Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Republican ConventionFollow

#27 Sep 03 2008 at 12:56 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Can you get trolled easier?


Ah. So now you're just trolling again...

Well. I guess you can just say any false thing you want, right? If people believe you then you're good. If they don't, just say you were trolling all along.

Weak.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#28 Sep 03 2008 at 12:56 PM Rating: Default
knoxsouthy wrote:
Smashed,

Quote:
LOL. Yeah, lol, the desperation is coming from the party that's ahead in the polls.


You people and your poll worship.


Yes, knoxy, if McCain was 10 points ahead in the polls, you would never use that as an argument for anything.
#29 Sep 03 2008 at 12:56 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
Blair was a rhetoric machine.
I still enjoy listening to George Galloway - he's like a left-wing scottish Varrus who memorised a dictionary.


He's recently been speaking out about Obama
Smiley: lol
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#30 Sep 03 2008 at 1:01 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
shadowrelm wrote:
you want to hear the funniest part about the whole "baby gate" thing?

the dems dont care. one bit. we are liberal like that. its the republicans own party raising a stink from the religious right.


No. It's not. Hence why every conservative is kinda shrugging their shoulders, saying that unplanned pregnancies happen all the time, and acknowledging that she's making the correct choice by having the baby and marrying the father.

Meanwhile all you hear from the left side is how much conservatives should be concerned about this. It's incredibly amusing the frequency with which liberals attempt to tell us all what conservatives think.

You have any idea how many good church going conservatives there are out there, who, when you calculate the difference in time between their wedding and their first child's birth, end up having clearly been pregnant at the time? It's not that uncommon. It's something that Conservatives don't really have a problem with at all.

Quote:
we will gladly take her when they dump her on the street for embarassing them. as far as we are concerned, she did fine, and her daughter made a mistake, but we dont care, we will embrace her too.


You don't get the issue at all.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#31 Sep 03 2008 at 1:09 PM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
gbaji wrote:
shadowrelm wrote:
you want to hear the funniest part about the whole "baby gate" thing?

the dems dont care. one bit. we are liberal like that. its the republicans own party raising a stink from the religious right.


No. It's not. Hence why every conservative is kinda shrugging their shoulders, saying that unplanned pregnancies happen all the time, and acknowledging that she's making the correct choice by having the baby and marrying the father.


It's kind of like how the criticism of Reverend Wright and Obama's relationship shows how little the lily white conservative party knows about African American culture in this country.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#32 Sep 03 2008 at 1:10 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

No. It's not. Hence why every conservative is kinda shrugging their shoulders, saying that unplanned pregnancies happen all the time, and acknowledging that she's making the correct choice by having the baby and marrying the father.

Meanwhile all you hear from the left side is how much conservatives should be concerned about this. It's incredibly amusing the frequency with which liberals attempt to tell us all what conservatives think.


No one on the left has done anything but point out the abject hypocrisy of the Right's constant rhetoric on teen pregnancy when compared to this. Of course, what with the Right being the land of "Don't tell me what happens, I just want to pretend" it's time to pretend that it's great that a 17 year old is knocked up, and that her hockey player soon to be husband is going to faithfully care for her, at least until he's old enough to drink legally.




You have any idea how many good church going conservatives there are out there, who, when you calculate the difference in time between their wedding and their first child's birth, end up having clearly been pregnant at the time? It's not that uncommon. It's something that Conservatives don't really have a problem with at all.


No, it's something they don't have a problem with when it happens to THEM. They have a GIANT problem with it when it happens to black women, or Jamie Lynn Spears. That fiasco wasn't so long ago, shall we go back and see how GOP politicians and mouthpieces felt about that and the impact of parental responsibility for her actions?

Would you like that, little turnip?

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#33 Sep 03 2008 at 1:39 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
No one on the left has done anything but point out the abject hypocrisy of the Right's constant rhetoric on teen pregnancy when compared to this.


It's not hypocrisy. The problem is that you don't actually understand the position or the reasons for it.

Conservatives believe in personal freedom coupled with personal responsibility. You make your own choices and must take responsibility for those choices.

There is nothing hypocritical here. It only appear so because you hold a position in which the action is more important than the reason for the action. You assume therefore that since you're ok with unwed pregnancy that conservatives must hold the absolute reverse position. That's simply not true. It's not the pregnancy itself that matters so much as the reasons around it. If she loves her boyfriend, chooses to have his child, and marries him, then there's no problem at all. That's seen as taking responsibility for the situation.


And *that's* what matters to conservatives.

Quote:
Of course, what with the Right being the land of "Don't tell me what happens, I just want to pretend" it's time to pretend that it's great that a 17 year old is knocked up, and that her hockey player soon to be husband is going to faithfully care for her, at least until he's old enough to drink legally.


Again. You'd be surprised just how many marriages start off that way, succeed, and those parents are now part of the very group of conservatives you think should be condemning her.

You just plain don't understand conservative values. It's really not about dogmatically following some kind of list of things you do and don't do.



Quote:
No, it's something they don't have a problem with when it happens to THEM. They have a GIANT problem with it when it happens to black women, or Jamie Lynn Spears.


No. They have a problem when someone who does not share their same ethical believe in individuals taking responsibility for their actions does it. Because overwhelmingly, the rest of us end up paying for it.

What part of this position did you not understand the first thousand or so time I explained it to you? It is and has always been about freedom coupled with responsibility. Take away either, and you take away the other.


Quote:
That fiasco wasn't so long ago, shall we go back and see how GOP politicians and mouthpieces felt about that and the impact of parental responsibility for her actions?


Go for it. Want to bet that the number of actual Conservative pundits attacking her were far outnumbered by the number of Liberal pundits saying that conservatives are attacking her? I honestly don't recall anyone really making that big a deal about it on the conservative side Smash. The biggest issue was whether or not she was going to marry the father, and praise that she choose to have the child instead of an abortion.


Once again, we're seeing the difference between the reality of the conservative response and position and the perception as presented to the public by a mostly liberal leaning media. Shocker!

Edited, Sep 3rd 2008 2:36pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#35 Sep 03 2008 at 1:54 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Ah. So now you're just trolling again...

Well. I guess you can just say any false thing you want, right? If people believe you then you're good. If they don't, just say you were trolling all along.
If you're too fucking retarded to noodle out that I'm not serious when I say that Palin's anti-American husband forced his teenaged daughter to get pregnant, I don't really think there's a whole lot anyone here can do to help you.

Keep crying, though.

On another note, and speaking of crying, remember when you shed big tears that the "mainstream media" didn't properly jump all of the Enquirer reporting on the Edwards affair? Now I know you'll magically have some excuse why this is different! but I really hope you won't insult our intelligence and will instead fully back an investigation into the latest. Especially since Camp McCain is threating lawsuits if the story comes out:
CBS News wrote:
(ST. PAUL, MINN.) – John McCain’s campaign threatened legal action against the National Enquirer today for running a story about McCain’s running mate, Sarah Palin, allegedly having an affair with her husband’s business partner.

“The smearing of the Palin family must end. The allegations contained on the cover of the National Enquirer insinuating that Gov. Palin had an extramarital affair are categorically false. It is a vicious lie,” said McCain senior adviser Steve Schmidt.

“The efforts of the media and tabloids to destroy this fine and accomplished public servant are a disgrace. The American people will reject it.”

The Enquirer also alleges that Palin unjustly fired a public safety official while she was governor of Alaska, but the story is based entirely on unnamed sources. The Enquirer has also paid sources in the past to speak with them, something mainstream media outlets do not do.

“Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin look forward to discussing the issues that Americans care about, fixing broken government, creating jobs, making our country energy independent and securing the peace for the next generation by bringing the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to a victorious end,” said Schmidt.

“Legal action will be considered with regard to this disgraceful smear.”
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#37 Sep 03 2008 at 2:06 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

It's not hypocrisy. The problem is that you don't actually understand the position or the reasons for it.


I assure you that isn't the case. Any GOP position can be understood by virtually anyone. The complete lack of nuance is a point of pride. That they're largely imaginary and anchored in no way in reality or fact is another issue.


Conservatives believe in personal freedom coupled with personal responsibility. You make your own choices and must take responsibility for those choices.

There is nothing hypocritical here.


Yes, there is.


It only appear so because you hold a position in which the action is more important than the reason for the action. You assume therefore that since you're ok with unwed pregnancy that conservatives must hold the absolute reverse position. That's simply not true.


I'm not assuming anything. I'm judging the STATED POSITION OF YOUR PARTY.


It's not the pregnancy itself that matters so much as the reasons around it. If she loves her boyfriend, chooses to have his child, and marries him, then there's no problem at all. That's seen as taking responsibility for the situation.


So, just to sum up, the GOP is fine with high school students having unprotected sex with one another resulting in unplanned pregnancies, so long as they marry after the fact? That's the policy position?



Again. You'd be surprised just how many marriages start off that way, succeed, and those parents are now part of the very group of conservatives you think should be condemning her.


Actually I know exactly how many marriages start off that way and succeed because I'm not an ignorant fucking clown who can't be bothered to do 35 seconds of research. Since you are, though, enlighten me as to what you think the percentage of marriages involving 17 year old mothers that don't end in divorce before the kid graduates high school is.


You just plain don't understand conservative values. It's really not about dogmatically following some kind of list of things you do and don't do.


No, in fact, that's EXACTLY what it's about. That's EXACTLY how it's legislated, it's EXACTLY how it's articulated in the GOP Platform, it's EXACTLY how it's argued in rhetoric, and it's EXACTLY how decisions on appointing judges are made.

What you're posting about is your imaginary belief that the GOP somehow represents what you believe. It doesn't. Never has. You're too fucking stupid to realize it, of course, we've long established that. Fortunately for us you live in a state where your vote is utterly and completely meaningless.



No. They have a problem when someone who does not share their same ethical believe in individuals taking responsibility for their actions does it. Because overwhelmingly, the rest of us end up paying for it.


The rest of us end up paying for a millionaire child star's kid? How so?


What part of this position did you not understand the first thousand or so time I explained it to you? It is and has always been about freedom coupled with responsibility. Take away either, and you take away the other.


The part where you quoted something and didn't respond. If what you argue were true (I know, laughable, but let's suspend reason for a minute) then Conservatives should have been completely fine with Ms. Spears kid, and with the movie Juno, right?


Go for it. Want to bet that the number of actual Conservative pundits attacking her were far outnumbered by the number of Liberal pundits saying that conservatives are attacking her?


Sure. Any amount you'd like.


I honestly don't recall anyone really making that big a deal about it on the conservative side Smash. The biggest issue was whether or not she was going to marry the father, and praise that she choose to have the child instead of an abortion.


Let's see, shall we sucker?


Once again, we're seeing the difference between the reality of the conservative response and position and the perception as presented to the public by a mostly liberal leaning media. Shocker!


No, once again we're seeing you ignore history in favor of what you wish had been true after the fact. Because you susbscribe to the LET'S PRETEND! Party. LET'S PRETEND we were never concerned with teen pregnancy, just unmarried teen pregnancy among poor girls!!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,317577,00.html

O'Reilly on Spears:


On the pinhead front, 16-year-old Jamie Lynn Spears is pregnant. The sister of Britney says she is shocked. I bet.

Now most teens are pinheads in some ways. But here the blame falls primarily on the parents of the girl, who obviously have little control over her or even over Britney Spears. Look at the way she behaves.


Hmm, fascinating. The blame falls on....the parents.

So the blame here falls on.....let me guess, the media.

Ahh, sucker, it's fun to pretend you have any actual positions that exist, isn't it?

Here's an important difference between us: When Biden was picked, before, actually, I said it was a bad idea. After I said it was a bad idea. When McCain makes a ludicrous blunder, you just spew out what you're fed blindly like the sad, ignorant, partisan hack you are.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#38 Sep 03 2008 at 2:22 PM Rating: Good
Historic? Really? Judge for yourself:

LA Times wrote:
Text of Sen. Joe Lieberman's speech
From Federal News Service

September 3, 2008

Sen. Joe Lieberman delivered these remarks Tuesday night at Xcel Energy Center in St. Paul, Minn.

SEN. JOE LIEBERMAN: Dear friends, as you well know, we meet tonight in the wake of a terrible storm that's hit the Gulf Coast but that really hurts all of us, no matter where we live, because we are all members of our larger American family. Right? (Cheers, applause.)

At times like this, we set aside all that divides us and we come together to help our fellow Americans in need. The last thing we think about is whether one of the victims was a Democrat or a Republican, because we're all Americans. (Cheers, applause.) You know, the sad truth is that it shouldn't take a hurricane to bring us together like this. (Applause.)

Every day -- every day across our country, millions of our fellow citizens are facing very big and real problems. They're worried about their homes and their jobs, their businesses. They're worried about the outrageous cost of gasoline and health insurance. And they are worried about the threats from our enemies abroad. (Applause.)

But when they look to Washington, all too often they don't see their leaders coming together to tackle these problems. Instead, they see Democrats and Republicans fighting each other rather than fighting for the American people. (Applause.)

I don't have to tell you that we were blessed in this country to have a great generation of founders, and they foresaw the danger of this kind of senseless partisanship. In fact, our first president, George Washington, in his farewell dress -- address, warned that the spirit of party could be the worst enemy of our democracy and enfeeble our government's ability to do its job.

My friends, I think tonight we could say that President Washington was absolutely right. The truth is, today we are living through his worst nightmare in the capital city that bears his name. (Applause.)

And that brings me directly to why I'm here tonight. What, after all, is a Democrat like me doing at a Republican convention like this? (Cheers, applause.)

(Chuckles.) Well, I'll tell you what. I'm here to support John McCain because country matters more than party. (Cheers, applause.)

I am here tonight for a simple reason. John McCain is the best choice to bring our country together and lead America forward. (Cheers, applause.)

And dear friends, I am here tonight because John McCain's whole life testifies to a great truth. Being a Democrat or a Republican is important, but it is nowhere near as important as being an American. (Cheers, applause.)

AUDIENCE: USA! USA! USA! USA! USA!

SEN. LIEBERMAN: I think you know that both of the presidential candidates this year have talked about changing the culture of Washington, about breaking through partisan gridlock and the special interests that are poisoning our politics. But my friends, only one of them has actually done it. Only one of them has shown the courage and the capability to rise above the smallness of our politics to get big things done for our country and our people, and that one is John S. McCain. (Cheers, applause.)

You know John, and you know that he understands that it shouldn't take a natural disaster like a hurricane to get us to take off our partisan blinders and work together to get things done. It shouldn't take a natural disaster to teach us that the American people really don't care much if you have an R or a D after your name. What they care about is, are we solving the problems that they're against every day?

Let me tell you, what you can expect from John McCain as president is precisely what he's done this week: put our country first. (Cheers, applause.)

That -- that's not -- that's not a political posture by John; that's the code by which he has lived his entire life. And that is the code that he will carry with him into the White House next January. (Cheers, applause.)

Now, let me tell you that I've had the privilege of serving with John for almost 20 years and the honor of becoming a dear friend of his. I have personally seen him over and over again bringing people together, from both parties, to tackle our toughest problems -- for example, to reform our campaign finance laws, our lobbying and ethics laws, to create the independent 9/11 commission after that great natural -- that great unnatural disaster caused by the terrorists, and then to work to pass the national security reforms that have made every American safer since then. And then he worked together to end the partisan paralysis over nominations to the Supreme Court and other federal courts. This is the record. (Cheers, applause.)

Now, let me -- let me share something with you that I'm in a unique position to do as a Democrat.

My Democratic friends know all about John's record of independence and accomplishment. And you see, that's why I think some of them are spending so much time and so much money trying to convince the American people that John McCain is someone else.

I am here to tell you what I think you know, but I want to speak to the people out there. Don't be fooled by some of these political statements and advertisements. Trust me. God only made one John McCain and he is his own man. (Cheers, applause.)

Let me -- let me, as John would say, give you some straight talk here. If John McCain was just another go-along partisan politician, he never would have taken on corrupt Republican lobbyists or big corporations that were cheating the American people or powerful colleagues in Congress who were wasting taxpayer money, but he did. If John McCain was another go-along partisan politician, he never would have led the fight to fix our broken immigration system or actually do something about global warming, but he did. (Applause.)

As a matter of fact, friends, if John McCain is just another partisan Republican, then I'm Michael Moore's favorite Democrat. (Laughter, cheers, applause.) And I'm not. (Laughs.) And I think you know that I'm not. (Laughter.)

Senator Barack Obama is a gifted and eloquent young man who I think can do great things for our country in the years ahead.

But my friends, eloquence is no substitute for a record, not in these tough times for America. (Cheers, applause.)

In the -- in the Senate, during the three-and-a-half years that Senator Obama's been a member, he has not reached across party lines to accomplish anything significant, nor has he been willing to take on powerful interest groups in the Democratic Party to get something done. And I just ask you to contrast that with John McCain's record of independence and bipartisanship.

But let me go one further -- and this may make history here at this Republican Convention. Let me -- (laughs) -- let me contrast Barack Obama's record to the record of the last Democratic president, Bill Clinton, who stood up to some of those same Democratic interest groups, worked with Republicans, and got some important things done like welfare reform, free trade agreements and a balanced budget. (Cheers, applause.)

Now I'm honored to say just a word about the great lady that John McCain has selected as his running mate. (Cheers, applause.) Governor Palin, like John McCain, is a reformer. She's taken on the special interests and the political power brokers in Alaska, and reached across party lines to get things done. The truth is, she is a leader we can count on to help John shake up Washington. (Cheers, applause.)

That's why -- that's why I sincerely believe that the real ticket for change this year is the McCain-Palin ticket. (Cheers, applause.)

Let me tell you, friends, that the Washington bureaucrats and the power brokers are not going to be able to build a pen that will hold in these two mavericks. It's just not possible. (Cheers, applause.) Together, I think we can count on John and Sarah to fight for America and to fight for you, the American people. And that's what our country needs most right now. (Cheers, applause.)

We all know it; these are tough times here at home, and we have dangerous enemies in the world. And what America needs now, frankly, is not more party unity; what we need now is more national unity. (Cheers, applause.)

And this is especially true, of course, because we are a nation at war. We need a president we can count on to fight for what's right for our country not only when it's easy, but when it's hard. And I was there, so I can tell you, when others were silent about the war in Iraq, John McCain had the guts and the judgment to sound the alarm about the mistakes we were making in Iraq. (Applause.) You know, when others wanted to retreat in defeat from the field of battle, which would have been a disaster for the USA; when colleagues like Barack Obama were voting to cut off funding for our American troops on the battlefield -- (boos) -- John McCain had the courage to stand against the tide of public opinion, advocate the sure, support the surge.

And because of that, today, America's troops are coming home, thousands of them, and they're coming home in honor. (Cheers, applause.)

AUDIENCE: (Chanting.) U-S-A! U-S-A! U-S-A!

SEN. LIEBERMAN: My friends, I have had the privilege and I'd say the pleasure of traveling the world with John McCain. Even with Lindsey Graham, it was a pleasure. (Laughter.) When I speak of John and I say that I can tell you from these travels how much he's respected and admired and liked by leaders across the globe -- John McCain will be a president our allies will trust and our enemies will fear, and that's the kind of president we need in today's world. (Cheers, applause, chanting.)

My friends, before I conclude, I want to ask the indulgence of all of you here in this hall tonight, because I want to speak directly to my fellow Democrats and independents who are watching or listening tonight. I want to speak directly to you out there. I know many of you are angry and frustrated by our government and our politics today, and for good reason.

You may be thinking of voting for John McCain, but you're not sure yet. Some of you may never have voted for a Republican before and, frankly, in an ordinary election, you probably never would. But I want you to believe with me that this is no ordinary election -- (cheers, applause) -- because -- and it's no ordinary election because these are not ordinary times. And, trust me, John McCain is no ordinary candidate. (Cheers, applause.)

You may not agree with John McCain on every issue, but you can always count on him to be straight with you about where he stands, and to stand for what he thinks is right for our country regardless of the politics. I can tell you with a certain faith that, as president, you can count on John McCain to be what he is naturally -- a restless reformer who will clean up Washington and get our government working again for all of the American people. (Cheers, applause.)

So tonight, I want to ask you whether you are an independent, a Reagan Democrat, a Clinton Democrat or just a plain old Democrat, this year, when you vote for president, vote for the person you believe is best for the country, not for the party you happen to belong to. (Chanting.)

I ask those of you who are watching or listening: Vote for the leader who since the age of 17, when he first raised his hand and took an oath to defend and protect our Constitution, has always put America first. (Applause.)

My friends, I appeal to independents, Democrats and Republicans. Let's come together this November to make a great American patriot, John McCain, our next great president. (Cheers, applause.)

Thank you, God bless you, and God bless America.

#39 Sep 03 2008 at 3:21 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Wow, that's 10 instances of "friends" "my friends" and "dear friends" in a 2000 word speech.

That rivals the all time highs.

#40 Sep 03 2008 at 3:39 PM Rating: Good
***
3,909 posts
I liked Lieberman's speech.
#41 Sep 03 2008 at 3:41 PM Rating: Decent
Why does politics turn grown men into tenacious toddlers? You guys are all acting childish about pretty much everything going on surrounding this election.
#42 Sep 03 2008 at 3:57 PM Rating: Excellent
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Why does politics turn grown men into tenacious toddlers? You guys are all acting childish about pretty much everything going on surrounding this election.


Shhhhh...it's fun to read Smiley: popcorn
#43 Sep 03 2008 at 4:07 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
knoxsouthy wrote:
If the enquirer has pictures of them engaged in said act sure.
Oh, no... this is something that the mainstream media needs to be investigating. Why would they stand by and let this go untouched and leave it to the Enquirer to research? Remember that once...
Gbaji wrote:
The question you have to ask is: "Was only a tabloid covering this because it was really tabloid trash, or was it because they were the only ones who would?".

At the end of the day, the information they were operating on was the same information anyone else could have followed up on and verified for themselves. But none of the "big guys" did. What's amusing is that when questioned on this while he was still running for president Edwards constantly dismissed the claims as "tabloid trash". Seems like that was circular, doesn't it?
The major outlets would be doing a disservice if they don't dig into this story and find out everything they can.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#44 Sep 03 2008 at 4:11 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
The cover John McCain is threatening lawsuits over so you won't see...

Screenshot
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#45 Sep 03 2008 at 4:12 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Rarely did the phrase "Witch Hunt" have so many levels Smiley: lol
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#46 Sep 03 2008 at 4:41 PM Rating: Excellent
Scholar
****
4,731 posts
Quote:
Why does politics turn grown men into tenacious toddlers? You guys are all acting childish about pretty much everything going on surrounding this election.


gbaji is some sort of OCD / autistic middle management type who, when not relentlessly organising his socks by exact weight and fabric composition, uses forum=4 to relate how some theortical concept of politics would work if everyone viewed life as he does.

Smasharoo is a dyed in the wool socialist nutjob with a chip on his shoulder and a superiority complex.

Both of them find it cathartic, after a long day hiding from the sun and real people, to call each other idiots in the most verbose way possible, drawing out that orgasmic moment when they finally hit the "Post Message" button. Like some repressed housewife, gbaji keeps returning for more punishment and Smash never tries to initiate a lasting solution to their incessant bickering because he enjoys it too much.

Millions of grown adults live like this. At least these two don't play it out in front of the kids or anything, unless you count Jophiel.
#47 Sep 03 2008 at 4:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Youshutup wrote:
At least these two don't play it out in front of the kids or anything, unless you count Jophiel.
Daddy drinks because Mommy is a Republican Smiley: frown

Edited, Sep 3rd 2008 7:40pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#48 Sep 03 2008 at 4:48 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
4,731 posts
Quote:
Daddy drinks because Mommy is a Republican


They say it's not your fault but you know it is. :(
#49 Sep 03 2008 at 4:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Why does politics turn grown men into tenacious toddlers? You guys are all acting childish about pretty much everything going on surrounding this election.


Because not everyone has the sanguine calm to just not give a fuck at all about the future of the country and the world. It really takes a special person to say "Yeah, I don't know, they're all the same, right? I don't vote. I just want to eat Cheetos and play with my balls. Who cares if women can have abortions, or if we invade Iran or if the government can monitor my every movement. I don't break the law, I just want to watch the new James Bond movie."

Really, you're pretty exceptional. Political apathy? Amazing. What secret have you used to accomplish this??

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#50 Sep 03 2008 at 4:53 PM Rating: Decent
Smasharoo wrote:

Why does politics turn grown men into tenacious toddlers? You guys are all acting childish about pretty much everything going on surrounding this election.


Because not everyone has the sanguine calm to just not give a fuck at all about the future of the country and the world. It really takes a special person to say "Yeah, I don't know, they're all the same, right? I don't vote. I just want to eat Cheetos and play with my balls. Who cares if women can have abortions, or if we invade Iran or if the government can monitor my every movement. I don't break the law, I just want to watch the new James Bond movie."

Really, you're pretty exceptional. Political apathy? Amazing. What secret have you used to accomplish this??


You mistake a lack of concern for what is merely the ability to recognize when someone's mind is so ridiculously brainwashed that no amount of playground bullying will change anything. I mean.. seriously, some of you guys act like your little "I'm right and you're wrong and your party stinks" is sanctioned by the candidates themselves, despite the fact that I'm pretty sure neither candidate would approve of your behavior, especially in the name of their cause.

Smiley: twocents
#51 Sep 03 2008 at 4:56 PM Rating: Excellent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

You mistake a lack of concern for what is merely the ability to recognize when someone's mind is so ridiculously brainwashed that no amount of playground bullying will change anything


We're not arguing with EACH OTHER, fool.


I mean.. seriously, some of you guys act like your little "I'm right and you're wrong and your party stinks" is sanctioned by the candidates themselves, despite the fact that I'm pretty sure neither candidate would approve of your behavior, especially in the name of their cause.


Yeah, seriously, guys. You're totally so immature. I mean it's all "I'm great and you're not".

There may come a day where you can discern the difference between reasoned argument and arbitrary repetition of rhetoric. I won't hold my breath, but let me know if that ever occurs.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 152 All times are in CST
Gidono, Anonymous Guests (151)