Quote:
1. I'm unsure anyone has said that sex does not or should not involve an aspect of intimacy...just that it doesn't inherently...that we construct it to be so.
I've never argued that fact, but anytime I seem to mention sex and intimacy in any way shape or formed sometimes linked I've had people argue against it, hence my question.
I can see it as being an issue of trust. But then, if sex does not equal intimacy on some level for those in a relationship., I then wonder why it would have to be something only they can participate in together? Money issues, I get it. To spend money that someone else worked hard for is a lack of trust. Addiction of drugs, alcohol, gambling can change a person and make them not the same, nor necessarily safe to be around. But sex? If intimacy was attached to sexual intercourse, it makes sense. But if sex holds no intimacy in a relationship, or "shouldn't" then would the person cheated on then be causing more hardship by making such a big deal about it? I mean why would someone want to trust another not to do something that really doesnt mean anything except for physical release? See where I'm coming from?
Again, this is why I said a few times, for the majority of people out there, sex does not always equate intimacy, but it does not mean that sex never equals intimacy. There is no black and white. Never is, never was. And anyone who says otherwise is an idiot, plain and simple.