SWM wrote:
Gore's phrasing is clumsy but he isn't claiming to have invented the internet but instead to have been responsible for the legislation which fostered it's development. 'Invent' is a very different word from 'create'.
Yes. I'm aware of it. It's a bit of a strawman though. While some certainly used the modified "invented the internet" phrase to lampoon Gore, his original statement is *also* not really correct though.
He didn't "create" the internet. Had he said that he helped it's creation, that would have been ok. If he'd said he passed legislation to do so, that would have been even more ok. But you've got to have an ego the size of Nebraska to claim to have "created the internet".
That was my real point. It's why I put both words side by side in quotes in my earlier post. To me, either claim is incorrect. Either one puts the efforts of the politician well outside the range of what he actually did. The issue here isn't whether the word "invent" or "create" was used, but the context in which it was used. Gore directly claimed to have "created the internet". A McCain staffer, when asked what McCain had done on the commerce committee, pointed to a blackberry and said:
“Telecommunications of the United States, the premiere innovation in the past 15 years, comes right through the Commerce Committee. So you’re looking at the miracle that John McCain helped create ... And that’s what he did. He both regulated and de-regulated the industry.†Again. Three massive differences:
1. He's clearly talking about telecommunications regulation, not building the devices themselves.
2. He's not saying that McCain did it all by himself, but that he "helped create" them.
3. He's not McCain.
The Obama camp of course immediately jumped on the same strawman you're saying is important to distinguish. They said that McCain claimed to have "invented the BlackBerry". So. If it's wrong to switch the word "create" with "invent", then is it not doubly wrong to do that *and* then attribute the claim to someone else?
Quote:
All Gore is saying is that he took someone else's invention and pushed it from a legislative perspective to make it a reality.
No. He really didn't though. He said he "created the internet", a wholly false statement. He was involved in pursuing legislation that helped it grow. But that's not even vaguely in the same league. The internet likely would have come to be whether Al Gore had ever entered politics or not. Gore is a political opportunist. He latches onto ideas that are coming down the pipe but aren't yet broadly covered in the media and pushes them hard so that people think they were his. DARPA and ARPANET were around quite a bit before he got into this area. Home computers were being built as well. The infrastructure of the internet was already in place. The only thing that would have stopped its formation was if the government actually added regulation to prevent it. So Gore being a champion of new technology certainly helped, but was hardly a creative force.
One can argue that the single event that "created" what we now call the internet was the adoption of TCP/IP as the standard communication protocol across all networks. I'm not aware that Gore had any role at all in this. And the decision to adopt TCP/IP was such an obvious one that it's unclear if any action for or against it would have changed this at all. So he didn't "create" the original networks (email was around 3 years before he took his first political office just to give you an idea how off this is), and he didn't have a hand in the core change that "created" a single large "internet".
I just think that even the word "create" is a gross exaggeration of his role here. Helped grow? Sure. Helped to prevent over-regulation? Sure. Tossed some funding it's way? Absolutely. But "created"? Not in even the most twisted stretch of the term did he "create" the internet.