Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Alcohol vs Tobacco vs MarijuanaFollow

#52 Aug 13 2008 at 4:41 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
Legalize it, tax the hell out of it, use it to win the next war in Afghanistan.
ftfy...nothing like a sharing a doob to settle ones differences.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#53 Aug 13 2008 at 5:19 AM Rating: Default
Elinda wrote:
No one mentioned the slippery slope argument?

Legalize dope and way is paved to legalized cocaine, herion, shrooms. Lordy lordy we be sinners..


That's just propaganda that the tobacco/alcohol owned politicians want you to believe. Legalizing weed isn't gonna suddenly make heroin or cocaine legal anytime soon.

You could say the same about alcohol...keep it legal and you're paving the way to legalize other drugs, so let's make it illegal too?
#54 Aug 13 2008 at 5:27 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Debalic wrote:
How do they tax something you can grow yourself?
The same way they tax beer and wine despite your ability to make them yourself?

If marijuana was legal, there's absolutely no doubt in my mind that home-growers would be in the distinct minority and the majority of smokers would be buying Phillips Morris or RJ Renyolds branded weed at the local 7-11. Hey, a home-made hamburger is cheaper and tastier than one from McDonald's but McD's still manages to sell a bajillion of 'em. People are just lazy.

____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#55 Aug 13 2008 at 5:37 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Debalic wrote:
How do they tax something you can grow yourself?
The same way they tax beer and wine despite your ability to make them yourself?

If marijuana was legal, there's absolutely no doubt in my mind that home-growers would be in the distinct minority and the majority of smokers would be buying Phillips Morris or RJ Renyolds branded weed at the local 7-11. Hey, a home-made hamburger is cheaper and tastier than one from McDonald's but McD's still manages to sell a bajillion of 'em. People are just lazy.



It's true. It's way cheaper to even just roll your own cigarettes but most people can't be bothered to even do that.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#56 Aug 13 2008 at 5:40 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

If marijuana was legal, there's absolutely no doubt in my mind that home-growers would be in the distinct minority and the majority of smokers would be buying Phillips Morris or RJ Renyolds branded weed at the local 7-11.


I tend to doubt it. While tobacco companies obviously have the technology to cheaply produce brands, (and brands already trademarked) the initial tax burden would, I suspect be massive.

Also there's a difference in scale. It's rare for someone to smoke the same quantities as they would of tobacco. If I could easily grow tobacco in sufficient quantities to not have to pay $7 a pack for smokes, I'd do it tomorrow.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#57 Aug 13 2008 at 5:40 AM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
Debalic wrote:
How do they tax something you can grow yourself?
The same way they tax beer and wine despite your ability to make them yourself?

If marijuana was legal, there's absolutely no doubt in my mind that home-growers would be in the distinct minority and the majority of smokers would be buying Phillips Morris or RJ Renyolds branded weed at the local 7-11. Hey, a home-made hamburger is cheaper and tastier than one from McDonald's but McD's still manages to sell a bajillion of 'em. People are just lazy.


Yeah, I mean look how many people are extremely addicted to tobacco and coffee, but how many home tobacco/coffee farms are there?

Would there be some people who would grow it themselves? Yeah, but not enough to put much of a dent in the tax revenue. This is just another example of Puritanical values from the 1600s existing in this day in age.

It's obvious that weed is much less dangerous/addictive than alcohol is, but because most people have been brainwashed into thinking it's evil, it's illegal. I mean, seriously, what does weed do to harm you that alcohol doesn't? Lung Cancer, that's about it, but then why are cigarettes legal? It's really ridiculous.


#58 Aug 13 2008 at 5:45 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
If I could easily grow tobacco in sufficient quantities to not have to pay $7 a pack for smokes, I'd do it tomorrow.


"Easily" being the key word. I still think that the majority wouldn't find growing it to fall under the definition of "easy" enough. People would even pay extra to not have to roll them themselves.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#59 Aug 13 2008 at 5:46 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
DaimenKain wrote:
It's obvious that weed is much less dangerous/addictive than alcohol is,
It's also much more difficult to test if someone's under the influence. I think if marijuana had a tests as simple to administer as alcohol does, it might have a chance of being legalized.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#60 Aug 13 2008 at 5:47 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Nexa wrote:
People would even pay extra to not have to roll them themselves.

Nexa
I know I do. It's cheaper to roll your own than it is to buy a pack. At a pack a day, it's easily $30 plus/month.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#61 Aug 13 2008 at 5:49 AM Rating: Good
If it were legal, I would grow more than I already do.

Of course, I've also been rolling my own cigarettes for the past eight years, which should give you an idea as to the depths of my thriftiness.
#62 Aug 13 2008 at 5:54 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Smasharoo wrote:
I tend to doubt it.
You have too much faith in people Smiley: wink2

I don't doubt that folks would have the best of intentions for home growing. The first time they want some weed and it's not readily available for whatever reason, they'll pop down to the gas station, pay some fairly nominal charge for one or two joints and think "That was easy".

Even at $7 a pack, that's only thirty-five cents a cigarette. As you say, people don't smoke 20 joints a day. Paying out a buck a day in weed would seem a bargin.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#63 Aug 13 2008 at 5:56 AM Rating: Decent
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
DaimenKain wrote:
It's obvious that weed is much less dangerous/addictive than alcohol is,
It's also much more difficult to test if someone's under the influence. I think if marijuana had a tests as simple to administer as alcohol does, it might have a chance of being legalized.


I highly doubt that the "well it's hard to test people to see if they're high, so we shouldn't legalize it" argument has ever been used.


#64 Aug 13 2008 at 6:09 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
DaimenKain wrote:
I highly doubt that the "well it's hard to test people to see if they're high, so we shouldn't legalize it" argument has ever been used.


Not publicly. That would be admitting it's not as evil as they want it to seem.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#65 Aug 13 2008 at 6:15 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

You have too much faith in people


Yeah, I get that a lot.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#66REDACTED, Posted: Aug 13 2008 at 10:38 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) They call it DOPE for a reason.
#67 Aug 13 2008 at 10:40 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Boomsticker wrote:

They call it DOPE for a reason.
What's the reason?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#68 Aug 13 2008 at 10:41 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

They call it DOPE for a reason.


Heroin? Sure.

No one's called marijuana "dope" since the 30s.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#69 Aug 13 2008 at 10:43 AM Rating: Decent
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
Quote:
marijuana is bad for you


It is bad for you. That's why you use a vaporizer to smoke it. It tastes delicious, or so I am told. I currently cannot afford any since my money is all spoken for. Smiley: frown
#70 Aug 13 2008 at 10:43 AM Rating: Good
Well they call it pot for a reason, right?
#71 Aug 13 2008 at 10:48 AM Rating: Default
Quote:
No one's called marijuana "dope" since the 30s.


Not true. Maybe it's not called DOPE by YOU but its still used today by some. Where do you think the phrase "thats dope" came from?
#72 Aug 13 2008 at 10:52 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Where do you think the phrase "thats dope" came from?


Dutch.

See, I actually know where it came from, so this asking ignorant questions hoping the other person doesn't know isn't going to be very very effective.

ETA: I was considering explaining it to you, but realized how close to impossible that would be with your attention span and intelligence.

So here's a Russian woman with a huge rack to do it, instead:

http://www.hotforwords.com/2008/02/01/thats-dope/

Edited, Aug 13th 2008 2:53pm by Smasharoo
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#73 Aug 13 2008 at 10:59 AM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

They call it DOPE for a reason.


Heroin? Sure.

No one's called marijuana "dope" since the 30s.



Not true. They called it that in Northern Maine in the 80s.


Yes, I know, shut up.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#74 Aug 13 2008 at 11:00 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

They called it that in Northern Maine in the 80s.


Given the 50 year cultural time lapse between the rest of the world and The County, that seems to confirm my earlier statement.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#75 Aug 13 2008 at 11:01 AM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

They called it that in Northern Maine in the 80s.


Given the 50 year cultural time lapse between the rest of the world and The County, that seems to confirm my earlier statement.



I KNOW. Smiley: mad Gawd. We were so behind the times that we called the Projects, the Housings.

Edited, Aug 13th 2008 2:59pm by Annabella
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#76 Aug 13 2008 at 12:27 PM Rating: Decent
Boomsticker wrote:
Quote:
Question: Why are Alcohol and Tobacco legal but Marijuana isn't? Doesn't really make sense to me. Every argument I've heard against marijuana apply equally, or even more so, to alcohol and/or tobacco.

So, why the hypocrisy? I guess alcohol and tobacco companies just got lucky for getting in on the ground floor in this country, or their supporters have just had more money to give to politicians over the years


They call it DOPE for a reason.


Well, Mr. Genius, just tell me how (outside of legality)it has more of a negative impact on someone's life than alcohol or tobacco?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 344 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (344)