Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Poll: Dem. VP CandidateFollow

#27 Jun 09 2008 at 12:45 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Wesley Clark.

Quote:
“I think we're at risk with our democracy. I think we're dealing with the most closed, imperialistic, nastiest administration in living memory. They even put Richard Nixon to shame.”

Quote:

“One of the principles that we operate on in this country is that leaders are held accountable. The simple truth is that we went into Iraq on the basis of some intuition, some fear, and some exaggerated rhetoric and some very, very scanty evidence.”


Quote:
“As president, I would support giving gays and lesbians the legal rights that married couples get,”


Quote:
“I didn't go to Yale.”


There's your man, right there.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#28 Jun 09 2008 at 5:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
I voted for the Tim guy, because he has an awsome name!
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#29 Jun 10 2008 at 6:52 AM Rating: Decent
I think I should be running alongside Barack Obama
Barack Obama rocks!!!
#30 Jun 10 2008 at 7:02 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Izaacpaul wrote:
I think I should be running alongside Barack Obama
Barack Obama rocks!!!
Barry's a smoker. Should be easy to keep up with. Smiley: wink
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#32 Jun 10 2008 at 9:12 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I love how Obama's been in control of the narrative throughout this.

"Yes we can"? Shit, that's working.. umm... how about "Yes we will"?
"Change you can believe in?" Umm.. quick, we need something... "A Leader you can believe in"?
"Bush's third term"? Man, that one's sticking... maybe... "Carter's second term"?

Obama's completely driving this thing and everyone else is just scrambling to keep up.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#34 Jun 10 2008 at 11:05 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Of course educated people know that companies don't pay taxes


This part's true.



; people do.


This part has to have a "middle class" before the "people".

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#36 Jun 10 2008 at 12:15 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Of course educated people know that companies don't pay taxes


This part's true.



; people do.


This part has to have a "middle class" before the "people".



So you agree that the policies of the left will mostly result in a negative effect on the middle class?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#37 Jun 16 2008 at 4:59 AM Rating: Default
So you agree that the policies of the left will mostly result in a negative effect on the middle class?
--------------------------------------------------------------------

absolutly not. the policies of the left will force large companies to put their money back into the economy instead of letting it sit in some bank collecting interest. that was the whole point behind the luxury tax and capitol gains tax.

and EVERY dime spent on social services gets pumped directy into the economy. the economy only grows when people spend.

we gave the energy industry a 14 billion dollar tax cut so they would pump it back into the economy as jobs for exploration, development of new energy, and more drilling and refinery jobs. what they did was pay stock holder dividends and pocket the rest.

it is capitulating to the top that stifels the economy. the bottom and the middle IS the economy. and the more you pump into it at those points, the greater the returns for economic growth.

#38 Jun 16 2008 at 2:31 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
shadowrelm wrote:
So you agree that the policies of the left will mostly result in a negative effect on the middle class?
--------------------------------------------------------------------

absolutly not. the policies of the left will force large companies to put their money back into the economy instead of letting it sit in some bank collecting interest. that was the whole point behind the luxury tax and capitol gains tax.

and EVERY dime spent on social services gets pumped directy into the economy. the economy only grows when people spend.

we gave the energy industry a 14 billion dollar tax cut so they would pump it back into the economy as jobs for exploration, development of new energy, and more drilling and refinery jobs. what they did was pay stock holder dividends and pocket the rest.

it is capitulating to the top that stifels the economy. the bottom and the middle IS the economy. and the more you pump into it at those points, the greater the returns for economic growth.



You and I obviously have radically different ideas about what "in the economy" means...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 375 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (375)