shadomen wrote:
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Stop and think about it before you post another thinly veiled attempt to justify your misinterpretation and subsequent attitude.
Please refer to my early post about that "holier than thou" attitude.
QFT.
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- So, seriously... (was forum=28)
So, seriously... (was forum=28)Follow
Stop and think about it before you post another thinly veiled attempt to justify your misinterpretation and subsequent attitude.
Please refer to my early post about that "holier than thou" attitude.
QFT.
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Wrong again.
What I did was bring attention to the fact that we're not supposed to bash people just because they're not regulars. I did so in your thread because it relates to your OP and if I were to bring up such a random fact in a thread about, say, BT moving to Iowa, it wouldn't exactly make sense, would it? Now, maybe you feel that was implying that you were being defiant of the forum rules or that I had an inclination to report you, but that's not the case. You made an assumption about my intentions because you took my response to Anna personally.
Stop and think about it before you post another thinly veiled attempt to justify your misinterpretation and subsequent attitude.
What I did was bring attention to the fact that we're not supposed to bash people just because they're not regulars. I did so in your thread because it relates to your OP and if I were to bring up such a random fact in a thread about, say, BT moving to Iowa, it wouldn't exactly make sense, would it? Now, maybe you feel that was implying that you were being defiant of the forum rules or that I had an inclination to report you, but that's not the case. You made an assumption about my intentions because you took my response to Anna personally.
Stop and think about it before you post another thinly veiled attempt to justify your misinterpretation and subsequent attitude.
Oh, Stubs. It's ok, I knew you meant that for me. I am also aware that you knew I would understand it was meant for me, so you tried to cleverly word it so as to make it seem that you were just, randomly and for no reason whatsoever, certainly not because I called two newbies morons, posting the forum rules as a public service to keep everyone informed on what was and was not acceptable behavior.
You're such a considerate poster, Stubs. They should totally hire you as an admin here.
So, despite me telling you flat out that your interpretation was incorrect and that what I said was not intended to carry the the meaning you took from it, you're going to continue to deny the fact that you were wrong? Classic example of denying the facts because it doesn't support your position.
You took something personally that was not intended for you and it resulted in an entire page of ******** argument. You won't admit that this was indeed your mistake because, god forbid you actually admit that you're wrong to me. I mean.. that's gotta be a cardinal sin around here, yeah? You can admit that you're wrong to whomever you want, but for god's sake, never admit to Stubs that you were wrong about him.
Stubbs is wrong, I'm saying this to be oppressive.
Queen NixNot wrote:
Stubbs is wrong, I'm saying this to be oppressive.
Authoritarian too?
I'm never wrong about Stubs. Never.
Because he's easy.
Because he's easy.
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
So, despite me telling you flat out that your interpretation was incorrect and that what I said was not intended to carry the the meaning you took from it, you're going to continue to deny the fact that you were wrong? Classic example of denying the facts because it doesn't support your position.
You took something personally that was not intended for you and it resulted in an entire page of bullsh*t argument. You won't admit that this was indeed your mistake because, god forbid you actually admit that you're wrong to me. I mean.. that's gotta be a cardinal sin around here, yeah? You can admit that you're wrong to whomever you want, but for god's sake, never admit to Stubs that you were wrong about him.
You took something personally that was not intended for you and it resulted in an entire page of bullsh*t argument. You won't admit that this was indeed your mistake because, god forbid you actually admit that you're wrong to me. I mean.. that's gotta be a cardinal sin around here, yeah? You can admit that you're wrong to whomever you want, but for god's sake, never admit to Stubs that you were wrong about him.
It's funny, because I admitted I was wrong on the last page when I said I used the word insult incorrectly.
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Queen NixNot wrote:
Stubbs is wrong, I'm saying this to be oppressive.
Authoritarian too?
Nix is a bottom, he can't be authoritarian.
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Classic example of denying the facts because it doesn't support your position.
god forbid you actually admit that you're wrong to me. I mean.. that's gotta be a cardinal sin around here, yeah? You can admit that you're wrong to whomever you want, but for god's sake, never admit to Stubs that you were wrong about him.
god forbid you actually admit that you're wrong to me. I mean.. that's gotta be a cardinal sin around here, yeah? You can admit that you're wrong to whomever you want, but for god's sake, never admit to Stubs that you were wrong about him.
Poor Stubs, always misunderstood and misrepresented. You are the only good person here, aren't you?
martyrdom is hard.
I'd photoshop your head on Jesus's picture on the cross or do a parody of you in OOT based on the stations of the cross, but I'd probably get in trouble again for it.
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
So, despite me telling you flat out that your interpretation was incorrect and that what I said was not intended to carry the the meaning you took from it, you're going to continue to deny the fact that you were wrong? Classic example of denying the facts because it doesn't support your position.
You took something personally that was not intended for you and it resulted in an entire page of bullsh*t argument. You won't admit that this was indeed your mistake because, god forbid you actually admit that you're wrong to me. I mean.. that's gotta be a cardinal sin around here, yeah? You can admit that you're wrong to whomever you want, but for god's sake, never admit to Stubs that you were wrong about him.
You took something personally that was not intended for you and it resulted in an entire page of bullsh*t argument. You won't admit that this was indeed your mistake because, god forbid you actually admit that you're wrong to me. I mean.. that's gotta be a cardinal sin around here, yeah? You can admit that you're wrong to whomever you want, but for god's sake, never admit to Stubs that you were wrong about him.
It's funny, because I admitted I was wrong on the last page when I said I used the word insult incorrectly.
No no, that's an attempt to skate around the issue. You remain intent on believing that my statement was some how intended to be about you and / or for you, when it was neither. I'm sorry you can't admit it, Belkira, but you were wrong. Your flagrant denial is providing quite a reference for future arguments though.
Commander Annabella wrote:
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Classic example of denying the facts because it doesn't support your position.
god forbid you actually admit that you're wrong to me. I mean.. that's gotta be a cardinal sin around here, yeah? You can admit that you're wrong to whomever you want, but for god's sake, never admit to Stubs that you were wrong about him.
god forbid you actually admit that you're wrong to me. I mean.. that's gotta be a cardinal sin around here, yeah? You can admit that you're wrong to whomever you want, but for god's sake, never admit to Stubs that you were wrong about him.
Poor Stubs, always misunderstood and misrepresented. You are the only good person here, aren't you?
martyrdom is hard.
I'd photoshop your head on Jesus's picture on the cross or do a parody of you in OOT based on the stations of the cross, but I'd probably get in trouble again for it.
Jesus was a martyr, stubs is not.
You should photo shop his face onto a picture of a suicide bomber. They think they are martyrs.
I bet you got this bookmarked in your files for future threads, don't you?
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Commander Annabella wrote:
I bet you got this bookmarked in your files for future threads, don't you?
Yes. This is a goldmine.
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
No no, that's an attempt to skate around the issue. You remain intent on believing that my statement was some how intended to be about you and / or for you, when it was neither. I'm sorry you can't admit it, Belkira, but you were wrong. Your flagrant denial is providing quite a reference for future arguments though.
I'm sorry, did my admitting I was wrong to you on the last page hurt that attempt to always seem misunderstood? If I were as **** as you, I could probably trot out plenty of times that I've said to you that I was wrong. That, however, doesn't stop your litany of "You won't admit you're wrong to me ever."
So, see, it's ironic. Because you're accusing me of not being able to ever admit when I am wrong, but I've done so in the past, to you expressly. So by saying that, it's like you can't admit when you are wrong, therefore helping to credit Anna's theory that you are exactly what you accuse each and every one of us as being.
Edited, Aug 28th 2008 2:49pm by Belkira
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
No no, that's an attempt to skate around the issue. You remain intent on believing that my statement was some how intended to be about you and / or for you, when it was neither. I'm sorry you can't admit it, Belkira, but you were wrong. Your flagrant denial is providing quite a reference for future arguments though.
I'm sorry, did my admitting I was wrong to you on the last page hurt that attempt to always seem misunderstood? If I were as **** as you, I could probably trot out plenty of times that I've said to you that I was wrong. That, however, doesn't stop your litany of "You won't admit you're wrong to me ever."
So, see, it's ironic. Because you're accusing me of not being able to ever admit when I am wrong, but I've done so in the past, to you expressly. So by saying that, it's like you can't admit when you are wrong, therefore helping to credit Anna's theory that you are exactly what you accuse each and every one of us as being.
You have yet to admit you were wrong. I'm not sure where you think you did. The post you were referring to:
Quote:
Yeah, I knew you'd go there, and I thought about editting my post. Insult wasn't the right word. You were, however, stating that I was an Allakhazam rule breaker (oh noes!). So I encouraged you to report me. Much like I would anyone who wanted to pull a rule book out of their pocket and pinpoint where they thought someone was crossing a line.
That is not an admission of wrongness. As far as I'm concerned you've done everything can to avoid it.
Repeat after me, Belkira:
"I accept that I mistook your post for a personal dig at me."
It's not really that hard.
I would just like to state right now that I have absolutely no idea what BD and Belk are arguing about.
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
You have yet to admit you were wrong. I'm not sure where you think you did. The post you were referring to:
That is not an admission of wrongness. As far as I'm concerned you've done everything can to avoid it.
Repeat after me, Belkira:
"I accept that I mistook your post for a personal dig at me."
It's not really that hard.
Quote:
Yeah, I knew you'd go there, and I thought about editting my post. Insult wasn't the right word. You were, however, stating that I was an Allakhazam rule breaker (oh noes!). So I encouraged you to report me. Much like I would anyone who wanted to pull a rule book out of their pocket and pinpoint where they thought someone was crossing a line.
That is not an admission of wrongness. As far as I'm concerned you've done everything can to avoid it.
Repeat after me, Belkira:
"I accept that I mistook your post for a personal dig at me."
It's not really that hard.
But that's the thing. I don't think I was wrong. It's my opinion that you posted the rules of the forum because of a post I made.
Am I really wrong, Stubs? Really? Did you log into the OOT today with the thought, "Today, I shall post the forum rules regarding new posters?"
Mistress Nadenu wrote:
I would just like to state right now that I have absolutely no idea what BD and Belk are arguing about.
Me neither, honestly.
Commander Annabella wrote:
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Classic example of denying the facts because it doesn't support your position.
god forbid you actually admit that you're wrong to me. I mean.. that's gotta be a cardinal sin around here, yeah? You can admit that you're wrong to whomever you want, but for god's sake, never admit to Stubs that you were wrong about him.
god forbid you actually admit that you're wrong to me. I mean.. that's gotta be a cardinal sin around here, yeah? You can admit that you're wrong to whomever you want, but for god's sake, never admit to Stubs that you were wrong about him.
Poor Stubs, always misunderstood and misrepresented. You are the only good person here, aren't you?
martyrdom is hard.
I'd photoshop your head on Jesus's picture on the cross or do a parody of you in OOT based on the stations of the cross, but I'd probably get in trouble again for it.
Quote:
I'm sorry, did my admitting I was wrong to you
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
But that's the thing. I don't think I was wrong.
Do you see how these statements contradict each other?
Do you see how your face contradicts your mom?
ITT I have learned that Stubs is actually kinda cut.
Queen NixNot wrote:
Do you see how your face contradicts your mom?
Yes.
Rock me Sexy JesusStubsonasura.
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Quote:
I'm sorry, did my admitting I was wrong to you
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
But that's the thing. I don't think I was wrong.
Do you see how these statements contradict each other?
For someone who likes to accuse others of not being able to read, you're not doing such a good job yourself.
I see how the two statements you pulled out of context contradict each other, sure.
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Am I really wrong, Stubs? Really? Did you log into the OOT today with the thought, "Today, I shall post the forum rules regarding new posters?"
In a round-about sort of way, yes, actually. There have been several posters lately bashing newbies. I had meant to say something, but your post took it a step further and made a blanket judgment, which reminded me that I intended to bring it up.
Recent Visitors: 175
All times are in CST
Gidono, Anonymous Guests (174)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- So, seriously... (was forum=28)
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC