Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Can McCain keep his own States?Follow

#27 Oct 20 2008 at 3:59 PM Rating: Decent
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
Quote:
which many economists will agree with


and I'm sure just as many disagree with. Anyone who pretends to know what is going to happen to the economy is full of shit.

Quote:
considering Obama was groomed to run for the presidency


lol Manchurian candidate. So you discount that fact that some people had read his book, maybe worked with him in the past, and someone recommended him to keynote the '04 convention?

In that case, I'd like to state that I KNOW McCain has been groomed as a candidate for years. The far right has been biding their time and found their candidate of choice in McCain years ago. Bush went against the party's wishes when he slimed McCain in the primaries so they were stuck waiting eight more years since Bush was effectively allowing them the run the country.

Now they have a president that will surely die--with or without their help--and a back-up, see fucking dumb-*** from Alaska, to take over and do whatever they tell her when he dies.

Gee, forming completely fucking retarded opinions is fun!

Edited, Oct 20th 2008 7:58pm by Paskil
#28 Oct 20 2008 at 4:02 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
AmorTonight wrote:
Obama is not, I repeat not, 100% in control.
At least as much as McCain is of his campaign. Probably considerably more so.
Quote:
We had a far far worse economic situation in the 80's when Reagan come into power and he brough us around with the same exact economic policies of today,
We had a far, far better economy in the 90's and then Bush came into power and enacted the economic policies of today. We see how well that went.

Edited, Oct 20th 2008 6:56pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#29 Oct 20 2008 at 7:29 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
McCain is pulling out of Iowa, Colorado and New Mexico. His plan now is to win in Florida, Nevada, Virginia, Ohio, North Carolina and to take Pennsylvania.

Smiley: dubious

Pennsylvania is currently Obama +12 according to RCP. Virginia is Obama +8. No mention of Missouri in McCain's master plan but he has to keep it to win and it's currently in Obama's column by three points. Nevada has Obama up by four. Ohio, Florida and N. Carolina are all the closest McCain has to a tie (all Obama +2).

So McCain needs to hold Missouri, sweep every Republican battleground state and overthrow a double digit lead in Pennsylvania. Well... good luck to him, I guess.

All that said, I'm sad to hear that McCain is leaving Iowa. He never stood a chance in hell there so I always enjoyed hearing that McCain spent another day there or dropped another half million on TV ads. I don't know which political genius told McCain to waste his resources on the state which practically launched Obama's presidental run but I want to thank that man for every dollar and day not spent in Ohio, Virginia and Florida.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#30 Oct 20 2008 at 8:28 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
The Neispace of Doom wrote:
McCain has done things which have annoyed his base.
I think it's more telling that McCain recanted from all of those things when he ran for president.


Lol. Or the Obama camp went looking through transcripts of speeches and statements made over a decade to create an apparent contrast and/or change...


Quote:
Immigration? "Hey, I wouldn't vote for my own bill today!"


False. Just plain false.

Quote:
Taxes? "Sure, I said Bush's tax cuts hurt the middle class but now I think they're great!"


He didn't say that. He said that he wanted more cuts for the middle class as well as those in the Bush tax cuts. The implication in your statement is that he believed that by lowering taxes on the "rich" it would hurt the middle class (which is today an Obama claim), but that's simply not what he said back then. He didn't like the Bush tax cuts because he wanted them to include more cuts for the middle class as well, not because he didn't think that the existing ones were good.

You're inventing a contrast that doesn't exist. Ok. Actually, you're just mindlessly parroting one that was created for you...

Quote:
Campaign finance reform? "Sure the RNC is using every loophole in the McCain-Feingold bill to buy commercials for me but who cares about 'intent' if a technicality works? Yay for the RNC!"


Both sides are Joph. Surely your not suggesting that McCain must comply with a set of rules that Obama does not comply with simply because in a perfect world everyone would? Um... Your guy already went back on his promise regarding funding when he realized he could get more doing it differently so he's hardly got the high moral ground here.

Quote:
Energy? "You know, based on the poll numbers I guess we should drill off-shore! Only off-shore drilling can save us now!"


So all positions must be absolute? Never drill no matter what? You're holding McCain to an impossible standard. A sane person would assume that McCain's reason for changing his position on drilling had to do with oil prices reaching record highs last summer. Cause that would be a sensible reason for one to do so...

Quote:
Torture? "Yeah, I think torture is horrible. But I support Bush vetoing the bill banning it!"...


Huh?

Quote:
People who think that McCain is some counter-party maverick obviously stopped paying attention in 2006. He didn't say his famous "I voted with Bush over 90% of the time" line to convince the base that he's going to buck the Republican party.


No. He said it to show that he's a conservative.

The 10% of the things that McCain didn't vote with Bush on are pretty much exactly the same 10% of things that folks like you have been bashing Bush over for the last 8 years. Yet, that's not enough for you is it?


Could you just come out and say: "I'll come up with a reason to attack any Republican candidate no matter who they are or what their exact political ideology is"? It would be much more honest and would save us all a ton of time...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#31 Oct 20 2008 at 8:56 PM Rating: Good
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
gbaji wrote:
Quote:
Immigration? "Hey, I wouldn't vote for my own bill today!"


False. Just plain false.


Are you calling John McCain a liar? HE WAS A POW AND SERVED THIS COUNTRY GODDAMNIT.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#32 Oct 20 2008 at 9:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
False. Just plain false.
True, he just weaseled around, refused to answer the question directly and then gave a description of immigration reform which ran completely counter to his original bill.
Quote:
He didn't say that. He said that he wanted more cuts for the middle class as well as those in the Bush tax cuts.
"I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us, at the expense of middle class Americans who most need tax relief."

In fact, McCain offered a Senate amendment (which failed, 49-49) to rein in the upper class cuts and instead enlarge the middle class cuts. Co-sponsored by Biden, as it turns out.
Quote:
Both sides are Joph. Surely your not suggesting that McCain must comply with a set of rules that Obama does not comply with simply because in a perfect world everyone would?
Obama didn't write the law. This was one of McCain's big signature Maverick things, wasn't it? Is your defense of McCain subverting his own law "Well, Obama did so-and-so!!!"?

I was noting that all of McCain's major "Maverick" issues are things he's backpedaled from. you can try to apologise for each instance of McCain backpedaling and try to excuse it away but it doesn't change the direction of the man's feet.
Quote:
So all positions must be absolute? Never drill no matter what? You're holding McCain to an impossible standard.
Well, no. I was holding him to the standard of not drilling in a place where he said we shouldn't drill.
Quote:
Huh?
Huh-wha???
Quote:
The 10% of the things that McCain didn't vote with Bush on are pretty much exactly the same 10% of things that folks like you have been bashing Bush over for the last 8 years. Yet, that's not enough for you is it?
Well, now that he's lockstep with Bush on them, I have less reason to be grateful Smiley: laugh
Quote:
Could you just come out and say: "I'll come up with a reason to attack any Republican candidate no matter who they are or what their exact political ideology is"?
Gee... you caught me criticizing a guy whose political positions run contrary to my own. You're such a sleuth!

Edited, Oct 20th 2008 11:56pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 202 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (202)