Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

McCain chicken?Follow

#1 Sep 24 2008 at 11:23 AM Rating: Good
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
The lengths the man is willing to go to to avoid a debate...

Quote:
John McCain suspends campaigning to work on economy, requests postponing Friday debate; asks Obama do the same.


Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#2 Sep 24 2008 at 11:30 AM Rating: Good
Nexa wrote:
The lengths the man is willing to go to to avoid a debate...

Quote:
John McCain suspends campaigning to work on economy, requests postponing Friday debate; asks Obama do the same.


Nexa
I can't help but imagine him sitting at a desk laboring under the dim light of an old-timey desk lamp, frantically working the lever of his manual adding machine as his green visor keeps his brow free of sweat.
#3 Sep 24 2008 at 11:48 AM Rating: Decent
its absolutly brillant. im gona give mccain a 10 for this one.

think about it.

a foreign policy debate during a time of an economy crises. how much impact do you think it would have? how long do you think it would stick in peoples minds?

its his calling card about to be washed out by this financial crises.

stall. and be patriaotic about it on the way.

he gets to put his strongest card off untill after this mess is behind us. he gets to pretend that he is sacrificing for the country, then DARE obama to not do the same, then bring his strog card back to the table at a time when it might stick in peoples minds a little stronger.

its absolutly brilliant.

obama MUST agree. it will be intersting to see if obama can come up with a strong counter to it.

Edited, Sep 24th 2008 3:43pm by shadowrelm
#4 Sep 24 2008 at 11:49 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,211 posts
Wait... didn't he just get his panties in a bunch because Obama wouldn't debate him at some Town Meetings? Hypocrite much?
#5 Sep 24 2008 at 11:50 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
That was before 26 years' worth of deregulation initiatives turned out to be such a spectacularly bad idea.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#6 Sep 24 2008 at 11:57 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Nexa wrote:
McCain chicken
For some reason I immediately thought of chicken nuggets.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#7 Sep 24 2008 at 12:02 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Elinda wrote:
Nexa wrote:
McCain chicken
For some reason I immediately thought of chicken nuggets.


Don't be ridiculous...he's running for President...he's fancier than nuggets!

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#8 Sep 24 2008 at 12:02 PM Rating: Excellent
Scholar
****
4,731 posts
Samira wrote:
That was before 26 years' worth of deregulation initiatives turned out to be such a spectacularly bad idea.


Where is gbaji anyway? I want to find out how a $700 billion bailout of banks was actually the fault of liberals and how they forced Bush to do it.
#9 Sep 24 2008 at 12:04 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Youshutup wrote:
Samira wrote:
That was before 26 years' worth of deregulation initiatives turned out to be such a spectacularly bad idea.


Where is gbaji anyway? I want to find out how a $700 billion bailout of banks was actually the fault of liberals and how they forced Bush to do it.
Knox has already been in here touting the party line, its all the same.
#10 Sep 24 2008 at 12:12 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Winning teams don't call for a time out.

Does McCain expect the Senate to still be in session come Friday evening? Get that plane of yours in the air and debate, ya big wuss.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#11 Sep 24 2008 at 12:18 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,760 posts
Can anyone enlighten me on the bail-out they are proposing? I keep reading vastly different opinions on it, varying from "It's absolutely necessary or the planet will 'splode" to "If we do this, it will be the biggest mistake since the duck-billed platypus."
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#12 Sep 24 2008 at 12:38 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
haha, I'm soooo happy that Obama's folks are saying "it's on."

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#13 Sep 24 2008 at 12:43 PM Rating: Excellent
Mistress of Gardening
Avatar
*****
14,661 posts
Can't they just shift the topic or move the debate?
____________________________
Yum-Yum Bento Box | Pikko Pots | Adventures in Bentomaking

Twitter


[ffxivsig]277809[/ffxivsig]
#14 Sep 24 2008 at 12:44 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,158 posts
I wonder if he thinks that 'it' will all be sorted out soon enough for him to get back to the campaign any time this year?

If he does, he's even more ignorant of the problem than I would have thought!
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#15 Sep 24 2008 at 12:44 PM Rating: Excellent
currently, there is a plan to buy up the bad debt from major financial institutions. everything from bonds, securities, to even credit card debt.

what does that man to the consumer?

nothing. you still have to pay. all it means is the financial institutions will be free of deliquent loan payments and investment instruments that are literly not worth the paper they are written on.

then they will propose some regulations to keep the crooks who made the bad loans and worthless investment instruments from doing it again.

there are three or four major points of contention with the bill.

1. first and foremost it goes against everything this country stands for. a free market economy. with rewards somes risk. it says if you make a bad risk and losse, uncle sam will ponie up YOUR tax dollars to take care of it.

2. not enough oversight. the bill leaves ONE person in charge of oversight for 700 BILLION dollars of YOUR tax money. boy is he going go have a bunch of lobbiest buddies once that is done.

3. no penalties for the executives who drovbe their bussiness in the ground. they want to give them a free pass. the repubs AND dems are in an uproar over this in a rare show of pipartisenship.

4. the dems are trying to attach earmarks to it in the form of trying to give the people SOMETHING for their money. in the form of creating jobs, more tax breaks and other middle income government give aways.

in a RARE showing of bipartisan ship on capitol hill, both the dems and the repubs are howling like stuck pigs. newt gingrich even going as far as saying mccain should publically stand opposed to this autrocity.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

now, why its necessary.

1.its not the banks money that will be lost when they go bellie up.

its your money. your CDs, your money market accounts, your bank notes, your savings accounts. its your money.

and the banks that survive will be scared crapless, and regulated to the point they cant loan you a staple without getting government approval. loans will dry up for homes, autos, small bussinesses and a hoste of other things bringing the entire economy to a grinding halt.

2. in addition to loosing some of YOUR money, tens of thousands of people will be out of jobs in the financial sector. this will trickle down to home building, contractors, the auto industry etc etc etc potentially driving the country into not just a recession, but mabe a full blown depression.

so, you loose with this bill, you loose without this bill. capitol hill just thinks you loose less with this bill.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

as for me, i say......LET IT FALL. the market has been trying to make a correction since the tech stock bust in 2000. by lowering inrterest rates the feds avoided it AT THAT TIME by flooding the market with BORROWED money.

this bail out of its approved WILL NOT FIX the economy. it will only buy us a little time becuause the economy is still stuffed to the gills with artifical money gained from that flood of BORROWED money over the last 6 years.

it will try to fall again, probably in less than a few years.

LET IT FALL and spend that 700 billion dollars for job programs AFTER the fall and other social servies to get people back on theri feet.
#16 Sep 24 2008 at 1:05 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
****
4,731 posts
Pikko wrote:
Can't they just shift the topic or move the debate?


They say Obama has put aside a LOT of time preparing for this debate specifically, and McCain hasn't, so basically, they want their assraping as was previously agreed.
#17 Sep 24 2008 at 1:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Internet polls aren't worth much but the ones on the news sites I've seen show about an 80/20 split between those who think the debates should go on and those who say no.

I think McCain will back off of the debate portion of his "suspension" pretty quickly.

Edit: SurveyUSA did a phone poll and found that only 10% of the people polled think the debate should be postponed. McCain bounced off the rim on this one.

Edited, Sep 24th 2008 5:12pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#18 Sep 24 2008 at 2:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Obama wrote:
With respect to the debates, it’s my belief that this is exactly the time when the American people need to hear from the person who, in approximately 40 days, will be responsible for dealing with this mess. And I think that it is going to be part of the president’s job to deal with more than one thing at once. I think there’s no reason why we can’t be constructive in helping to solve this problem and also tell the American people what we believe and where we stand and where we want to take the country.
BAM!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#19 Sep 24 2008 at 2:22 PM Rating: Excellent
****
8,619 posts
Obama wrote:
With respect to the debates, it’s my belief that this is exactly the time when the American people need to hear from the person who, in approximately 40 days, will be responsible for dealing with this mess. And I think that it is going to be part of the president’s job to deal with more than one thing at once. I think there’s no reason why we can’t be constructive in helping to solve this problem and also tell the American people what we believe and where we stand and where we want to take the country.
Rack that.
#20 Sep 24 2008 at 2:57 PM Rating: Excellent
Mistress of Gardening
Avatar
*****
14,661 posts
Oh damn!

CNN wrote:
McCain also said he would not attend Friday night's debate with Democratic rival Barack Obama unless an economic bailout deal is reached by then.
____________________________
Yum-Yum Bento Box | Pikko Pots | Adventures in Bentomaking

Twitter


[ffxivsig]277809[/ffxivsig]
#21 Sep 24 2008 at 3:31 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
That was before 26 years' worth of deregulation initiatives turned out to be such a spectacularly bad idea.


This, coupled with W's tax policies.


Edited, Sep 24th 2008 8:01pm by Omegavegeta
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#22 Sep 24 2008 at 3:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Obama wrote:
With respect to the debates, it’s my belief that this is exactly the time when the American people need to hear from the person who, in approximately 40 days, will be responsible for dealing with this mess. And I think that it is going to be part of the president’s job to deal with more than one thing at once. I think there’s no reason why we can’t be constructive in helping to solve this problem and also tell the American people what we believe and where we stand and where we want to take the country.
BAM!

They're gonna hone in on the "40 days" comment and claim he doesn't know when the president actually takes office.

#23 Sep 24 2008 at 4:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
They're gonna hone in on the "40 days" comment and claim he doesn't know when the president actually takes office.


Only if he flip-flops and starts campaignin' again!
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#24 Sep 24 2008 at 4:43 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
CNN wrote:
McCain also said he would not attend Friday night's debate with Democratic rival Barack Obama unless an economic bailout deal is reached by then.
Obama should go to the debate and put a sock on his hand if McCain isn't there.

Ed Rendell said it best: "Does McCain think that the Senate will be meeting at 9pm on a Friday night?"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#25 Sep 24 2008 at 4:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Obama should offer to let the VP debate and the first Pres debate just switch nights!

*watches as Sarah Palin swallows her own tongue*

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#26 Sep 24 2008 at 4:53 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Oh... you'll love this one!
CNN wrote:
(CNN) — McCain supporter Sen. Lindsey Graham tells CNN the McCain campaign is proposing to the Presidential Debate Commission and the Obama camp that if there's no bailout deal by Friday, the first presidential debate should take the place of the VP debate, currently scheduled for next Thursday, October 2 in St. Louis.

In this scenario, the vice presidential debate between Joe Biden and Sarah Palin would be rescheduled for a date yet to be determined, and take place in Oxford, Mississippi, currently slated to be the site of the first presidential faceoff this Friday.
Smiley: laughSmiley: laughSmiley: laughSmiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 151 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (151)