I'll reiterate. I don't like seeing Belkira being called a cnut and to be perfectly honest, I don't like to see any woman called that name. I can understand why Nobby says it--it's used differently in England but here, it bothers me more than any other term. Plus Belkira isn't being all that offensive.
You ******* constantly bash newbies. I'm the only one in this forum who is entitled to be self-righteous in this regard.
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- So, seriously... (was forum=28)
So, seriously... (was forum=28)Follow
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Call me crazy, but I don't think any of the ones she named (or any other recent newbies) were purposely provoking trouble. 
It's ok, Stubs. You win. I'm a *****. I've never pretended to be otherwise on this forum.
Doesn't that make you feel good? I thought it might.
And if you would like to report me to the admins for violating that rule, please, by all means, do so.
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Call me crazy, but I don't think any of the ones she named (or any other recent newbies) were purposely provoking trouble.
It's ok, Stubs. You win. I'm a *****. I've never pretended to be otherwise on this forum.
Doesn't that make you feel good? I thought it might.
And if you would like to report me to the admins for violating that rule, please, by all means, do so.
There you go being defensive again. I was merely making a statement.
Quote:
You @#%^ers constantly bash newbies.
I have never bashed someone for being new here.
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
I have never bashed someone for being new here.
Maybe, but I'm like the RA for every goddamned freshman on the OOT dorm.
Don't you forget it.Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Call me crazy, but I don't think any of the ones she named (or any other recent newbies) were purposely provoking trouble.
It's ok, Stubs. You win. I'm a *****. I've never pretended to be otherwise on this forum.
Doesn't that make you feel good? I thought it might.
And if you would like to report me to the admins for violating that rule, please, by all means, do so.
There you go being defensive again. I was merely making a statement.
Sure, Stubs. I'm a sensitive *****. Always getting defensive. Your words hurt, Stubs. Why do you want to hurt me? What did I ever do to you?
That's ok, though. I just want you to know that if you want to report me for being in violation of this website's policies, I give you my blessing. I won't hold a grudge.
I think Catt is right. I think Brownduck is having some issues about something b/c his behavior has been really off lately.
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Commander Annabella wrote:
I think Catt is right. I think Brownduck is having some issues about something b/c his behavior has been really off lately.
None to speak of.
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Commander Annabella wrote:
I think Catt is right. I think Brownduck is having some issues about something b/c his behavior has been really off lately.
None to speak of.
You've been really unnecessarily combative lately.
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Was I combative in this thread? Or did I merely speak what's on my mind? Perhaps you have grown too sensitive to my commentary and your perception is merely that I've been combative?
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Was I combative in this thread? Or did I merely speak what's on my mind? Perhaps you have grown too sensitive to my commentary and your perception is merely that I've been combative?
You've been really combative in alot of threads.
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Was I combative in this thread? Or did I merely speak what's on my mind? Perhaps you have grown too sensitive to my commentary and your perception is merely that I've been combative?
Was I defensive in this thread? Or did I merely speak what's on my mind? Perhaps you have grown too sensitive to my commentary and your perception is merely that I've been defensive?
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Was I combative in this thread? Or did I merely speak what's on my mind? Perhaps you have grown too sensitive to my commentary and your perception is merely that I've been combative?
Was I defensive in this thread? Or did I merely speak what's on my mind? Perhaps you have grown too sensitive to my commentary and your perception is merely that I've been defensive?
No, you've been remarkably defensive.
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
No, you've been remarkably defensive.
I wonder how you can know me more than I know myself.
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
No, you've been remarkably defensive.
I wonder how you can know me more than I know myself.
The same way you presume to do so about me.
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
No, you've been remarkably defensive.
I wonder how you can know me more than I know myself.
The same way you presume to do so about me.
And when have I ever presumed to know you?
All of you are cnuts, especially the women. 
pics prz belky? <3
pics prz belky? <3
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
No, you've been remarkably defensive.
I wonder how you can know me more than I know myself.
The same way you presume to do so about me.
And when have I ever presumed to know you?
Every single time you've ever judged any of my commentary based on who I am and not what I say. And let's face it, it happens more often than not with you and several others. I don't mind your disdain for me as a poster but your hypocrisy in denying your own guilt of the same things you accuse others of doing is rather disappointing.
I'm not sure you really understand, so let's dissect an example:
I wrote:
I don't really care about Belkira vs Doug earlier, I was just stirring the pot, but it seems like a good time to bring this up: <yadda yadda copy pasta>
This was a fairly benign statement in response to Anna's comment about bashing newbies. I made no attempt to label you, call you names, or anything of the sort, and your very first response is:
Quote:
It's ok, Stubs. You win. I'm a *****. I've never pretended to be otherwise on this forum.
Doesn't that make you feel good? I thought it might.
Doesn't that make you feel good? I thought it might.
I don't care if you think you were being sarcastic, it was easily interpreted as a defensive remark. I had not addressed you at all, and yet you felt the need to respond negatively. Ha ha.
Quote:
Every single time you've ever judged any of my commentary based on who I am and not what I say. And let's face it, it happens more often than not with you and several others.
That's a huge assumption especially when you write so many ****** up things.
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Commander Annabella wrote:
Quote:
Every single time you've ever judged any of my commentary based on who I am and not what I say. And let's face it, it happens more often than not with you and several others.
That's a huge assumption especially when you write so many @#%^ed up things.
I suppose, if you consider the expression of one's opinion a ************ up thing", but I'm more inclined to believe that you merely dislike how openly I disagree with you on so many different subjects.
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Commander Annabella wrote:
Quote:
Every single time you've ever judged any of my commentary based on who I am and not what I say. And let's face it, it happens more often than not with you and several others.
That's a huge assumption especially when you write so many @#%^ed up things.
I suppose, if you consider the expression of one's opinion a "@#%^ed up thing", but I'm more inclined to believe that you merely dislike how openly I disagree with you on so many different subjects.
No, sometimes, BD, you are just an *** and you constantly do all this **** that you accuse other people of doing.
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Commander Annabella wrote:
you constantly do all this sh*t that you accuse other people of doing.
Not true. The majority of the time I am completely docile.
Edited quote for clarity.
Edited, Aug 28th 2008 1:54pm by BrownDuck
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Every single time you've ever judged any of my commentary based on who I am and not what I say. And let's face it, it happens more often than not with you and several others. I don't mind your disdain for me as a poster but your hypocrisy in denying your own guilt of the same things you accuse others of doing is rather disappointing.
I don't like you, but there have been plenty of times where I have conceded an argument to you, apologized to you, or said that I understand your point. Nice try, though.
Stubs wrote:
I'm not sure you really understand, so let's dissect an example:
This was a fairly benign statement in response to Anna's comment about bashing newbies. I made no attempt to label you, call you names, or anything of the sort, and your very first response is:
I don't care if you think you were being sarcastic, it was easily interpreted as a defensive remark. I had not addressed you at all, and yet you felt the need to respond negatively. Ha ha.
I wrote:
I don't really care about Belkira vs Doug earlier, I was just stirring the pot, but it seems like a good time to bring this up: <yadda yadda copy pasta>
This was a fairly benign statement in response to Anna's comment about bashing newbies. I made no attempt to label you, call you names, or anything of the sort, and your very first response is:
Quote:
It's ok, Stubs. You win. I'm a *****. I've never pretended to be otherwise on this forum.
Doesn't that make you feel good? I thought it might.
Doesn't that make you feel good? I thought it might.
I don't care if you think you were being sarcastic, it was easily interpreted as a defensive remark. I had not addressed you at all, and yet you felt the need to respond negatively. Ha ha.
You weren't "labeling" me, you were saying that I was in violation of the website's policies by bashing some newbies. It was one post out of many where you implied many negative things about me. That had been your last post about me (if not to me) so I responded by letting you know that I know I'm a *****, and encouraged you to report me to the admins. I would love for you to, then they might see the thread and tell us if the posters mentioned in the OP are socks or not.
I can see how you might take that as being defensive, but, much like yourself, I do enjoy stirring the pot on occasion. I have honestly not felt the need to be defensive about anything, mostly because I don't really care if Doug considers me a "@#%^" or if you think I'm a hypocrite.
The funny thing is, no matter what I say, you'll label me as being defensive because you think it bothers me. The only way you wouldn't label me as that is if I didn't bother to respond. But even then, there might be a, "Oh look, I got under her skin, she's so mad she won't respond" post made.
Really, there's no winning with you. Mostly because you're trying to troll me, and you aren't doing a very good job. Edited, Aug 28th 2008 1:56pm by Belkira
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
The only way you wouldn't label me as that is if I didn't bother to respond. But even then, there might be a, "Oh look, I got under her skin, she's so mad she won't respond" post made.
Not my style. I have never taken a lack of response as a signal of "winning" the argument, and I challenge you to find a single post demonstrating the contrary. Try again.
Quote:
Really, there's no winning with you.Yeah, there is, would you like examples? I'm asking because there's no sense in providing any if you're simply going to ignore them.
Quote:
Mostly because you're trying to troll me, and you aren't doing a very good job.
I'm not trying to troll you, but even without the effort, it seems I'm doing an OK job at it, judging by your continued response and the nature of your posts.
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Commander Annabella wrote:
you constantly do all this sh*t that you accuse other people of doing.
Not true. The majority of the time I am completely docile.
Edited quote for clarity.
Edited, Aug 28th 2008 1:54pm by BrownDuck
Let me be totally frank. I think you view yourself as this outsider, this independent thinker, fighting against conformity every time people disagree with you. BD, sometimes you are just acting like an ***, sometimes I actually just disagree with you on something and it has nothing to do with other people's view and sometimes, I get tired of your narrow-minded self-righteousness and lack of willingness to engage in any reasonable dialog without making it a personal issue with others. This has been an issue the entire time I've known you on this board and it's irritating.
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
The only way you wouldn't label me as that is if I didn't bother to respond. But even then, there might be a, "Oh look, I got under her skin, she's so mad she won't respond" post made.
Not my style. I have never taken a lack of response as a signal of "winning" the argument, and I challenge you to find a single post demonstrating the contrary. Try again.
Quote:
Really, there's no winning with you.Yeah, there is, would you like examples? I'm asking because there's no sense in providing any if you're simply going to ignore them.
If you don't take a lack of response as "winning" something, then I'm wrong, aren't I?
BrownDuck wrote:
Quote:
Mostly because you're trying to troll me, and you aren't doing a very good job.
I'm not trying to troll you, but even without the effort, it seems I'm doing an OK job at it, judging by your continued response and the nature of your posts.
I respond to almost anything, if it makes the day go by faster.
I'm not sure what "nature" you're seeing in my-- oh wait. Was that another, "You're being defensive again" comment? Sort of like what I expected?
Recent Visitors: 441
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (441)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- So, seriously... (was forum=28)
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC