Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

VP DebateFollow

#52 Oct 02 2008 at 7:31 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,512 posts
gbaji wrote:
Maybe it's in the eye of the beholder, but I didn't see a single moment where she looked "flustered".


I had work tonight and was only able to catch the end of the debate on the radio on my way home, but there was one point that I felt she sounded extremely flustered. She was talking much faster than she was before, and breathing every few words. I believe this was during her response to the question about being a heartbeat away from the President. I felt like I was back in high school watching freshmen audition for the fall play.

All in all I thought they both did a pretty good job, but I felt as though Palin was a little more transparent in her parroting of McCain's position. It was nice to see that they both didn't necessarily agree 100% with their presidential candidate. Made me feel as though Palin might be able to be independent (not party affiliation) after all.
#53 Oct 02 2008 at 7:35 PM Rating: Default
Palin did a great job. so did Biden.

Biden still came out on top in foreign policy and the economy. i give it a tie on the Iraq issue if you ASSUME it ws necessary to go in the first place.
#54 Oct 02 2008 at 7:38 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
When Palin said that Biden's teacher wife's reward was in Heaven, Biden should have said "That's great but teachers would rather get paid more here on Earth". Smiley: grin

Folks elsewhere on the computernets are ripping into Palin for winking... repeatedly. Opinion is that one does look presidental while saying "You betcha!" and winking.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#55 Oct 02 2008 at 7:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Biden's answer, while perfectly ok, was poorly timed. Bad idea to deflect the negative perception about you by saying how you haven't changed in 30 years, and then immediately go through a series of questions where your response is to talk about how much your ticket will change things.
Of course, Palin said that Biden had been in the Senate for thirty years and that's why we need a maverick in the White House.

Mind you, McCain's been in Congress for twenty-six years... heh

Who cares about my opinion on who won or lost? I'll wait a day or two and see how the numbers move. I think Palin did reasonably well but I also think there's much larger forces at work right now moving the election along.


Yeah, agreed.

I thought they both did okay, with Biden having a much higher bar.

No major gaffes on either side. We'll see if anyone gets much of a bounce out of it.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#56 Oct 02 2008 at 7:56 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
CBS snap poll of uncommitted voters gives it to Biden by a fair margin.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#57 Oct 02 2008 at 7:57 PM Rating: Good
***
1,701 posts
Jophiel wrote:
When Palin said that Biden's teacher wife's reward was in Heaven, Biden should have said "That's great but teachers would rather get paid more here on Earth". Smiley: grin


/nod
____________________________
If life gives you lemons, make lemonade. Then find someone that life has given vodka and have party.


This establishment does not serve women. You must bring your own.
#58 Oct 02 2008 at 7:58 PM Rating: Decent
Palin did this whole eyelash fluttery thing the whole time.

She came across like a newscaster without a teleprompter. I could see that journalism school coming through this time (didn't during her interviews with Couric) and for that her professors deserve accolades. However, her poly sci professors, if she had any, probably were banging their heads on the wall.
#59 Oct 02 2008 at 8:05 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
She said 'dog-gone'.

WTF..thats not even a word is it??
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#60 Oct 02 2008 at 8:51 PM Rating: Default
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
Edit: Smiley: frown

Edited, Oct 3rd 2008 12:45am by Paskil
#61 Oct 02 2008 at 8:52 PM Rating: Default
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
Jophiel wrote:
CBS snap poll of uncommitted voters gives it to Biden by a fair margin.


"Ninety-seven percent say Biden is prepared for the job." Smiley: lol
#62 Oct 02 2008 at 8:54 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
He memorized some numbers. She countered with conceptual positions.


Well numbers don't do very well for us if we cannot remember them, right? I can only assume that by "numbers" you mean logical straight-forward statements and by "conceptual positions" you mean empty strawman debate styles and the echoing regurgitation of the scraps of credivility that your party can still muster..

For instance; her main attack against Biden was when he pointed out the the ridiculous folly of the last 8 years and McCain's connection to it. All that Palin could retort with was an attempt to divert the audience from the facts and accuse Biden of living in the past?

That is not to mention her meaningless good ole' hometown rhetoric. Way to try to steer a vice presidential debate toward a fucking Oprah interview with a bunch of bullshit about [I'm paraphrasing]"I'm qualified to be vice president become I'm a mother".
Props to Biden for calling her out on that pathetic shit.


But sadly enough the average American people are going to be drawn toward actual substance and facts, are they? No. They are going to go for someone who's biggest claim to anything politically relevant is that they look like and talk like a soccer mom.
Yeah. I love my friends and family; but quite honestly if any of them ran for president I wouldn't be that self centered to vote for them.

Edited, Oct 3rd 2008 12:53am by Kelvyquayo
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#63 Oct 02 2008 at 9:03 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,829 posts
Between the dozen or so times she used the word "nukular" and the "you betcha's" and other annoyingly contrived vernacular intended to make her look like the cute and harmless girl-next-door, I've decided that woman is the most annoying female figure to emerge in the media since Paris Hilton and I'd rather gouge out my eyeballs with a melon scoop than listen to her for another hour and a half.

But it was the moment when she F'UCKING WINKED AT THE CAMERA that sealed it.

Excuse me, I need to go wash my brain with bleach and Brillo pads now.


Edited, Oct 2nd 2008 9:57pm by Ambrya
#64 Oct 02 2008 at 9:14 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
she F'UCKING WINKED AT THE CAMERA


Well that just her lil' ole way of lettin' us know that she's just got it all under control! and that momma's gonna take car'o all 'dem bad ol' dictators and economies.

To her credit, she did pronounce 'nuclear' correctly the very first time she said it...dunno what happened after that..
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#65 Oct 02 2008 at 9:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Mediacurves Polling gives it to Biden when you look at the Independent results.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#66 Oct 02 2008 at 9:34 PM Rating: Excellent
**
506 posts
The very fact that we're being asked to take Sarah Palin seriously is a big enough insult in itself to deny John McCain my vote. Is he that cynical, does he believe that we are that stupid, does he think we are so undeserving?

Leading up to the debate, all of the pundits were going on asking if Sarah Palin would be ready. We all wondered the same. A lot of us thought it would be a slaughter. Would she be able to discuss the issues? Would the McCain campaign be able to prep her in time? The very fact that these questions were our focus--would she be able even to discuss the issues competently--are a testament to Sarah Palin's staggering inadequacy. You can't cram for an office of this magnitude.

I mean, what the hell? McCain has the gall to call Obama inexperienced and not capable of understanding, and then turn around and stand next to Sarah Palin and wave blithely at America.

And it is a distinct possibility that Palin may spend some time as President. What then? She has less knowledge and is less articulate than George W. Bush. So if McCain croaks, we will possibly have a worse president than GeoB.

And what's with all the winking and head cocking? What the **** is that? Never mind not looking presidential; i'd be more concerned about not looking like a waitress at hooters if i were her.

I'm NOT Joe Six-pack. I'm tired of the constant meaningless drivel and shrill bickering as people try recklessly to get ahead. I want substance. I want info. I want a candidate to stand up and break down some numbers. I'm tired of being catered to like i'm the lowest common denominator. I'm tired of feeling like someone on the other end assumes that we're all idiots. I'm starving for some truth, for some thoughtfulness, for someone to stand up and show a little love for reason.

Can Obama and Biden provide that? I don't know. Probably not. But at least they're not trying to sell us ******** wholesale like we saw tonight. I mean, Biden at least seemed genuine. Obama, when he concede ground to McCain in their debate, showed that he has some intellectual honesty. No such smoke signals from the desert island that is the McCain campaign.
#67 Oct 03 2008 at 12:58 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,952 posts
Screenshot


Where is McCain's Condy?

From the outside, in Australian news, Condalezza Rice has always been viewed as utterly politically competent from the start. They might not have known where she sprang from, only knowing at the start of the Bush administration that she was a Bush friend and crony, but from her own public conduct and articulation of Republican party positions, everyone soon accepted her as another politician in the power stratosphere.

Left wing Aussies might view her as a selfish evil bitch, but only in the same way as they view everyone in the Bush Republican administration as selfish, oblivious, evil bastards. They call her an evil bitch while utterly respecting her abilities and her power. They disagree with what she has done, what she does and what she stands for, but they acknowledge that she has earned her position, that her power is real, and that she thinks she's doing what is right and what is within her rights, and the rights of America.

If Rice is sent overseas, outsiders know America means business. No-one thinks, "Why are we getting fobbed off with Rice, where's the President?". Around the world they treat her with respect, even deference, and listen intently to what she says. People expect that when they talk to Rice, they are talking to America, and when they listen to Rice, they are listening to America. In the past she has had the same presence at international tables as President Putin, as Tony Blair, as Hu Jintao. She has authority, she has weight, she has gravitas.

Why, why, why, when the Republican party has women like Rice to call on, have they called on Sarah Palin?

Edited, Oct 3rd 2008 4:59am by Aripyanfar
#68 Oct 03 2008 at 2:47 AM Rating: Default
*****
16,160 posts
Sarah Palin is a knockout and she knocked out Biden. For someone who ostensibly was supposed to be murdered out there against the wiley old Senate veteren, she stood her own, gave a good bit back, and looked damned sexy doing it too.

On that basis alone, even if you were to at worst call it a draw, she won handily by outperforming Biden at what was supposed to be a cake walk for him.

She did extremely well, particularly since all you heard out of Biden was, "Wonk, wonk, wonk, policy policy policy, wonk, wonk, wonkity-wonk, white noise, wonk, more white noise, wonk."

Palin, on the other hand, was personable, spoke to typical Americans on their level without all the Senate/political-speak, and appeared to being having fun too.

Did I mention she's hot?

Totem
#69 Oct 03 2008 at 3:24 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
She did better than I expected, but he held his ground and did basically exactly as I expected. The polls are showing he won...excepting Fox, of course, haha. It wasn't some crazy landslide victory for Biden or anything, but she certainly didn't come off as the more capable leader.

Is it just me or did she really "turn up" the folksy, cutesy voice and manner of speaking? Maybe that connects with some Americans, but it was like she was doing an impression of Tina Fey doing and impression of her.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#70REDACTED, Posted: Oct 03 2008 at 3:26 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) One last observation of the debate: In both of their final/closing remarks, Palin's ending statement had punch, whereas Biden's was... ok, but not particularly effective. It ended a rather good closing statement mildly. That surprised me. I thought he'd have had a more crescendo-like, powerful sentence.
#71 Oct 03 2008 at 3:34 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Totem wrote:
Sarah Palin is a knockout and she knocked out Biden.
On what planet? I'll admit she didn't **** up outright, but that's a long cry from saying she matched Biden. She didn't even address the question half the time, she didn't know the name of our own General in Afghanistan, and there were at least two instances of winking. Winking. It isn't a ******* Miss America contest, where this would be "good enough". I was more impressed with her hairdo.

And for the record, CNN's live reaction chart of undecideds in Ohio showed a marked downturn in the audience whenever she got folksy. People may like her, but it's people who are easily patronized.
#72 Oct 03 2008 at 3:36 AM Rating: Excellent
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
I thought Biden took it as well. He was succinct, focused and prepared. Nothing she threw at him was a problem. I loved the part when he addressed her constant use of the word "maverick". Dy-no-mite.

Palin did o-k, by my reckoning. Her "babe of the woods" bit got old for me really fast. I'll say it again though, one can only have gone up from where Palin sat before the debate and she did redeem herself somewhat by simply not looking like a complete buffoon. It is very notable that she seemed to avoid the questions.

Hope to see what I saw refected in the polls this weekend. Smiley: nod
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#73 Oct 03 2008 at 3:38 AM Rating: Excellent
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Quote:


Palin, on the other hand, was personable, spoke to typical Americans on their level without all the Senate/political-speak, and appeared to being having fun too.


If by personable, you mean vague and simplistic. She did beat expectations. Of course because those expectations were incredibly low but it would have been nice for her to answer the questions. And really, wouldn't you like to have a vice-president who understands policy since that is their job?

Edited, Oct 3rd 2008 7:32am by Annabella
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#74 Oct 03 2008 at 3:38 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Listening to her and her colloquilisms reminds me of Scandanavian Midwesterners. My wife's family all talk like that, with Fargo-like sayings. "Soooper!" "Oh, yah!" or "ruff" instead of roof-- that sort of stuff. I can see where to the untrained or unaccustomed ear it grates with all those hard vowel sounds and folksy-isms.

Her winking at me tells me she wants mah hawt body, that's all. It was her secret message to me.

Totem
#75 Oct 03 2008 at 3:44 AM Rating: Excellent
Those of us from the rednecky bits of the south were rolling our eyes. Really. We're not stupid. Our politicians AVOID the use of those cutesy phrases except in rare circumstances where they have punch. In a debate like this, they do not have that kind of punch.

Republicans love her. We already knew that. Nothing last night was going to change that. But you already had Republican votes. She needed to reassure independents. So far, all the snapshot polls show that independents gave the debate to Biden by a two to one margin.

The American people aren't stupid, and some of us find Sarah Palin @#%^ing insulting to our intelligence.

Edited, Oct 3rd 2008 7:38am by catwho
#76 Oct 03 2008 at 3:52 AM Rating: Decent
*****
16,160 posts
Hmmm, we'll see. (Obviously) My thinking is people are telling polls one thing but how they vote will be another. Having lived in the Deep South for decades I don't think most people-- including Democrats --will vote for a black man. It's ugly, but there it is. It's not a Republican/Democrat thing, it's just history for them. But that's just my take. Apply heavy amounts of salt as needed.

Totem
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 243 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (243)