knoxsouthy wrote:
lock,
Quote:
I do like the "I joined a gang to protect myself from roving gangs of gay kids" idea though :) That made me chuckle.
Since reading comprehension isn't your strong point here's what I said;
Quote:
Do you know why kids join the neo-***** and skin heads? Protection. To protect themselves from gangs of minorities.
Now follow me carefully; is there any mention of gangs of gays in my post?
I merely made the point that neo-***** and skin-heads join gangs for protection; but apparently you don't seem as concerned about their welfare.
Yeah, um, you were responding to a post about how neo-***** joined up to protect themselves from minorities, and the ONLY minorities mentioned in the topic previously were gays (well, and Metalheads, but we kind of have two separate stories going on here). You added in "minority gangs" in a topic about gays. The obvious conclusions are:
1. You meant gay gangs, because no other minority groups had been discussed.
2. You were throwing up irrelevant points. And to be fair, I did call it a strawman, so it was probably this second point :)
You're really bad at this logical debate, huh?
Also,
Varrus wrote:
Let me ask you this. If I wear an "I hate f*gs" t-shirt to a homosexual rally in san fran and get attacked by a mob of angry ****** should the constitution be re-written to protect me?
Sorry, I saw mob as synonymous with gangs here. According to Thesaurus.com, they are similar meanings: http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/mob?jss=0
See? Logical deduction. Discussion about gay students + "white kids join neo-***** for protection" + your own example IMMEDIATELY after about "mobs of ******" = you saying white kids join the neo-**** movement to protect themselves from gay gangs.
Logical!