Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Well, this is going to be interesting.Follow

#52 Aug 17 2008 at 3:42 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Boomsticker wrote:
Quote:
I guess technically 3 hours is more than 40 minutes. But so it 41 minutes. And if a story was going for drama, I doubt they'd undershoot it that far.

So, 40 Minutes != 3 Hours.

LOL. I should have said 3 hours before the school was considered safe. The point remains the same imo.

The point remains the same? That if teachers had guns, the victims would have been found sooner than 3 hours? Do the guns have corpse-finding radar?

#53 Aug 17 2008 at 3:47 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
trickybeck wrote:
Do the guns have corpse-finding radar?



My gun has everything, plus some!

Screenshot
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#54 Aug 17 2008 at 3:48 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
The point remains the same? That if teachers had guns, the victims would have been found sooner than 3 hours? Do the guns have corpse-finding radar?


What are you talking about?
#55 Aug 17 2008 at 4:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Boomsticker wrote:
Quote:
The point remains the same? That if teachers had guns, the victims would have been found sooner than 3 hours? Do the guns have corpse-finding radar?


What are you talking about?


What color is the sky in your world?
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#56 Aug 17 2008 at 4:21 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
Quote:
The point remains the same? That if teachers had guns, the victims would have been found sooner than 3 hours? Do the guns have corpse-finding radar?


Did you expect me to answer this question seriously? I'm sorry but the question has no foundation in reality and is posed as a hypothetical. I answered it with the respect it deserved.
#57 Aug 17 2008 at 5:21 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
I would challenge you to provide a story where a conceal and carry person was convicted of a wrongfull shooting. I will in turn provide 100 stories where conceal and carry have saved lives.


I still await this challenge. The left is wrong on this and always has been.
#58 Aug 18 2008 at 4:59 AM Rating: Good
***
2,453 posts
Boomsticker wrote:
Quote:
I would challenge you to provide a story where a conceal and carry person was convicted of a wrongfull shooting. I will in turn provide 100 stories where conceal and carry have saved lives.


I still await this challenge. The left is wrong on this and always has been.


Here ya go.

Quote:
Deadliest Mass Shootings (10 or more dead) in Western Democracies 1966-2002

The following data were prepared in the wake of the shooting in Erfurt, Germany, 26 April 2002.
In the 14 deadliest mass shootings committed in wealthy nations during the past 35 years:
*79% of the victims were shot with lawfully held firearms (185 of 233 victims)
*86% of these mass shooting (12 of 14) were committed by lawful gun owners

Many killers, like the 19-year-old who shot 16 people dead at his school in Germany, were previously law-abiding sporting shooters or pistol club members - men whose legal ownership of guns was not questioned by authorities until after the tragedy.

Date Place Dead Legal status

26 Apr 2002 Erfurt, Germany 16 + 1 Legal guns, pistol club member
27 Sep 2001 Zug, Switzerland 14 + 1 Legal guns, licensed pistol owner
29 Jul 1999 Atlanta, GA, USA 12 + 1 Legal guns, no licence required
20 Apr 1999 Littleton, CO, USA 13 + 2 Not legal guns
28 Apr 1996 Port Arthur, Australia 35 Legal guns*
13 Mar 1996 Dunblane, Scotland 17 + 1 Legal guns, pistol club member
16 Oct 1991 Killeen, TX, USA 23 + 1 Legal guns, no licence required
13 Nov 1990 Aramoana, New Zealand 13 + 1 Legal guns, licensed gun owner
18 Jun 1990 Jacksonville, FL, USA 9 + 1 Legal guns, no licence required
06 Dec 1989 Montreal, Canada 14 + 1 Legal guns, no licence required
19 Aug 1987 Hungerford, England 16 + 1 Legal guns, pistol club member
20 Aug 1986 Edmond, OK, USA 14 + 1 Legal guns, no licence required
18 Jul 1984 San Ysidro, CA, USA 21 + 1 Legal guns, no licence required
01 Aug 1966 Austin, TX, USA 16 + 1 Legal guns, no licence required



* Gunman had no gun licence and his possession and use of the guns was illegal


I believe you owe me something on the order of 1300 stories where legally carried guns saved lives. Get busy.
#59 Aug 18 2008 at 6:09 AM Rating: Default
Deathwysh wrote:
Boomsticker wrote:
Quote:
I would challenge you to provide a story where a conceal and carry person was convicted of a wrongfull shooting. I will in turn provide 100 stories where conceal and carry have saved lives.


I still await this challenge. The left is wrong on this and always has been.


Here ya go.

Quote:
Deadliest Mass Shootings (10 or more dead) in Western Democracies 1966-2002

The following data were prepared in the wake of the shooting in Erfurt, Germany, 26 April 2002.
In the 14 deadliest mass shootings committed in wealthy nations during the past 35 years:
*79% of the victims were shot with lawfully held firearms (185 of 233 victims)
*86% of these mass shooting (12 of 14) were committed by lawful gun owners

Many killers, like the 19-year-old who shot 16 people dead at his school in Germany, were previously law-abiding sporting shooters or pistol club members - men whose legal ownership of guns was not questioned by authorities until after the tragedy.

Date Place Dead Legal status

26 Apr 2002 Erfurt, Germany 16 + 1 Legal guns, pistol club member
27 Sep 2001 Zug, Switzerland 14 + 1 Legal guns, licensed pistol owner
29 Jul 1999 Atlanta, GA, USA 12 + 1 Legal guns, no licence required
20 Apr 1999 Littleton, CO, USA 13 + 2 Not legal guns
28 Apr 1996 Port Arthur, Australia 35 Legal guns*
13 Mar 1996 Dunblane, Scotland 17 + 1 Legal guns, pistol club member
16 Oct 1991 Killeen, TX, USA 23 + 1 Legal guns, no licence required
13 Nov 1990 Aramoana, New Zealand 13 + 1 Legal guns, licensed gun owner
18 Jun 1990 Jacksonville, FL, USA 9 + 1 Legal guns, no licence required
06 Dec 1989 Montreal, Canada 14 + 1 Legal guns, no licence required
19 Aug 1987 Hungerford, England 16 + 1 Legal guns, pistol club member
20 Aug 1986 Edmond, OK, USA 14 + 1 Legal guns, no licence required
18 Jul 1984 San Ysidro, CA, USA 21 + 1 Legal guns, no licence required
01 Aug 1966 Austin, TX, USA 16 + 1 Legal guns, no licence required



* Gunman had no gun licence and his possession and use of the guns was illegal


I believe you owe me something on the order of 1300 stories where legally carried guns saved lives. Get busy.


This data has absolutely no apparent relationship to conceal and carry laws. Millions of people around the world legally own guns and do not have the right to legally carry and conceal them. The fact that a lawful gun owner snapped and went postal doesn't bear any relevance to the topic at hand unless you have further information on which percent of those listed above were licensed to carry a concealed handgun in public places.
#60 Aug 18 2008 at 6:54 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
[quote=Deathwysh]

This data has absolutely no apparent relationship to conceal and carry laws. Millions of people around the world legally own guns and do not have the right to legally carry and conceal them. The fact that a lawful gun owner snapped and went postal doesn't bear any relevance to the topic at hand unless you have further information on which percent of those listed above were licensed to carry a concealed handgun in public places.



Millions of people around the world can legally carry concealed weapons without a license to do so. Until you care to show that each of the local laws in all of the above incidents required a permit to carry concealed then your argument is invalid.

Guess what, the perpetrators of the above slaughters weren't convicted either. They either killed themselves or were gunned down by the authorities. And that too has no bearing on the argument. Don't quibble over the little ****. The point is that people who have the right to their guns are the ones that have committed the worst slaughters. And you want to bring that into our schools?
#61 Aug 18 2008 at 6:59 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I really think it's time for this.

Screenshot


____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#62 Aug 18 2008 at 7:02 AM Rating: Default
Deathwysh wrote:
BrownDuck the Wise wrote:
[quote=Deathwysh]

This data has absolutely no apparent relationship to conceal and carry laws. Millions of people around the world legally own guns and do not have the right to legally carry and conceal them. The fact that a lawful gun owner snapped and went postal doesn't bear any relevance to the topic at hand unless you have further information on which percent of those listed above were licensed to carry a concealed handgun in public places.



Millions of people around the world can legally carry concealed weapons without a license to do so. Until you care to show that each of the local laws in all of the above incidents required a permit to carry concealed then your argument is invalid.

Guess what, the perpetrators of the above slaughters weren't convicted either. They either killed themselves or were gunned down by the authorities. And that too has no bearing on the argument. Don't quibble over the little sh*t. The point is that people who have the right to their guns are the ones that have committed the worst slaughters. And you want to bring that into our schools?


It's not arguing about the little sh*t. He asked for evidence showing that conceal and carry laws caused more violent shootings than simple gun ownership, or more specifically, a single example of such. You did nothing to prove or disprove that point. It's a bit like trying to prove that unicorns exist by showing someone a picture of a Rhino. Yeah, kinda like that.

Edited, Aug 18th 2008 9:59am by BrownDuck
#63 Aug 18 2008 at 8:11 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
http://www.bradycampaign.org/facts/research/?page=conctruth&menu=gvr

15 seconds to find.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#64 Aug 18 2008 at 8:13 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
Actually what he said was:


Boomsticker wrote:
[quote]
Wrongfull shootings almost never occur by people with with conceal and carry permits.


Until he backs it up with some evidence, there's nothing to refute. Every source I've managed to find does not make any mention of whether the shooter had a CCW permit, only whether the guns were acquired legally or illegally.
#65 Aug 18 2008 at 12:26 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
http://www.bradycampaign.org/facts/research/?page=conctruth&menu=gvr

15 seconds to find.



Geez Smash. Could you find some older data please?


That's also got to be the most blatant example of cherry picked statistics I've ever seen... Comparing rates of crime deltas? Um... How about looking at the historical rates of crime overall? I think it's somewhat obvious that if violent crime drops nationally for some reason (as it did during the time that link studies) it's going to drop highest in the areas that already have the highest crime. Not coincidentally, those are also the states with the most restrictive CCW laws in place.

Showing that your state with strict gun control laws went from massive amounts of violent crime to moderate amounts, and during the same time a state with much looser gun and CCW laws went from moderate crime to slightly less moderate crime rates and proclaiming that their methods fail because crime went down more in your state is kinda absurd.


It's like arguing that a rowboat can cross the Atlantic faster than an oceanliner because it gains more speed when the rowers row than when they don't. It's an absurd and fallacious manipulation of the data.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#66 Aug 18 2008 at 12:56 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Not coincidentally, those are also the states with the most restrictive CCW laws in place.


False.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#67 Aug 18 2008 at 1:24 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
Geez Smash. Could you find some older data please?


Until the people killed are resurrected it's valid data.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#68 Aug 18 2008 at 2:04 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Until the people killed are resurrected it's valid data.


Nah don't be silly. If there's a one week period where crime drops over 15 years, it's proof that guns are the reason. The reason that 1000 longitudinal studies have shown these laws to have zero positive impact on crime, ever, anywhere doesn't matter.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 337 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (337)