Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

How many of you Obamites will not play ball?Follow

#1 Apr 24 2008 at 6:28 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
16,160 posts
Newsweek brought up a frightening scenario for the Dems this week. After asking the typical Lefty lib Hellbeast supporter what they'd do if Obama stole their candidate's rendevous with destiny from them, fully half said they'd either stay home on Election Day or vote for McCain. On the other hand, 83% of Obamites said, "Meh. No biggie. ABB."

In other words, the guy who presumably has the lead for the title of Liberal Savior of the World is in danger of alienating a very large chunk of the Democratic Party base if he wins/earns/steals the nomination in Denver. So I ask you, you crazed Obamites (and let's face it-- that's nearly everybody on this board who's American, except gbaji and me), if the Hellbeast manages to wring this victory from the jaws of Defeat, would you blightly accept her as your candidate and vote for her in November?

Totem
#2 Apr 24 2008 at 6:31 PM Rating: Decent
*****
18,463 posts
Ron Paul FTW!!!
#3 Apr 24 2008 at 6:33 PM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Spread the word, Brother.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#4 Apr 24 2008 at 6:33 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Mike Gravel 4evah!


I probably would abstain from the presidental part of the ballot and just vote for the downticket candidates. But since Illinois is going to go blue no matter what, it's a pretty toothless protest. If I was in a swing state, I'd probably give myself a hard pinch and vote for Clinton just for the SCotUS considerations.

Edit: I don't much buy into the protest polls. It's been a heated race and people are still staking out for their candidate. Once it comes down to Democrat vs Republican, I expect most people will fall behind party lines more often than defect. Clinton is, first and foremost, an establishment Democrat and the core of her supporters are the same. I don't realistically expect them, in great numbers, to vote (R) on the ticket. Some may stay home but the same can be said for conservatives unhappy with McCain.

I've seen this same poll on other forums and, for all the bickering, I'd say 90%+ from both sides admit that they'd rather see the opposing Democrat win in November than McCain.

Edited, Apr 24th 2008 9:49pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#5 Apr 24 2008 at 7:19 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Time made the interesting observation that the very anger that makes the "typical" Hillary supporter who they are does not apply to Obama and his base. If he were to show the resentment and anger Hillary does, it'd negate the very thing the "typical" Obama rooter likes about him: laid back coolness. He can't afford to show what might be a normal human emotion-- anger and frustration --to Hillary's scorched earth campaign style lest he alienate those voters who are drawn to him because of his controlled emotions.

Totem
#6 Apr 24 2008 at 8:02 PM Rating: Decent
Totem wrote:
Newsweek brought up a frightening scenario for the Dems this week. After asking the typical Lefty lib Hellbeast supporter what they'd do if Obama stole their candidate's rendevous with destiny from them, fully half said they'd either stay home on Election Day or vote for McCain. On the other hand, 83% of Obamites said, "Meh. No biggie. ABB."

In other words, the guy who presumably has the lead for the title of Liberal Savior of the World is in danger of alienating a very large chunk of the Democratic Party base if he wins/earns/steals the nomination in Denver. So I ask you, you crazed Obamites (and let's face it-- that's nearly everybody on this board who's American, except gbaji and me), if the Hellbeast manages to wring this victory from the jaws of Defeat, would you blightly accept her as your candidate and vote for her in November?

Totem


Well considering Clinton's views are much closer to Obama's then say, uhh that other guy, you know the one that's supposed to be a Pubbie, what was is name?


Oh yeah, McCain. The choice is pretty obvious.

Edited, Apr 24th 2008 9:03pm by NaughtyWord
#7 Apr 24 2008 at 8:40 PM Rating: Decent
*****
16,160 posts
But you see, that just means you are exactly what typifies your average Obama supporter. You really don't ultimately care who wins since in your view one is a woman who is slightly black and the other is a man who is slightly effeminate. Mix and match, either will do just fine.

If you were the type of voter that Newsweek claims to be drawn to Hillary, you'd be mightily offended some uppity black man decided to steal your candidate's thunder and moment in history.

Furthemore, it appears that elderly white women are largely those who are most offended by this turn of events. Were you an older white woman, you'd apparently see this race not as a doubly historic event, but as a singular opportunity for women to correct issues that supercede race. In these purple states the elderly woman vote was hugely lopsided in the Hellbeast's favor. Such a dedicated voter base is an absolute Godsend for any candidate and has to date not yet adhered to Obama or been historically dependable (youth and blacks).

Totem
#8 Apr 24 2008 at 8:42 PM Rating: Decent
Really can't say I like either Hillary or McCain. I'd have to seriously look over their plans before I made that decision.

Most likely I'll be lazy and just do what Joph is going to do if Hillary wins the nom. I'm not really a Republican or Democrat, more of a Liberal Conservative or a Conservative Liberal. I don't really feel a dedication to either party.


This is definatly going to be an interesting election year.
#9 Apr 24 2008 at 8:53 PM Rating: Decent
I believe Clinton's views are closer to my own than McCain's. Given the lack of Obama as a choice, yes, I would vote for Clinton.
#10 Apr 24 2008 at 9:01 PM Rating: Decent
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
Voted for HillDog in the Wisco primary.
#11 Apr 24 2008 at 9:22 PM Rating: Decent
Totem wrote:
So I ask you, you crazed Obamites (and let's face it-- that's nearly everybody on this board who's American, except gbaji and me)
I like him only in the sense that I think he'd make a great VP for McCain.

That said, if for some reason Romney comes out as a third-party candidate for the general, I'm more inclined to vote for him than anyone else.
#12 Apr 25 2008 at 2:29 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
I've got my Hillary bumper sticker just waiting to go up in the rear window if she turns out to be the candidate.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#13 Apr 25 2008 at 2:41 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
I'd have no problem voting for Hillary over McCain, simply because McCain's a himbo. As for my view of Hillary as a feminist icon, well... I have to say she doesn't resonate with me for those reasons. Then again if I were to consider whether race or sex has had greater negative impact on me throughout the course of my life, race wins hands-down.
#14 Apr 25 2008 at 5:19 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Whoever loses is going to turn around and throw their support to the winner, and voters tend to fall in line with that.

What worries me more is the large number of minorities, mostly blacks, who tend to not vote. While they'll come out in force for Obama, I'm not sure they would for Clinton.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#15 Apr 25 2008 at 5:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
It's interesting that republicans, stuck with a candidate that alot of the current Pubbies in power hate and a president with historically low approval numbers, can only count on the incompetence of the democrats to seal their win.


....


Oh FUck, it's 2004 all over again.

If democrats fUck this up again, I'm moving back to Canada.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#16 Apr 25 2008 at 5:55 AM Rating: Good
Commander Annabella wrote:
It's interesting that republicans, stuck with a candidate that alot of the current Pubbies in power hate and a president with historically low approval numbers, can only count on the incompetence of the democrats to seal their win.


I find this crazy too. The Iraq war debacle, the economy ********-up, the mortgage crisis, the foreign policy in general... They've screwed-up abroad, they've screwed-up at home, I just don't understand how they've still got even a tiny chance to get re-elected.

Quote:
If democrats fUck this up again, I'm moving back to Canada.


If they fUck up, I'm asking for the univeral right to vote in the US elections. It's jsut not fair otherwise. I can vote in French elections, the results of which has 0 impact of my life, and I can't vote for the guys that decide how the planet is run.

We need a new universal civil rights movement.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#17 Apr 25 2008 at 6:06 AM Rating: Decent
*
60 posts
I'm voting for Snoopy! Equal rights for beagles! A full dog bowl for every American! Fire hydrants in every yard! Free shots and annual checkups! Inexpensive and better housing! War on the terrorist fleas and ticks!
#18 Apr 25 2008 at 6:15 AM Rating: Good
Totem wrote:
But you see, that just means you are exactly what typifies your average Obama supporter. You really don't ultimately care who wins since in your view one is a woman who is slightly black and the other is a man who is slightly effeminate. Mix and match, either will do just fine.



Smiley: dubious


No, that just means even though Obama didn't get the nomination, I'm still not stupid enough to vote Conservative.
#19 Apr 25 2008 at 6:17 AM Rating: Good
I live in Georgia. If Obama wins, then there's a small chance that Georgia could be something other than red, because of the large college population (youth) urban population (blacks) and high tech population (educated.) If Clinton wins, the fundies will come out in droves just to shoot her down and my vote won't matter much anyway.
#20 Apr 25 2008 at 7:15 AM Rating: Decent
*
60 posts
Snoopy For President
1968, The Royal Guardsmen

(The original single version of this song featured a spoken
introduction by "The Red Baron," mentioning the then-current
presidential candidates for the 1968 election. Unfortunately,
Bobby Kennedy was assassinated just days after the record had
already been shipped to stores. Later pressings eliminated
the spoken intro.)

Written by Phillip A. Gernhard, **** Holler, and Arnold Lee
Shapiro


The time had come to elect a President
And all the famous candidates thought they were heaven-sent
They screamed and raved and pounded their hands above their hearts
But soon the noble promises were hard to tell apart

Waiting at the pumpkin patch, a dog sincere and brave
And everybody hoped that soon the country he would save
The pumpkin said "The day has come for you to take a stand"
"For love has left the people across our native land"

Some wear the sign of the elephant
and some wear the sign of the mule
But we'll hold the sign of the beagle high
and love will shine right through

All the politicians, they swore he couldn't win
But Snoopy only shook his head and flashed his famous grin
He jumped into his faithful friend, the Sopwith Camel plane
And bounced around the countryside from Washington to Maine

Some wear the sign of the elephant
and some wear the sign of the mule
But we'll hold the sign of the beagle high
and love will shine right through

New York State was lookin' bad till Snoopy made a speech
Soon Illinois and Tennessee were both within his reach
He won the vote in Oregon but time was growin' thin
And back at the convention hall, the votes were pourin' in

Snoopy smiled his way into the hearts of everyone
But when the votes were counted up, they found he needed one
The winning vote for Snoopy came when a stranger raised his hand
Snoopy turned, the stranger spoke
"Mein friend, vee meet again!"

Some wear the sign of the elephant
and some wear the sign of the mule
#21 Apr 25 2008 at 7:17 AM Rating: Excellent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

if the Hellbeast manages to wring this victory from the jaws of Defeat, would you blightly accept her as your candidate and vote for her in November?


I'd vote for her, and after they cooled off a little, so would most other Obama supporters. The same is true of Hillary supporters. Polls like this with emotions running high are completely meaningless in terms of General Election support.

Here's what the consequences would be though, and having talked to people I know who organize and raise money for the Party we're all pretty much in agreement:

People involved in nominating Hillary will find their money disappearing. They'll be attacked in primaries by progressive candidates able to raise money from all 50 states to run for house seats. They'll lose. Joe Liberman may have the profile to survive this, a first year congressman in the Texas 5th district doesn't (I picked that arbitrarily, it's not an example). Similar to the process used by the 90s GOP to primary out "RINOS" people involved in nominating Hillary would find it almost impossible to survive in Democratic politics, even if she's elected President.

The money machine isn't what it used to be. There's been a slight shift in power to the party activists and away from special interest blocs. It might not last forever, but it'll certainly last long enough for there to be consequences in the next decade or so for anyone involved in this sort of deal.

That said, I'll gladly lay you 15 to 1 it doesn't happen, and you'd be a fool to take the bet.



Edited, Apr 25th 2008 11:19am by Smasharoo
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#22 Apr 25 2008 at 1:50 PM Rating: Excellent
The man who started it all!
***
1,635 posts
I assume you are talking about the super delegates rising up and pushing Hillary to the nomination despite Obama's lead in votes and delegates. I would vote for Hillary, but I doubt I would contribute to her campaign. I already gave Obama the max I can give for the primaries and will likely give again for the general election, plus some to the national party. If it were Hillary, I would likely save the money for something better. I imagine that goes for the rest of the donors currently giving to Obama. Hillary would probably be better off following McCain's lead and taking public money.

I don't put much stock in any of these polls though. Emotions are high right now and it is easy to say you will vote for McCain over that other person when asked. I'm actually amazed that McCain isn't leading in those polls that show him versus Clinton or Obama in a general election. Once there is a nominee, the stark contrasts between the two candidates will start to come out. Given a few months to cool down the average democratic voter will realize he has to vote democrat. Even the average moderate will realize that on all important issues the democrat favors their view point.

I'm not thrilled at how the campaigns have gone so completely negative. I used to think it was a really bad thing for the party. But I've slowly begun to think that by getting these issued out ahead of time, Hillary might be doing Obama a favor, though I don't believe that is why she is doing it. Eventually the election still will come down to continuing unpopular Bush policies or moving in a different direction. Once the choices are laid out, most democrats will come back to the fold.
____________________________
[wowsig]1855[/wowsig]
#23 Apr 25 2008 at 4:09 PM Rating: Decent
I"m going to recant some things I've said earlier in other post. After doing some more reading and research, I would be more inclined to vote for Obama than McCain at the moment. As far as Clinton goes, there is just something about her I can't bring myself to trust.
#24 Apr 25 2008 at 9:22 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
Hillary supporters are on the defense because things don't look good for her. The "poll" was probably either biased or they're bluffing to give Hillary some favor.

Regardless of what anyone says at this point, anyone who is adamantly in favor of one D candidate over another enough so that they say they'd abstain or vote R if their candidate isn't the nominee will probably vote D anyway. Why? Because whichever D isn't the nominee is going to adamantly endorse the other over McCain. They'll have a swift change of heart.

Personally I'd vote for Hillary. I just vastly prefer Obama, much in the same way I'd vastly prefer her to McCain.

Quote:
But I've slowly begun to think that by getting these issued out ahead of time, Hillary might be doing Obama a favor, though I don't believe that is why she is doing it.


I agree. It's probably a good thing that all of this is coming up now and not later.

Edited, Apr 25th 2008 10:23pm by Kachi
#25 Apr 25 2008 at 9:59 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
I think you're reading the situation wrong, Kachi. These people- women -who support Hillary see her as a living, breathing vindication and validation of the feminist movement stemming back in the '60s. This isn't an "our candidate is losing and we're kinda sore about it" reaction to Obama, but rather a viscerally angry response to their champion being thwarted from her... destiny. I sincerely see them viewing Obama and his supporters as upstarts who have not paid their dues like they themselves have.

Measured against generations of racism it may seem almost trivial to you and others, but for the hardcore Hillary supporters this was to be their moment where they could finally prove that a woman can not only do the job better than a man, but exceed everyone's expectations. Wildly exceed everyone's expectations even. And now a bunch of kids and rookies are stealing their opportunity.

Other than black Obama supporters they don't have that history of anger and frustration. They're too young to have reached the ceiling beyond which they cannot rise and haven't experienced the inequity of doing the same job and only being paid a fraction of what men get paid.

I may not agree with their world view, but I certtainly understand why they feel as they do. And I can certainly emmpathize with their particular dissatisfaction even if I think it is ill-founded. What I am surprised by is how many of you Democrats/Obamites haven't acknowledged their position.

Totem
#26 Apr 25 2008 at 10:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Hillary's base is largely made up of the upper middle class democrats, a large percentage of which, are women. Many of these women are putting large amounts of their gender issues (Also known as Feminism) onto Hillary's candidacy and are angry that their "preemptive nominee" has been losing to a guy.

And while they're thinking it, they can't say that they're just miffed that it's SUCH a well spoken black guy, that they'd much rather vote for if not for their vaginal handicap.

When she loses, give em' a week to stop cool off & they'll start to smell what Barack is cooking.

____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 218 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (218)