Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Electric Car MPG?Follow

#27 Aug 07 2008 at 9:37 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:

Whatever. I can't argue with people that refuse to accept certain facts and think things through. I could run it all down for you

No, you couldn't, you @#%^ing ignorant clown. I don't know what sort of crazy witchcraft you're using to find the right keys on the keyboard, but there isn't anything you could "run down" with the possible exception of how to drool on yourself.


Why are liberals always so screechy and offensive? Maybe because thier arguments can't stand up to scrutiny so they have to shout any opposing view down. This is you Smasharooni.

Edited, Aug 7th 2008 1:37pm by Boomsticker
#28 Aug 07 2008 at 9:45 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
There really needs to be a forum law for the "I could explain it if I thought you'd comprehend" schtick.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#29 Aug 07 2008 at 1:26 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Moving right along...

Smasharoo wrote:

Except, shadow, that oil still is, dollar-to-dollar, the cheapest form of energy out there, despite what your wallet says when you fill up your car.


Yeah, not close. Nat Gas powered cars run at an equivalent of about $1.75 a gallon. Did you mean "fossil fuels" by "oil" maybe?


Nice bait and switch there Smash. Do the comparison in dollars/mile and see how they stack up.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#30 Aug 07 2008 at 1:34 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Nice bait and switch there Smash. Do the comparison in dollars/mile and see how they stack up.


Stacks up to about $1.75 a gallon, Einstein. Of the equivalent mileage in gasoline.

A "gallon" is kind of a ******* useless measurement of a gaseous substance, genius. Hence the word "equivalent" in my post. Most people probably missed that, right?

****.





____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#31 Aug 07 2008 at 1:36 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Why are liberals always so screechy and offensive? Maybe because thier arguments can't stand up to scrutiny so they have to shout any opposing view down.


Who's shouting, shitbird? Go ahead and run it down for us. I'm waiting with bells on. My balls. Giant four ton brass bells.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#32 Aug 07 2008 at 2:47 PM Rating: Decent
Efficiency values of standard cars and power plants are well known and widely accepted values. You can find them in textbooks, not just research papers.

In my estimate above, I left out factors which contribute to efficiency. I did not attempt to compute total cost of ownership or how much power (resources) consumed in the construction/maintenance of each as this was not the question asked above.

It is a necessary (but not sufficient) condition to move to electric cars that efficiency is improved.

#33 Aug 07 2008 at 4:23 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
yossarian wrote:
I did not attempt to compute total cost of ownership or how much power (resources) consumed in the construction/maintenance of each as this was not the question asked above.


Er? From original post and the direct quote you responded to:

Quote:
What is the equivalent MPG that you get with these things? Sort of a gas to electric conversion factor... How much would the average car add to our electric bill every month?


He's clearly asking about "cost of ownership" of an electric car compared to a gas powered one. Talking about scientific efficiency ratios really doesn't help him much. Talking about how many dollars/mile does. Adding in total cost over time due to maintenance does even more.

Quote:
It is a necessary (but not sufficient) condition to move to electric cars that efficiency is improved.


Actually, I disagree. The efficiency ratios of existing electric motors is well well well beyond what's needed to make them worth using when compared to gasoline.

As I said in my initial response. The problem with electric cars is not the cost to operate (efficiency times energy cost), but the physical ability to store a sufficient charge to allow for an operational range that would allow for a complete replacement of existing gasoline powered cars.

Seriously. If we could build a battery that weighed 500-700 pounds, cost less then $5000, and could store a charge sufficient to move its weight plus the car and passengers for 800-1000 miles along existing roads, we'd never see a car manufacturer make a gas powered car again. The battery charge is literally the only and most important thing in the way right now, and honestly has been since the first electric cars were built.


Electric motors have been able to perform similarly (better actually) then internal combustion motors for decades. The issue has *always* been the charge you could store in a battery small enough to carry in the car itself. It was the problem 30 years ago, 20 years ago, 10 years ago, and it's the problem today. Efficiency is absolutely irrelevant to the discussion. It's all about the batteries.

Edited, Aug 7th 2008 5:22pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#34 Aug 07 2008 at 4:31 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

move its weight plus the car and passengers for 800-1000 miles along existing roads


While this would be nice, or hell, one that you recharged once every 10,000 miles, most people drive less than 100 miles per day. By a large margin. Now, granted most people probably have at least one day a year where they really do drive a couple of hundred miles, but 800 miles? This is borderline absurd. Virtually no gasoline powered cars have a range this large. With sufficient infrastructure, a range of 300ish miles would be more than enough for 99% of vehicles.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#35 Aug 07 2008 at 5:00 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
A friend of mine just fitted a hydrogen/baking soda fuel cell that he made himself to his Mitsibishi diesel truck. He reckons a bunch of his mates are running all sorts of vehicles with them and are getting about 30% fuel savings.

He just took off down to the South Island for a coupla days o' snowboarding with it.

I'll let you know if it works when he gets back...
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#36 Aug 07 2008 at 5:18 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

move its weight plus the car and passengers for 800-1000 miles along existing roads


While this would be nice, or hell, one that you recharged once every 10,000 miles, most people drive less than 100 miles per day. By a large margin. Now, granted most people probably have at least one day a year where they really do drive a couple of hundred miles, but 800 miles? This is borderline absurd. Virtually no gasoline powered cars have a range this large. With sufficient infrastructure, a range of 300ish miles would be more than enough for 99% of vehicles.


No. That's not sufficient. You have to be able to carry enough charge for an entire day of driving. With a gasoline powered car, I can stop at a gas station and refill the tank and be on my way in under 5 minutes. How long do you think it'll take to recharge my electric car battery? Not 5 minutes. Most batteries take hours to recharge. There has been some promising developments, but that's using cadmium batteries, which are massively toxic.


I suppose you are correct though. We could alternatively develop a battery that could be charged in a short amount of time using reasonably available charging technology and it might work as a replacement for gasoline. Either way though, the problem is not on the efficiency end (especially including efficiency at the plant as Yoss did), but the battery charge end.


Either way, a viable alternative actually has to allow us to do all the things we currently do with a car. That means that if I want to drive out to Vegas, I should be able to do so. Right now, I could drive there in some of the available electric cars, but it might take 2 or 3 days to do so. That's not really viable as a true alternative...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#37 Aug 08 2008 at 5:22 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Either way, a viable alternative actually has to allow us to do all the things we currently do with a car.


Meh, I disagree. You're point of view is a "The Technology must solve every problem or it's useless" one that's a little unrealistic. This whole "fat lazy Americans not having to change their lifestyles an iota is worth an extra 30 trillion in development costs" thing isn't going to fly.

Cost is the main issue, in my mind. Production electrics with a range of 150 miles that cost $12k could serve the vast majority of the market. If you want to drive 400 miles, rent something. There's no reason not to purpose build cars more granularly as we do everything else. Every car doesn't have to be capable of driving cross country on a whim, just as every computer doesn't have to be capable of rendering high end animation quickly.



____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#38 Aug 08 2008 at 5:28 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Either way, a viable alternative actually has to allow us to do all the things we currently do with a car.


Meh, I disagree. You're point of view is a "The Technology must solve every problem or it's useless" one that's a little unrealistic. This whole "fat lazy Americans not having to change their lifestyles an iota is worth an extra 30 trillion in development costs" thing isn't going to fly.

Cost is the main issue, in my mind. Production electrics with a range of 150 miles that cost $12k could serve the vast majority of the market. If you want to drive 400 miles, rent something. There's no reason not to purpose build cars more granularly as we do everything else. Every car doesn't have to be capable of driving cross country on a whim, just as every computer doesn't have to be capable of rendering high end animation quickly.


That's true. Some computers just need to be able to check email and play Diablo II and not be upgradable and cost almost nothing...but sometimes that just drives people ******* crazy.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#39 Aug 08 2008 at 5:34 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

That's true. Some computers just need to be able to check email and play Diablo II and not be upgradable and cost almost nothing...but sometimes that just drives people batsh*t crazy.


Sometimes, those very same computers can be made dramatically faster with virtually no effort, and no risk to the electronics at all. Yay!

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#40 Aug 08 2008 at 5:35 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

That's true. Some computers just need to be able to check email and play Diablo II and not be upgradable and cost almost nothing...but sometimes that just drives people batsh*t crazy.


Sometimes, those very same computers can be made dramatically faster with virtually no effort, and no risk to the electronics at all. Yay!



Sure! BUT SOMETIMES WE DON'T NEED THEM TO BE FASTER...because they're just for EMAIL AND DIABLO!

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#41 Aug 08 2008 at 5:41 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Sure! BUT SOMETIMES WE DON'T NEED THEM TO BE FASTER...because they're just for EMAIL AND DIABLO!


Sure, but having a car that goes 150 MPH for the exact same price as one that goes 75MPH isn't a bad thing, even if you never go over 70MPH. Plus, there are some things that will use all of the speed they can get. File compression, for instance....

:)

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#42 Aug 08 2008 at 6:15 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Sure! BUT SOMETIMES WE DON'T NEED THEM TO BE FASTER...because they're just for EMAIL AND DIABLO!


Sure, but having a car that goes 150 MPH for the exact same price as one that goes 75MPH isn't a bad thing, even if you never go over 70MPH. Plus, there are some things that will use all of the speed they can get. File compression, for instance....

:)



You're a compressed file.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#43 Aug 08 2008 at 6:18 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

You're a compressed file.


You ah.

I know you'll never thank me, but I'll also secretly smile whenever you're unzipping a file and you don't say "Why isn't it done yet, I wish I were dead. I hate this. Make it finish. I want it!"

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#44 Aug 08 2008 at 6:20 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

You're a compressed file.


You ah.

I know you'll never thank me, but I'll also secretly smile whenever you're unzipping a file and you don't say "Why isn't it done yet, I wish I were dead. I hate this. Make it finish. I want it!"



My saint-like patience with you must be countered somewhere or the balance of the universe is thrown askew.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#45 Aug 08 2008 at 6:21 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

My saint-like patience with you must be countered somewhere or the balance of the universe is thrown askew.


I always assumed you just slaughtered bunnies when no one was around.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#46 Aug 08 2008 at 11:17 AM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Geez you two! Get a damn room... ;)

Smasharoo wrote:

Either way, a viable alternative actually has to allow us to do all the things we currently do with a car.


Meh, I disagree. You're point of view is a "The Technology must solve every problem or it's useless" one that's a little unrealistic.


Not at all. It doesn't have to do everything, but before the majority of American's will replace their existing cars with electric cars, those electric cars need to fill all the roles they use their current cars for.

And the gap isn't in the efficiency or cost performance of using electricity versus using gas. It's the lack of sufficient range on a single charge. Always has been. You build an electric battery/charge system light enough to work in a passenger car and capable of allowing people to drive for 8 hours cross-country (or just around town all day), and on that day you'll see electric cars take a significant share of the market. Until then, fully electric cars will never be more then a niche and therefore irrelevant in terms of any sort of broad energy policy.


Quote:
Cost is the main issue, in my mind. Production electrics with a range of 150 miles that cost $12k could serve the vast majority of the market.


No. It wont. It'll maybe serve the majority of the market of people who already live in urban areas and don't drive much anyway. No one living in a suburban or rural area will ever buy that car, no matter how cheap it is. You can't subsidize your way out of this Smash.

Quote:
If you want to drive 400 miles, rent something.


Every time I want to run errands around town? Seriously. I can easily drive 300 miles over the course of a single day just running errands and having any sort of plans for the evening afterwards.

Edited, Aug 8th 2008 12:16pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#47 Aug 08 2008 at 11:29 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

No. It wont. It'll maybe serve the majority of the market of people who already live in urban areas and don't drive much anyway. No one living in a suburban or rural area will ever buy that car, no matter how cheap it is.


Nah, this is patently wrong. A 150 mile range would service 90% of consumers. You couldn't possibly produce these fast enough to meet demand.


Every time I want to run errands around town? Seriously. I can easily drive 300 miles over the course of a single day just running errands and having any sort of plans for the evening afterwards.


********* "Come on, Smash, I have to go to Stater Bros on Sunset to buy bread, then up to the Warf in SF for Halibut, then back home to make a sandwich out of it. Then I score a hooker in TJ. Heh, that's 1200 miles right there, I do that every Tuesday. Folks. Lol!"

You do seven hours of driving to run errands?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#48REDACTED, Posted: Aug 08 2008 at 11:37 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) you couldnt make them fast enough to satisfy the demand once they hit the assembly line.
#49 Aug 08 2008 at 11:46 AM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
Nah, this is patently wrong. A 150 mile range would service 90% of consumers. You couldn't possibly produce these fast enough to meet demand.
]
For $12k? I'd buy it in a heartbeat.

I live in the suburbs 25 miles outside of Chicago. My round trip commute for work is 70 miles/day.

70 miles/day = 350 miles/week
350 milles / 25mpg Nissan Altima = 14 gallons / week
14 gallons x $4.00 = $56
$56/week x 52 weeks = $2,912/year on gas

Not sure how much I drive beyond the 350 miles/week for commuting, but 99% of the time, it's somewhere between 0-100 miles/week.


But instead, I think I'll buy a Ford Excursion for that 1 day out of the year when I need to drive myself and my 10 friends around.

#50 Aug 08 2008 at 12:35 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

No. It wont. It'll maybe serve the majority of the market of people who already live in urban areas and don't drive much anyway. No one living in a suburban or rural area will ever buy that car, no matter how cheap it is.


Nah, this is patently wrong. A 150 mile range would service 90% of consumers. You couldn't possibly produce these fast enough to meet demand.


No. It really wouldn't. People aren't going to replace a car that they can drive to and from work everyday *and* drive on longer trips with one that they can only drive to and from work. I suppose I'll grant that if the whole car was very very cheap, maybe, but even then probably not. 12k still buys a whole lot of years of gasoline, and if I still have to pay it when I take the longer trips anyway, there's just not much reason to buy a second electric car just for the short local ones.

Quote:

Every time I want to run errands around town? Seriously. I can easily drive 300 miles over the course of a single day just running errands and having any sort of plans for the evening afterwards.


Bullsh*t. "Come on, Smash, I have to go to Stater Bros on Sunset to buy bread, then up to the Warf in SF for Halibut, then back home to make a sandwich out of it. Then I score a hooker in TJ. Heh, that's 1200 miles right there, I do that every Tuesday. Folks. Lol!"


Sigh. The closest Frys to my place is 15 miles away. One of my good friends lives 15 miles away. My mom lives 20 miles away. My brother lives 30 miles away. Heck. The closest Best Buy is about 12 miles away. I recently went hunting for a specific video game and ended up driving up to San Marcos (you really don't want to know what the round trip was). This was *after* driving to a couple other stores.

On Christmas, it's not uncommon at all for me to cover several hundred miles. Heck. I drive to the aforementioned friends house for breakfast, then drive to my brothers house (usually) for the whole family thing. Total round trip? 130 miles (cause they're in opposite directions). That assumes I don't stop *anywhere* else or need to take any side trips and only visit two different groups during the day. Sure. I could charge my car up at the stops, but that's not the point. I may not know how long I'm staying. It may not be enough time to charge the vehicle. And if we're talking about mass adoption of electric cars, exactly how many extension cords are we talking about for everyone to do this?


You really don't have a clue about how much (and far!) people in California drive do you Smash? And honestly, that's dwarfed by folks who live in states like Colorado, Utah, Iowa, etc... where going to the darn store might well be a 100 mile round trip. I knew some folks who lived in Telluride. You want to know how far it was just into town much less the nearest large store (Walmart in Montrose IIRC)? Heck. I used to live in Bonny Doon California. The nearest store was easily an hour drive down a windy mountain road.


It's not uncommon at all for me to go on a series of errands in which I drive to UTC, then off to I15 (other end of Miramar Rd), then down into the Friar's Rd area, then to La Mesa, perhaps down to Chula Vista, then back to Del Mar area. All without stopping anywhere for more then maybe 30 minutes or so. And that's just errand running. What about people who drive around town for a living? I know several people in the Real Estate business. They drive clients around all day long Smash. An electric car wont work. Anyone with a delivery job? Wont work. Anyone with a hobby that requires travel (I know a whole slew of people who do Ren activities every few weeks which require often hundreds of miles of travel in a single day and no convenient electrical outlets).


I'd be surprised if more then maybe 1 in 10 people I know personally would gain *any* real advantage from that (cost aside). Heck Smash. I know people who own electric cars. They owned them long before people like you got into them because they were a popular political issue. For them it was the geek factor and fun of building and operating an electric car. Guess what? Every single one of them owns another vehicle. I don't know *anyone* who owns an electric car as their only car. Not one. Heck. Most of them own a truck in fact. Want to know why? So they can tow their electric cars to where they want to use them.


The biggest obstacle is range Smash. Always has been. 150 miles is nice I suppose, but still not nearly good enough for mass adoption of electric cars. If you want to get more then a niche market for the tech, it has to be a full replacement for everything people currently do with their cars. 150 miles just isn't enough. Not by a long long long shot.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#51 Aug 08 2008 at 12:48 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
trickybeck wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:
Nah, this is patently wrong. A 150 mile range would service 90% of consumers. You couldn't possibly produce these fast enough to meet demand.
]
For $12k? I'd buy it in a heartbeat.

I live in the suburbs 25 miles outside of Chicago. My round trip commute for work is 70 miles/day.

70 miles/day = 350 miles/week
350 milles / 25mpg Nissan Altima = 14 gallons / week
14 gallons x $4.00 = $56
$56/week x 52 weeks = $2,912/year on gas


So. In approximately the time the battery will need to be replaced on the car (which is about half the cost of the whole car at this point, which is somewhat absurd all by itself), you'll have saved enough in gasoline to pay for the car.

Quote:
Not sure how much I drive beyond the 350 miles/week for commuting, but 99% of the time, it's somewhere between 0-100 miles/week.


I think you'd be surprised just how often you'll realize that you need to do something and your electric car wont get you there and back. But by all means go out and buy one though. There are kits out there already that will perform within the range you're talking about.

Until the range dramatically improves, electric cars aren't really more then an expensive hobby for enthusiasts. Very very few people can actually replace their existing car with an electric one.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 159 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (159)