Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

The Glorious leader in China Gives Freedom to Forgien PressFollow

#1 Jul 31 2008 at 5:01 PM Rating: Decent
**
591 posts
By restricting their internet access and blocking Wikipedia for the 5th time. Seriously, The Glorious leaders intelligence is greater then the amount of money senator Ted Stevens has received from an oil company to renovate his house.


http://www.japantoday.com/category/sports/view/china-reneges-on-internet-freedom-during-olympics

The link said wrote:
BEIJING —

The Beijing Olympics were plunged into another controversy on Wednesday as China announced a backflip on Internet freedoms for the thousands of foreign reporters covering the Games.

China’s decision to reverse a pledge on allowing unfettered web access proved an embarrassment for the International Olympic Committee (IOC), which had repeatedly said foreign press would not face any Internet curbs in Beijing.

It was also the latest in a long line of issues to have tarnished the run-up to the Olympics, which start on Aug 8, following controversies over pollution, human rights and terrorism threats.

Beijing Olympic organizing committee spokesman Sun Weide triggered the latest public relations flare-up when he confirmed foreign reporters would not have access to some sites deemed sensitive by China’s communist rulers.

“During the Olympic Games we will provide sufficient access to the Internet for reporters,” Sun said.

However “sufficient access” falls short of the complete Internet freedoms for foreign reporters that China had promised in the run-up to the Games.

Sun specified sites linked to the Falungong spiritual movement, which is outlawed in China, as ones that would remain censored for the foreign press at Olympic venues.

He did not identify any others but reporters trying to surf the Internet at the main press center for the Games on Wednesday found a wide array of sites deemed sensitive by China’s rulers to be out-of-bounds.

These included sites belonging to Tibet’s government-in-exile and Amnesty International, as well as those that had information on the 1989 Tiananmen massacre in which the military used deadly force to crush democracy protests.

The head of the IOC’s press commission, Kevan Gosper, said on Wednesday that he would take the matter up with Chinese officials.

“I will speak with the Chinese authorities to advise them of the restraints and to see what their reaction is,” he said.

Australian Olympic team chief John Coates, who is also an IOC member, expressed frustration with China’s Internet about-face, pointing out that the Chinese authorities had gone back on one of their “key” Olympic promises.

“It certainly is disappointing… I think it’s a matter that the IOC will take seriously,” Coates told reporters.

Two weeks ago, IOC president Jacques Rogge insisted there would be no censorship of the Internet.

“For the first time, foreign media will be able to report freely and publish their work freely in China,” he said.

“There will be no censorship on the Internet.”

The IOC late Wednesday denied knowing in advance of China’s plans to restrict the Internet for the 20,000 reporters covering the Games and said it was pushing for curbs to be lifted.

IOC spokeswoman Giselle Davies had said earlier that the IOC had been made aware of China’s plans to censor the Internet in previous talks with the Beijing Olympic organizing committee.

However, she later clarified her statement to say that the organizing committee, when referring to Internet restrictions, had spoken only of pornographic sites and sites sensitive for national security reasons.

“It would be incorrect to say that we knew in advance that China was to restrict certain sites and we are pushing for those restrictions to be blocked,” Davies said.

“They were talking about restrictions that are similar to those that exist in other countries.”

Gosper earlier Wednesday told the South China Morning Post that the IOC knew some sites would be blocked.

“Recently, I have also been advised that some of the IOC officials had negotiated with the Chinese that some sensitive sites would be blocked,” the Hong Kong-based newspaper quoted Gosper as saying.

“If you have been misled by what I have told you about there being free Internet access during the Games, then I apologize.”

Reporters Without Borders, the Paris-based press freedom group, said it was surprised the IOC had kowtowed so easily to China’s leadership over web access.

“When China applied to host the Games they promised total press freedom and that must include Internet access,” said Vincent Brossel, the group’s Asia director.

“What a total humiliation this is for the (IOC president) Jacques Rogge. How can the IOC be so weak and feeble?”


Edited, Jul 31st 2008 9:01pm by DarthGekko
#2 Jul 31 2008 at 5:24 PM Rating: Default
***
1,162 posts
What's your point again?
#3 Jul 31 2008 at 5:28 PM Rating: Good
**
591 posts
What's your point again?

It's just above your head.
#4 Jul 31 2008 at 5:31 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Would it be too foolish to assume that the presses IT depts would have been smart enough to get air cards for them?

Why should they care anyway? The press is supposed to be covering the damn Olympics; not looking up Falungong websites.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#5 Jul 31 2008 at 5:46 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,162 posts
Quote:
The Glorious leaders intelligence is greater then the amount of money senator Ted Stevens has received from an oil company to renovate his house.


I don't see the connection.
#6 Jul 31 2008 at 6:27 PM Rating: Good
***
2,453 posts
feelz wrote:
Quote:
The Glorious leaders intelligence is greater then the amount of money senator Ted Stevens has received from an oil company to renovate his house.


I don't see the connection.


Its not your fault that you don't see the connection. After many years here, I've found that you often have to examine these things as if you were an utter simpleton. To simulate this, I usually ask my Jack Russell Terrier to take a look at these sorts of posts, since he's on an intellectual par with the OP. What it comes down to is this:


"Glorious leader" (Chinese Communist=Liberal=Bad... very bad) > "Ted Stevens + oil company" (Conservatinve + big business + free market = Very good)

Its an attempt at sarcasm which fails on many levels. Or so says my Jack Russell, but he could be wrong. He does, after all eat **** every chance he gets (another trait he probably shares with the OP).
#7 Jul 31 2008 at 6:39 PM Rating: Excellent
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

I didn't know intelligence could be measured in dollars. What's the exchange rate?



My college friends and I had a dorky running joke: a universal unit of measurement called "Manflow," to which you could convert any other unit of measurement, completely arbitrarily.
As in:
"Damn it's cold outside, it's gotta be about 14 manflow."

"We emptied 2 kegs at that party." "How much is that in manflow?" "About 0.6"


#8 Jul 31 2008 at 8:00 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,162 posts
Quote:
Its not your fault that you don't see the connection. After many years here, I've found that you often have to examine these things as if you were an utter simpleton. To simulate this, I usually ask my Jack Russell Terrier to take a look at these sorts of posts, since he's on an intellectual par with the OP. What it comes down to is this:


"Glorious leader" (Chinese Communist=Liberal=Bad... very bad) > "Ted Stevens + oil company" (Conservatinve + big business + free market = Very good)

Its an attempt at sarcasm which fails on many levels. Or so says my Jack Russell, but he could be wrong. He does, after all eat **** every chance he gets (another trait he probably shares with the OP)


Unfortunately, I think your dog is right.
#9 Jul 31 2008 at 8:33 PM Rating: Decent
trickybeck wrote:

My college friends and I had a dorky running joke: a universal unit of measurement called "Manflow," to which you could convert any other unit of measurement, completely arbitrarily.
As in:
"Damn it's cold outside, it's gotta be about 14 manflow."

"We emptied 2 kegs at that party." "How much is that in manflow?" "About 0.6"



What about a new unit of measure in which everything is zero. How about Iqoot (pronounced I-cute in American english. We'll allow the limies to pronounce it any darn way).

"Damn it's cold outside, it's gotta be about zero iqoot."

"We emptied 2 kegs at that party." "How much is that in iqoot?" "About zero"

Oh I'm amused by such small things.
#10 Aug 01 2008 at 2:48 AM Rating: Good
**
792 posts
I say that the IOC should put China on Olympic time-out.

And take the Olympic Games to Japan. That'll learn 'em.
#11 Aug 01 2008 at 5:11 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Speedly wrote:
I say that the IOC should put China on Olympic time-out.

And take the Olympic Games to Japan. That'll learn 'em.
I'm pretty sure the Glorious One is a Mandroid that is being remote controlled from Centi-004X7*@2, sector XIII.5. If we were to move the Olympics now, it would mess up the signals and the athletes might not perform properly.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 294 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (294)