You'd think that the English would know the difference by now...
TOO WHOM THIS MAY CONCERN:
Attention: Sir/Madam,
On behalf of Moore and Associates Law Firm, I must say that we really
appreciate the effort you are presently putting into taking time out
to pay attention to this confidential email and offer which has been
forwarded to you. However, I have been advised by my superior to go
straight to the point as regards this offer which requires your urgent
and confidential assistance, so as to enable the urgently required and
swift accomplishment of this transaction.
So as to cut to the chase, We are willing to offer you as an acclaimed
next of Kin, 20% out of 1,557,000 Great British Pounds of which this
transaction holds in store, in relationship to funds belonging to our
late client, having no next of kin assigned to its claim and according
to our thorough research made, is the last of her numerous dormant
accounts which she failed to state within her WILL and one which is
now set to be turned into the bank reserve, if no one is brought
forward to claim it as the beneficiary.
The reason for the 20% acknowledged by us for the support and effort
expected of you to perform in relationship to this issue, is due to
the fact that we are a total of three (Me, my superior and a bank
official) involved and have the major roles to play.
As for documents and requirements needed to enable the success of this
transaction, they have been taking care of plus, we have the sincere,
genuine and committed legal assistance of the bank official who works
with the bank in possession of these funds and one who is in the
position to assist in the legal and swift transfer of the funds to
"YOU", representing "US", in secrecy.
However, be rest assured that our legal assistance and guidiance will
enable the success of this transaction and also, that of the positive
legal status of this transaction is very much at its peak so
therefore, you have nothing to worry about.
Should incase you bear receipt of this confidential information and
offer expressed within, We will then expect that you contact us along
with your urgently required, positive response to this offer,
inclusive of your full names, address, location, telephone and fax
numbers, age, sex and occupation, via our website link or at
Calvin.Moore@Alum.com (my personal email contact address).
Reason to contacting us via these email addresses is due to our
present inability in receiving forwarded emails from our various
clients over the past few days and also, our inability due to virus
infection, to retrieve contents within emails forwarded to this
particular email address which was used to contact you.
We await your urgently required response.
Best regards,
Mr. Calvin Moore (Managing Partner)
MOORE & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM - Legal Practitioners and Solicitors.
London - U.K.
Tel: (+44)-7045752150
Fax: (+44)-7005983375
www.mooreandassociateslawfirm-londonuk.page.tl
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- To vs Too
To vs TooFollow
Dude, which part of "confidential email" didn't you understand?
Bad form, man
Bad form, man
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Common mix-ups:
there vs their
it's vs its
were vs we're
were vs where
who vs whom
Most over used, unnecessary, word in the English language:
really
(Most scams begin with e-mails/letters that are "confidential.")
there vs their
it's vs its
were vs we're
were vs where
who vs whom
Most over used, unnecessary, word in the English language:
really
(Most scams begin with e-mails/letters that are "confidential.")
Most over used, unnecessary, word in the English language:
like
Tew!
like
Tew!
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
Is it, like, really the most overused word?
bstdawnstar wrote:
Common mix-ups:
there vs their
it's vs its
were vs we're
were vs where
who vs whom
Most over used, unnecessary, word in the English language:
really
(Most scams begin with e-mails/letters that are "confidential.")
there vs their
it's vs its
were vs we're
were vs where
who vs whom
Most over used, unnecessary, word in the English language:
really
(Most scams begin with e-mails/letters that are "confidential.")
It's not a scam you prick, I'm going to be rich.
Edited, Apr 11th 2008 5:19pm by NephthysWanderer
Umm, I'm leaning towards "Tu." While on the surface it would appear they are English, a closer examination shows they either are ancient Roman (as in "Et Tu, Brute?") or Mexican (Hola! Tu hiring landscapers today?). A more concise determination can't be properly made until the 1,557,000 Great British Pounds are safely in hand.
Totem
Totem
Totem wrote:
Umm, I'm leaning towards "Tu." While on the surface it would appear they are English, a closer examination shows they either are ancient Roman (as in "Et Tu, Brute?") or Mexican (Hola! Tu hiring landscapers today?). A more concise determination can't be properly made until the 1,557,000 Great British Pounds are safely in hand.
Totem
Totem
I think the expression is more "Chu wan grass cut?"
Where's git when you need him.
I can't hardly hear you over the noise of those Mexican bagpipes Git is using to blow the leaves off the sidewalk...
Totem
Totem
NephthysWanderer wrote:
bstdawnstar wrote:
Common mix-ups:
there vs their
it's vs its
were vs we're
were vs where
who vs whom
Most over used, unnecessary, word in the English language:
really
(Most scams begin with e-mails/letters that are "confidential.")
there vs their
it's vs its
were vs we're
were vs where
who vs whom
Most over used, unnecessary, word in the English language:
really
(Most scams begin with e-mails/letters that are "confidential.")
It's not a scam you prick, I'm going to be rich.
Hey Neph, did u mail that dollar out yet? I keep telling you it works man; you send me a dollar and I will send you a list of 10 people that you can send a letter to asking them for a dollar each!
Holy Bloody briches batman, we are gonna be rich! You can make 1 dollar into 10 dollars to!
Recent Visitors: 222
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (222)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- To vs Too
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC