Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Now the AP poll has McCain ahead too. Uh-oh, Dems.Follow

#27 Sep 16 2008 at 12:04 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Newsweek now has the race tied. Some swing states are moving slightly in McCain's favor.

Totem
#28 Sep 16 2008 at 12:19 PM Rating: Decent
polls aside, as if they mean anything anyway.....

mccain is making gains in the delegate count. currently not counting florida, ohio and the three toss up states, mccain will have 227 and obama 233 when that time gets here.

its still in obamas favor, still his to loose, but he is loosing ground.

if what we have now stands, giving mccain florida,s 27 electorial votes, obama will have to win ohios 20 electorial votes, which he probably will and two of the toss up states or just michigan to win.

mccain now only has to win, given he gets florida, either ohio or two toss up states or michigan. it is a dead **** tie right now. obama has to win ohio or its over.

but the same can be said about mccain. if he looses florida, its over for mccain.

a dead heat.

with all the stupidity going on in the country for the last 8 years, how did we get here? is half of this country just so stupidly blind to everything going on? or dont they care? or is it more about the "winning" than what you actually win?

either way, we will get exactly what we deserve, just like we have gotten exactly what we deserve under bush,s watch. we EARNED where we are right now. on the cusp of another cold war, allies that pretend they dont know us, and still scraping up body parts from 9-11. we have EARNED this place we are at.
#30 Sep 16 2008 at 12:24 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,158 posts
SR

Quote:
or is it more about the "winning" than what you actually win?


Once in a while SR, you hit the nail square on.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#32 Sep 16 2008 at 12:42 PM Rating: Decent
*****
16,160 posts
"with all the stupidity going on in the country for the last 8 years, how did we get here?" --shadowrelm

Ok, I don't understand how other than being in the same party Bush gets hung around McCain's neck. Seriously. The two have little in common, dislike each other, and have no connection to each other in terms of world outlook, politics, religion, military experience, taste in women, love for cheeseburgers, or preference in pets.

I get that Dems want to tie Bush to McCain to sully him in the eyes of the American voting populace, but McCain has always been held up by the Left to the Right Wing as the standard of what bipartisanship and cooperation is supposed to look and act like. The 2000 primary election hinged on this very issue, submarining McCain's chances that year.

Realistically, it'd be the same as if I claimed Obama precisely represented Hillary or Algore, only in a black man's body-- and I doubt any of you Obamites would agree with that.

Heh. I just had to comment on that, seeing as this continues to occur. Meh, carry on with your regularly scheduled political diatribes.

Totem
#33 Sep 16 2008 at 12:49 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
ToUtem wrote:
McCain has always been held up by the Left to the Right Wing as the standard of what bipartisanship and cooperation is supposed to look and act like.
As an subject of Her Britannic gilf Mad Lizzy, I should point out that my preferences (& hopes) on the forthcoming US erlection are not purely based on party alignment.

If McCain is to be next Prez, I'll still feel safer than I do under GW Shrub.

Sure, I'm hoping Obama is successful, but either way I'm relieved that US Foreign policy is likely to be less xenophobic.

____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#34 Sep 16 2008 at 12:53 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Totem wrote:
Realistically, it'd be the same as if I claimed Obama precisely represented Hillary or Algore, only in a black man's body-- and I doubt any of you Obamites would agree with that.
Policy-wise, Obama and Clinton were/are basically the same. I started out mainly liking Obama for his difference in health care and impression that his plan was more likely to pass through Congress than Clinton's. I eventually came to dislike Clinton's campaign and her running of it but their policies were pretty much identical.

In McCain's case, I've seen him swing to the right on every issue he was a "maverick" about. Immigration, tax cuts, energy, etc.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#35 Sep 16 2008 at 12:56 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
If McCain is to be next Prez, I'll still feel safer than I do under GW Shrub.


Ummm...me too.

The worry I would have is when McCain drops dead or has a stroke.

Then the person with the power is going to be a muddle headed religeous fundamentalist. Thats a bad thing anywhere. But in a country like the US where something like 60% of the people believe that the the bible is literally true, that shakes me to the core.

/shudder
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#36 Sep 16 2008 at 1:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Not quite half believe that, but close enough.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#37 Sep 16 2008 at 2:54 PM Rating: Excellent
Totem wrote:
with all the stupidity going on in the country for the last 8 years, how did we get here?" --shadowrelm

Ok, I don't understand how other than being in the same party Bush gets hung around McCain's neck. Seriously. The two have little in common, dislike each other, and have no connection to each other in terms of world outlook, politics, religion, military experience, taste in women, love for cheeseburgers, or preference in pets.

I get that Dems want to tie Bush to McCain to sully him in the eyes of the American voting populace, but McCain has always been held up by the Left to the Right Wing as the standard of what bipartisanship and cooperation is supposed to look and act like. The 2000 primary election hinged on this very issue, submarining McCain's chances that year.

Realistically, it'd be the same as if I claimed Obama precisely represented Hillary or Algore, only in a black man's body-- and I doubt any of you Obamites would agree with that.

Heh. I just had to comment on that, seeing as this continues to occur. Meh, carry on with your regularly scheduled political diatribes.

Totem


See, you're talking about the McCain of 8 years ago. This is the McCain, that had he beaten W in the primaries, I would have considered voting for over Gore.

McCain of 2008, actually about 2003 really, is a different McCain. This is a McCain that sucks up to the "Jerry Falwell's of the Right" (Hell, he selected one as a running mate!), campaigns for a President who's own campaign against him was down right EVIL to him in the primaries, uses blatant lies in his adds (Which is the tactic that defeated him in the primaries in 00'), supports a war who's tactics he's laughed at, critiscizes said war's use of "torture" - flip flops back to supporting it, & calls himself a "maverick" while voting with the President 90% of the time!

I get it: he really wants to be President. But instead of bucking party extremists on both sides, which he's built a career on, he's sucking up to the extremists on the right in order to win.

He might be the same man he was 8 years ago, but he isn't acting like it.



Edited, Sep 16th 2008 6:51pm by Omegavegeta
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#38 Sep 17 2008 at 9:34 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Today's daily trackers:
Rasmussen: McCain +1
Gallup: Obama +2
Hotline/FD: Obama +3

The McCain bump is over and the momentum is back towards the Democratic side.

Blah, blah "urine". Blah, blah "terrified".
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#39 Sep 17 2008 at 1:54 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Youshutup wrote:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCo7qbzEX3c <-- that's how you do a tough interview


If politics were approached in this manner in the US we have to bring pistol duels back.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#40 Sep 17 2008 at 5:17 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,735 posts
gbaji wrote:
I'll also assume that you also fall into the "going to vote Obama no matter what" category as well...


I usually think the same thing whenever I see anybody defend McCain/Palin, ironically.

I think it has something to do with the reasoning making either no sense, or just seems a little retarded.

I guess blind faith goes a long way.



Seriously, do you believe that McCain/Palin is actually a good choice to govern our country or are you only siding with them simply because they are Republican?
#41 Sep 17 2008 at 6:13 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Sir Exodus wrote:
Seriously, do you believe that McCain/Palin is actually a good choice to govern our country or are you only siding with them simply because they are Republican?


I think they are a better choice than Obama/Biden. What part of this is confusing to you? Are they the absolutely perfect candidates? No. But then no one is. Are they "good choices"? Yes. I think so. Heck. I doubt if Obama/Biden would "break" the country. They'd just do things differently than I'd like is all.


It's not really a choice between doom and gloom versus unicorns and sunshine Ex. It's ultimately a choice of platforms. And yes. I am a Republican. I'm a republican because their platform taken as a whole more closely matches my own political viewpoint than the Democrat platform does. So it's kinda silly to bash me because I might support them "because they're Republicans". In the grand scheme of things, I'd rather a mediocre Republican sit in office than a sharp as tacks Democrat *because* of the platform differences. It tends to eclipse the candidates themselves.

Um. But even beyond that, McCain is personally vastly more experienced and capable than Obama IMO. I just find it amusing that someone would look at the matchup of Obama and McCain and argue that it's the McCain supporter blindly supporting him because of his party affiliation...


On the VP pick, Palin has about the same total experience as Obama. Perhaps a bit more since Governors are traditionally considered to be a better match in terms of experience for the President than Legislators are. Biden's got experience to burn, but he's the VP, not the top of the ticket. Also, he's a nut. Have you actually seen him talk when he's not campaigning? He's a fairly regular guest on Bill Maher's show. He's *really* nutty. This is the guy who championed the idea of resolving the problems in Iraq by splitting it into three separate countries, one for Shia, one for Sunni, and one for the Kurds. Total disaster IMO...


So yeah. I support Obama and Palin, not only because I'm a Republican but also because I do happen to think they are a better total ticket then Obama and Biden.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#42 Sep 18 2008 at 5:04 AM Rating: Good
But, at the very least, Obama didn't pick his VP, someone who can possibly be President, for 100% image and marketing reasons.
#43 Sep 18 2008 at 5:19 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
gbaji wrote:

So yeah. I support Obama and Palin,


haha, let me know how that works out for you.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#44 Sep 18 2008 at 5:47 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
gbaji wrote:
In the grand scheme of things, I'd rather a mediocre Republican sit in office than a sharp as tacks Democrat *because* of the platform differences. It tends to eclipse the candidates themselves.
I don't understand this line of thinking. Now, I know American parties are more polar than Canadian, but I've typically been a Liberal all my life, but in the last election and in this one, my vote is Conservative because the Liberals were horrible in the years right before the last election and the Conservatives have done a decent job running the country since then. I would think after the mess Bush has made for the US, you'd be looking at a different way, for at least a few years.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#46 Sep 18 2008 at 7:15 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
knoxsouthy wrote:
Most of us don't think W has done a terrible job and in fact think he's done all he could in the face of tremendous obstacles; i.e. katrina and 911.
When a Canadian Prime Minister has done a better job of weathering his country through a storm, you have to question the worth of the President he calls a neighbour.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#47 Sep 18 2008 at 7:19 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Define "us".

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#49 Sep 18 2008 at 7:55 AM Rating: Decent
Samira wrote:


It's the liberal media!!
#50 Sep 18 2008 at 7:56 AM Rating: Good
knoxsouthy wrote:


translation:

Quote:
America is bad. We caused 911. We deserved 911. Our allies hate us. We hate us.


Sound about right?


Well in a way, yea we caused 9/11. The same way you cause yourself to get punched in the face if you punch another guy in the face first.
#51 Sep 18 2008 at 7:56 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
knoxsouthy wrote:
Samy,

Quote:
Define us


Christians.

Be more specific, because you don't speak for all Christians.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 154 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (154)