Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Sure. That's my take on it, but it makes sense and matches the facts listed in the article.
[...]
They've given him just enough rope to hang himself with and maintained a continual "this guys a nutjob" stance all along. Obama would legitimize the very leader that the Iranians don't trust or like anymore.
If the Iranian people were concerned that Obama's diplomacy would legitimize someone they don't care for, it stands to reason that they wouldn't view him as their best chance at bridging the gap between nations. It's not as though the people of Iran aren't following the US election or are unaware of Obama's dipolmacy policies.
You're correct. That seems to be contradictory, doesn't it? On the one hand, you've got an article that's primarily about how the Iranian people like us because they dislike their current leadership and we oppose that leadership (the "It's a matter of being drawn to the opposite of what you can't stand" quote).
On the other hand, there's a single speculative statement at the end that says that Iranians "seem" to support Obama because they believe he'll patch things up with Iran.
So which is it? Do they want us to "patch things up" with their leadership? Or do they want us to oppose their leaders and support them perhaps in obtaining better leadership? We can speculate on the nuances of the article author's word choice, but I have a feeling that if you polled Iranians with the question "Do you want the US president to have direct talks with Ahmadinejad", most would say "hell no!".
Um... Maybe Iranians really don't support Obama that much? Or they, like many American's, also think Obama holds different positions then he actually does?
Quote:
More likely, they see Obama as someone who can, along with internal pressure from the people/government of Iran, get Ahmadinejad to take the carrot. Or, if not Ahmadinejad, then whoever replaces him.
I seriously doubt it. I think that more likely, the article writer took a bit of license with his "seem to support Obama" statement. The entire substance of the article was about how the US's stance against Ahmadinejad is the main reason why Iranians like us, but then ends with a statement that they like Obama? Either that is a false statement, or there's a lot of people in Iran who don't know what Obama has said he'd do. I doubt seriously that any of them think that Obama can sit down with the man and magically "patch things up".