Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

This just in from FOX...Follow

#27 Aug 12 2008 at 2:54 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Iowa, Colorado, New Mexico and other 2004 Bush states.


Virginia is when Nexa and I start drinking. Either way, really. If Obama wins it, it's over for McCain. If McCain wins it, black turnout is likely trending toward traditional levels and it's a long night.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#28 Aug 12 2008 at 2:56 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Iowa, Colorado, New Mexico and other 2004 Bush states.


Virginia is when Nexa and I start drinking. Either way, really. If Obama wins it, it's over for McCain. If McCain wins it, black turnout is likely trending toward traditional levels and it's a long night.



Why not start drinking before it all happens, pass out, then wake up the next morning and find out who won without having to go through all the ridiculous crap of election day coverage?
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#29 Aug 12 2008 at 2:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
Why not start drinking before it all happens, pass out, then wake up the next morning and find out who won without having to go through all the ridiculous crap of election day coverage?


Cause that's where the fun is.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#30 Aug 12 2008 at 3:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Well, God willing this won't result in us having to stay up until 4am waiting on election results from St. Louis or Gary again Smiley: laugh

I'm tempted to take the day after eection day off but mainly because I expect to be working as a judge that day and it's a 14-16 hour shift.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#31 Aug 12 2008 at 3:15 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
TirithRR wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

Iowa, Colorado, New Mexico and other 2004 Bush states.


Virginia is when Nexa and I start drinking. Either way, really. If Obama wins it, it's over for McCain. If McCain wins it, black turnout is likely trending toward traditional levels and it's a long night.



Why not start drinking before it all happens, pass out, then wake up the next morning and find out who won without having to go through all the ridiculous crap of election day coverage?


Consider that Presidential Elections are my Superbowl. Would a football fan sleep through a superbowl to avoid the stress of watching the game?

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#32 Aug 12 2008 at 3:18 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts


Consider that Presidential Elections are my Superbowl


Olympics. Congressional elections are your Superbowl :)

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#33 Aug 12 2008 at 3:18 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Nexa wrote:
TirithRR wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

Iowa, Colorado, New Mexico and other 2004 Bush states.


Virginia is when Nexa and I start drinking. Either way, really. If Obama wins it, it's over for McCain. If McCain wins it, black turnout is likely trending toward traditional levels and it's a long night.



Why not start drinking before it all happens, pass out, then wake up the next morning and find out who won without having to go through all the ridiculous crap of election day coverage?


Consider that Presidential Elections are my Superbowl. Would a football fan sleep through a superbowl to avoid the stress of watching the game?

Nexa


If the football game was just going to be a bunch of people talking about the plays, and what MIGHT happen if the player did x or y... rather than what they are actually doing... then ya, I'd sleep through it. It'd be like if between touchdowns, they didn't show actual plays, but just a bunch of "what if" cg'd scenarios.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#34 Aug 12 2008 at 3:19 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

If the football game was just going to be a bunch of people talking about the plays, and what MIGHT happen if the player did x or y... rather than what they are actually doing... then ya, I'd sleep through it. It'd be like if between touchdowns, they didn't show actual plays, but just a bunch of "what if" cg'd scenarios.


So...a Superbowl broadcast, you're saying?

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#35 Aug 12 2008 at 3:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Nexa wrote:
Consider that Presidential Elections are my Superbowl.
See? You guys should fly out to Chicago for the big day. I mean, you'd want to be in the hometown of the champion when the game's done, right? Smiley: grin
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#36 Aug 12 2008 at 3:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Smasharoo wrote:
If the football game was just going to be a bunch of people talking about the plays, and what MIGHT happen if the player did x or y... rather than what they are actually doing... then ya, I'd sleep through it. It'd be like if between touchdowns, they didn't show actual plays, but just a bunch of "what if" cg'd scenarios.

So...a Superbowl broadcast, you're saying?
Don't be stupid, Smash. Election day commercials aren't as good.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#37 Aug 12 2008 at 3:20 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

See? You guys should fly out to Chicago for the big day.


They way things are going, we'll probably be closing on a house. By "we" I mean Nexa, while I'm using the lawyers machine to post.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#38 Aug 12 2008 at 3:24 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:
If the football game was just going to be a bunch of people talking about the plays, and what MIGHT happen if the player did x or y... rather than what they are actually doing... then ya, I'd sleep through it. It'd be like if between touchdowns, they didn't show actual plays, but just a bunch of "what if" cg'd scenarios.

So...a Superbowl broadcast, you're saying?
Don't be stupid, Smash. Election day commercials aren't as good.


Maybe if Doritos made a commercial where McCain is sitting in a chair outside of a voting booth, eating a bag of Doritos... then Obama jumps out of the booth from behind the curtain and starts beating on him? I'd watch.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#39 Aug 12 2008 at 3:28 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Maybe if Doritos made a commercial where McCain is sitting in a chair outside of a voting booth, eating a bag of Doritos... then Obama jumps out of the booth from behind the curtain and starts beating on him?


That'll be the election broadcast by 10PM, anyway.

"For a race that was A NEAR DEAD HEAT all the way to the election, this is quite the landslide. Let's go to ******** ************* to explain what happened. Bull?"

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#40 Aug 12 2008 at 4:20 PM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
Well, God willing this won't result in us having to wait weeks later waiting on election results from the Supreme Court again.


I agree
#41 Aug 12 2008 at 5:32 PM Rating: Good
knoxsouthy wrote:
Damien,

Quote:
It's not like he just came out of nowhere and they just put him on the ballot for fun


Actually he did just come out of nowhere. Look at how much time he's actually spent in congress. He's an invention of the DNC because they were sick of the Clintons running the party. And now with what's come out about Edwards it makes me wonder if he would have won the nomination at all had the media reported the story back when they first heard about it. Obama is nothing more than a puppet.



No he didn't come out of nowhere. He gained public attention on a massive level (well as massive as a person in his place could have been) during the Kerry Campaign.
#42 Aug 12 2008 at 9:28 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
He gained public attention on a massive level during the Kerry Campaign


When he made this speech @ the DNC & the collective Democratic party, myself included, thought wtf are we doing w/Kerry?

Granted, I didn't see Obama beating Clinton in the next electing @ that time, I thought he'd be President in 2016, or possibly Clinton's VP.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#43 Aug 12 2008 at 9:44 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
Quote:
He gained public attention on a massive level during the Kerry Campaign


When he made this speech @ the DNC & the collective Democratic party, myself included, thought wtf are we doing w/Kerry?

That transcript has a misused "it's," and it's doing a disservice to Obama! And America!

#44 Aug 13 2008 at 3:39 AM Rating: Decent
It's Just a Flesh Wound
******
22,702 posts
I personally feel that even though Obama doesn't have "enough" experience I like the way he plans to do things more. If I could find that picture on their tax reduction plans again I'd link that, <.<;

I can't really say that I'm experienced though and that I know what I'm doing, for this'll be my first time voting.
____________________________
Dear people I don't like: 凸(●´―`●)凸
#45 Aug 13 2008 at 5:26 AM Rating: Decent
Saying that Obama shouldn't be president because he has little experience doesn't make much sense. There's been presidents with gubanatorial/congressional experience that have failed miserably as president (like our current one?)

While, I'm not so deluded that I think Obama is some shining light of purity, I actually prefer that he's only been a Senator for a few years. He's much less entrenched in the "Washington Game" and all that "Well I scratched your back, now you scratch mine" than McCain is. I'm not saying he's totally seperate from that, but at least less so than McCain.

I have the feeling that since he's only been in Washington for a few years, Obama is much more in touch with the true needs and/or feelings of the people, rather than McCain, who for all intents and purposes is another out-of-touch career politician.

Edited, Aug 13th 2008 9:24am by DaimenKain
#46 Aug 13 2008 at 5:55 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

See? You guys should fly out to Chicago for the big day.


They way things are going, we'll probably be closing on a house. By "we" I mean Nexa, while I'm using the lawyers machine to post.



Even more of an issue is that I'll likely have just started at a new job and don't like letting folks in on the crazy quite that soon. "Yeah, I know I'm just getting things set up here, but I need to take a couple days off to fly to Chicago to watch Obama win from home court. There will be wine and cheese and a big screen tv. You know how it is."

Maybe we can work something out for the inauguration though.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#47 Aug 13 2008 at 5:58 AM Rating: Decent
Nexa wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

See? You guys should fly out to Chicago for the big day.


They way things are going, we'll probably be closing on a house. By "we" I mean Nexa, while I'm using the lawyers machine to post.



Even more of an issue is that I'll likely have just started at a new job and don't like letting folks in on the crazy quite that soon. "Yeah, I know I'm just getting things set up here, but I need to take a couple days off to fly to Chicago to watch Obama win from home court. There will be wine and cheese and a big screen tv. You know how it is."

Maybe we can work something out for the inauguration though.

Nexa


That's why you lie and say your grandmother died or something. ;p

If you want to save something for the inauguration, just say "There's this guy knoxsouthy on the message board I frequent and he committed suicide, and I need to go to the funeral"
#48REDACTED, Posted: Aug 13 2008 at 6:29 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Newsflash. He is "way behind" in the polls. In a year when Dems are polling consistently 15-20 points ahead of Republicans on brand alone, Obama can't manage to garner more then a few point lead over McCain? He's running on popularity. His entire campaign depends on having such a massively popular appeal that the people wont stop and think about issues and positions until after they've voted.
#49 Aug 13 2008 at 6:49 AM Rating: Decent
It's Just a Flesh Wound
******
22,702 posts
Quote:
I actually prefer that he's only been a Senator for a few years.


Yeah, that's one of the things I like most about him. My father however...
____________________________
Dear people I don't like: 凸(●´―`●)凸
#50 Aug 13 2008 at 12:38 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
DaimenKain wrote:
I actually prefer that he's only been a Senator for a few years.
He's had less time to say things like this:
PolitiFact wrote:
In this item, we’ll focus on whether McCain called a requirement for the federal government to buy American products "disgraceful."

Indeed he did.

McCain has repeatedly voted and spoken against requiring the government to buy American-made products. He argues that such a requirement hurts trade and doesn’t guarantee the lowest prices for taxpayers.

In a 1997 article in Defense Daily, McCain criticized the requirement as "the worst, most disgraceful aspect of the legislative process in Washington. I can not be more strong in my views without using four letter words. It’s crazy for us, because ball bearings are made in a certain state, to somehow prevent the United States Defense Department from purchasing ball bearings if they meet quality standards from our allies."

In 2005, he specifically mentioned motorcycles during Senate debate on a spending bill for the Department of Homeland Security.

"Lastly, I am also disappointed that the bill once again this year contains a department-wide 'buy America' requirement, and specific language directing the Secret Service to purchase American-made motorcycles. I firmly object to all 'buy America' restrictions, as they represent gross examples of protectionist trade policy."
I can already guess the standard response from the usual suspects here and, hell, I even agree somewhat. But that'll come as small consolation to the Rust Belt voters as they hear this message repeated that McCain is vehemently against provisions requiring our government to Buy American.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#51 Aug 13 2008 at 6:43 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
DaimenKain wrote:
Saying that Obama shouldn't be president because he has little experience doesn't make much sense. There's been presidents with gubanatorial/congressional experience that have failed miserably as president (like our current one?)


Go take a logic class. Then come back and read what you just wrote.

Some first rank draft picks in the NFL "fail". But if you had a choice between one of them and some unranked guy who showed up on the practice field looking for a shot who would you place odds on? It does, in fact, make perfect sense.

Quote:
While, I'm not so deluded that I think Obama is some shining light of purity, I actually prefer that he's only been a Senator for a few years. He's much less entrenched in the "Washington Game" and all that "Well I scratched your back, now you scratch mine" than McCain is. I'm not saying he's totally seperate from that, but at least less so than McCain.


Obama comes from the Chicago, one of the most corrupt and "backscratch" political environments in the country. And he rose *very* fast. The odds that he managed to do that without owing a whole batch of very very corrupt people is somewhere just barely above zero.

Let's remove the generalities here. We're talking about Obama vs McCain. One of them has a longstanding record as a very straight guy politically and ethically. The other has a short record filled mostly with constantly changing opinions, different stories depending on who he's talking to, a record that seems designed most to please a short list of very liberal and very powerful political groups, and a list of political connections that should make anyone cringe. Sorry. I'll take the long time Senator over the guy who attends a church run by a bigot because it helps his political career, sits on a board with a domestic terrorist for the same reason, writes a position on gun control that's popular in Chicago (for his career), then pretends he didn't write it when that's convenient for his political career, gets a perfect score from Planned Parenthood and is ranked as the most Liberal Senator, but claims he's a centrist, and otherwise has a pretty ridiculous list of positions he's swapped, adjusted, restated, or just plain not ever taken a stance on at all, all of which are designed to make it really hard to actually nail him down to a real position on anything.


Obama's greatest facet is that he lies so habitually that you can't tell when he's lying. You don't have any "truth" from him to compare it to. It's so rare to get a solid commitment from him on anything that it's laughable. He's a politician who apparently stands for nothing at all, but pretends he stands for whatever the people he's talking to at the moment care about.


Quote:
I have the feeling that since he's only been in Washington for a few years, Obama is much more in touch with the true needs and/or feelings of the people, rather than McCain, who for all intents and purposes is another out-of-touch career politician.


Why? More then a person who's name you randomly grabbed out of a phonebook?


That's a position that makes no sense. Look. I know this may be crazy, but I don't vote for president based on whether I feel like someone is "in touch" with the people (whatever the hell that means). I vote for president based on that person's positions on issues and (more importantly) his reasons why he holds those positions. This lets me know how he'll act with regard to the specific issues at hand, and gives me a clue as to how he'll respond to future issues that haven't been specifically talked about. It allows me to vote for the person who will make the decisions that I agree with.

That *should* be what you're looking for in a president. And for me, Obama doesn't match up at all. Maybe he does for you, but then again, maybe you're just planning on voting for him because he "feels right". I'm just suggesting that you make your choice based on an examination of the candidate, not just how you feel.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 188 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (188)