Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

The State of the NHS Follow

#52 May 18 2008 at 4:16 PM Rating: Decent
Darkknight wrote:
Quote:
It's designed to be an example of why socialized medicine would fail on a larger scale.


Disagree. They want it to work. Is it not?

--DK
Also from Oregon here, I'll field this one.

The OHP is woefully underfunded (or so they claim, at least) and so basically won't cover anyone over, oh, about half the poverty line unless they're pregnant. (Minor exaggeration for effect, but it's pretty damn close to that.)

It's pretty well designed to be crap, or to soak up as much of the budget as possible (what with the goddamn teacher's union in this state, that doesn't tend to be much). If everyone suddenly were making 3x what they were, maybe they'd cover everyone at or below the poverty line.

...But I wouldn't count on it.
#53 May 19 2008 at 12:19 AM Rating: Excellent
***
1,225 posts
Nobby wrote:
Leodis wrote:
nobody should have to wait more than 18 months for elective surgery.
18 weeks darling. 18 weeks, not months,

Back in 1997, when the imperative came in, i.e. when the Labour party was elected, the statement, the target was 18 months.

We got hung out to dry each time a local newspaper found someone waiting for longer than 18 months, especially when a hospital in Plymouth had been found falsifying its lists and a hundred of these buggers were uncovered.

Now the target is 18 weeks, but over the last 11 years, it's changed a fair bit.
#54 May 19 2008 at 12:53 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Leodis wrote:
Back in 1997
I could admit that I misread your post, or tell you to FUck Off.

Decisions, decisions.

So which bit of the NHS owns your soul?
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 713 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (713)