Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Salary and hiring practicesFollow

#27 Jun 26 2008 at 5:15 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
gbaji wrote:
Yeah. That's what I've always assumed/heard as well. And it's not a public service vs corp thing either. In most corp settings, the people interviewing you have *nothing* to do with the salary you may eventually get. Heck. I don't know what the other guys in my own working group make. How on earth would I know how much they're going to offer some new guy I'm interviewing?

You don't ask salary details during the interview. You ask that stuff during the offer process. If they make an offer, it'll include a salary. You accept it or not. The interview process is purely to determine if the applicant is worth hiring, not to establish pay levels.


What the hell do your HR people do? Anything? All of our hiring for head office, gets screened by HR first. They're the ones that place the adds. They need to know salary range because people will ask. The only time our corporate HR don't do the hiring is for on site at hotels, where the HR representative at the hotel (usually the Assistant manager) will do it. Again, they always need the salary range. I don't know, maybe we're ahead of the times, but in an ever decreasing supply of employees, you don't weed people out just because they asked what the salary is. Actually, imo and apparently in our company's opinion, it helps us in the hiring process. If the salary range isn't what someone wanted, then they save both of us time and money.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#28 Jun 26 2008 at 5:20 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
I wouldn't apply for a post that didn't list salary and benefits up front, or at least provide these details on initial enquiry.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#29 Jun 26 2008 at 7:09 AM Rating: Good
***
3,128 posts
Like Nobby, I would not apply for a job without the salary details, and if they don't provide such when I email or call before I submit my resume, then I do not send my resume.
#30 Jun 27 2008 at 6:33 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
What the hell do your HR people do?


They sort resumes and send them to departments with open RECs that look like they fit. Then, if the folks who actually work in the field and have the professional knowledge to determine someone's abilities within that field give a "yes" result to the process, they make an offer and perhaps engage in Richardering over salary, benefits, etc.


And yes. A potential applicant should be able to find out the salary range for the position he's interviewing for ahead of time. But he does that by asking whatever HR rep set up the process, *not* in the actual interview itself.


I was responding to a question about whether it's ok to ask about salary "during the interview". That's an absolute no-no unless you're interviewing at a small business in which the person interviewing you is *also* the person who handles payroll and makes decisions about salary. In any medium to large sized business, the people you interview with are not even remotely connected to figuring out how much to pay you.


Quote:
Anything? All of our hiring for head office, gets screened by HR first. They're the ones that place the adds. They need to know salary range because people will ask. The only time our corporate HR don't do the hiring is for on site at hotels, where the HR representative at the hotel (usually the Assistant manager) will do it. Again, they always need the salary range. I don't know, maybe we're ahead of the times, but in an ever decreasing supply of employees, you don't weed people out just because they asked what the salary is. Actually, imo and apparently in our company's opinion, it helps us in the hiring process. If the salary range isn't what someone wanted, then they save both of us time and money.



Yes. But are any of those HR people actually interviewing the applicant? No? Then my response is valid. Thank you for playing though... ;)

Edited, Jun 27th 2008 7:37pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#31 Jun 27 2008 at 6:39 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
gbaji wrote:
Then, if the folks who actually work in the field and have the professional knowledge to determine someone's abilities within that field



hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Going to bed.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#32 Jun 27 2008 at 8:22 PM Rating: Decent
We hire all the time. We're at a public university, so clever applicants already know the answer, but we don't care if they ask. It's really to our advantage not to waste our time if someone is good, we want them, but they simply won't come for money reasons. We're in an expensive part of the country.

And everything is always negotiable. But we pay well, so salary is not an issue for us. However there are many other things which are negotiable.

Edited, Jun 27th 2008 9:23pm by yossarian
#33 Jun 28 2008 at 11:04 AM Rating: Decent
it is incumbant on the bussiness to fill positions for as little money as possible. also, advertising what the position pays would make it a whole lot easier for their competition to buy the better applicants out from under them. only menial labor jobs are going to list the pay in the want add.

always in a hiring situation, the applicant has super high expectations, and the bussiness owner has a low ball starting point in mind that he feels is the least he can offer for the position and still be in the ball park for what that particular type of job pays in that given area. and usually those two figures are seperated buy a wide margine.

what you have to offer the bussiness that other applicants cant will determine how far off that starting offer the owner will come. and keep in mind in todays market, a BA is a dime a dozen. if you dont have something better, or have some work experience in the field to add to it, better take the low ball offer if that is the field you want to work in.

you want to talk about wasting YOUR time, look at it from the owners point of view. every day he wasts a couple hours chatting to someone who isnt really interested in working for him, or working at all, he is just looking for a fat paycheck and has no experience or even an education a cut above the masses and will get indignant unless he offers them 100k, a company car, 5 weeks a year paid vacation and a secretary to do the job he is responsible for.

go through a dozen of them in a week and see if you can still give an interview with a smile.

bottom line, starting jobs pay squat. look for other benifits like health, 401k, paid leave and if the work experience you get will help your resume for the job you really want. and EVERYONE except the bosses kids starts at the BOTTOM of the pay scale unless you are interviewing with a competitor for a position you already hold in another company or you hae a masters degree and 5 plus years work experience in the field.

its just like EQ. you have to grind your way to the top from the BOTTOM.
#34 Jun 30 2008 at 8:21 AM Rating: Good
Our HR department was outsourced to Myanmar I believe. I really feel sorry for any new applicants, those who have managed to make it through the hiring process have horror stories.

Our company doesn't list salary either. It has the payband it's in, but if you are not inside the company already and are transferring you have no idea what that payband's ranges are. I imagine this is pretty standard in our industry at least since we're a major player and benchmark against other companies to make sure our practices are consistent.

I would love to move to the east coast but what we make here is so low compared to what the cost of living out there is I wouldn't even know what to ask for to live a comparable life out there. My wife and I absolutely loved Boston Smiley: thumbsup
#35 Jun 30 2008 at 8:31 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Wint wrote:
Our HR department was outsourced to Myanmar I believe. I really feel sorry for any new applicants, those who have managed to make it through the hiring process have horror stories.

Our company doesn't list salary either. It has the payband it's in, but if you are not inside the company already and are transferring you have no idea what that payband's ranges are. I imagine this is pretty standard in our industry at least since we're a major player and benchmark against other companies to make sure our practices are consistent.

I would love to move to the east coast but what we make here is so low compared to what the cost of living out there is I wouldn't even know what to ask for to live a comparable life out there. My wife and I absolutely loved Boston Smiley: thumbsup


haha, it varies so greatly even just within Massachusetts that it makes job hunting a nightmare...trust me. I'm using the real estate market to gauge what jobs I apply for.

Step one: This job sounds neat. It pays X amount.
Step two: How much do houses in that area cost?
Step three: Judge whether that's a livable wage when compared to the cost of housing.

I'll seriously take a job making 40k less in Western Mass vs. Eastern Mass.

Also: you should move here. Your expenses would be diminished by my making you dinner a couple times a month!

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#36 Jun 30 2008 at 9:10 AM Rating: Good
Yes but what is child care like? We're forking out $1,400 a month for a center, and I'm told it's on the low end of what costs can be in other areas Smiley: yikes
#37 Jun 30 2008 at 9:16 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
$1400 for one? Damn, and my friend is happy his drops to half price at $300 come September.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#38 Jun 30 2008 at 9:22 AM Rating: Good
No that's both. Actually it went down a bit when Aedyn turned 3, $342 a week now for both of them.
#39 Jun 30 2008 at 9:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
I'm not sure Wint, but you can easily research the various daycares and preschools in the area online...

You could also consider moving just before Aedyn hit's school age. That way she's not moving once she's in school, and you'll be cutting down on the daycare expense by only paying for one plus an after-school program.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#40 Jun 30 2008 at 9:35 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
How young can you put them into daycares in the US? Pretty hard to find anyone who will take anyone under 18months around here.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#41 Jun 30 2008 at 9:35 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
How young can you put them into daycares in the US? Pretty hard to find anyone who will take anyone under 18months around here.


6 weeks, for places licensed.

It's like giving away kittens.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#42 Jun 30 2008 at 9:46 AM Rating: Good
Yep, Zoe started at 10 weeks because my wife took as much extra time off as he could since Zoe was so early.

Edit: What kind of maternity benefits do you get in Canada? Here my wife got 6 weeks paid, one week she had to use out of her bank of days off (so 5 weeks really). The US is one of the worst countries when it comes to time off for women who have given birth (Well I can't seem to find the article I read about this, it was in National Geographic and it was a one page article with a graphic that showed what the government guarantees for postpartum child care in terms of paid time off. Take it for what it's worth.).

Edited, Jun 30th 2008 12:58pm by Wint
#43 Jun 30 2008 at 9:52 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
I thought it was 12 months, but one of my friends gave birth in mid-November and doesn't go back to work until December 21st. Mind you, she works for a huge utility that's unionized, so she may get more than the average person (may also be saved sick days/personal days and vacation). Dads can take time off as well, but I believe it reduces the time the mother can be off.

Edited, Jun 30th 2008 2:52pm by Uglysasquatch
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#44 Jun 30 2008 at 10:03 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
There is no required paid time off in the US for family leave, though employers are required to allow 12 weeks of time off (unpaid), with a few restrictions, under the family medical leave act.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#45 Jun 30 2008 at 10:15 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
I'm not 100% sure how it works, but I believe the Federal government pays it and it's somwhere around 65% of your normal pay. The only thing an employer is required, is to ensure your job is available to you once your year is up.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#46 Jun 30 2008 at 10:18 AM Rating: Good
****
5,492 posts
Nexa wrote:
There is no required paid time off in the US for family leave, though employers are required to allow 12 weeks of time off (unpaid), with a few restrictions, under the family medical leave act.

Nexa


In California, you can also get 6 weeks of paid disability for vaginal birth, 8 weeks paid disability for a C-Section, and up to 4 weeks paid disability off befor the baby is born. This is going to help us alot when Connor is born. Mrs. Aadyn will be taking off till the first of next year.

Edited, Jun 30th 2008 11:23am by Aadyn Litefoot
#47 Jun 30 2008 at 10:18 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
I'm not 100% sure how it works, but I believe the Federal government pays it and it's somwhere around 65% of your normal pay. The only thing an employer is required, is to ensure your job is available to you once your year is up.


I pay for "short term disability", a benefit through my employer. That would cover 60% of my pay for four weeks, after two weeks of illness/whathaveyou. Other than that, it's using sick and vacation time for me if I get pregnant.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#48 Jun 30 2008 at 10:47 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
I won't tell you about the UK's statutory paid leave for maternity and paternity leave.

You'd cry.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#49 Jun 30 2008 at 11:01 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Nobby wrote:
I won't tell you about the UK's statutory paid leave for maternity and paternity leave.

You'd cry.


I'm aware...my ex husband is British and it was one of the many items we took into consideration when deciding which country to reside/raise a family in. Cost of living in the U.S. won out, obviously.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#50 Jun 30 2008 at 11:04 AM Rating: Decent
Nexa wrote:
While I understand that employers want candidates for positions to be interested in the work and the organization rather than in the money involved, I find that the practice of not listing salary in the job description or at least informing a potential candidate of the pay before the interview process to be a huge waste of everyone's time. No matter how much you might enjoy the work, or be dedicated to a company, if you can't accept a position because they simply aren't paying enough...it's a waste of everyone's time up until the point of the offer. Of course one can't ask during the interview process either, since it's considered a faux pas at best.

That's my opinion, I welcome yours.

Nexa



I agree, donkey balls to employers who don't post salary in their listing.
#51 Jun 30 2008 at 11:09 AM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Maybe it's true but the dilemmas that Nexa is dealing with is pretty standard in the worlds of non-profits and the unspoken expectation that magically, your income should come from somewhere else so it shouldn't be a focus. (like a trust fund. Goddamnit. I want one.)



Edited, Jun 30th 2008 3:10pm by Annabella
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 732 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (732)