Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

The plot thickens! Follow

#1 Apr 30 2008 at 1:37 AM Rating: Decent
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/04/wrightsetup.html


Quote:
as Jeremiah Wright's speech set up by a Clinton supporter?

Well, here's a most interesting connection we just came across.

Everybody is talking today about how much the Rev. Jeremiah Wright's latest unrepentant militant remarks hurt his most prominent parishoner, Sen. Barack Obama, and his chances to win the Democratic presidential nomination and the general election. So much so that the Obama camp realized the latent danger overnight and the candidate was forced to speak out publicly a second time today, as The Ticket noted here earlier today.

There was little doubt left in today's remarks by Obama, who recently said he could no more disown Wright than he could the black community. He pretty much disowned Wright today. Obama described himself as "outraged" and "saddened" by "the spectacle of what we saw yesterday."

But now, it turns out, we should have been paying a little less attention to Wright's speech and the histrionics of his ensuing news conference and taken a peek at....

who was sitting next to him at the head table for the National Press Club event.

It was the Rev. Dr. Barbara Reynolds, a former editorial board member of USA Today who teaches at the Howard University School of Divinity. An ordained minister, as New York DailThe Rev. Dr. Barbara Reynolds and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright at the head table of the National Press Club event Monday which Reynolds helped arrangey News writer Errol Louis points out in today's column, she was introduced at the press club event as the person "who organized" it.

But guess what? She's also an ardent longtime booster of Obama's sole remaining competitor for the Democratic nomination, none other than Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York. It won't take very much at all for Obama supporters to see in Wright's carefully arranged Washington event that was so damaging to Obama the strategic, nefarious manipulation of the Clintons.

Their supporter, Reynolds, helps arrange a speech by the outspoken and egocentric Wright which receives blanket national coverage to the disadvantage of Clinton's opponent. As Louis writes: "The Rev. Jeremiah Wright couldn't have done more damage to Barack Obama's campaign if he had tried. And you have to wonder if that's just what one friend of Wright wanted."

Reynolds has not returned e-mails or phone calls seeking comment, but Louis notes the obvious conflict between her political allegiance and her press club arrangements. He quotes a February blog entry of Reynolds saying, "My vote for Hillary in the Maryland primary was my way of saying thank you" to Clinton and her husband for his administration's successes.

In another entry, Reynolds notes critically of Obama, "It is a sad testimony that to protect his credentials as a unifier above the fray, the senator is fueling the media characterization that Rev. Dr. Wright is some retiring old uncle in the church basement."

Louis notes himself about the Wright appearance: "It's hard to exaggerate how bad the actual news conference was. Wright, steeped in an honorable, fiery tradition of Bible-based social criticism, cheapened his arguments and his movement by mugging for the cameras, rolling his eyes, heaping scorn on his critics and acting as if nobody in the room was learned enough to ask him a question."

(UPDATE: Sylvia Smith, the press club president, confirmed today that Reynolds is on the club's speakers committee. She told Michael Calderone on Politico.com that she still doesn't know whom Reynolds supports for president, adding, "Rev. Wright is newsworthy, period.")

--Andrew Malcolm


Ooooh if this is true the Hellbeast is toast! Rev. Wright will look like a bought tongue. Obama can point at it and look good by calling it "Old politics that I'm against." McCain can point at the Hellbeast and condemn her for the contemptible act and look good!




Edited, Apr 30th 2008 2:38am by NaughtyWord
#2 Apr 30 2008 at 4:39 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Clearly, the woman knows how the game works. She's just not skilled enough to cover her tracks.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#3 Apr 30 2008 at 5:01 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Umm, yeah. Smiley: rolleyes

So, what do people think of the Clinton backed plan to suspend the $0.18/gal fuel tax?

Will it help or hurt fuel costs and the economy?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#4 Apr 30 2008 at 7:46 AM Rating: Good
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Elinda wrote:
So, what do people think of the Clinton backed plan to suspend the $0.18/gal fuel tax?

Will it help or hurt fuel costs and the economy?

Obviously reducing taxes will lower the cost, but demand for gasoline is fairly inelastic, so I wouldn't expect prices to change very much at all. 15 cents at the most.

Which is total BS considering it's almost $4 a gallon anyways.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#5 Apr 30 2008 at 7:52 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
I'm going to do my part to lower gas by buying lots of stocks in gas companies and demanding that they give me lower returns on my investment.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#6 Apr 30 2008 at 7:55 AM Rating: Good
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
I'm going to do my part to lower gas by buying lots of stocks in gas companies and demanding that they give me lower returns on my investment.

You're absolutely right. $49 billion in profits simply isn't enough for one company, or its shareholders. How do these oil tycoons stay in business with such paltry returns?
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#7 Apr 30 2008 at 8:05 AM Rating: Excellent
Unfortunately, Hillary is the energizer bunny. I fully expect her to be fighting this in the courts if the DNC picks someone other than her. T_T
#8 Apr 30 2008 at 8:07 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
catwho, pet mage of Jabober wrote:
Unfortunately, Hillary is the energizer bunny. I fully expect her to be fighting this in the courts if the DNC picks someone other than her. T_T


If she was the Energizer Bunny, Bill never would've let Monica touch him. If you had said battery acid, it'd be different.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#10 Apr 30 2008 at 8:23 AM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
obamamania wrote:
W laid it out for the rabid liberals blaming the oil companies. We either produce our own oil or continue to allow opec to dictate our energy costs.

Go away, Varrus.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#12 Apr 30 2008 at 8:38 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
obamamania wrote:
Demea,

Stop forcing govn healthcare and other methods of communism down our throats because you're too pathetic to take care of yourself.
You know what's going to happen when America finally implodes on itself? Those commies up north are going to take their sleds down south and round up all the women and children to be whores and slaves and then feed the men to the livestock. Except for you. We're going to send you to France.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#13 Apr 30 2008 at 10:24 AM Rating: Good
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
obamamania wrote:
Demea,

Stop forcing govn healthcare and other methods of communism down our throats because you're too pathetic to take care of yourself.

For the record:

- Government-mandated healthcare won't solve all of the problems with the healthcare industry, it'll merely replace them with new ones. Yeah, more people will be covered, but the quality and speed (important if you're ******* dying) will be severely hampered. I'm still on the fence on this one.

- Communism was a great idea. In practice, not so much. However, there's only so much that free markets can do, and inevitably, there are market failures (like, say, the healthcare industry!). Government interaction usually just tries to distort the market to correct for a pre-existing distortion. Go take a basic microeconomics course before you decide to vomit all over the forum again.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#16 Apr 30 2008 at 10:59 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Yeah, more people will be covered, but the quality and speed (important if you're @#%^ing dying) will be severely hampered


Hahahhahaa. Ahh. No.

Unless you mean the quality and speed of care of people paying cash for care instead of going through insurance. Even that's unlikely to decline.




____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#17 Apr 30 2008 at 11:01 AM Rating: Good
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
I'm fairly sure that I've had this discussion with RedPhoenixxxxxxxx before, but seeing as he's on vacation (in Chicago, of all places), he won't be chiming in I reckon.

Nobby? Tarv? How's that universal healthcare over in the EU?
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#18 Apr 30 2008 at 11:13 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Here's the part I don't understand about the anti-national healthcare argument.

The vast, vast, vast, vast majority of people who have health insurance in the US are insured under managed care for profit systems where there's an actual profit motive to deny them care, delay early testing because it's not as cost effective as testing someone in later stages of a disease, etc.

Why would these people think that somehow, removing that profit motive would cause care to *decline*.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#20 Apr 30 2008 at 11:19 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

The real question is how the doctors view this.


I'm not sure, honestly. I know my friends who are doctors ******* hate the HMO thing, but they may hate the idea of National Healthcare more. As an odd cooincidence, I'm doing some consulting on an FDA test of a new medical device and there will be a dozen or so radioligists there on Friday. I'll ask some and see what they think.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 240 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (240)