NY Times article on Sarah PalinFollow

Obama was doing coke and smoking pot while McCain was fighting for his country. It's in his book.

Cat,

I'm a firm believer in dealing with terrorists before they conduct another 911 if that's what you're asking. To bad Clinton didn't have something like the Bush doctrine, perhaps we could have avoided 911.

oh and quite a few fannie mae's ex-executives are on Obama's economic advisory council.

That's a poor argument as many issues arise as a result of previous administrations' behaviours/policies. No way 9/11 was completely planned and executed solely under Bush's time in office.

Ash,



Apparently you struggle at the concept of exaggeration. I wasn't about to look up exactly when Obama was smoking the crack pipe.

Actually, Clinton got pretty close to taking out Obama with some missles during his administration after the bombing of the US cole.

Ugly,

Well the muslims for america support Obama. So when I say radical muslims are for Obama it's a fact. Obama was also against the surge that has been a tremendous success for the US, not so much for the radical muslims.

http://www.muslimsforobama08.com/

Oh and Obama is a marxist,



It's not about "technical definitions" it's about how the people "feel". So when radical leftist feel the need to invent new definitions for words like "recession" so they can use them as a political weapon it's alright as long as they "feel" good about doing it.

Nevermind the fact that he's spent the last 20yrs attending an extremely radical church. And yes where you attend church is a reflection of you.

Obama was doing coke and smoking pot while McCain was fighting for his country. It's in his book.

Let's not forget his connections with Rezko and Ayers.

But all that aside Obama has by far the most liberal voting record in the senate, when he's not voting present on controversial issues.



http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. and the kkk is for mccain. what exactly is your point about the muslims, extremists or not?

2. do you even know what a marxist is? karl marx wrote a book on a utopoean society in russia during a time of conctant civil uprest and war. a book which was used to model the socialist style government on based on a premise VERY MUCH LIKE the CONSTITUTION that all people were created equal. the soviets took it to the next level in maintaining that no one should be held above anyone else and that every one should work for the common good of the whole of the people.

the socialism of russia and even china for that matter is based on the very same principles that our constitution is. socialism is also alot closer to what the Bible describes than our capitolistic society. the main differance between communism and capitolism is that communism takes all people being equal to mean financially too. capitolism is more dog eat dog and survival of the fittest.

even the Bible extols on us the responsibility of people in need. not charity, but a real demand. we are our brothers keeper. we are RESPONSIBLE for our brothers well being.

so, Obama is a marxist? well, so was Jesus. put that in your right wing pipe and smoke it.

3, recession. how people FEEL is EXACTLY what we need to worrie about. 70 percent of our economy is based on FEEL about their financial condition. if they dont FEEL good about it, they stop spending. the entire stock market is largely based on how people FEEL about stuff. oil for instance still only cost around 10 bucks a barrow to pump out of the ground. what people are paying for it on the open market is mostly how people FEEL about its supply and about how people FEEL wars and natural disasters will factor into the cost nest month/year/ten years.

so how people FEEL about their economic situation is very very pertenant. technical definitions are for spinn pundits like the whole torture issue and what exactly is a prisoner of war. i guarentee you every one of those detainees FEELS like a prisoner of war reguardless of the legal definition. just like most americans FEEL we tortured them reguardlss of how this addministraiton DEFINES torture.

4. obama has a liberal voting record. HELLO McFly. he is a DEMOCRAT. do you think he could have won the party nomination with a conservative voting record?

here is one for you. mccain has a 90 percent conservative voting record. sooo, good luck getting liberals to vote for him? is that your point? ok, you win. conservatives probably wont vote fore obama. who would have guessed?

5........

the national journal.

its a REPUBLICAN spinn rag. its worse than fox news. its primary mantra is "tell a lie long enough and people will believe its the truth" obamas a fanatical right wing muslim extremist who wants to turn our country into the nest marxist revolution.

its true. must be. it was in the national journal......

dude. if your going to quote something, especially something you know NOTHING about, try a simi respectible source atleast if you cant find a truly bipartisn source.

coarse, if your not with us your against us, so, unless its fox news or the national journal, its a liberal biased media plot to overthrow the country. right?

Seems Knoxsouthy is a firm believer in the Bush Doctrine anyway.

Did anyone every explain to poor Palin what it was?

"Countries don't have rights. People do. Countries have obligations to their citizens".

The govt of Pakistan has an obligation to protect the 'rights' of its people not to be blown to smithereens by a foreign military power.

It does not exist in fact, nor even in interpretation of the decisions made by President Bush.

V. Prevent Our Enemies from Threatening Us, Our Allies, and Our Friends with Weapons of Mass Destruction
A. Summary of National Security Strategy 2002

The security environment confronting the United States today is radically different from what we have faced before. Yet the first duty of the United States Government remains what it always has been: to protect the American people and American interests. It is an enduring American principle that this duty obligates the government to anticipate and counter threats, using all elements of national power, before the threats can do grave damage. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction – and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory action to defend ourselves, even if uncertainty remains as to the time and place of the enemy’s attack. There are few greater threats than a terrorist attack with WMD.

To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively in exercising our inherent right of self-defense. The United States will not resort to force in all cases to preempt emerging threats. Our preference is that nonmilitary actions succeed. And no country should ever use preemption as a pretext for aggression.

Countering proliferation of WMD requires a comprehensive strategy involving strengthened nonproliferation efforts to deny these weapons of terror and related expertise to those seeking them; proactive counterproliferation efforts to defend against and defeat WMD and missile threats before they are unleashed; and improved protection to mitigate the consequences of WMD use. We aim to convince our adversaries that they cannot achieve their goals with WMD, and thus deter and dissuade them from attempting to use or even acquire these weapons in the first place.