Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Politically CorrectFollow

#1 Mar 31 2008 at 10:41 AM Rating: Default
*
165 posts
The following is the winning entry from an annual contest at Texas A&M University calling for the most appropriate definition of a contemporary term. This year's term was “Political Correctness”.

The winner wrote:

"’Political Correctness’ is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a **** by the clean end."

Amen.
#2 Mar 31 2008 at 10:47 AM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Hotdiggity wrote:
The following is the winning entry from an annual contest at Texas A&M University calling for the most appropriate definition of a contemporary term. This year's term was “Political Correctness”.

The winner wrote:

"’Political Correctness’ is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a **** by the clean end."

Amen.


Texas A&M-- taking down the imagined enemies of the right wing from 1992. Smiley: oyvey
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#3 Mar 31 2008 at 10:52 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Think they should stick to trying to build the perfect bonfire.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#4 Mar 31 2008 at 10:55 AM Rating: Decent
i would love to shake the guy/girls hand who wrote that. so very true.
#5 Mar 31 2008 at 11:01 AM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
It's perfectly fine to ***** people over, treat them badly and dicriminate against them, so long as they are in the majority.
#6 Mar 31 2008 at 11:31 AM Rating: Default
***
2,453 posts
Hotdiggity wrote:
The following is the winning entry from an annual contest at Texas A&M University calling for the most appropriate definition of a contemporary term. This year's term was “Political Correctness”.


Cite?
#7 Mar 31 2008 at 11:32 AM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
BullShit.

In my experience, it's rarely the 'affected' minority (wimminz, gheys, people of coloUr) who get all ****** it's almost always* limp-wristed overprivileged whit middle-class do-gooders.

A case in point:

I had a meeting with hippy wasters Social Workers a few weeks ago about social exclusion and was asked how I wanted my coffee. I said 'black, no sugar'.

The skinheaded dangly-earingy social worker fugly ***** looked daggers at me.

The Jamaican guy next to me leaned across and said loudly, "If she makes some comment about you asking for a 'black' coffee, I'm fUckin' off out of here".

*on other occasions I see the right-wing press distorting stories about Christmas or "Baa Baa Black Sheep" being 'banned' to prove that we're going to hell in a handcart.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#8 Mar 31 2008 at 11:39 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Nobby wrote:
I had a meeting with hippy wasters Social Workers a few weeks ago about social exclusion and was asked how I wanted my coffee. I said 'black, no sugar'.

The skinheaded dangly-earingy social worker fugly ***** looked daggers at me.

The Jamaican guy next to me leaned across and said loudly, "If she makes some comment about you asking for a 'black' coffee, I'm fUckin' off out of here".
How are you supposed to ask for black coffee?Smiley: dubious
#9 Mar 31 2008 at 11:46 AM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
How are you supposed to ask for black coffee?
No milk, no suger?

I agree though i fail to see how anyone would be offended by someone asking for a black coffee.
#10 Mar 31 2008 at 11:59 AM Rating: Good
***
2,499 posts
Quote:
In my experience, it's rarely the 'affected' minority (wimminz, gheys, people of coloUr) who get all ****** it's almost always* limp-wristed overprivileged whit middle-class do-gooders.


This has always been my experience as well. As a Black man, I just want to be treated the same as everyone else, there really is no need for some sort of "special" word for my racial background.

I never hear anyone saying European-American or not colored, so why do I have to have terms just for me? Plus, for some reason it sort of annoys me when people get more "offended"(Sometimes I don't think they are offended. I at times believe it to be just a way to try and show not being racist, sort of like those "I have a black friend..." stories.) then me when the term is directed at my race. If I don't get upset about it, I really don't see why someone outside of my race should be either.
#11 Mar 31 2008 at 12:10 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Man, that's at least three years old, isn't it? Do we really need three year old chain emails as posts here?

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#12 Mar 31 2008 at 12:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Oh, and when it first circulated, it was an illogical "liberal minority"...can't forget the liberal part there...

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#13 Mar 31 2008 at 1:04 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
Nobby wrote:
I had a meeting with hippy wasters Social Workers a few weeks ago about social exclusion and was asked how I wanted my coffee. I said 'black, no sugar'.

The skinheaded dangly-earingy social worker fugly ***** looked daggers at me.

The Jamaican guy next to me leaned across and said loudly, "If she makes some comment about you asking for a 'black' coffee, I'm fUckin' off out of here".
How are you supposed to ask for black coffee?Smiley: dubious


Yeah, you can't ask for it plain or ugly people will be offended.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#14 Mar 31 2008 at 1:27 PM Rating: Decent
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Nobby wrote:
BullShit.

In my experience, it's rarely the 'affected' minority (wimminz, gheys, people of coloUr) who get all ****** it's almost always* limp-wristed overprivileged whit middle-class do-gooders.

A case in point:

I had a meeting with hippy wasters Social Workers a few weeks ago about social exclusion and was asked how I wanted my coffee. I said 'black, no sugar'.

The skinheaded dangly-earingy social worker fugly ***** looked daggers at me.

The Jamaican guy next to me leaned across and said loudly, "If she makes some comment about you asking for a 'black' coffee, I'm fUckin' off out of here".

*on other occasions I see the right-wing press distorting stories about Christmas or "Baa Baa Black Sheep" being 'banned' to prove that we're going to hell in a handcart.


I agree with your general contention but your specific example-- I mean, I went to Smith and Hampshire College and lived in Amherst and Northampton, MA. If anyone know those areas, it's like the Mothership of the Politically Correct and no one I ever met ever, ever, ever, would object to a black coffee being called black. Your example seems like that proverbial example used to dismiss either real examples of political correctness gone awry or the ways that PC is used as a dismissal or a straw man tactic to silence those who might genuinely have a beef with the way that something is done or said. And for good reasons--like the realities that we live in a genuinely racist world where people are really being discriminated against constantly and the real issue aren't minor points of style, as indicated here, but really inequities. And also real times where there is something said or done that is controversial and does not just serve as comedy fodder.

Edited, Mar 31st 2008 5:28pm by Annabella
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#15 Mar 31 2008 at 1:38 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Singdall wrote:
i would love to shake the guy/girls hand who wrote that. so very true.

Not if they've been trying to pick up a **** by the clean end...
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#16 Mar 31 2008 at 1:41 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
644 posts
Someone found the thesaurus tool in Microsoft Word.

And, as stated before, this is some old *********
____________________________
I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked, dragging themselves through the negro streets at dawn looking for an angry fix, angelheaded hipsters burning for the ancient heavenly connection to the starry dynamo in the machin ery of night.
#17 Mar 31 2008 at 1:46 PM Rating: Default
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
like the realities that we live in a genuinely racist world where people are really being discriminated against constantly and the real issue aren't minor points of style, as indicated here, but really inequities.
At the risk of starting a huge debate, could you supply some examples to show what you are indicating, to ejumakate this limp wristed whit working class do gooder.

Maybe it's an American thing or i'm just happily sheltered by my superPC job where people are judged on merit not race/sex.
#18 Mar 31 2008 at 1:48 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Commander Annabella wrote:
we live in a genuinely racist world where people are really being discriminated against constantly and the real issue aren't minor points of style
I concur.

I have yet to hear many of these 'politically correct' statements come from the mouths of people genuinely trying to make a difference.

Take away the people using it as a defence mechanism, those who want to sound trendy, and those tryng to prove that we straight white men are victims of minority oppression, and you're usually left with boringly temperate language.

I note your caution. As a child, overtly offensive language went unchallenged. Thankfully I now rarely hear people shouting Paki, ****, Pouffter or wog, as I did. I once challenged my late father-in-law for referring to black neighbours as 'n1ggers' within earshot of my kids. I was accused of being PC.

____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#19 Mar 31 2008 at 1:55 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Nobby wrote:
Commander Annabella wrote:
we live in a genuinely racist world where people are really being discriminated against constantly and the real issue aren't minor points of style
I concur.

I have yet to hear many of these 'politically correct' statements come from the mouths of people genuinely trying to make a difference.

Take away the people using it as a defence mechanism, those who want to sound trendy, and those tryng to prove that we straight white men are victims of minority oppression, and you're usually left with boringly temperate language.

I note your caution. As a child, overtly offensive language went unchallenged. Thankfully I now rarely hear people shouting Paki, ****, Pouffter or wog, as I did. I once challenged my late father-in-law for referring to black neighbours as 'n1ggers' within earshot of my kids. I was accused of being PC.

Pouffter isn't used often enough in today's society.
#20 Mar 31 2008 at 2:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Baron von tarv wrote:
At the risk of starting a huge debate, could you supply some examples to show what you are indicating, to ejumakate this limp wristed whit working class do gooder.

Maybe it's an American thing or i'm just happily sheltered by my superPC job where people are judged on merit not race/sex.
As per my previous comment, time has moved the boundaries.

Examples of what I challenge that get me ridiculed as being "Too PC" are:
  • A local Hospital has a 60% british Muslim catchment area, but (until recently) still had documentation requiring people's "Christian Name". It's an anachronism that makes assumptions that became invalid decades ago. As a non-christian - I don't have a 'christian name' - it's my 'first' name.
  • I still hear people use the word 'Jew' as an adjective meaning to cheat or swindle. I find that ridiculous and worth challenging.
  • I still grumble at the TV when criminals/terrorists are described by their ethnicity and/or faith even when it's irrelevant.
  • I despise the use of 'gay' as a generic insult.



On the other hand, I will happily share a jaunty "Oh just FUck Off" with anyone who challenges me ordering "Black" Coffee, singing the national anthem, flying St George's Cross on St George's day or when England are playing, or challenging the celebration of Christmas (or Eid/Hannukah/Vaisaki etc.)
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#21 Mar 31 2008 at 2:14 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Under extreme duress at being told what to do at work last week I heard myself utter the words "That's gay". Interesting vibe in the room after that... The times certainly have changed.

Then again; I was walking to my car at Wendy's the other day and a large white gentleman drove slowly by the negroid operated establishment and yelled ********** you, nigger" into the window and slowly drove away.
It was certainly strange hearing those words, so loud and clear, in broad daylight; lunchtime actually.
Must have been what the 60s were like around here.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#22 Mar 31 2008 at 2:29 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
Examples of what I challenge that get me ridiculed as being "Too PC" are:

A local Hospital has a 60% british Muslim catchment area, but (until recently) still had documentation requiring people's "Christian Name". It's an anachronism that makes assumptions that became invalid decades ago. As a non-christian - I don't have a 'christian name' - it's my 'first' name.
I still hear people use the word 'Jew' as an adjective meaning to cheat or swindle. I find that ridiculous and worth challenging.
I still grumble at the TV when criminals/terrorists are described by their ethnicity and/or faith even when it's irrelevant.
I despise the use of 'gay' as a generic insult.
Surely these are the exactly the trivial bullsh*t that when you get right down to it are nothing more than a mild iritation and in the great scheme of things are not going to have an effect on someones life.

Sure get rid of them but it's hardly

A. going to happen overnight
B. Solely the province of skin coloUr/ethnicity (how many time have you heard the phrase "Small man's syndrome"?

The first example wouldn't offend me and i'm not Christian

The Second example i have never heard, Big nosed, Yes but cheats/swindle No thats usually accompanied by Gypsy wher i was brought up and is used exactly the same way as Scoucer only with half the vigor.

I grumble at the TV when any of a thousand inaccurate typecasts are thrust upon a group: Hoodies, Punk, the list is endless, Lets face it the press are purely out to label any group to make "selling" the story easier.

Does racism exsist? Yes it does.

Does racism target only non whites? No it doesn't, not that you will ever see it portrayed that way by the press.

Does ALL racism need to be adressed? yes but lets get the REAL issues dealt with and stop worrying so much about trivial sh*t like what a form indicates your first name to be, and start adressing the media portrayal of immigration and get a programme to intigrate members of cross culture neighbourhoods.

the best way to stop people hating each other because of skin coloUr is to let them get to know each other and socialise with one another rather than live in a "Them and Us" system like we do at the moment, on both sides.
#23 Mar 31 2008 at 2:49 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I agree though i fail to see how anyone would be offended by someone asking for a black coffee.


So I'm right in being surprised when people are taken aback when I order "Hot steaming nigger juice"?

I'm joking of course. I don't drink hot coffee.



Edited, Mar 31st 2008 6:50pm by Smasharoo

Edited, Mar 31st 2008 6:50pm by Smasharoo
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#24 Apr 01 2008 at 2:08 AM Rating: Good
When I was a teenager in London in the early 90s, everyone called "newsagents" "Paki shops". That's just how they were called. And it made sense, since they were mostly staffed by, you know, Pakis. So we were like "Et man, ca va? On va a la Paki shop? C'est cool, ils ont des Mars bars". I didn't realise "Paki shop" was offensive until I reached 17-18, and even then I still sometimes referred to newsagents as "paki shops" when I was with my friends, purely out of habit.

On the whole though, PC is a good thing. Not being pointlessly offensive to people can only be a good thing in a multi-ethnic society. It goes too far sometimes, but so does everything. The situation we're in now is much better than the one in "This is England", and it's partly thanks to PC. It's a good film, by the way. The part when the 12 year old boy sucks the 14 year old girl's tits is a bit disturbing, but other than that it's really quite cool.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#25 Apr 01 2008 at 2:51 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Quote:
It was certainly strange hearing those words, so loud and clear, in broad daylight; lunchtime actually.

I would think about as weird as reading this:
Kelvyquayo the Irrelevant wrote:
negroid operated establishment
#26 Apr 01 2008 at 3:08 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Baron von tarv wrote:
Does ALL racism need to be adressed? yes but lets get the REAL issues dealt with and stop worrying so much about trivial sh*t like what a form indicates your first name to be, and start adressing the media portrayal of immigration and get a programme to intigrate members of cross culture neighbourhoods.

the best way to stop people hating each other because of skin coloUr is to let them get to know each other and socialise with one another rather than live in a "Them and Us" system like we do at the moment, on both sides.
Problems as complex as inherent racism/sexism need to be tackled on many fronts. Several people, myself included, have at one time or another used a word that is considered a slur, whether intentionally or out of ignorance. Systematically altering language is just one way to make our interactions more open and program ourselves to not make automatic assumptions about people, but it's just as important to not fear these differences as dangerous or 'bad'. There's nothing I despise more than the statement that "we're all alike, no one's any different". We may be biologically identical, but trying to impose the idea that your ethnic identity, gender, religion, or race doesn't or shouldn't matter in the larger scheme of things is illogical, and smacks of trying to hide your head in the sand simply because you're uncomfortable dealing with it. You should acknowledge and celebrate difference, not feel like you have to sweep it under the rug, and work to make general processes and languages more inclusive at the same time.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 267 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (267)