Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I said that I admited I was wrong when I used the word insult, that it wasn't an accurate term. I brought that up to show that I had, only a page before, admitted to you that I was wrong about something.
Fine, but that's not what I argued that you were wrong about. I can admit that I was wrong about the cause of canker sores as an example of me admitting when I'm wrong, but I'm sure you'll agree the example bears little relevance - I could care less about the use of the word insult much the same as you could care less about a canker sore. The point is that you took a post personally that was not intended for you.
Quote:
I have not, nor will I ever, admit that I think I was wrong in assuming I was the reason you posted the forum rules. Which, by the way, you have admitted is the case:
Ergo, your post about the forum rules was, in fact, made because of my OP.
Boy, I can't wait for you to pull this up in another argument.
BrownDuck wrote:
There have been several posters lately bashing newbies. I had meant to say something, but your post took it a step further and made a blanket judgment, which reminded me that I intended to bring it up.
Ergo, your post about the forum rules was, in fact, made because of my OP.
Boy, I can't wait for you to pull this up in another argument.
Kindly scroll back and find where I argued that my post was not made because of your OP. I never said that. I said that my post was not intended for you personally. Can you see the difference? If you can't, perhaps you can get someone smarter than you to explain it to you.
