Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

McCain went too Far!Follow

#1 Sep 15 2008 at 4:19 PM Rating: Good
So sayeth, Karl Rove.

Quote:
Former Bush adviser Karl Rove said Sunday that Sen. John McCain had gone "one step too far" in some of his recent ads attacking Sen. Barack Obama.

Karl Rove said both candidates are guilty of going too far in their attacks.

Rove has leveled similar criticism against Obama.

"McCain has gone in some of his ads -- similarly gone one step too far," he told Fox News, "and sort of attributing to Obama things that are, you know, beyond the '100 percent truth' test."


McShame!

____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#2 Sep 15 2008 at 4:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Tucker Bounds can't get a break. First CNN's Campbell Brown makes him cry and now even Fox's Megyn Kelly rakes the little weasel over the coals. Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#3 Sep 15 2008 at 5:51 PM Rating: Decent
**
792 posts
I find it hilariously ironic that Karl Rove, of all people, is coming down on ANYONE about political tactics.
#4 Sep 15 2008 at 6:52 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
That's one of the most incredibly obviously biased bits of journalism I've seen.

Wow. Just wow. Seriously guys. Read the article, not just the headline.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#5 Sep 15 2008 at 7:08 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
gbaji wrote:
That's one of the most incredibly obviously biased bits of journalism I've seen.

Wow. Just wow. Seriously guys. Read the article, not just the headline.
Do you mean to say someone posted information that obviously meant to say ONE thing and slanted it to fit THEIR view instead of the one it was meant to convey?

Say it ain't so.
#6 Sep 15 2008 at 7:18 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
Do you mean to say someone posted information that obviously meant to say ONE thing and slanted it to fit THEIR view instead of the one it was meant to convey?


Posted? No. I was talking about the CNN article linked in the OP.

I'm not going to condemn bias in someone's posts. I expect it. I will point it out when it occurs in a format most people assume is supposed to be non-partisan and non-biased though...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#7 Sep 15 2008 at 7:30 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
gbaji wrote:
Atomicflea wrote:
Do you mean to say someone posted information that obviously meant to say ONE thing and slanted it to fit THEIR view instead of the one it was meant to convey?


Posted? No. I was talking about the CNN article linked in the OP.

I'm not going to condemn bias in someone's posts. I expect it. I will point it out when it occurs in a format most people assume is supposed to be non-partisan and non-biased though...


wasnt the second one from Fox though?
Smiley: lol
#8 Sep 15 2008 at 10:17 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
You can watch the rove interview though, he was pretty clear about McCain going too far with his ads. honestly he went farther in his interview then this article reported on.

Also, I'm not sure what article you're reading, as it seemed to me to be essentially just saying what's happening.

"On September 1, McCain's campaign reported raising $47 million in August. That haul also set a monthly record for the Arizona senator, whose campaign says it received a financial shot in the arm after McCain picked Palin to join the ticket."

"Obama has rejected public financing, calling the system "broken" -- a decision that frees him to continue raising money for November."

"McCain has accepted federal matching funds for his general election campaign, giving him $84 million to spend for November. The money comes with strict spending limits, but the Republican National Committee's victory fund can continue to raise and spend money on his behalf."

it's pretty much all like that.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#9 Sep 16 2008 at 5:19 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Richard Cohen, a political columnist who was (by his own words) "in the tank" for McCain, writes a column calling McCain a tragedy and a farce for the campaign he's run.
Cohen wrote:
"We know that those two ads are untrue," Behar said. "They are lies."

Freeze. Close in on McCain. This was the moment. He has largely been avoiding the press. The Straight Talk Express is now just a brand, an ad slogan like "Home Cooking" or "We Will Not Be Undersold." Until then, it was possible for McCain to say that he had not really known about the ads, that the formulation "I approve this message" was just boilerplate. But he didn't.

"Actually, they are not lies," he said.

Actually, they are.

McCain has turned ugly. His dishonesty would be unacceptable in any politician, but McCain has always set his own bar higher than most. He has contempt for most of his colleagues for that very reason: They lie. He tells the truth. He internalizes the code of the McCains -- his grandfather, his father: both admirals of the shining sea. He serves his country differently, that's all -- but just as honorably. No more, though.
[...]
But Joy Behar knew better. And so McCain lied about his lying and maybe thinks that if he wins the election, he can -- as he did in South Carolina -- renounce who he was and what he did and resume his old persona. It won't work. Karl Marx got one thing right -- what he said about history repeating itself. Once is tragedy, a second time is farce. John McCain is both.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#11 Sep 16 2008 at 6:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
knoxsouthy wrote:
Well since he said he was for McCain I guess it must be true.
Smiley: laugh

Deny, deny, deny!!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#13 Sep 16 2008 at 6:50 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
It's okay, Varrus. I know you're scared of the mean ole media.

Cohen has a history of apologetic stances towards McCain. If you need to tell yourself he never really liked McCain to make yourself feel better, well, I suppose it's cheaper than a blankie.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 226 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (226)