Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Reply To Thread

Here's my vote for restricting who can have childrenFollow

#1 Jul 28 2008 at 1:59 PM Rating: Excellent
Spankatorium Administratix
*****
1oooo posts
If you are sensitive you may not want to read this, I didn't cry like I thought I would, I got angry. Smiley: mad


News story There are comments under the story if you are interested.


Quote:
Puppy Kills Baby Boy

Posted: July 28, 2008 11:32 AM

Updated: July 28, 2008 04:20 PM
FEATURED VIDEO
Infant Killed
The incident happened at a home in the 2900 block of East 102nd Street South.
The incident happened at a home in the 2900 block of East 102nd Street South.
Police officers tell the News On 6 that the baby boy was in a child swing when the incident happened.
Police officers tell the News On 6 that the baby boy was in a child swing when the incident happened.

A baby boy was mauled by a dog on Monday morning in south Tulsa. Police say it happened while the parents left the child in a baby swing unattended inside their home. The News On 6's Emory Bryan reports they believe the dog was just a puppy.

Tulsa Police have a lot of questions yet to be answered about what happened, but they believe a 6-week- old black lab bit the baby numerous times. They are unsure how long the baby had been dead when an ambulance was called this morning.

A family member made the 911 call at 10:19 Monday morning. When paramedics arrived, the eight and a half-week-old little boy was dead. A forensic examination of the body is pending, but Tulsa Police say it was obvious the baby boy was mauled by a dog.

"Let's just say it was apparent the wounds came from the dog, and we don't know what caused the death of the child, but at this point it appears to be dog bites," said Tulsa Police Officer Jason Willingham.

Animal Control officers removed a small pug from the home, but police believe it was a 6-week-old black lab puppy which killed the baby.

The child's father was consoled by neighbors who gathered at the scene. The child's 17-year-old mother was visibly distraught. She was taken by ambulance to Saint Francis hospital to be checked out.

"The parents were home. There were several people home, three people at the time of the incident, obviously that's part of the investigation to determine how this tragic event unfolded," said Tulsa Police Officer Jason Willingham.

Police are not sure how the baby was killed without the parents realizing it was happening. Police say the child was unattended in a baby swing for an undetermined amount of time. They were questioning the child's grandmother, who was also in the home.

The first responders were shaken by the scene.

EMSA relieved both the paramedics who responded and the dispatcher who took the call for a stress debriefing.

"All the investigators and firefighters, the paramedics, many of us have children of our own, so when you see something like this occur, that was a defenseless child, it really strikes deep," said Tulsa Police Officer Jason Willingham.

The neighbors were shocked by the news.

"You never think of it happening in your yard or neighborhood," said Tulsan Heejin Davies.
____________________________

#2 Jul 28 2008 at 2:01 PM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
An eight week old baby left unattended outside for how long? Holy ****.

Oh. Seventeen-year-old mother.

Smiley: oyvey

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#3 Jul 28 2008 at 2:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Or it could have been the killer hamsters.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#4 Jul 28 2008 at 2:13 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
I don't even know what to say. And how the hell do you NOT HEAR a baby crying? I'm assuming that the baby cried if it was bit repeatedly. You can't ignore a baby crying.
#5 Jul 28 2008 at 2:24 PM Rating: Decent
Samira wrote:
Or it could have been the killer hamsters.



This was most likely what actually happened.
#6 Jul 28 2008 at 2:31 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
A possible scenario is, baby unhappy, 17 year old mother can't deal with it, puts it in the swing so it will hopefully stop crying, doesn't pay enough attention and so misses the change in tone from unhappy to pain, or at least misses it for long enough that the damage is done. I don't think it would take too long really. Pretty sad.

There are too many unanswered questions at the moment to make any kind of real statement of blame or whatever if that's what you want to do.

Edited, Jul 28th 2008 5:30pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#7 Jul 28 2008 at 2:47 PM Rating: Decent
Jack of All Trades
******
29,633 posts
Quote:
I don't even know what to say. And how the hell do you NOT HEAR a baby crying? I'm assuming that the baby cried if it was bit repeatedly. You can't ignore a baby crying.


I think after a while of having to put up with it, many people do/want/try to ignore the crying. I know I would, but that's probably why I don't intend to have kids.
#8 Jul 28 2008 at 3:20 PM Rating: Good
***
1,162 posts
This story doesn't make sense. 6 weeks old puppy managed to pull out a kid from a swing and kill him? Even a lab, at 6 weeks they are maybe 10 inches high and don't even have all their baby teeth.
#9 Jul 28 2008 at 3:32 PM Rating: Excellent
****
5,492 posts
feelz wrote:
This story doesn't make sense. 6 weeks old puppy managed to pull out a kid from a swing and kill him? Even a lab, at 6 weeks they are maybe 10 inches high and don't even have all their baby teeth.


This...

The swing would be above the dogs head..

best the puppy could do? jump up and nip at the heels of the baby. there has got to be more to the story...
#10Smasharoo, Posted: Jul 28 2008 at 4:35 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) [b]
#11 Jul 28 2008 at 4:58 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,162 posts
Quote:
No, it was "OMG!! Taht dawg was framed!!"


Did you see the picture of the puppy? That dog was totally framed!



The pug did it, in the library with the chandelier
#12 Jul 28 2008 at 5:10 PM Rating: Good
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Yeah, bet's on it was one of those everyone-thinks-someone-else-is-watching-the-kid deals. I had a falling out with a friend because she was always bringing her toddler to my house for barbecues and whatnot and not supervising him...I was afraid he'd get hurt since I couldn't keep an eye on him while cooking/entertaining.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#13 Jul 28 2008 at 5:23 PM Rating: Good
21 posts
Samira wrote:
An eight week old baby left unattended outside for how long? Holy sh*t.

Oh. Seventeen-year-old mother.

Smiley: oyvey



The article said the baby swing was inside the house, though.
#14 Jul 28 2008 at 6:00 PM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
Ugh. Reminds me of the parents whose newborn baby (asleep in his car seat carrier) got his toes eaten by a puppy while his parents were asleep on the f'ucking floor RIGHT NEXT TO HIM.

Seriously--how do you not notice your kid is being eaten by a dog?
#15 Jul 28 2008 at 6:07 PM Rating: Decent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
feelz wrote:
This story doesn't make sense. 6 weeks old puppy managed to pull out a kid from a swing and kill him? Even a lab, at 6 weeks they are maybe 10 inches high and don't even have all their baby teeth.


A baby swing you moron...they're like 3 inches off the floor...see here.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#16 Jul 28 2008 at 6:31 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,952 posts
Ambrya wrote:
Ugh. Reminds me of the parents whose newborn baby (asleep in his car seat carrier) got his toes eaten by a puppy while his parents were asleep on the f'ucking floor RIGHT NEXT TO HIM.

Seriously--how do you not notice your kid is being eaten by a dog?

When you are totally passed out from the exhaustion of waking up every two hours, every night for months, trying to console a crying baby, who won't be consoled for hours at a time. Feeding it every three to four hours overnight, baby depending.

Exhausted sleeping mothers can have their baby put onto their breast by the father, and not wake up, and sleep through the breastfeeding.

#17 Jul 28 2008 at 6:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Aripyanfar wrote:
Ambrya wrote:
Ugh. Reminds me of the parents whose newborn baby (asleep in his car seat carrier) got his toes eaten by a puppy while his parents were asleep on the f'ucking floor RIGHT NEXT TO HIM.

Seriously--how do you not notice your kid is being eaten by a dog?

When you are totally passed out from the exhaustion of waking up every two hours, every night for months, trying to console a crying baby, who won't be consoled for hours at a time. Feeding it every three to four hours overnight, baby depending.

Exhausted sleeping mothers can have their baby put onto their breast by the father, and not wake up, and sleep through the breastfeeding.



In this case they were high on drugs, heroin I believe.

However, I have 2 kids, and I've been exhausted beyond anything I've ever experienced before, days without more than an hour of sleep, but the instant my baby girl makes a noise I'm up like a shot and in there to take care of her. That is unacceptable that they wouldn't notice.

Edited, Jul 28th 2008 9:40pm by Wint
#18 Jul 28 2008 at 7:13 PM Rating: Excellent
I had to tell a friend not to bring her kid over because our house wasn't baby proofed and we had no intention of going through the expense of baby proofing it since all we have is a cat. She got huffy because that meant we were obviously not up for free babysitting.

I'm sure the 17-year-old had to sit through hours of lectures and tapes about keeping the baby, but no one bothered to give her an actual parenting class once she decided to keep it.

License to breed: Yes please.
#19 Jul 28 2008 at 7:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
The dog *was* framed.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#20 Jul 28 2008 at 7:19 PM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:
Ambrya wrote:
Ugh. Reminds me of the parents whose newborn baby (asleep in his car seat carrier) got his toes eaten by a puppy while his parents were asleep on the f'ucking floor RIGHT NEXT TO HIM.

Seriously--how do you not notice your kid is being eaten by a dog?

When you are totally passed out from the exhaustion of waking up every two hours, every night for months, trying to console a crying baby, who won't be consoled for hours at a time. Feeding it every three to four hours overnight, baby depending.


Been there and done that, I would still notice if my kid were being EATEN right beside me.

Quote:

Exhausted sleeping mothers can have their baby put onto their breast by the father, and not wake up, and sleep through the breastfeeding.


Maybe I'm just an extra-light sleeper then, because the only time I've never noticed when my baby woke up was one time after a very restless night, I accidentally fell asleep on the sofa while he was napping on the bed. Even though I had the baby monitor on, I missed the mellow cooing that he normally does to tell me he's awake, and didn't wake up until he had crawled off the bed and started to cry. But I have never failed to wake up while he's actually crying.

I believe Wint is right, though, there might have been other substances involved with the parents whose baby's toes got eaten.

Wint wrote:
I've been exhausted beyond anything I've ever experienced before, days without more than an hour of sleep, but the instant my baby girl makes a noise I'm up like a shot and in there to take care of her. That is unacceptable that they wouldn't notice.


Yes. This. Last week we had a particularly rough bout of teething and I got less than 10 hours of sleep in four days. I still woke with every cry, even when Mr. Ambrya had him in the other room rocking him.

Edited, Jul 28th 2008 8:23pm by Ambrya
#21 Jul 28 2008 at 7:23 PM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
catwho, pet mage of Jabober wrote:
I had to tell a friend not to bring her kid over because our house wasn't baby proofed and we had no intention of going through the expense of baby proofing it since all we have is a cat.


Reminds me of a post someone made on the parenting101 community on LJ yesterday. The woman' boyfriend's brother and Sister-in-law came over to her house, and while they were there, their toddler got into the cat litter and started eating turds. The SIL then told the woman it was HER fault for not watching the kid, since it was HER home, and that she should reimburse the SIL the $30 it was going to take for her to take the kid to the doctor and make sure he hadn't been harmed by eating the cat turds.

/boggle

Apparently your responsibility to monitor your kid stops when you arrive at someone else's house. Who knew?
#22 Jul 28 2008 at 7:54 PM Rating: Good
Sage
****
4,042 posts
Ugh. At the end of the video they say they put down the puppy. It was 6 weeks old, he probably just went at the baby like it was a moving, screaming chew toy. It wasn't an inherently vicious attack. I think the parents should be euthanized.
#23 Jul 29 2008 at 4:50 AM Rating: Good
Duchess Guenny wrote:
Ugh. At the end of the video they say they put down the puppy. It was 6 weeks old, he probably just went at the baby like it was a moving, screaming chew toy. It wasn't an inherently vicious attack. I think the parents should be fed to rabid dingoes.


Fickst
#24 Jul 29 2008 at 5:33 AM Rating: Good
***
3,211 posts
Duchess Guenny wrote:
Ugh. At the end of the video they say they put down the puppy. It was 6 weeks old, he probably just went at the baby like it was a moving, screaming chew toy. It wasn't an inherently vicious attack. I think the parents should be euthanized.


Wow, that's like giving a 3 year old lethal injection because it accidently knocked the hairdryer into the bathtub killing it's mother >.>

This story just keeps on failing.
#25 Jul 29 2008 at 5:41 AM Rating: Default
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Ranzera wrote:
Duchess Guenny wrote:
Ugh. At the end of the video they say they put down the puppy. It was 6 weeks old, he probably just went at the baby like it was a moving, screaming chew toy. It wasn't an inherently vicious attack. I think the parents should be euthanized.


Wow, that's like giving a 3 year old lethal injection because it accidently knocked the hairdryer into the bathtub killing it's mother >.>

This story just keeps on failing.


Yes, putting down a puppy that would bite a crying baby until it died is exactly the same as euthanizing a toddler for an accident. Don't be absurd.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#26 Jul 29 2008 at 6:01 AM Rating: Excellent
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Nexa wrote:
Yes, putting down a puppy that would bite a crying baby until it died is exactly the same as euthanizing a toddler for an accident. Don't be absurd.

Nexa

Haven't movie focus groups shown that the only thing more upsetting to an audience than killing children is killing a dog?

« Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 279 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (279)