Smasharoo wrote:
The technology has potential. My main issue is that a standard motor isn't going to take much advantage of it. There are a number of car companies designing cars specifically to use this sort of system right now, and they are seeing some pretty impressive numbers.
Really, more impressive than, oh, I don't know, storing the excess electric energy in some sort of battery then using that to power the vehicle?
Key point being that you don't need a battery with the hydrogen systems. And if you do it right, you don't need a large quantity of hydrogen either. So. Less tanks/weight == more efficient process. More significantly, the only components to the hydrogen system is water and borax. Compared with the need to replace batteries completely every 3-5 years and the toxic materials they're made of, there are some benefits to that.
Ask yourself why almost all hybrids on the road are of the "battery assist" type. They get most of their power from the internal combustion engine and only use the battery for additional power as needed. In practice the most efficient form of hybrid uses a purely electric motor to drive the wheels, and a small gas powered generator to charge the battery (typically about 50 horsepower tops). The advantage is that you can operate your generator as the optimum rpm for maximum fuel efficiency since it only needs to produce as much power as the average you use. It's by far more efficient then how we're running most hybrids today. We don't build them in as great numbers for exactly the reasons that the battery systems involved need to be much more powerful. Which means more expense and more toxic materials in their construction. In otherwords the same problems we run into with fully electric cars. The second you're using a pure electric motor to run a car, the problems with existing battery systems crop up. I know you seem to want to ignore those problems, but they're really what's keeping us behind on this.