Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

PETA and Ben & Jerry's Ice CreamFollow

#27 Sep 29 2008 at 5:31 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
***** drinking breast milk. It tastes like rice milk. Bleh.


Ungrateful wench, do you KNOW how hard it is to milk rice?

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#28 Sep 29 2008 at 5:39 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
I read an auto-biograhpy years ago, written by an African women of a jungle tribe. She found drinking milk, once weaned from the breast, abhorrent. Especially so getting it from other animals.

Milk isn't really necessary for an adult human diet. We justify it as a source of protein, vitamins and minerals, but mostly it's just the fat that we like.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#29 Sep 29 2008 at 5:51 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
I don't drink a lot of milk. I get my milk from cheese, ice cream, etc. I keep it around because my son drinks it and there's always some recipe that calls for milk.

But I'm with Nexa. It's not so much that I'd have a problem with human milk, but the human it comes from. And offhand, I can't think of many women that would allow themselves to be locked away/monitored for the sake of clean milk.
#30 Sep 29 2008 at 5:55 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
What the hell is wrong with breast milk? There's nothing wrong with breast milk.
#31 Sep 29 2008 at 6:01 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Personally I find the thought of farming women for milk a huge waste of human resource. But then the Miss America Pagent is still going strong, eh.

...and while Nexa has a point about the quality of milk you may be getting (from women), the cows we currently mass produce for milk are pumped full of anti-biotics to fend off the diseases they routinely get from production dairies, oh and perhaps laced with some bovine growth hormones too. cheers.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#32 Sep 29 2008 at 6:08 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
I'll take antibiotics over Meth any day, though.
#33 Sep 29 2008 at 8:08 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,472 posts
I wonder if I sat out side their HQ's here eating some Ben and Jerry's, if they would say something.

A local radio show here used to hold an annual fishing tournimate here just out side their building lol.

Aside from that when my ex wife had our daughter, I was getting up for work 330am sux, and was making the coffee, yes I grabbed the breast milk instead of regualr, cause she put it a container similar to what I put my coffee mil in.

didnt taste to bad, just had a twang to it lol.

Edited, Sep 29th 2008 12:02pm by wolfjorg
#34 Sep 29 2008 at 8:28 AM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
zepoodle wrote:
What the hell is wrong with breast milk? There's nothing wrong with breast milk.


All milk is breast milk. Smiley: oyvey
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#35 Sep 29 2008 at 8:30 AM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Paradox wrote:
Deadgye wrote:
Quote:
Q: Follow-up to previous question: How is it that the Earth does not have a gravitational pull, but stars and the moon do?

A: This argument is a non sequitur. You might as well ask, "How is it that snakes do not have legs, but dogs and cats do?" Snakes are not dogs or cats. The Earth is not a star or the moon. It doesn't follow that each must have exactly the properties of the others, and no more.


But.. the earth does have a gravitation pull?


Quote:
A: The Earth is accelerating upwards at 1g (9.8m/s^2) along with every star, sun and moon in the universe. This produces the same effect as gravity.


XD

It's really hilarious stuff. Some of the Flat-earth believers think that Antarctica is the great ice-wall, penguins were genetically engineered to provide food for the troops who guard the great ice wall, and that all governments are in cahoots with one another to prevent anyone from actually setting foot on the ice wall. Oh, and the moon landing? Fake.


Not to mention the fact that the Earth sits upon one of two things: dark matter, or the back of a giant elephant which is standing on four giant turtles.


How do the Flat Earthers explain the Lunar Eclipses? (Where the Earth is between the Sun and the Moon)


I refuse to make an account and try to talk with people as stubborn as those appear to be.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#36 Sep 29 2008 at 12:27 PM Rating: Decent
TirithRR wrote:

How do the Flat Earthers explain the Lunar Eclipses? (Where the Earth is between the Sun and the Moon)


I refuse to make an account and try to talk with people as stubborn as those appear to be.


Erm... as far as I remember, they just say you can't see it from where you are. Honestly, I don't believe it, it's just fun to argue, and play devil's advocate against those who vehemently believe the Earth is round, just because they were told so.

The Sun & Moon in the flat-earth model are each only like... 30 miles above the Earth, btw. I'll try to dig up a picture after I finish with my geo homework.
#37 Sep 29 2008 at 12:38 PM Rating: Decent
Alright, here ya go:

Screenshot

Screenshot


Yeah, I don't remember the math behind it, but these are the models they use.

Edited, Sep 29th 2008 4:32pm by Paradox

So I guess, in the Flat-earth model, the sun literally is behind the moon during an eclipse?

Edited, Sep 29th 2008 4:33pm by Paradox
#38 Sep 29 2008 at 12:41 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
Paradox wrote:
The Sun & Moon in the flat-earth model are each only like... 30 miles above the Earth, btw. I'll try to dig up a picture after I finish with my geo homework.


~4000 miles, actually. Smiley: rolleyes
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#39 Sep 29 2008 at 12:54 PM Rating: Decent
bsphil wrote:
Paradox wrote:
The Sun & Moon in the flat-earth model are each only like... 30 miles above the Earth, btw. I'll try to dig up a picture after I finish with my geo homework.


~4000 miles, actually. Smiley: rolleyes


Heh, like I said, it's been a while. Like 2 years or so...
#40 Sep 29 2008 at 1:30 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Paradox wrote:
Alright, here ya go:

Screenshot

Screenshot


Yeah, I don't remember the math behind it, but these are the models they use.

Edited, Sep 29th 2008 4:32pm by Paradox

So I guess, in the Flat-earth model, the sun literally is behind the moon during an eclipse?

Edited, Sep 29th 2008 4:33pm by Paradox


Wow, I'd like to see their physics behind the "Sun" orbiting around a single point in space with no mass (OMG Black Hole?). And having it periodically and repeatably chance the diameter of the orbit based on the season.

But ya... from my point of view it's more about the fun rather than actually caring. It's hard to believe that there are actually people out there who truly believe in this.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#41 Sep 29 2008 at 1:45 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
TirithRR wrote:
But ya... from my point of view it's more about the fun rather than actually caring. It's hard to believe that there are actually people out there who truly believe in this.


I would wager that about 99% of the people who advocate a Flat Earth Model do so purely for the intellectual "fun" of poking holes in people's own logic. It's not about proving the earth is flat but getting people to acknowledge that most of the reasons they believe in whatever model they believe in is just as equally based on "because that's what I was taught" arguments.

I know quite a few engineers who'll take up the flat earth argument just for the sake of the puzzle of it. Can you come up with "sound" explanations for everything we see that would fit in a flat earth model? Can you come up with a model that is complete enough that only first hand observation can disprove it? That's really the objective for those guys IMO. Because then they can point to the vast majority of people who don't have that first hand observation and say "Ok. How do you really know for sure your model is true and you aren't just being lied to?".


It's a pure intellectual exercise. At least for most people...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#42 Sep 29 2008 at 2:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
They could have used human breast milk for a few new delicious flavors like "***** ***** Bang-Bang," "Banana Boobalicious," or "Nipplepolitan."


Nah. They'd go with "Mother's Milkshake", at the most risqué.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#43 Sep 29 2008 at 5:19 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
TirithRR wrote:
But ya... from my point of view it's more about the fun rather than actually caring. It's hard to believe that there are actually people out there who truly believe in this.


I would wager that about 99% of the people who advocate a Flat Earth Model do so purely for the intellectual "fun" of poking holes in people's own logic. It's not about proving the earth is flat but getting people to acknowledge that most of the reasons they believe in whatever model they believe in is just as equally based on "because that's what I was taught" arguments.

I know quite a few engineers who'll take up the flat earth argument just for the sake of the puzzle of it. Can you come up with "sound" explanations for everything we see that would fit in a flat earth model? Can you come up with a model that is complete enough that only first hand observation can disprove it? That's really the objective for those guys IMO. Because then they can point to the vast majority of people who don't have that first hand observation and say "Ok. How do you really know for sure your model is true and you aren't just being lied to?".


It's a pure intellectual exercise. At least for most people...


Two words: Poe's Law.
#44 Sep 30 2008 at 6:37 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
If we don't get milk and meat from them, then what good would cows otherwise be? They're domesticated feedstock.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#45 Sep 30 2008 at 6:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Debalic wrote:
If we don't get milk and meat from them, then what good would cows otherwise be? They're domesticated feedstock.


We'd still have to eat them...unless PETA is pushing for Soylent Green...which wouldn't surprise me, haha.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#46 Sep 30 2008 at 6:22 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Nexa wrote:
I'm just endlessly fascinated by how horrified people are at drinking milk from people...like we're supposed to, haha, like it's THE grossest thing in the world...but the idea of suckling off cows, goats, etc...A-OK.


Well, I think it boils down to the fact that animals are raised for food. Historically, every part of them has been used for food/fuel/tools/clothing.

Where as grown adults eating anything that comes from a Human is considered taboo.

There are quite a few individuals who save the Placenta from their child's birth, and then eat it at a later time. This is considered by many to be disgusting. But eating of chicken eggs, which contain placentas as well, is perfectly fine.


Also I believe, at least in western society, that the breast being involved with anything not infant is highly sexual (good or bad, it's just the way it is). Drinking the breast milk of a complete stranger would just be odd and many people would probably get off on the idea.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#47 Sep 30 2008 at 6:43 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
TirithRR wrote:

Also I believe, at least in western society, that the breast being involved with anything not infant is highly sexual (good or bad, it's just the way it is).


Ding ding ding, we have a winner! This is exactly the problem in western society and the reason why children in other cultures are unabashedly breastfed until 2 or 3, even four years old, while in the U.S., anything longer than a year (hell, even 6 months) is considered "extended" breastfeeding and gets women dirty looks and shocked reactions when others learn about it.

Not long ago, there was one woman who posted a bunch of "PSA"-type video blogs about how breastfeeding is sexual abuse.

Quote:
Drinking the breast milk of a complete stranger would just be odd and many people would probably get off on the idea.


Check out Craigslist sometimes, there are ads from men offering to pay women for their expressed breastmilk to be used for fetish purposes.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 215 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (215)