Totem wrote:
Barry is naive to think he can out-think or out talk other leaders.
He's not.
Diplomacy and multilateralism are the bedrock of foreign policy. Surely, if the last 8 years have shown us anything, it is precisely that. It's obvious the next American President should talk to Iran's president. And not just Iran, but Syria, Hamas, and Hezbollah too.
I seriously wonder what kind of world you live in when you think ignoring those people will be productive. What is the reasoning? That they'll break down and give up the struggle because the US president is ignoring them? What is this, 4th grade diplomacy?
Talking to leaders doesn't mean sucking their ****, or giving them nukes as birthday presents. It simply means exploring other avenues than war, destruction, and death. Opening up potential lines of communication. What matters isn't so much that you speak to them, but the substance of what you say. What you offer, if anything. And Obama isn't talking about offering them anything. Only opening up a dialogue.
Finally, you have to be pretty delusional to think that talking to the US president is somehow a "win" for those guys. It's not. If anything it discredits them amongst their most ardent and extreme supporters.
I'm glad to see the US might have a President that has a few brain cells. Ignoring problems has
never led them to being resolved. Look at the Palestinians. 40 years of ignoring their leaders: Arafat, Abu Amza, now Hamas. And what progress has been made during all this ignoring? Ah, that's right, they only got more violent and extremist. Iran since the revolution? Worst. Cuba? More entrenched. NK? They built some nukes.
And it's not just the US. When an Islamist party won the elections in Algeria, France and the military governement cancelled the elections and ignored them. The result? 20 years of civil war, of carnage and bloodshed of ordinary civilians. Perfect breeding ground and real-life military training camps for fanatics.
Now look at the opposite end of the spectrum: look at Northern Ireland. Sri Lanka. The USSR.
And before some **** throws in "appeasement" and Hitler: the problem wasn't that the Allies tried to talk to Hitler. That wasn't "appeasement". The appeasement was giving Hitler Czechoslovakia. Until the US presiendet talks about offering Iraq to Iran, Barbados to Cuba or Israel to Hamas, it will have nothing to do with appeasement.