Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

For those interested in sex educationFollow

#52 Sep 17 2008 at 6:26 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Nexa wrote:
knoxsouthy wrote:
Debo,

Quote:
He uses spell checkers!


It's not that difficult. Trying to read Shadows posts is like watching a ****** try and hump a door knob.


huh, alright then. I'll have to defer to your expertise in this since I simply don't have the field experience in Southern customs to have observed such a phenomenon.

Nexa


Don't make me come up there and punch you. Smiley: mad
#53 Sep 17 2008 at 6:28 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Mistress Nadenu wrote:
Nexa wrote:
knoxsouthy wrote:
Debo,

Quote:
He uses spell checkers!


It's not that difficult. Trying to read Shadows posts is like watching a ****** try and hump a door knob.


huh, alright then. I'll have to defer to your expertise in this since I simply don't have the field experience in Southern customs to have observed such a phenomenon.

Nexa


Don't make me come up there and punch you. Smiley: mad


You don't want to come up here Nads, we're all out of grits and nuclear facilities ;) Also: I'm crap at line dancing.

LOVE!

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#54 Sep 17 2008 at 6:31 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Good. I hate grits.

ALMOST AS MUCH AS YOU HATE ME!!

Smiley: cry
#55 Sep 17 2008 at 6:38 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Mistress Nadenu wrote:
Good. I hate grits.

ALMOST AS MUCH AS YOU HATE ME!!

Smiley: cry


You are mistaken, I keep a bottle of vodka in the cupboard and put it out each June 7th before I go to bed along with some bon bons so that you can have a snack when you deliver secession gifts to all the children of the Northeast.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#56 Sep 17 2008 at 6:40 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Nexa wrote:
Mistress Nadenu wrote:
Good. I hate grits.

ALMOST AS MUCH AS YOU HATE ME!!

Smiley: cry


You are mistaken, I keep a bottle of vodka in the cupboard and put it out each June 7th before I go to bed along with some bon bons so that you can have a snack when you deliver secession gifts to all the children of the Northeast.

Nexa


Smiley: inlove
#57 Sep 17 2008 at 6:43 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Of course the secession gifts are invisible, kids! Look up the meaning of the word!

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#58 Sep 17 2008 at 7:00 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Samira wrote:
Of course the secession gifts are invisible, kids! Look up the meaning of the word!



Not necessarily! I got this print for last secession!

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#59 Sep 17 2008 at 9:54 AM Rating: Decent
This is a tough situation. In my opinion, it can really go either way. You want children to be educated about safe sex and "good touch" "bad touch", but I believe it should be the responsibility of the parents, up to a certain age.

However, there's no reason for, say a junior high health class, to not talk about what condoms are, or other ways to protect from STDs and pregnancy; including abstinence.

Education in those matters is vital for someone just entering their teen years; I think we can limit the exposure they get to that stuff in school before then and trust in the parents to make good decisions.

Abstinence-only education is just not the way to go. It is ludicrous to believe that teenagers are going to feel the need to have sex more because they were taught about what a vas deferens is, or that condoms protect from STDs and pregnancy.

A person raised with good parents and good "family values" is still most likely going to have sex in their teens before marriage, even if they've been taught abstinence-only; what is the reasoning behind not teaching them sex ed?

#60 Sep 17 2008 at 9:57 AM Rating: Decent
Man, this thread did not live up to it's expecations.
#61 Sep 17 2008 at 10:14 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Kaelesh wrote:
Man, this thread did not live up to it's expecations.


We've already discussed this topic for the most part. So Nexa and I had to resort to a slap fight.

Same difference.
#62 Sep 17 2008 at 10:18 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Mistress Nadenu wrote:
Kaelesh wrote:
Man, this thread did not live up to it's expecations.


We've already discussed this topic for the most part. So Nexa and I had to resort to a slap naked pillow fight.

Same difference.


Throw him a bone, Nads.

So to speak.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#63 Sep 17 2008 at 10:18 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Kaelesh wrote:
Man, this thread did not live up to it's expecations.

Srsly, I thought Nexa was offering sex ed lessons!

But we may get a treat if that slap fight gets any more vigorous.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#64 Sep 17 2008 at 10:20 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Samira wrote:
Mistress Nadenu wrote:
Kaelesh wrote:
Man, this thread did not live up to it's expecations.


We've already discussed this topic for the most part. So Nexa and I had to resort to a slap naked pillow fight.

Same difference.


Throw him a bone, Nads.

So to speak.



Oops. I fell face first onto Nexa's heaving bosom. Whatever will I do now.

/wide eye
#65 Sep 17 2008 at 10:32 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Debalic wrote:
Kaelesh wrote:
Man, this thread did not live up to it's expecations.

Srsly, I thought Nexa was offering sex ed lessons!

But we may get a treat if that slap fight gets any more vigorous.


Happy to, but recent events indicate that you may have already figured it out!

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#66 Sep 17 2008 at 1:14 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Nexa wrote:
Debalic wrote:
Kaelesh wrote:
Man, this thread did not live up to it's expecations.

Srsly, I thought Nexa was offering sex ed lessons!

But we may get a treat if that slap fight gets any more vigorous.

Happy to, but recent events indicate that you may have already figured it out!

That wasn't my fault! I made sure she was on top!

Maybe I just need more practice!
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#67 Sep 17 2008 at 8:02 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,952 posts
DaimenKain wrote:
This is a tough situation. In my opinion, it can really go either way. You want children to be educated about safe sex and "good touch" "bad touch", but I believe it should be the responsibility of the parents, up to a certain age.

However, there's no reason for, say a junior high health class, to not talk about what condoms are, or other ways to protect from STDs and pregnancy; including abstinence.

Education in those matters is vital for someone just entering their teen years; I think we can limit the exposure they get to that stuff in school before then and trust in the parents to make good decisions.

Abstinence-only education is just not the way to go. It is ludicrous to believe that teenagers are going to feel the need to have sex more because they were taught about what a vas deferens is, or that condoms protect from STDs and pregnancy.

A person raised with good parents and good "family values" is still most likely going to have sex in their teens before marriage, even if they've been taught abstinence-only; what is the reasoning behind not teaching them sex ed?


It's very simple. You leave the teaching of personal sexual morals to parents.

The state ensures that schools teach all the correct medical and scientific happenings to do with human reproduction, the gestation and birth of babies, and the options of contraception in disease prevention and ... well... contraception.

Since "Good touch/Bad touch" (I don't like those phrases, but I get the drift) is also crucial to teach children so that they know their own rights, schools need to teach those too.

We have to remember that we have state supervised or provided compulsory schooling precisely because collectively we can't trust parents to have the right information and the time themselves to pass on crucial information. Parents can be fonts of incorrect information such as: "don't scratch that cut/sore, the itching means it's healing, leave it alone" (An itching, red cut or sore is infected, it's NOT healing correctly on it's own, it probably needs an anti-biotic applied.)

Our technology, civilisation and culture has massively leaped ahead since the introduction of compulsory schooling, and the widespread dissemination of correct and helpful information.

Pregnancy is a massive occurrence to a couple. The repercussions and responsibility of pregnancy span decades. STDs (STIs ?) are a massive health problem. The yearning for sexual congress of all types is an innate and major force in almost every human life. This is such a universally applicable and important-for-each-individual-person arena of human activity that it is absolutely crucial that it's taught in schools so that correct information is widely disseminated. It is then up to the morals of each individual, and the moral education that they have received from their parents as to how they aply that information in their own lives.

Edited, Sep 17th 2008 11:58pm by Aripyanfar
#68 Sep 18 2008 at 6:54 AM Rating: Good
**
907 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:
DaimenKain wrote:
This is a tough situation. In my opinion, it can really go either way. You want children to be educated about safe sex and "good touch" "bad touch", but I believe it should be the responsibility of the parents, up to a certain age.

However, there's no reason for, say a junior high health class, to not talk about what condoms are, or other ways to protect from STDs and pregnancy; including abstinence.

Education in those matters is vital for someone just entering their teen years; I think we can limit the exposure they get to that stuff in school before then and trust in the parents to make good decisions.

Abstinence-only education is just not the way to go. It is ludicrous to believe that teenagers are going to feel the need to have sex more because they were taught about what a vas deferens is, or that condoms protect from STDs and pregnancy.

A person raised with good parents and good "family values" is still most likely going to have sex in their teens before marriage, even if they've been taught abstinence-only; what is the reasoning behind not teaching them sex ed?


It's very simple. You leave the teaching of personal sexual morals to parents.

The state ensures that schools teach all the correct medical and scientific happenings to do with human reproduction, the gestation and birth of babies, and the options of contraception in disease prevention and ... well... contraception.

Since "Good touch/Bad touch" (I don't like those phrases, but I get the drift) is also crucial to teach children so that they know their own rights, schools need to teach those too.

We have to remember that we have state supervised or provided compulsory schooling precisely because collectively we can't trust parents to have the right information and the time themselves to pass on crucial information. Parents can be fonts of incorrect information such as: "don't scratch that cut/sore, the itching means it's healing, leave it alone" (An itching, red cut or sore is infected, it's NOT healing correctly on it's own, it probably needs an anti-biotic applied.)

Our technology, civilisation and culture has massively leaped ahead since the introduction of compulsory schooling, and the widespread dissemination of correct and helpful information.

Pregnancy is a massive occurrence to a couple. The repercussions and responsibility of pregnancy span decades. STDs (STIs ?) are a massive health problem. The yearning for sexual congress of all types is an innate and major force in almost every human life. This is such a universally applicable and important-for-each-individual-person arena of human activity that it is absolutely crucial that it's taught in schools so that correct information is widely disseminated. It is then up to the morals of each individual, and the moral education that they have received from their parents as to how they aply that information in their own lives.

Edited, Sep 17th 2008 11:58pm by Aripyanfar


You deserve a gold star. :)

But a green arrow will have to do.

Edited, Sep 18th 2008 8:50am by Deadbeet
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 147 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (147)