would need to be raised, you’d have to slap on a whole bunch of sales taxes on. And I do believe for folks like me who have worked hard, but frankly also been lucky, I don’t mind paying just a little bit more than the waitress that I just met over there who’s things are slow and she can barely make the rent."

Obama said, "My attitude is that if the economy’s good for folks from the bottom up, it’s gonna be good for everybody. If you’ve got a plumbing business, you’re gonna be better off if you’re gonna be better off if you’ve got a whole bunch of customers who can afford to hire you, and right now everybody’s so pinched that business is bad for everybody and I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody."


____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#44 Oct 21 2008 at 8:12 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
knoxsouthy wrote:
Who?
Read the thread. And buy a newspaper.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#45 Oct 21 2008 at 8:16 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
We should set up a collection to deliver the news to Varus. The collection isn't so much to buy him the newspaper but more so for the literacy so he can read it.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#46 Oct 21 2008 at 8:16 AM Rating: Good
knoxsouthy wrote:
Jophed,

Who?

It's not like this is news that 90% of the media is liberal and push their particular brand of socialism on everyone, all presented in the most unbiased way.

As opposed to Republican-brand socialism? Smiley: laugh
#47 Oct 21 2008 at 8:21 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Mindel wrote:
As opposed to Republican-brand socialism? Smiley: laugh
That's the type where the Republican president buys up the banks and the Republican presidental nominee says we need to pay off banks for mortgages at 100% even if they're only worth 50% and have the tax-payer foot the other half so the banks don't have to take a hit, right?

Redistribution of wealth!


Upwards redistribution is still redistribution, you know...
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#48 Oct 21 2008 at 8:26 AM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
Mindel wrote:
As opposed to Republican-brand socialism? Smiley: laugh
That's the type where the Republican president buys up the banks and the Republican presidental nominee says we need to pay off banks for mortgages at 100% even if they're only worth 50% and have the tax-payer foot the other half so the banks don't have to take a hit, right?

Redistribution of wealth!


Upwards redistribution is still redistribution, you know...
The Free Market is the answer until market liquidity declines. Smiley: schooled
#49 Oct 21 2008 at 10:34 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I found someone to head up the Anti-American Congresspeople investigation!
Politico wrote:
Rep. Robin Hayes (R-N.C.), has conceded that he did tell a North Carolina crowd that "liberals hate real Americans that work and accomplish and achieve and believe in God," even though he initially denied making such a statement.

Now he says he didn’t mean it that way, and he was just trying to rev up a campaign rally.

“I genuinely did not recall making the statement and, after reading it, there is no doubt that it came out completely the wrong way. I actually was trying to work to keep the crowd as respectful as possible, so this is definitely not what I intended,” Hayes said in a statement for Politico.
Smiley: oyvey
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#51 Oct 21 2008 at 11:00 AM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
Incidentally this kind of reporting is a primary reason main news outlets are laying off people by the 100's.


I would have thought that the interwebz were the main cause of newspapers having a falling readership.

I havnt bought an newspaper for ages, proabably years.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 189 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (189)