Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

I live in NC and voted for the black guy...Follow

#77 May 14 2008 at 3:06 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

"involved"? He wasn't found to have violated any campaign finance rules. The prosecutor has since stated repeatedly that he found zero evidence of any wrongdoing by McCain,


What ludicrously bad judgment, though, huh? I guess that's what happens when you just blindly do what you're told for 40 years.

Thank goodness that's all changed!


____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#78 May 14 2008 at 3:33 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
What ludicrously bad judgment, though, huh? I guess that's what happens when you just blindly do what you're told for 40 years.


Bad judgment? About what? He accepted campaign donations in accordance with the campaign finance rules. He did nothing different then every other senator and representative in congress. His only mistake was that one of the many businesses he received funding from later went bankrupt, and it turned out that some other members of congress (three democrats in particular) acted inappropriately in order to try to benefit the business in question.

But McCain didn't. That's the point. It's not a violation of campaign rules to accept donations. It's only a violation if you return that favor by using your position to direct some specific favors of your own back to the same person or entity (trading taxpayer money for campaign money in effect).


It's going to be pretty hard to point the finger at McCain, when both Obama and Clinton are actively engaging in exactly the sort of thing he did 20 years ago that got him in trouble. Don't you think?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#79 May 14 2008 at 3:36 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
The worst you can say about McCain on this issue is that 20 years ago he did the same things that every other member of Congress did
Wait.. I thought we were all excited about McCain's distant past and how it proved how trustworthy he is...


Sure. It tells you what kind of person he is. Whether he's about himself, or about others. We can hem and haw over campaign donations, but there aren't a whole lot of people who can say that if they were in a prison and were told they could leave if they wanted, would refuse to do so because he thought it was unfair to the rest of the people still there.


Trying to say that bit of selflessness doesn't count because he accepted campaign donations (which all the other candidates do as well) isn't exactly going to go over well. The absolute worst you can say about McCain has him doing the same things that his opponents are doing. But his best simply can't be matched. Period.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#80 May 14 2008 at 3:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Trying to say that bit of selflessness doesn't count because he accepted campaign donations (which all the other candidates do as well) isn't exactly going to go over well.
Of course it will. You're delusional if you think otherwise.

No one is going to say "Who cares if McCain was a POW? He did THIS!!". They're just going to say "He did THIS!!". And McCain had better have a better response for it than "POW POW POW POW" or else he's going to wind up like 9iu11ani.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#81 May 14 2008 at 4:58 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Bad judgment? About what? He accepted campaign donations in accordance with the campaign finance rules. He did nothing different then every other senator and representative in congress. His only mistake was that one of the many businesses he received funding from later went bankrupt, and it turned out that some other members of congress (three democrats in particular) acted inappropriately in order to try to benefit the business in question.

But McCain didn't.


There's nothing to indicate this, actually.

McCain wasn't proven to have done so, which is something completely different. OJ wasn't proven to have murdered anyone.


It's going to be pretty hard to point the finger at McCain, when both Obama and Clinton are actively engaging in exactly the sort of thing he did 20 years ago that got him in trouble. Don't you think?


They're peddling influence for campaign donations? Who knew.

I don't think it will be an issue, not because there's nothing there, but because it was so long ago. I think McCain will lose much of the idiot vote because he's so busy holding off the Grim Reaper with his left hand that he can't focus on campaigning. His age is going to be a huge, possibly deciding factor.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#82 May 14 2008 at 8:05 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Bad judgment? About what? He accepted campaign donations in accordance with the campaign finance rules. He did nothing different then every other senator and representative in congress. His only mistake was that one of the many businesses he received funding from later went bankrupt, and it turned out that some other members of congress (three democrats in particular) acted inappropriately in order to try to benefit the business in question.

But McCain didn't.


There's nothing to indicate this, actually.

McCain wasn't proven to have done so, which is something completely different. OJ wasn't proven to have murdered anyone.


OJ was brought to trial though. There was sufficient evidence to indicate a crime had been committed by him. There was zero evidence indicating McCain did anything wrong. McCain was investigated purely because he was one of 5 members of congress who had received campaign donations from the business in question.

To follow your analogy, McCain was "involved" in about the same way Kato Kaelin was. He was questioned, and his testimony was used in the investigation, but he was never suspected, much less charged with any crime.

Quote:

It's going to be pretty hard to point the finger at McCain, when both Obama and Clinton are actively engaging in exactly the sort of thing he did 20 years ago that got him in trouble. Don't you think?


They're peddling influence for campaign donations? Who knew.


Hey. I wasn't the one who brought this up as though it would be an issue for McCain to deal with. If you think it's silly for Obama or Clinton to accuse McCain of this, talk to Joph, not me.


Quote:
His age is going to be a huge, possibly deciding factor.



Doubtful. Unless something happens that specifically highlights his age (ie: he gets sick, or injured or something), I just don't see it. While his gaffs are more likely to be labeled "senior moments" by the press, he doesn't have them any more often then anyone else on the campaign trail, and arguably less often. Obama's lack of experience has caused him to fall into far more problems then McCain's has had. And Bill's attempt to explain away the bosnia gaff by saying it was old age setting in, didn't exactly help Clinton either.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#83 May 14 2008 at 8:57 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Doubtful. Unless something happens that specifically highlights his age (ie: he gets sick, or injured or something), I just don't see it.


You haven't seen the opposition research yet, either. Let's discuss this again in 4 months or so.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#84 May 14 2008 at 10:54 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
I'd seriously question that portion of your analogy...


Are you actually the owner of fishtaco gbaji?

It's like mr. taco was just beating and thumping on RP, not really saying anything coherent or even intelligible, but through sheer tenacity he managed to convince RP to play his game; he got him to make an analogy! and at that point he was lost. I get the mental image of gbaji, drumming his fingers on the desk with a smile of glee on his face, cackling to himself as he pounces on the now weary, exhausted phoenix.

Quote:
I know that this is a "Clinton vs Obama" discussion, but IMO that's kinda like arguing about which toddler will do better in a track meet against an Olympic level athlete.


And a sports analogy to boot!
#85 May 15 2008 at 1:29 AM Rating: Good
Pensive wrote:
now weary, exhausted phoenix.


That's true but only because I can't shake off this flu I've had for the past two weeks Smiley: mad I caught it in Chicago, so I can only assume your American strain of influenza is pumped up with steroids and growth hormones, cos it's kicking the Shit out of me. Now I know how the Natives felt.

Anyway. Flishtaco, I actually liked the bit about Clinton being an assistant manager. While Obama is clearly an ex-football player. The only one to have actually played the game. By that I mean that he's the only to have had a "normal" upbringing. Sure he was extremely clever and driven and talented, but no one could've predicted that this kid of a single mum would end up where he is now. In fact, you could've understoof if he's ended up a drug-taking McDonalds counter boy: relative poverty, mixed racial and cultural identity, and broken family. Not easy to make it when you start out like this. To me, he's one of "us". Just one who made it.

This isn't true for either Hillary or McCain. Both were born into wealth and politically influential families. They have never been one of "the people", never had to struggle financially, never had to rely on food stamps, etc... Sure, you can say McCain was tortured and was in the army, but he still came from a privileged and powerful family.

The same can be said about Oabma's relative lack of experience. Spending 20 years in Congress might make you understand how the politics are played, but it also insulates you from the real world. From the ordinary problems of ordinary people.

When white-working class voters say they can't "identify" with Obama, I struggle to find reasons for this which are not based on his skin colour/perceived racial identity. He's more like them than hillary could ever be, even if she spent the next 5 years in a homeless shelter prostituting herself for crack.

So Obama is theonly one to have actually played the game. To know what it feels like to be one of the guys managed. The other two have managed other people their whole life. I think managers are a million times better when they've been on the other side themselves. So, Hillary assistant coach, Obama ex-player.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#86 May 15 2008 at 2:13 AM Rating: Decent
Meh a good arguement RP, he has played the game. But how many ex players actually can coach even superstars like Lou Al Cinder (Kareem). Bird was decent, some others have proven to be good/great GMs ( Dumars, other in basketball I could name I supose but none with a hall of fame type career and this good at being a GM, different debate I digress) Obama has come up and has a good to great pedigree to be a someone I can trust (honestly I liked Edwards over Kerry but liked Kerry with the Vietnam vet thing as a slight edge) Your a ******* btw I am starting to like you now that you actually are debating me. To your current stand I would have taken Mark Jackson over D'Antoni in NY, the players in NY would be more likely to respond to him over a proven entity in this case. However if I was looking for someone to replace Stern I would not lean toward him or any other player I can think of vs say MS. Phil Jackson iirc she is the daughter of the Lakers owner and would have Phil "in the whitehouse".

The thing I think I find the most enamouring about McCain currently is despite his background he served in the military, too many were dodging or psuedo dodging with his background. He even let his own son serve in this fiasco ( I am sure he has been removed now from combat). Secondary is he is from my state (transplant yes) and I have voted for him and mostly felt I have been represented well. God did he ever suck some Bush *** in 2004 though. If it wasnt for that huge huggle at best, he would be above HRC in my book as it stands he is below her and I want Bill back.

As to me being Gbaji christ its been awhile but I have gone to the mattressess' with him before. Don't know me ok but god thats about the worst slander ever.

If its not clear I am 100% sure as a former Republican from AZ that I would vote for HRC if she is on the ballot and like 55% for JM if she is not.

I am born and raised in Phoenix, AZ and I dont know where he was born but Gbaji while nearer me then other posters (San Diego) has disagreed with me more then he has ever agreed with me. My posts all have my signature and I have played with Smashroo in the EQ game as well as Tacosid, Kaolin Baldisking, Patrician, etc in the Alla guild on FV. My ex-wife was also in the guild.

Anyways, I would think I could manage to drum up enough support to get others besides Gbaji to say I am not his sockpuppet.

/Salute RP I am enjoying our debate and will continue it if you desire. I am pro-Clinton and likely to switch to McCain though =P.

(again in AZ my vote is unlikely to matter if I do decide to vote for Obama though)
#87 May 15 2008 at 5:32 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Lack of experience can be overcome. Lack of character and/or intelligence can't.

Quote:
To follow your analogy, McCain was "involved" in about the same way Kato Kaelin was. He was questioned, and his testimony was used in the investigation, but he was never suspected, much less charged with any crime.


Kaelin was censured by an ethics committee? Didn't know that.

McCain received more than campaign donations, although I agree the sort of petty corruption he indulged in is very common.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#88 May 15 2008 at 5:49 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I was honestly less worried about the nuts & bolts of the Keating 5 scandal than I was amused that Gbaji thinks stuff that happened to McCain 40+ years ago will provide a force field against any criticism of him today.

"Hey, McCain says he wants to maintain Bush's upper class tax cuts despite originally opposing their passage as an unfair burden on the working class."
"HE WAS A PRISONER OF WAR, DAMN YOU! HOW DARE YOU SPEAK OF HIM LIKE THAT?? HE COULD HAVE GONE HOME BUT HE DIDN'T!! HAVE YOU NO SHAME??"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#89 May 15 2008 at 6:12 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I don't care either way about the Keating five - four of them were Democrats, after all.

McCain is old as dirt and about as smart. THAT worries me, although if he could by any stretch of the imagination select a competent moderate as his running mate I'd be less worried. He can't, so I am.



____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#90 May 15 2008 at 6:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Samira wrote:
I don't care either way about the Keating five - four of them were Democrats, after all.


Sure, but Alex was so vocal of a Republican that it really downplayed the Democratic tendencies of the rest of the family.




OH KeatING...sorry, sorry.

Nexa

Edited, May 15th 2008 10:25am by Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#91 May 15 2008 at 6:28 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Nexa wrote:
Samira wrote:
I don't care either way about the Keating five - four of them were Democrats, after all.


Sure, but Alex was so vocal of a Republican that it really downplayed the Democratic tendencies of the rest of the family.

..and the dad was pure wimp.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#92 May 15 2008 at 7:16 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I struggle to find reasons for this which are not based on his skin colour/perceived racial identity.


There aren't any, they just hate and fear black men. Don't overthink it.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#93 May 17 2008 at 12:07 AM Rating: Decent
No clue if this is aimed at me, despite the gambling problem I love Charles Barkley ( he played and well for the Suns and I am a sports fan as should be obvious, and until recently, well by my standards we had only the Suns that mattered), and Al Sharpton ( no gambling problem that I know of but black).

I dont fear Obama for being black at all ( hell back in like 7th/8th grade I pissed off my Government/history teacher by getting the class to vote Jesse Jackson over Reagan, he was more pissed by the rules that the name had to be on the ballot to decide his vote I think).

I have absolutely no problem with blacks I live in AZ and have encountered few to be fair, but 90% of the Mexicans/illegals (not the same I know, but I have had some who admitted to me they were) I know I have loved, they are hardworking, dont ***** and know when you are treating them fairly (shocked as hell when a dumbass white ****** like me can speak Spanish too, and the ******** among them are ******** for the same reasons I would chalk up a white/black dude for being an *******). We have a large population of Mexicans btw if you didnt know.

Yes, I was in the Army and when I encountered blacks/hispanics I generally got along better with the hispanics but I think that was a result of my Spanish and familiarity over prejudice, I can only think of one black guy from then I didnt like and that was because he was a **** and not because he was black, it certianly wasnt over a lack of "African-Americans" in the army. All but the one I remember were "golden rule" type people treat others how you treat them.

I also wonder if much like the vote, America is more ready to accept a woman over a black man. Certainly the black man follows but alone in the voting booth I cannot speak for America, but suspect I am right.

We shall see I suppose in McCain vs Obama.
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 258 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (258)