Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Here's One For Ya, TotemFollow

#1 Oct 03 2008 at 6:58 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I know you love the "OMG Someone wrote THIS!!" threads. Well, Charles Krauthammer has just admitted that McCain's fumbled it and Obama's most likely going to be president.

Money quote:
Charles Krauthammer wrote:
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. famously said of Franklin Roosevelt that he had a "second-class intellect, but a first-class temperament." Obama has shown that he is a man of limited experience, questionable convictions, deeply troubling associations (Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Tony Rezko) and an alarming lack of self- definition -- do you really know who he is and what he believes? Nonetheless, he's got both a first-class intellect and a first-class temperament. That will likely be enough to make him president.
Obviously not a ringing endorsement of Obama (not that I agree with Chuck) but rather an admission of reality.

I never thought I'd see Krauthammer throw in the towel, but there you have it.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#2 Oct 03 2008 at 7:13 AM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
I know you love the "OMG Someone wrote THIS!!" threads. Well, Charles Krauthammer has just admitted that McCain's fumbled it and Obama's most likely going to be president.

Money quote:
Charles Krauthammer wrote:
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. famously said of Franklin Roosevelt that he had a "second-class intellect, but a first-class temperament." Obama has shown that he is a man of limited experience, questionable convictions, deeply troubling associations (Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Tony Rezko) and an alarming lack of self- definition -- do you really know who he is and what he believes? Nonetheless, he's got both a first-class intellect and a first-class temperament. That will likely be enough to make him president.
Obviously not a ringing endorsement of Obama (not that I agree with Chuck) but rather an admission of reality.

I never thought I'd see Krauthammer throw in the towel, but there you have it.


Well, after last night when he recognized that most of America realized we could be only a "heart beat away" from her as president. Yeah, it's time to focus on 2010/2012.
#3 Oct 03 2008 at 1:55 PM Rating: Decent
*****
16,160 posts
Hmm, interesting article, Jo. The description of Obama is spot on though. It amazes me that nobody on the Dem side seems concerned or even bothered by his close association with Ayers. It's as if you could hang out with Timothy McVeigh, go out for beers and such, but no one bats an eye. Community organization and subsequent good deeds don't erase a life of domestic terrorism in my book. I imagine you could find plenty of "nice" things McVeigh did for others when he wasn't blowing up OKC federal buildings in his spare time as well.

I guess you get a pass on poor judgement if you use it early enough.

Ultimately, more than any other thing, which includes his association and apparent fascination with individuals connected with the Communist Party, black liberation theology, and shady real estate dealings, is this blithe attitude towards Ayers' past.

Yet none of you Obama supporters appearr to be the least bit bothered by this. Care to explain?

Totem
#4 Oct 03 2008 at 1:59 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
More like having served on a zoning commission with Timothy McVeigh.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#5 Oct 03 2008 at 2:22 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Totem wrote:
Yet none of you Obama supporters appearr to be the least bit bothered by this. Care to explain?
Have anything other than guilt by association for me to explain?

Or, for that matter, some sort of evidence of a "close association"? I mean Kurtz wrote about his "findings" in those oh-so-damning UIC records a week or two ago. Did you read it? He sounded like Geraldo Rivera at Al Capone's vault as Kurtz tried to make a story out of three or four unexciting sentences and justify the buzz he created. Embarassing for him but, when you try to make much out of nothing, you still wind up with a lot of nothing.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#6 Oct 03 2008 at 2:24 PM Rating: Default
*****
16,160 posts
Ok, for the sake of discussion, I'll agree with you, Sammy. I'd still object if anybody I knew had any dealings with McVeigh, zoning commission or poker buddies, when it is common knowledge and undeniable fact what he did. Ayers is no different except in the sheer scale, but not for a lack of desire or effort.

Seriously, this is the solitary issue that sticks in my craw about Obama. Everything else is just window dressing. The man has accepted the company of a proud self-confessed domestic terrorist. This is simply unacceptable to me as an American.

Totem
#7 Oct 03 2008 at 2:29 PM Rating: Default
*****
16,160 posts
So Jophiel, to be clear, you are not convinced Obama has had any dealings with William Ayers, publically, personally, or political, certainly nothing which tells you he is wrong for having made his acquantance. Is that what you are saying? And you are saying I am making spurious accusations against Obama for having nothing more than a passing association with Ayers?

Is this correct?

Totem
#8 Oct 03 2008 at 2:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Totem wrote:
Ayers is no different except in the sheer scale, but not for a lack of desire or effort.
That doesn't even make sense. If Ayers had the same "effort and desire" as McVeigh, why would his scale be so much smaller?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#9 Oct 03 2008 at 2:32 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Totem wrote:
you are not convinced Obama has had any dealings with William Ayers, publically, personally, or political, certainly nothing which tells you he is wrong for having made his acquantance.
No associations which worry me, no. I guess I missed the day in health class when they taught that 1960's radicalism was a communicable disease from casual contact.
Quote:
And you are saying I am making spurious accusations against Obama for having nothing more than a passing association with Ayers?
I'm asking what your basis is for declaring it to be a "close association". Maybe you have solid evidence. Maybe we have widely different definitions of "close association". Your future posts will help me solve this riddle.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#10 Oct 03 2008 at 2:39 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Totem wrote:
Ok, for the sake of discussion, I'll agree with you, Sammy. I'd still object if anybody I knew had any dealings with McVeigh, zoning commission or poker buddies, when it is common knowledge and undeniable fact what he did.


So everyone who has ever associated with McVeigh is unfit for office? Is that really where you want to take this?

Everyone who has ever associated with any felon, then. Given a broad enough definition of terrorism you could include pretty much every ex-con.

Bear in mind that the Weathermen never killed anyone except themselves. You're equating that with a mass murderer.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#11 Oct 03 2008 at 2:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Samira wrote:
Bear in mind that the Weathermen never killed anyone except themselves.
So, technically, they've killed terrorists.

Ayers is an American hero!!! Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#12 Oct 03 2008 at 2:46 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Samira wrote:
Bear in mind that the Weathermen never killed anyone except themselves.
So, technically, they've killed terrorists.

Ayers is an American hero!!! Smiley: laugh


Well, in a Barney Fife sort of way, sure.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#13 Oct 03 2008 at 2:51 PM Rating: Default
*****
16,160 posts
Nice pithy sidestep of what is a very simple question of judgement, Jophiel. I submit to you that regardless of the closeness of a friendship or casual contact between two people interested in the same political goals, even having a passing connection with a man who dedicated his younger years to the death of policemen and soldiers is beyond the pale-- especially considering Ayers only regret about his actions and beliefs is that he didn't kill enough people while doing what he did.

Is that clear enough to you about the desire and scale of Ayers' stated goals?

Let me put it this way. We differ in world view and certainly political outlook. I can and do respect you regardless of these differences. However, were I to find out you were engaged in or associated with a domestic terrorism of either the Ayers or McVeigh variety, I wouldn't **** on you if you were on fire.

There is acceptable methods of civil disagreement and protest, but killing, bombing, and threatening policemen and soldiers, and civic and government buildings is absolutely not one of them. There is no excuse for having anything to do with William Ayers. Period.

Totem

Edit for clarity: Ayers did not kill anybody beyond his involvement as the leader of a domestic terrorism organization, through which the use of explosives killed his own people, but the intent to kill and subsequent death of radicals in the Weathermen is in my eyes the same a if he had detonated the device himself. Explaining away his actions as political belief put into motion is a smoke screen for excusing his own behavior.

Edited, Oct 3rd 2008 6:56pm by Totem
#14REDACTED, Posted: Oct 03 2008 at 2:55 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) "So everyone who has ever associated with McVeigh is unfit for office?" --Sammy
#15 Oct 03 2008 at 2:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
who dedicated his younger years to the death of policemen and soldiers


Whom did he kill? What building did they ever bomb (and no, I don't condone destruction of property) without giving adequate warning in time for full evacuation of same?

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#16 Oct 03 2008 at 3:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Totem wrote:
I submit to you that regardless of the closeness of a friendship or casual contact between two people interested in the same political goals, even having a passing connection...
I see we're rapidly lowering the bar from "close association" here. Should I take it that your previous assertation of that "closeness" was without merit?
Quote:
There is no excuse for having anything to do with William Ayers. Period.
Not much point in discussing it then, now is there? Almost makes one wonder why you'd ask about it.

Personally, I think his contact with Ayers was pretty minimal (as both claim) and that the context of those meetings (working on education reform, a field in which Ayers was well known before Obama became involved) was benign enough that it doesn't concern me. The big "Gotcha" of the UIC records turned out to be absolutely nothing which only serves to further show, in my mind, that there's nothing there that I give a shit about. If you feel that merely nodding as you pass Ayers in the grocery store disqualifies you then that's your choice. But it's not very compelling to me and I've yet to hear anything which concerns me.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#17REDACTED, Posted: Oct 03 2008 at 3:05 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Nice dodge again, Jo. Passing someone in a grocery store and working together politically aren't quite the same, are they? But please, continue with your justifications and obsfucations.
#18 Oct 03 2008 at 3:05 PM Rating: Excellent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
If they knew what McVeigh had done, absolutely. Obama knows-- or I should hope he knows --what Ayers is guilty of doing.
That makes no sence at all, just because you know a guy doesn't mean you share his views, doesn't mean you agree with him and doesn't mean you are influenced by him.

In fact you could more convincingly argue that you are more likely to hate fanatasism, having actually talked to a fanatic, be more convinced that you do not agree with him and be more sure that you would do anything to stop him.
#19 Oct 03 2008 at 3:07 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Totem wrote:
beyond stating he wished he had killed more people.
He never said that. His "I wish we had done more" remark was him saying that he wished they had done more, in general terms, to stop the Vietnam War.
Ayers wrote:
It's impossible to get to be my age and not have plenty of regrets. The one thing I don't regret is opposing the war in Vietnam with every ounce of my being.

During the Vietnam war, the Weather Underground took credit for bombing several government installations as a dramatic form of armed propaganda. Action was taken against symbolic targets in order to declare a state of emergency. But warnings were always called in, and by design no one was ever hurt.

When I say, "We didn't do enough," a lot of people rush to think, "That must mean, 'We didn't bomb enough shit.'"' But that's not the point at all. It's not a tactical statement, it's an obvious political and ethical statement. In this context, 'we' means 'everyone.'

The war in Vietnam was not only illegal, it was profoundly immoral, millions of people were needlessly killed. Even though I worked hard to end the war, I feel to this day that I didn't do enough because the war dragged on for years after the majority of the American people came to oppose it. I don't think violent resistance is necessarily the answer, but I do think opposition and refusal is imperative.
I'm not defending what he did do but you're parroting a mistaken view about what he thinks today.

And you can scoff and say "He's just saying that!!" but you're also the one taking his "We didn't do enough" quote as gospel. I wouldn't want to accuse you of cherry-picking which quotes you use.

Edited, Oct 3rd 2008 6:04pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#20 Oct 03 2008 at 3:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Totem wrote:
Nice dodge again, Jo. Passing someone in a grocery store and working together politically aren't quite the same, are they? But please, continue with your justifications and obsfucations.
I asked you to define what level of association damns someone. So far you haven't done so. For that matter, I've expressly said why I don't care -- because so far I heavn't heard a legitimate case for why I should care. I offered you the chance to make one and you simply fell back on "This is how it is, period!"

But keep accusing me of dodging Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#21 Oct 03 2008 at 4:33 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
I asked you to define what level of association damns someone.


Living with Communists for 5+years. Smiley: schooled
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#22 Oct 03 2008 at 9:10 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
Totem wrote:
Seriously, this is the solitary issue that sticks in my craw about Obama. Everything else is just window dressing. The man has accepted the company of a proud self-confessed domestic terrorist. This is simply unacceptable to me as an American.


Totem, I'm looking right now at a picture of Eisenhower shaking hands with Francisco Franco. Immediately above it is a picture of Franco and Hitler marching side-by-side.

When do you expect your leaders to "accept the company" of fascists and murderers? Before or after you've voted them into office?
#23 Oct 03 2008 at 9:30 PM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Ah sh*t, my boss and my colleagues knows people from the Weather Underground. Eh, if you work with enough people in social justice work, you'll hit a few with radical pasts. Generally it means almost nothing and certainly not an endorsement of their past. Given Obama's age and history, it is highly likely that he never really delved into Ayer's radical past. Eh, he got caught in 1981? Obama knew him afterwards, years after the entire group disbanded? The guy served his time and hasn't done sh*t since that time. Much like the various extremists on the right, you know, you let them move on eventually. This is a reach, as usual, rather than focusing on Obama the leader, it's all this peripheral sh*t that means nothing.

He's a university professor. He does anti-poverty stuff. That's what they shared, not conspiring about radical ideology from 15 years prior.

Edited, Oct 4th 2008 1:29am by Annabella
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#24 Oct 03 2008 at 9:47 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Commander Annabella wrote:
He's a university professor.
People who go to UIC are funding Ayers and should never become president.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#25 Oct 04 2008 at 7:23 AM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
YES. In fact, the person they know the best is married to William Ayers and the former leader, Bernadine Dohrn. Of course she is a law professor of a mainstream prestigious law school and works in juvenile justice, but you know, knowingly consorting with her must be all about what happened 30 years ago. :P



Edited, Oct 4th 2008 11:25am by Annabella
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#26 Oct 04 2008 at 8:56 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
Commander Annabella wrote:
YES. In fact, the person they know the best is married to William Ayers and the former leader, Bernadine Dohrn. Of course she is a law professor of a mainstream prestigious law school and works in juvenile justice, but you know, knowingly consorting with her must be all about what happened 30 years ago. :P



Edited, Oct 4th 2008 11:25am by Annabella


She made a rather tasteless joke about the Manson murders. I have no sympathy for the woman.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 224 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (224)