http://www.eursoc.com/news/fullstory.php/aid/985/Algerian_President_Attacks_French__Genocide_.html
Them Frogs been at it again. They done kilt a buncha Hoo-toos and Tootsies, all the while protestin' about how 'Merica's been engaged in an immoral war in Iraq, damn hypocrits. Turns out that while they was actin' all high and mighty, they was icing darkies by the bushelbasket-full. Uh-huh, now we cain flip them the middle finger anytime they protest about how we are a bunch of backwoods, gun-lovin' sexually repressed savages. Kiss mah red, white, and blue a$$ Frog!
Totem
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Dirty French sumbitches
Dirty French sumbitchesFollow
No. The French can say whatever they want to you until they too refuse to learn from history and begin to repeat it.
Making a mistake is common, not learning from it or other's, is the actions of a fool.
Making a mistake is common, not learning from it or other's, is the actions of a fool.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Quote:
Them Frogs been at it again.
46 years ago?
Anyway, the disastrous effects of European colonization in Africa are pretty well known.
trickybeck wrote:
Quote:
Them Frogs been at it again.
46 years ago?
Anyway, the disastrous effects of European colonization in Africa are pretty well known.
Yeah, what he's talking about is a little more recent.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Them Frogs been at it again. They done kilt a buncha Hoo-toos and Tootsies, all the while protestin' about how 'Merica's been engaged in an immoral war in Iraq,
Yes, but Arabs are *people*. People with oil. What does Rwanda have? Bauxite? *****, please.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Samira wrote:
Yeah, what he's talking about is a little more recent.
Was that somewhere in the article?
trickybeck wrote:
Samira wrote:
Yeah, what he's talking about is a little more recent.
Was that somewhere in the article?
Oh, my bad, I thought the article was about the recent accusations that France was backing the Hutus in Rwanda in '94. Guess I could have read it first.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Totem wrote:
Uh-huh, now we can flip them the middle finger anytime they protest
"Now"? What were you doing before?
Oh yeah, renaming fries, I forgot.
The Rwanda stuff is pretty awful. I'm not sure exactly how much the French government was involved, but there's no doubt that it was.
The stuff France did in its ex-African colonies (Chad, Ivory Coast, Central African Republic, Cameroon, Senegal, etc...) is pretty crazy. After the decolonisation, France installed some local dictator that was in pocket of the French governement, usually from the secret services. They made bi-lateral military treaties with most of those countries, so that if ever the government was "threatened" (ie, a revolt to overthrow the dictator, or some civil unrest, etc...) France would intervene militarily. They had permanent military bases in most of those countries. They had commercial treaties for the exclusive access to primary ressources at knock-down prices.
It was neo-colonism, without a doubt. Between the 60s and the 90s (when it more or less stopped), we interveend militarily over 40 times. The latest was in 2001 in Ivory Coast. I was gonna do a phd on that subject, but then I got my current job. It's almost a shame, it would've been cool.
What Bouteflika is saying is a bit weak, though. It's partially true, but then again it's true of all colonialism. Algeria was actually quite well-off for a colony, they were the only one that was actually part of France. Obviously, what the French army did in the war was atrocious and disgusting, and the way we supported Bouteflika from that point on isn't great either. Both of those points would've been much more true, but I guess he's just trying to shore up some populist support.
Algeria was actually quite well-off for a colony
Dirty wogs never knew how good they had it.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Smasharoo wrote:
Algeria was actually quite well-off for a colony
Dirty wogs never knew how good they had it.
Exactly, and then they start a war...
#11REDACTED,
Posted: Aug 06 2008 at 8:23 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) yea, they just colonized it and stole its identity.
On the bright side, no one's making fun of the French army anymore.
Every cloud...
Every cloud...
Arabs are people?!? Says who?
Totem
Totem
Quote:
The Rwanda stuff is pretty awful. I'm not sure exactly how much the French government was involved, but there's no doubt that it was.
Well, a lot of Western countries were involved in that tragedy, mostly just running away from it but anyway.
I'm not all that convinced France did all the Rwandese are saying they did, it just sounds a lot like payback for the accusations the French recenly made against those in power in Rwanda.
All in all, Belgium is most likely the most to blame for Rwanda, not just by messing the country up when it was our colony even more, also by running away first when our troops were butchered. (and abandoned by the UN too ofcourse, can't forget that)
Then again, par for the course I'ld say, after the millions of Congolese we butchered a century earlier.
Zieveraar wrote:
Quote:
The Rwanda stuff is pretty awful. I'm not sure exactly how much the French government was involved, but there's no doubt that it was.
Well, a lot of Western countries were involved in that tragedy, mostly just running away from it but anyway.
I'm not all that convinced France did all the Rwandese are saying they did, it just sounds a lot like payback for the accusations the French recenly made against those in power in Rwanda.
All in all, Belgium is most likely the most to blame for Rwanda, not just by messing the country up when it was our colony even more, also by running away first when our troops were butchered. (and abandoned by the UN too ofcourse, can't forget that)
Then again, par for the course I'ld say, after the millions of Congolese we butchered a century earlier.
Thanks mate.
Once again, Belgium manages to make us look pretty awesome in comparison.
Ahh, the heavy weight of the White Man's burden on Europe's collective shoulders...
Totem
Totem
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
Once again, Belgium manages to make us look pretty awesome in comparison.
Canada needs to find a neighbour like that.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Nah, we have enough collective White Man's burden around here, Ugly. Case in point: we're even contemplating hiring on Barry Hussein to ease our aching back.
Totem
Totem
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
Canada needs to find a neighbour like that.
Well, the Arctic Circle is pretty boring.
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
Canada needs to find a neighbour like that.
Speaking of Canada, does anyone know is the US/Canadian border still passable, via an automobile, without a passport?
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Only if you are doing a legal business in whale blubber and baby seal skins. Moose antlers require a passport yet.
Totem
Totem
Elinda wrote:
Speaking of Canada, does anyone know is the US/Canadian border still passable, via an automobile, without a passport?
Last I heard if traveling by land or water, no passport is needed to cross back and forth between the US and Canada until 2009. If you travel by air, you will need one.
Deathwysh wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Speaking of Canada, does anyone know is the US/Canadian border still passable, via an automobile, without a passport?
Last I heard if traveling by land or water, no passport is needed to cross back and forth between the US and Canada until 2009. If you travel by air, you will need one.
This looks right. Here's the official page.
Quote:
ENTRY/EXIT REQUIREMENTS: All Americans traveling by air outside the United States are required to present a passport or other valid travel document to enter or re-enter the United States . This requirement will be extended to sea travel (except closed loop cruises), including ferry service, by the summer of 2009. Until then, U.S. citizens traveling by sea must have government-issued photo identification and a document showing their U.S. citizenship (for example, a birth certificate or certificate of nationalization), or other WHTI compliant document such as a passport card for entry or re-entry to the U.S. Sea travelers should also check with their cruise line and countries of destination for any foreign entry requirements.
I also enjoyed the description:
Quote:
COUNTRY DESCRIPTION: Canada is a highly developed, stable democracy. Tourist facilities are widely available except in northern and wilderness areas, where they are less developed and can be vast distances apart.
I totally read Totem's OP with a Cajun accent.
Nadenu wrote:
I totally read Totem's OP with a Cajun accent.
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
The loss of a quarter ounce of white sticky fluid does not dehydration make, Nobs.
Totem
Totem
Recent Visitors: 332
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (332)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Dirty French sumbitches
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC