Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

McCain Wasn't in a Cone of SilenceFollow

#127 Aug 20 2008 at 7:19 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
Life begins at conception. Anything done to terminate that life is nothing less than murder; regardless of how you might rationalize it.


Yeah, your attitude of "throw it on the jumble sale table; someone will probably want it" approach to parenting really obviates against your whole sanctity of life bullsh*t.

'Cause nothing says "personal responsibility as a father and a man" like abandonment.



Edited, Aug 20th 2008 11:15am by Samira
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#129 Aug 20 2008 at 8:31 AM Rating: Excellent
I think most liberals take an existentialist view of procreation.

We're not concerned about the ones that haven't been born yet because we're more concerned about the ones that are already here. Unlike all the warmongering fundies who preach the sanctity of life and then go kill civilians in other countries.

Its the height of hypocrisy to say that "everyone" deserves to have life, then to advocate the killing and torture of other human beings -- men, women, children. If a Blackwater guard in Iraq kills a pregnant civilian Iraqi girl, is it abortion? Murder? Double murder? Is it any more or less of a tragedy that a potential life was killed because she wasn't an American?

Take care of the ones that are already born first. The toddler child of the crackhead mother that needs food. The little ones in elementary school that are shot because of unrestricted gun laws. The teenagers who will experiment with sex no matter how much you preach abstinence that need to know how to prevent pregnancy and STDs. The young men and women that we send off to war then fail to give adequate veterans care to afterward. The husband and wife who are trying to have a child, only to discover that the ovum implanted in the fallopian tube instead of the uterus, and she will die if it's not surgically terminated (ectopic pregnancy, the leading cause of death in pregnant women in South American countries where abortion is outlawed. No baby has ever been born out of one of these because the mother dies within a month of the implantation.) And the senior citizens, abanded by their families and left to rot in a nursing home with only social security to pay for their care.

There are too many problems in this world, and too many damn people, for humans to continue to procreate irresponsibly.
#130 Aug 20 2008 at 8:37 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
knoxsouthy wrote:
Samy,

Quote:
'Cause nothing says "personal responsibility as a father and a man" like abandonment.


I agree; which is why we should end welfare, which drives the fathers away from the home.


Riiiight...men never leave if you're not on welfare.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#131 Aug 20 2008 at 8:56 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Nexa wrote:
knoxsouthy wrote:
Samy,

Quote:
'Cause nothing says "personal responsibility as a father and a man" like abandonment.


I agree; which is why we should end welfare, which drives the fathers away from the home.


Riiiight...men never leave if you're not on welfare.

Nexa


My husband threatens to put me on welfare all the time so he can leave us. True story. =(
#133 Aug 20 2008 at 9:02 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
knoxsouthy wrote:
Nexa,

Quote:
Riiiight...men never leave if you're not on welfare.


Women receive twice as much money from the govn if there's no father around. You do the math.



Hey guess what? Men leave when women aren't receiving ANY money from the government! Also: women kick men out when they're not receiving government aid! There's no cause and effect going on there! I don't think you're likely to find many women who got rid of an involved father so that they could get another $20 a week or whatever it is they're giving them these days. A second income would certainly bring in more than the bumped up welfare allowance for single moms.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#135 Aug 20 2008 at 9:07 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
knoxsouthy wrote:
Nexa,

You don't actually think these women use the food stamp cards for food do you? And yes I think a woman would kick a man out the house for an extra 100$ a month. It happens!


The people I've known that got food stamps bought food with them. When I was in high school, I saw women with children coming in to buy food with WIC checks and food stamps all the time.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#137 Aug 20 2008 at 9:17 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
"Unlike all the warmongering fundies who preach the sanctity of life and then go kill civilians in other countries." -Cat Hole

This illustrates precisely my point earlier. Why, when you so despise this demographic, do you even care if McCain was given the questions before his turn? The very people this particular Q&A church service was aimed towards does not include you. If Obama chooses to present himself to this congregation for questions, what difference does it make to you? It's not like he was forced to go there.

And, like knox, I stand amazed that for a person so focused on fairness you never fail to paint with an incredibly broad brush. "Warmongering fundies?" Lol, you're so frothingly/foamingly rabid as to make the far Right look like they are chewing Prozac like vitamins by comparison.

Totem

#138 Aug 20 2008 at 9:20 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
knoxsouthy wrote:
Nexa,

Quote:
The people I've known that got food stamps bought food with them


The people i've known that got food stamps sold them for like 50 cents to the dollar.


I guess that's the difference between our upbringings. You were surrounded by people that hit kids, left their partners for small money, and took advantage of the government and I wasn't. No wonder you're bitter.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#139 Aug 20 2008 at 9:22 AM Rating: Decent
Nexa wrote:
knoxsouthy wrote:
Nexa,

You don't actually think these women use the food stamp cards for food do you? And yes I think a woman would kick a man out the house for an extra 100$ a month. It happens!


The people I've known that got food stamps bought food with them. When I was in high school, I saw women with children coming in to buy food with WIC checks and food stamps all the time.

Nexa


After the divorce, my dad used to go down to the hoods and buy $200-300 in food stamps for $100 cash whenever he needed to go shopping. This was back when they were distributed in paper form. I've not heard of much abuse on the card system, though I can see how easy it might be, since only a PIN is required in most cases, and not photo ID.
#142 Aug 20 2008 at 11:35 AM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Nexa wrote:
knoxsouthy wrote:
Nexa,

You don't actually think these women use the food stamp cards for food do you? And yes I think a woman would kick a man out the house for an extra 100$ a month. It happens!


The people I've known that got food stamps bought food with them. When I was in high school, I saw women with children coming in to buy food with WIC checks and food stamps all the time.

Nexa


While there are a lot of honest people, there are also a lot of dishonest people (obvious, I know). When I worked at a convenience store it was common to see a woman walk up to the store, kids in tow, stop outside and hand each child a one dollar food stamp, have each child buy a single piece of 5 cent gum or candy, return with the change, then the woman would come in and buy smokes or alcohol. Happened several times almost every single day.

I'm sure the same women also purchased groceries with the food stamps (just not at the convenience store), but it's pretty naive to suggest that a significant portion of that money doesn't go to paying for things that are not about providing food for their children. Also, it was quite clear to me that the women who did this were using their children to get whatever other things they wanted.


Oh. And Paul? You do realize that your position on abortion is almost *exactly* the same as mine? The difference is that I believe that the correct way to get there is via a legislative process involving public debate and this thing called "voting". I think that arbitrarily changing or manipulating the definition of things like "rights" and "human" in order to make a judicial case and force a change by fiat from on high is the wrong way to go about it. Even if the results are what I'd vote for, to me the method we use to get there is just as important.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#144 Aug 20 2008 at 12:19 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
Just because you lack faith in anything more than yourself doesn't mean the rest of us have to be so close-minded. We're talking about the essence of life and the best you have is insults towards a religion you don't agree with.


No. You're talking about the 'essence' of life.

Would you mind applying some sort of definition to this thing you call 'essence'?

Or is it just another 'word' that you use in place of actually knowing what you are talking about. like 'soul' or 'heaven' or 'god'.

Of course im talking about basing my thoughts on science! thats what I know because thats what I can prove.

You on the other hand, base your thoughts around (to paraphrase Smash) a book written about the exploits of an imaginary jew who got himself nailed to a tree 2000 years ago.

And you call me close- minded (sic)!

Quote:
regardless of how you might rationalize it.


The operative word there is 'rationalize'. That is a word that it is impossible to use in a debate that involves religeon.


Gbaji

Quote:
via a legislative process involving public debate and this thing called "voting".


I think thats what I said.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#145 Aug 20 2008 at 12:20 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
paulsol wrote:
Quote:
via a legislative process involving public debate and this thing called "voting".


I think thats what I said.


So you agree that the Roe v. Wade decision was a bad one and we should work to overrule it? I'm just trying to see where your position is on this...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#146 Aug 20 2008 at 12:26 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
So you agree that the Roe v. Wade decision was a bad one and we should work to overrule it? I'm just trying to see where your position is on this...


I dont know enough about Roe and Wade to debate it.

I do know about science and the real-life effects of illegally performed abortions performed by unskilled and unhygenic practitioners.

I'll debate that if you like.

I could probably provide pictures too?

Edited, Aug 20th 2008 8:23pm by paulsol
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#148 Aug 20 2008 at 12:41 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts

Quote:
His position is that God isn't real and it's ok to murder babies.


Of course I dont think God is real!!

Do You?
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#149 Aug 20 2008 at 12:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
paulsol wrote:
Quote:
So you agree that the Roe v. Wade decision was a bad one and we should work to overrule it? I'm just trying to see where your position is on this...


I dont know enough about Roe and Wade to debate it.

I do know about science and the real-life effects of illegally performed abortions performed by unskilled and unhygenic practitioners.

I'll debate that if you like.

I could probably provide pictures too?

Edited, Aug 20th 2008 8:23pm by paulsol


From our friends at Wikipedia (quoted sections lifted directly from Blackmun's majority decision):

Quote:
The Court determined that "arguments that Texas either has no valid interest at all in regulating the abortion decision, or no interest strong enough to support any limitation upon the woman's sole determination, are unpersuasive", and declared, "We, therefore, conclude that the right of personal privacy includes the abortion decision, but that this right is not unqualified and must be considered against important state interests in regulation."


The "right of personal privacy" in question is based on the 14th Amendment's "due process" clause.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#151 Aug 20 2008 at 12:55 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
Quote:
Of course I dont think God is real!!

Do You?


I do. And I should know, I talk to him regularly.


And does he answer you?
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 332 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (332)