Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

For those interested in sex educationFollow

#1 Sep 15 2008 at 8:50 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
...and personally, I think we all should be, especially with teen pregnancy rising for the first time in recent history...

SIECUS Releases the Fiscal Year 2007 Edition of the SIECUS State Profiles

Highlights:
Quote:
Highlights and trends from this edition of the State Profiles include:

· According to the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) and confirmed by SIECUS’ research, which oversees the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program, 25 states will no longer be participating in the program at the end of Fiscal Year 2008. This totals nearly $24 million in unspent monies.

· Health data released from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the last year reveal one in four teenage girls are infected with an STI and nearly half of all African American teenage girls are infected.

· Other data from the biennially released Youth Risk Behavioral Surveillance System shows little change in important health behaviors. This data shows disparities in sexual health behaviors among race, ethnicity, and geographic location.

· Texas received the highest amount of funding: $18,213,472.

· Four states received no abstinence-only-until-marriage funding: Minnesota, Montana, Wyoming, and Vermont. This is the first time since 1998 that any individual state has no federal abstinence-only-until-marriage funding coming into its jurisdiction.

· The majority of abstinence-only-until-marriage funding is concentrated in southern states; these 17 states received nearly half of all allocated funding ($84.6 million).

· Kentucky and Illinois distribute the greatest amount of funding to anti-choice crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs).

· CPCs receive abstinence-only-until-marriage funds in 23 states, totaling nearly $14 .

· Evidence continues to mount against abstinence-only-until-marriage programs with the first ever Congressional hearing on the effectiveness of federally funded abstinence-only-until-marriage programs. The majority of the health professionals called for an end to federal funding for the programs and said that funds should instead be spent on comprehensive sexuality education that has been proven to be effective.

· Three states passed laws requiring sex education to be medically accurate if taught in public schools. Additionally, the State Boards of Education in California and the District of Columbia passed updated standards for sex education, requiring it to be comprehensive, age-appropriate, and medically accurate.


Seems that we're making progress on coming back up from a recent renewal of the dark ages.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#2 Sep 15 2008 at 9:05 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
/insert "but it worked so well for Palin!" joke here


Seriously, this is good news.
#3 Sep 15 2008 at 9:22 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
4,731 posts
Quote:
Three states passed laws requiring sex education to be medically accurate if taught in public schools.


Facists!
#4 Sep 15 2008 at 9:37 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Forty-seven to go.....

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#6 Sep 15 2008 at 9:47 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
You just don't get that sex ed reduces teen pregnancy, do you?

And sure, you can call 'em bastards. I call most of 'em Texans.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#8 Sep 15 2008 at 9:54 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Age-appropriate sex education.

I have no problem with that, at all.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#9 Sep 15 2008 at 9:55 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
knoxsouthy wrote:
Samy,

Quote:
You just don't get that sex ed reduces teen pregnancy, do you?


You just don't get that it's not the duty of the govn to be teaching this in the first place.

Oh and Obama is for teaching sex-ed to kindergartners. The govn is already pushing books like "Janie has two Moms". This is more than just the govn telling people when, and how, to have sex.



You'd rather have kids growing to puberty not knowing what their junk is for?
#11 Sep 15 2008 at 9:58 AM Rating: Excellent
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
knoxsouthy wrote:
Samy,

Quote:
You just don't get that sex ed reduces teen pregnancy, do you?


You just don't get that it's not the duty of the govn to be teaching this in the first place.

Oh and Obama is for teaching sex-ed to kindergartners. The govn is already pushing books like "Janie has two Moms". This is more than just the govn telling people when, and how, to have sex.



You'd rather have kids growing to puberty not knowing what their junk is for?
I figured that out at the age of 8 when I first encountered a jacuzzi.
#14 Sep 15 2008 at 10:51 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
knoxsouthy wrote:
Yeah parents shouldn't be taken seriously when they tell their child not to have sex until they're married. I mean the govn says it's ok to f*ck whoever, whenever, they want.

Of course you liberals want more single parent households which become dependent on govn taxes to raise those bastards. Along with minorities this is your base.

Can we still refer to children born out of wedlock as bastards?

Maybe we should make babies conceived out of wedlock, bastards.

*does a little quick math*

Hm. Maybe not...
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#15 Sep 15 2008 at 10:55 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
knoxsouthy wrote:
Oh and Obama is for teaching sex-ed to kindergartners.
Why do you & McCain want to protect child molesters and baby-diddlers? Smiley: frown
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#16 Sep 15 2008 at 10:56 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Jophiel wrote:
knoxsouthy wrote:
Oh and Obama is for teaching sex-ed to kindergartners.
Why do you & McCain want to protect child molesters and baby-diddlers? Smiley: frown
They're just lookin out for their Peeps.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#18 Sep 15 2008 at 11:06 AM Rating: Good
*
127 posts
Quote:
Yeah parents shouldn't be taken seriously when they tell their child not to have sex until they're married. I mean the govn says it's ok to f*ck whoever, whenever, they want.


So you believe that no one should ever have sex outside of marriage (just to clarify your position)?
#19 Sep 15 2008 at 11:09 AM Rating: Good
Jack of All Trades
******
29,633 posts
Quote:
If someone doesn't know what their "junk" is for by 13, in this day and age, they are a f*cking ******.


I didn't know until around 14 and I was a 4.0 student at the time (for what it's worth, anyway), so I'd say the ****** thing is out. You should have seen the look on my face when I was on a family trip to Europe/Scandinavia around that time and I happened to catch some porno flick on the TV at one of the "hotels" we stayed at. It got even better once I was asking my mom exactly what it was that I saw (at that point in time, I had no clue what it was that I had seen).

But yes, let's blame people like me for not knowing, when it was really just the people responsible for educating them that were sorely lacking in that regard, shall we?
#20 Sep 15 2008 at 11:09 AM Rating: Good
**
907 posts
knox, if you're gonna troll, could you at least put some effort into it? The stuff in this thread is just not up to par. Maybe you should go take a nap and come back later.
#21 Sep 15 2008 at 11:11 AM Rating: Decent
**
907 posts
Fynlar wrote:
Quote:
If someone doesn't know what their "junk" is for by 13, in this day and age, they are a f*cking ******.


I didn't know until around 14 and I was a 4.0 student at the time (for what it's worth, anyway), so I'd say the ****** thing is out. You should have seen the look on my face when I was on a family trip to Europe/Scandinavia around that time and I happened to catch some porno flick on the TV at one of the "hotels" we stayed at. It got even better once I was asking my mom exactly what it was that I saw (at that point in time, I had no clue what it was that I had seen).

But yes, let's blame people like me for not knowing, when it was really just the people responsible for educating them that were sorely lacking in that regard, shall we?


I knew most of the mechanics before puberty, but I always thought the sperm was in our urine when I was a little kid, lol.
#22 Sep 15 2008 at 11:14 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
knoxsouthy wrote:
Why do you want to expose children to pornography?
You'd rather have kindergarters raped than exposed to ****?

You're fuckin' sick, man.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#23 Sep 15 2008 at 11:14 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Deadbeet wrote:
I knew most of the mechanics before puberty, but I always thought the sperm was in our urine when I was a little kid, lol.
Most people to this day still think that you ejaculate straight from the ********* too.
#24 Sep 15 2008 at 11:14 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Deadbeet wrote:
knox, if you're gonna troll, could you at least put some effort into it? The stuff in this thread is just not up to par. Maybe you should go take a nap and come back later.


Are you unclear on the meaning of "par"? This is what he always does.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#25 Sep 15 2008 at 11:19 AM Rating: Decent
**
907 posts
Samira wrote:
Deadbeet wrote:
knox, if you're gonna troll, could you at least put some effort into it? The stuff in this thread is just not up to par. Maybe you should go take a nap and come back later.


Are you unclear on the meaning of "par"? This is what he always does.



yes, I do. It just seems especially lazy today.
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 271 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (271)