Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

I'm actually going to vote this yearFollow

#27 Oct 16 2008 at 7:33 AM Rating: Excellent
JPizzleofBahamut wrote:
Quote:
Well, MY comment was a pun. Bet you didn't spot that, though, did ya? You intellectual GIANT, you.


Yes, I caught the pun. I didn't think it was clever enough to suck you off, but red and belk seemed to lick (like) it......


I licked it so much that I would totally have an intellectual threesome with Samira and Belki.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#28 Oct 16 2008 at 7:34 AM Rating: Excellent
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
JPizzleofBahamut wrote:
Quote:
Well, MY comment was a pun. Bet you didn't spot that, though, did ya? You intellectual GIANT, you.


Yes, I caught the pun. I didn't think it was clever enough to suck you off, but red and belk seemed to lick (like) it......


I licked it so much that I would totally have an intellectual threesome with Samira and Belki.


I'd be interested if I wasn't afraid that Samira would slaughter me to have you all to herself.
#29 Oct 16 2008 at 7:36 AM Rating: Good
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
JPizzleofBahamut wrote:
Quote:
Well, MY comment was a pun. Bet you didn't spot that, though, did ya? You intellectual GIANT, you.


Yes, I caught the pun. I didn't think it was clever enough to suck you off, but red and belk seemed to lick (like) it......


I licked it so much that I would totally have an intellectual threesome with Samira and Belki.


I'd be interested if I wasn't afraid that Samira would slaughter me to have you all to herself.


Sharing is caring.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#30REDACTED, Posted: Oct 16 2008 at 7:42 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Polish that knob ;)
#31 Oct 16 2008 at 8:06 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Well, here's the thing about third-party candidates in the U.S. They tend to be somewhat outside the main stream - you don't see anyone who thinks he or she has a real shot at candidacy with either major party breaking away to a third party. We almost saw that with Nader. The closest in recent years was really Ross Perot.

Politicians who are outside the main stream are handicapped almost by definition. They lack funding and they lack a cohesive base of any size. They're fringe.

Fringe doesn't win elections. It can lose them for a major party candidate (thanks, Nader, you flaming jerk), but it can't win them for the fringe candidate.

The only times in U.S. history that third or even fourth party candidates have been viable have been those times when the two major parties were both in turmoil at the same time. Think Teddy Roosevelt's Bull Moose party, and the major schisms in play that allowed Lincoln to slip past Douglas.

So basically if you want a viable third party you need to break the Dems into fragments within two or three years and hope the Pubs don't pull themselves back together in the same time frame.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#32 Oct 16 2008 at 8:16 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
In the 2006 Illinois gubernatorial election, there was enough dislike for both the Democratic & Republican candidate that the Green Party candidate managed to cross the 10% mark, thus making the Green Party a bona fide Illinois political party. This means they get automatic ballot placement without the laborious signature collection process, etc.

In the 2008 Illinois presidental primary, I worked a polling station. We had ballots for Democratic candidates, Republicans and Greens. After a long day working the most active primary in recent history, I had handed out zero Green Party ballots.

If they don't make 10% again in November, I'm not sure they keep their status. They may have until the 2010 gubernatorial.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#33REDACTED, Posted: Oct 16 2008 at 8:20 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I have studied a little history. I wasn't old enough to vote, but I really liked Ross Perot's plan to pay off the national debt. I still remember the impact he had on that election. I am just wondering, is there a candidate out there who better fits what you would like to see in the oval office? Or does Barack Obama/John McCain reflect everything you could ever ask for in a president?
#34 Oct 16 2008 at 8:22 AM Rating: Good
I think the GOP is going to be broken for a long, long time.

The greatest tragedy of the Republicans is that they let themselves get sidetracked by the religious fundamentalist issues and national security panic and they lost sight of the fiscal conservatism and smaller government they were supposed to represent. There hasn't been a Republican president or candidate that actually represented the real Republican party since Reagan.

The GOP needs to do some soul searching, flush the toilet of idiots like Sarah Palin and my family out in North Dakota that own the party there (t-_-t to you cousin Gary), and in eight years re-emerge with a smaller, tighter base of true conservatives instead of all the drunkards they have under the big tent right now.

Until that happens, the Dems are going to own this country. Considering the state we're in right now, that may not be such a bad thing.

(Seriously, didn't W completely trainwreck the baseball franchise he owned for a while there? Couldn't y'all have seen that he was going to eventually do the exact same thing to the entire country?)

Edited, Oct 16th 2008 12:15pm by catwho
#35 Oct 16 2008 at 8:23 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
JPizzleofBahamut wrote:
is there a candidate out there who better fits what you would like to see in the oval office?
"Out there"? No, not really. Somewhere may be a guy who I would have liked better but he never got his message out.

I don't have any scorn for you voting for whoever you want. I even agree that breaking from the two-party system might be a good change. It's just not likely to happen soon.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#36 Oct 16 2008 at 8:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Honestly, politically HRC is my closest-to-ideal candidate. But she's a pro, and having flubbed the primary there's no way she'd break away to a third party, effectively throwing the election to McCain.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#37 Oct 16 2008 at 8:42 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Quote:

Vote '08 - Rape


So it's win/win all around?

Sorry. Rape is never funny.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#38REDACTED, Posted: Oct 16 2008 at 9:04 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I don't know, I laughed my *** off at the new South Park episode when they sue Stephen Spielberg and George Lucas for raping Indiana Jones. Other than that I can't think of any time rape is funny.
#39 Oct 16 2008 at 9:09 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
JPizzleofBahamut wrote:
I don't know, I laughed my *** off at the new South Park episode when they sue Stephen Spielberg and George Lucas for raping Indiana Jones. Other than that I can't think of any time rape is funny.
I haven't laughed my *** off at South Park in about 5 years.
#40REDACTED, Posted: Oct 16 2008 at 9:18 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I'm sorry?
#41 Oct 16 2008 at 9:20 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
JPizzleofBahamut wrote:
Quote:
I haven't laughed my *** off at South Park in about 5 years.


I'm sorry?
Oh, what I meant was that the show has become lame, and now panders to idiots who like it for the shock value. It used to be a pleasant mix of potty humor and the occasional snarky commentary.
#42 Oct 16 2008 at 9:23 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Quote:
I don't know, I laughed my *** off at the new South Park episode when they sue Stephen Spielberg and George Lucas for raping Indiana Jones. Other than that I can't think of any time rape is funny.

/Whoosh.

This shirt is a good one.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#43REDACTED, Posted: Oct 16 2008 at 9:34 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Oh.
#44 Oct 16 2008 at 12:21 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
JPizzleofBahamut wrote:
He would also reduce spending and lower taxes.
At this point, it'd almost be impossible for any presidential candidate to enter office and not lower spending.


*cough* Obama *cough*
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#45 Oct 16 2008 at 1:04 PM Rating: Good
**
559 posts
If I were voting strictly on issues I would vote for Cynthia McKinney of the Green party.

I voted for Nader in 2000 because my state wasn't contested and I was hoping to get a 3rd party federal funding, but this year he is a complete joke and only recently put up some issues on his website that he is campaigning for. He was basically just campaigning against the other candidates this year which is not very helpful when it comes to offering solutions to the many problems that face us.

I can't believe anyone is voting for Bob Barr after this economic mess. Libertarians have always been ever more persistent than Republicans about free markets and no government regulations. Do you really think that private corporations will solve all of our ecological, economic, and social problems for us? I could never understand why so many people liked Ron Paul, maybe they weren't aware that he wanted to shut down the Dept. of Education and the Dept. of Energy, among others.

If you are interested in a REAL PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE not just a corporate controlled one check it out on Sunday (CSPAN).

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/15/still-to-come-the-third-party-debate/




#46 Oct 16 2008 at 1:46 PM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
gbaji wrote:
I'm sorry. I simply don't get people who are conservatives by nature, but throw their votes away on a third party because the Republican candidate isn't conservative enough. Is he less conservative than the Democrat candidate? Cause that's who you're basically voting for when you do that...
lawl.

You don't get alot of stuff.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#47 Oct 16 2008 at 1:52 PM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
gbaji wrote:
I'm sorry. I simply don't get people who are conservatives by nature, but throw their votes away on a third party because the Republican candidate isn't conservative enough. Is he less conservative than the Democrat candidate? Cause that's who you're basically voting for when you do that...


You know, I reasonably certain you were singing an entirely different song when it was liberals considering voting for Nader in '04.

Sucks when the shoe is on the other foot, don't it?
#48 Oct 23 2008 at 5:38 AM Rating: Good
**
559 posts
I'm voting today and I finally made up my mind about who I'm going to vote for.

I've decided to go with Barack Obama over Cynthia McKinney of the Green party, and here's why:

1. I think Obama would make a better President in our current political climate, even though I disagree with many of his positions and I think he is lacking some courage. He is an intellectual genius, open-minded, a hard worker, and knows his way around Washington. They wouldn't even let McKinney in the capitol building when she was a state representative, and she would be stonewalled by any status quo powers that remained.

2. Gov. Palin.

3. John McCain.

4. Relatively speaking, and because of our current mess, I think Obama will actually turn out to be one of the best Presidents in history, and the historical perspective of future generations will confirm that. I would like to be able to say in 40-50 years that, yeah, I voted for the first non-white and one of the best Presidents in US history.

5. Michelle Obama (I'm actually voting for her.) For the first time since George Bush was elected President, I am proud of this country.

P.S. If McCain wins I am moving to Canada pronto, and so are many other folks I've spoken to, so you Canadians get ready for the invasion if this election is stolen.

Who did you cast a vote for and why?

#49 Oct 23 2008 at 5:57 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
soulshaver wrote:
If McCain wins I am moving to Canada pronto, and so are many other folks I've spoken to, so you Canadians get ready for the invasion if this election is stolen.

Who did you cast a vote for and why?

Do you realize that Canada is one of the tougher countries to immigrate to, unless you hire an immigration lawyer. Effectively, you need to have family already here (and this only means it takes 2 years instead of never) or lots of money. If you had lots of money, you wouldn't be running from McCain.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#50 Oct 23 2008 at 6:21 AM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
He could marry Bhodi, that would cover the family angle.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#51 Oct 23 2008 at 6:29 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
If you can't get into Canada, try Australia, New Zealand or England. Maybe a northern European country if you decide to challenge yourself with a new language. (Northern Europe countries have extremely high quality of life ratings).

All of those countries have politics "left" or "progressive" or "liberal" in comparison to the American Pubbies. Australia has a growth policy for immigration. It goes on a points system, if you aren't coming in as a refugee, or already have family here. For example if you know English already, that gives you points. Having a degree gets you more points. If you can land yourself a job here before you immigrate, that makes you pretty much a shoe-in, as far as I know.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 238 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (238)